![]() |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by mmconhea
(Post 11727969)
Such BS... consumers have been pushing, buying and losing their rights for years. How many Xbox arcade games have you downloaded? Can you trade-in, share, or use those past the life of the 360? Nope.
People sent the signal to MS that digital and single owner is the way to go. Proof is in the numbers. And we are ALL guilty of it. MS sees that digital downloads are the way to go, so they decide to make downloads and discs indistinguishable in every way except initial install method. They then try to make these games sharable, tradeable, and resaleable in some way, leading to convoluted rules and a mandatory periodic online check for the console. Sony sees that digital downloads are the way to go, so they decide not to fuck with how disc based games work at all, but still have an online store. The discs are unrestricted, while the downloads are likely to be as restrictive as on the PS3, i.e. no sharing or trading or reselling. Then they leave it up to the consumer to decide. If digital downloads are the way of the future, both consoles will be able to take advantage of that. However, Sony is allowing consumers to make the choice with the PS4, while the Xbox One is basically forcing consumers into the digital download future whether they want it or not. Its not surprising that the system that gives consumers a choice is seen as more favorable. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 11728138)
Of course. I'm just saying there's a large segment of the gaming community who will have no incentive to upgrade to anything this year.
|
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
I seriously doubt either will be, gamers will be flocking to see the PS4, techies will be grabbing up the Xbox One. The first couple batches are accounted for, I can guarantee that. Unlike the Wii U these systems are an actual generational leap forward, not playing catch up with any other game console (though an argument can be made for catching up to PCs).
|
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 11728141)
If digital downloads are the way of the future, both consoles will be able to take advantage of that. However, Sony is allowing consumers to make the choice with the PS4, while the Xbox One is basically forcing consumers into the digital download future whether they want it or not. Its not surprising that the system that gives consumers a choice is seen as more favorable.
|
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
One thing that could help Microsoft is making sure the Xbox One comes out before the PS4. Get people to buy before they are side-by-side on the shelves with differing price points.
|
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 11728151)
Exactly. Digital will happen on it's own over time. Slowly digital sales will match and overtake retail sales without any interference. MS is just trying to brute force everyone's hand.
The PS Vita featured an interface that looks like Sony but works like Microsoft is proposing for the Xbox One, I'm curious to see if that gets brought to the PS4. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by mmconhea
(Post 11727969)
Look at all the retards that still stuck with MS, and still are making a Xbox one possible after getting fucked over with red ring after red ring. Paying $90 replacement fees, or outright buying a brand new consoles, for a known defect. Consumer rights my ass. Doritos.
Also purchasing a < $20, 1gb game is vastly different than a $60, 40gb game. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 11728135)
Go watch the trailer for Battlefield 4 or Ryse (which looks lousy but is visually impressive) and then watch anything current gen, it's night and day. Of course, the same was said between the Xbox and Xbox 360 (Xbox 1.5) when it launched so I guess I'm not surprised. But to me:
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/csA9Ie5nXoQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> That is night and day with this gen, especially around the 1:24 mark. That said, I don't disagree that the 360 and PS3 are still very good systems, their next iterations blow them out of the water but that doesn't make them any less good. One of the things I'm looking forward to is the fact we now have sufficient RAM in our game consoles, boosting from 512MB to 8GB is pretty substantial and should take care of loading issues and numerous other things. I don't see a "night and day" difference. However that is just my opinion. It just looks to me like a 360 or PS3 game that has been turned up to "ultra settings". It does look good, no doubt, but good enough to spend $500 for? To the hardcore gamer, yes probably, but to the average joe -- doubtful I am in my mid-30s, as I get older -- I am alot easier to please with video games. NOW, GET OFF MY LAWN!! ;) |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 11728154)
One thing that could help Microsoft is making sure the Xbox One comes out before the PS4. Get people to buy before they are side-by-side on the shelves with differing price points.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 11728141)
Here's my take on it:
MS sees that digital downloads are the way to go, so they decide to make downloads and discs indistinguishable in every way except initial install method. They then try to make these games sharable, tradeable, and resaleable in some way, leading to convoluted rules and a mandatory periodic online check for the console. Sony sees that digital downloads are the way to go, so they decide not to fuck with how disc based games work at all, but still have an online store. The discs are unrestricted, while the downloads are likely to be as restrictive as on the PS3, i.e. no sharing or trading or reselling. Then they leave it up to the consumer to decide. If digital downloads are the way of the future, both consoles will be able to take advantage of that. However, Sony is allowing consumers to make the choice with the PS4, while the Xbox One is basically forcing consumers into the digital download future whether they want it or not. Its not surprising that the system that gives consumers a choice is seen as more favorable. Sony, with their plastic discs that have to be carried around to every console you use, or MS with their fully-digital-from-day-one library? Sony, with their lack of trade/re-sellability of digital purchases, or MS with their "give/sell once or share with 'family' members" digital purchases? Look, I think MS went a little too far with some of their restrictions (24 hours offline, specifically, even though that will never affect me, and you can only "give" titles to friends of 30 days or more), but I don't think their plan for this new generation of consoles is as anti-consumer as people suggest. I know I tend to play devil's advocate for MS once in awhile on this forum (sometimes because it's amusing, sometimes because people bitch about the silliest things), so I'll be seen as biased, but whatever. My point is just that, while I agree that it seems like the XO plan is anti-consumer (and it is anti-consumer, for today's physical disc purchasers), I think they have a 10-year plan, where Sony only appears to have a 3-year plan. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by wlj
(Post 11728165)
I don't see a "night and day" difference. However that is just my opinion. It just looks to me like a 360 or PS3 game that has been turned up to "ultra settings".
It does look good, no doubt, but good enough to spend $500 for? To the hardcore gamer, yes probably, but to the average joe -- doubtful I am going to get a next gen system, no question. I am leaning to the PS4 but I am definitely not buying a system until I finish all the games sitting on my shelf right now as well as any I have yet to play that are only available on the 360 or PS3. So no system for me until at least holiday 2014.* By then, there should be some decent bundles and all of the questions of "which is the system for me" will be ironed out. *this statement only holds if my PS3 doesn't die within that time frame. If it dies, I won't hesitate to proceed with buying a PS4 first. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by wlj
(Post 11728114)
this article might have been posted already, but it is rather interesting.
"Xbox One's Greatest Enemy -- The Xbox 360" http://gamentrain.com/xbox-ones-grea.../#.Ubhwi-ekoRr Definitely a smart article. Maybe I have to see the games in person, but so far I haven't been impressed by either of the next gen consoles gameplay vids. They really don't look all that much better. However, I haven't seen them in person. Graphics can't get a whole lot better than what they already are in my opinion. I am still happy with what games look like now. All other generations, I was sick of the current systems graphics and salivating for a new system. This isn't the case this time around. 360 and PS3 games still look good, real good. Spending $500 for a system that makes the games look a little better is going to be a hard sell to average joe. Using a PC gaming analogy, here is the way i am seeing next gen (at least right now), turning current game settings to "ultra". Is it worth $500 for that? if you are like me, I don't mind playing PC games on medium/high settings -- the games still look good. I think what you're going to see more than anything in the next gen games is the level of detail being increased. Let's use GTA as an example. You'll see more buildings, more scenery, more vehicles on the road, more pedestrians. Maybe you'll see more enemies on screen at once. I'm not speaking specifically about GTA V, just GTA type games in general. GTA V might just end up being a 1080P upgrade of the PS3/360 version. This is a good opportunity for the gaming companies to actually innovate gameplay, instead of just putting on a new hi-res paint job to the same tired engines. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
And you could see that in Ryse. Look at all the troops on screen. It's impressive.
Originally Posted by SomethingMore
(Post 11728181)
Yes, Sony is giving users more choice... today (well, release day). But 5 years from now, if/when digital distribution is the majority...
I think they have a 10-year plan, where Sony only appears to have a 3-year plan. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Eh I tried :lol:
Like I said this reminds me of the Xbox 360 launch where people gave it flack for being the Xbox 1.5 since the graphics weren't "that much better". I have a 106" screen as well and the 360 and PS3 are definitely showing their age. Sony is doing it right though imho, give the user the option to get all the neat lazy features (game switching, etc; ) that the Xbox One will have, but in order to get it you have to buy digitally. It's better than forcing it down your throats with a convoluted trade-in, check-in, and borrowing scheme. Plus it keeps retailers and game rentals alive. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by SomethingMore
(Post 11728181)
Yes, Sony is giving users more choice... today (well, release day). But 5 years from now, if/when digital distribution is the majority... which console will be giving more choice to the consumer?
Sony, with their plastic discs that have to be carried around to every console you use, or MS with their fully-digital-from-day-one library? Sony, with their lack of trade/re-sellability of digital purchases, or MS with their "give/sell once or share with 'family' members" digital purchases? Look, I think MS went a little too far with some of their restrictions (24 hours offline, specifically, even though that will never affect me, and you can only "give" titles to friends of 30 days or more), but I don't think their plan for this new generation of consoles is as anti-consumer as people suggest. I know I tend to play devil's advocate for MS once in awhile on this forum (sometimes because it's amusing, sometimes because people bitch about the silliest things), so I'll be seen as biased, but whatever. My point is just that, while I agree that it seems like the XO plan is anti-consumer (and it is anti-consumer, for today's physical disc purchasers), I think they have a 10-year plan, where Sony only appears to have a 3-year plan. As far as the MS "give/sell once or share with family members" thing...whose to say Sony doesn't implement something similar? I am sure setting that up wouldn't require a whole new console since everything is digital. Sony makes a few changes and boom, you have the same advantages that MS is offering. I disagree with you stating MS has a 10 year plan and Sony has a 3 year plan. If stuff keeps going digital, both systems appear to be covered. Sony just has their eyes on the short game to help them also win the long game. MS just skipped the short game completely which I think is a massive misstep. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by TheKing
(Post 11728192)
It's quite similar to the DVD vs. Blu-ray debate. Sure, there's a bump in quality, but it's not as large of one as going from VHS to DVD.
I think what you're going to see more than anything in the next gen games is the level of detail being increased. Let's use GTA as an example. You'll see more buildings, more scenery, more vehicles on the road, more pedestrians. Maybe you'll see more enemies on screen at once. I'm not speaking specifically about GTA V, just GTA type games in general. GTA V might just end up being a 1080P upgrade of the PS3/360 version. This is a good opportunity for the gaming companies to actually innovate gameplay, instead of just putting on a new hi-res paint job to the same tired engines. 100% agree. Exactly what I am thinking. Hell, I just got a Bluray player for Christmas and so far I have watch probably 15 blurays and I have yet to see one that made me thing "wow this is so much better than DVD". It isn't because I have a "sucky" tv, I have a rather nice one. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by wlj
(Post 11728206)
100% agree. Exactly what I am thinking.
Hell, I just got a Bluray player for Christmas and so far I have watch probably 15 blurays and I have yet to see one that made me thing "wow this is so much better than DVD". It isn't because I have a "sucky" tv, I have a rather nice one. That said I sort of skipped Blu-rays in favor of streaming. My original comment on this upcoming gen was it was going to be PC gaming with the sliders maxed out and I stick by that, but I still think it looks hugely improved over the current gen which has been showing its age for a while now. I also have a pretty powerful PC and use it in conjunction with wireless HDMI and an Xbox 360 controller, so I've seen better on my setup than either console can offer. Of course the transition from PS2 -> PS3 -> PS4 and Xbox -> Xbox 360 -> Xbox One is nowhere near as huge as SNES -> Playstation -> Playstation 2. But those generations introduced new ways to game, something Microsoft wanted to do with the Kinect originally but frankly is overestimating its appeal outside of sheer novelty, and something Nintendo should have learned but didn't. But yes, next gen will focus on higher resolutions, more detail and more polygons, same as this gen and the last gen. However, the current gen brought proper online gameplay, wireless controllers out of the box, digital distribution and game consoles as more than dedicated gaming units, so I am curious to see what kind of non-graphics based things pop up with the next gen. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by brianluvdvd
(Post 11728205)
But you can still buy the games digitally from Sony or buy them disc based. You have a choice.
As far as the MS "give/sell once or share with family members" thing...whose to say Sony doesn't implement something similar? I am sure setting that up wouldn't require a whole new console since everything is digital. Sony makes a few changes and boom, you have the same advantages that MS is offering. I disagree with you stating MS has a 10 year plan and Sony has a 3 year plan. If stuff keeps going digital, both systems appear to be covered. Sony just has their eyes on the short game to help them also win the long game. MS just skipped the short game completely which I think is a massive misstep. MS has a vision of where things are headed, and if they're wrong, so be it. They're betting big, and if they fail, it will give people copious amounts of pleasure. But if MS is right (again, playing devil's advocate...), then Sony will be stuck playing catch up, just as they did with PSN, Trophies, etc. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
MS is headed in the right direction, but as with all things technology being the first one there is not always how you win the race.
|
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by SomethingMore
(Post 11728181)
Yes, Sony is giving users more choice... today (well, release day). But 5 years from now, if/when digital distribution is the majority... which console will be giving more choice to the consumer? ETA: what I mean is... which console will have given consumers more flexibility with the titles they purchased?
Sony, with their plastic discs that have to be carried around to every console you use, or MS with their fully-digital-from-day-one library? Sony, with their lack of trade/re-sellability of digital purchases, or MS with their "give/sell once or share with 'family' members" digital purchases? Look, I think MS went a little too far with some of their restrictions (24 hours offline, specifically, even though that will never affect me, and you can only "give" titles to friends of 30 days or more), but I don't think their plan for this new generation of consoles is as anti-consumer as people suggest. I know I tend to play devil's advocate for MS once in awhile on this forum (sometimes because it's amusing, sometimes because people bitch about the silliest things), so I'll be seen as biased, but whatever. My point is just that, while I agree that it seems like the XO plan is anti-consumer (and it is anti-consumer, for today's physical disc purchasers), I think they have a 10-year plan, where Sony only appears to have a 3-year plan. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by SomethingMore
(Post 11728237)
MS has a vision of where things are headed, and if they're wrong, so be it. They're betting big, and if they fail, it will give people copious amounts of pleasure. But if MS is right (again, playing devil's advocate...), then Sony will be stuck playing catch up, just as they did with PSN, Trophies, etc.
|
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
How exactly is MS "ahead of it's time" in terms of tangible benefits to the consumer?
|
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Microsoft is ahead of its time in basically wanting to kill physical media, unfortunately it's one of those "ahead of your times" where you're ahead of a majority of the population and that rarely works out.
I still stand by my original comment, it's one generation too soon right now. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
I remember when the PS3 was first announced, people were saying Blu-ray was one generation too soon as well...
The PS3 may have had a very slow start, but it worked out for them in the end. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by MoviePage
(Post 11728249)
I've had thoughts along these lines too. I can honestly see the Xbox One being the more desirable console when digital becomes the preferred method of distribution. From what we know, it seems more future-proof in a number of ways.
Until then, however...
Originally Posted by discostu1337
(Post 11728253)
This is exactly right. When the next-next-gen hits, PS5 will be playing catch up to what MS has already done with the XBOX One. Just like with Online gaming (Sony STILL hasn't caught up), trophies etc...MS is ahead of it's time.
Originally Posted by taffer
(Post 11728267)
I remember when the PS3 was first announced, people were saying Blu-ray was one generation too soon as well...
The PS3 may have had a very slow start, but it worked out for them in the end. |
Re: Xbox One: This Thread Requires An Always On Internet Connection
Originally Posted by discostu1337
(Post 11728253)
This is exactly right. When the next-next-gen hits, PS5 will be playing catch up to what MS has already done with the XBOX One. Just like with Online gaming (Sony STILL hasn't caught up), trophies etc...MS is ahead of it's time.
If the majority of buyers go the PS4 route over the Xbox1 over the next few years, and their digital content transfer to the next console, who do you thing people are going to stick with. Being ahead of your time or even being a better product certainly doesn't mean success. 8 tracks, Beta, Laserdiscs, Dreamcast, etc. say :wave:. And how people like you are overlooking MS' big brother attitude is just mind-boggling to me. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.