Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-16 | 05:11 PM
  #326  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,262
Received 1,555 Likes on 1,110 Posts
From: The place beyond the pines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Saw another trailer for this at Finding Dory today. Hadn't seen this trailer before (first shot is Hemsworth answering the phone, but not the "what's this place called?" bit, this appears to be later than that)

Anyway, it was one of those trailers that seemed to give too much away. The "someone trying to increase paranormal activity in the city" is blatantly obvious in this one, if it wasn't already kind of obvious in the previous trailers. This trailer had the Fall Out Boy version of the theme song in it. Ugh.
Dan is offline  
Old 07-04-16 | 07:02 PM
  #327  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,531
Received 444 Likes on 313 Posts
From: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Is this the only thread MovieMax isn't bumping.
majorjoe23 is offline  
Old 07-04-16 | 07:18 PM
  #328  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,591
Received 1,807 Likes on 1,294 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by majorjoe23
Is this the only thread MovieMax isn't bumping.
I don't think it's old enough.
TomOpus is offline  
Old 07-04-16 | 08:07 PM
  #329  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by majorjoe23
Is this the only thread MovieMax isn't bumping.
Too off-putting.
DaveyJoe is offline  
Old 07-04-16 | 10:43 PM
  #330  
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Vichy America
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
Yes, but he was supposed to be Winston. He wasn't going to play one of the scientists.
The script changed after Murphy backed out. In the original version, Winston was supposed to be as highly qualified as the rest of the team.

WINSTON: I've come about the ad in the paper. You know, for a security expert.

STANTZ: Okay. Do you have a resume?

WINSTON: I have all my service records.

STANTZ: What'd you do in the service?

WINSTON: Five years, US Air Force Air Police. I mustered out as Captain assigned to administer perimeter security at Reese Strategic Air Command Base. From there I designed electronic barrier systems for Sentry Alarms and I ended up as VP Tactics and Training at their Pacific Headquarters, until they closed the offices there.
Sean O'Hara is offline  
Old 07-04-16 | 11:35 PM
  #331  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

What's hard to believe about Eddie Murphy being a scientist? Is it because he's black?
DaveyJoe is offline  
Old 07-04-16 | 11:41 PM
  #332  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,531
Received 444 Likes on 313 Posts
From: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
What's hard to believe about Eddie Murphy being a scientist? Is it because he's black?
At the time of filming, he only would have been 22, that seems pretty young for a scientist or an experienced military man.

Plus, backpacks are heavy.
majorjoe23 is offline  
Old 07-04-16 | 11:50 PM
  #333  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by majorjoe23
At the time of filming, he only would have been 22, that seems pretty young for a scientist or an experienced military man.
So you don't think he's capable of playing older characters? Most actors aren't the age of the character they're playing.
DaveyJoe is offline  
Old 07-04-16 | 11:55 PM
  #334  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,531
Received 444 Likes on 313 Posts
From: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

I'm just messing with you, I don't give a shit. I was 5 when Ghostbusters came out, I couldn't have guessed the age of someone older than 10.
majorjoe23 is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 12:02 AM
  #335  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by majorjoe23
I'm just messing with you.
DaveyJoe is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 01:29 AM
  #336  
Sean O'Hara's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Vichy America
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
What's hard to believe about Eddie Murphy being a scientist? Is it because he's black?
Somebody claimed that McCarthy isn't believable as a scientist because she's loud and obnoxious. If that's true, Murphy should be equally unacceptable to people, even though Dan Aykroyd wanted him in the film.
Sean O'Hara is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 12:00 PM
  #337  
jjcool's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,957
Received 190 Likes on 150 Posts
From: CT
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Mike86
I think at least with McCarthy that she's pretty well fallen into being typecast in the loud, obnoxious type of role. So it is hard in her case to separate her as an actress versus her characters.
It is tough to separate the actor from the character when every character they play is the same loud and obnoxious type. Unfortunately, this film seems to have several of these.
jjcool is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 01:31 PM
  #338  
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 32,726
Received 4,824 Likes on 3,020 Posts
From: Colorado
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
Somebody claimed that McCarthy isn't believable as a scientist because she's loud and obnoxious. If that's true, Murphy should be equally unacceptable to people, even though Dan Aykroyd wanted him in the film.
There are a lot of bad ideas for good movies that never materialized. I seem to remember John Candy was going to play Louis as a weird German with German Shepard dogs. Eventually they went with Rock Moranis. That's the nice thing about making movies, at some point most bad ideas are mixed before production. Then of course, sometimes they aren't...
GoldenJCJ is online now  
Old 07-05-16 | 02:01 PM
  #339  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
Somebody claimed that McCarthy isn't believable as a scientist because she's loud and obnoxious. If that's true, Murphy should be equally unacceptable to people, even though Dan Aykroyd wanted him in the film.
Well, isn't that an indictment of the status of 80s Hollywood and its lack of opportunity for black actors that weren't playing up to caricatures? We've come a long way since then, there is more room for black actors to play actual people instead of loud stereotypes. Murphy built his career playing up to that, and it's what audiences wanted to see. Are we still stuck in that mentality, or are we mature enough to move on and give black actors better roles?
DaveyJoe is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 02:40 PM
  #340  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 25,412
Received 452 Likes on 288 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Obi-Wan Jabroni
The movie doesn't come out for another 2 weeks, and Target already has the toys on clearance.

Thanks. After reading this post, I went to Target and got a clearance Stay Puft.
GuessWho is online now  
Old 07-05-16 | 05:35 PM
  #341  
Abob Teff's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 34,239
Received 2,045 Likes on 1,391 Posts
From: Not necessarily Formerly known as Solid Snake
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Rather than quoting the whole string, I just picked a few posts ...

Originally Posted by Supermallet
Ah, I see. You are incapable of separating an actor from the roles they play. Not everyone has that problem, you know.
I'm going to agree with you Supermallet. They key word here is ACTOR. I think the reason this has become so difficult to do is that Hollywood has shunned true actors in favor of characters. An actor could pull off different roles across many spectrums. A character forces his or her own personality through and makes the role into a version of his or her self no matter how the character was writtten.

Originally Posted by jjcool
It is tough to separate the actor from the character when every character they play is the same loud and obnoxious type. Unfortunately, this film seems to have several of these.
As I said, I am not familiar with these ladies as actors so I am seeing the extremely shallow stereotypes they are playing. I just saw Leslie Jones' All-State commercial and I'm inclined to say she is not an actor (in the sense I am using it). I am aware of the type of character McCarthy has typically played, and this seems to be more of the same.

To be fair, I will concede the original may not have been far off that mark either.

If the world is going to make you rich for being a one-trick pony, all the more power to you. Just don't try to tell me you are a show horse.

Originally Posted by GoldenJCJ
There are a lot of bad ideas for good movies that never materialized. I seem to remember John Candy was going to play Louis as a weird German with German Shepard dogs. Eventually they went with Rock Moranis. That's the nice thing about making movies, at some point most bad ideas are mixed before production. Then of course, sometimes they aren't...
I loved "Rock" Moranis back in his wrestling days!
Abob Teff is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 05:45 PM
  #342  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
Somebody claimed that McCarthy isn't believable as a scientist because she's loud and obnoxious. If that's true, Murphy should be equally unacceptable to people, even though Dan Aykroyd wanted him in the film.
I'm not sure if you are referring to my comment or not, but I didn't say she was not believable as a scientist because she's loud and obnoxious, I said it was because she exclusively plays vulgar, uneducated, blue collar type characters. She doesn't seem to have it in her to change, just like I doubt Larry the Cable Guy has it in him to be in Branagh's next Shakespeare adaptation.
Mabuse is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 05:53 PM
  #343  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
You realize Eddie Murphy was supposed to be in the original, right?
Eddie Murphy had already played smart characters in Trading Places and Beverly Hills Cop, in fact he almost exclusively plays characters who are wise, street-wise, or both.
Mabuse is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 06:41 PM
  #344  
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 32,726
Received 4,824 Likes on 3,020 Posts
From: Colorado
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Abob Teff
I loved "Rock" Moranis back in his wrestling days!
Damn autocorrect. I think it's obvious I meant "Rack" Moranis.
GoldenJCJ is online now  
Old 07-05-16 | 07:36 PM
  #345  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Mabuse
I'm not sure if you are referring to my comment or not, but I didn't say she was not believable as a scientist because she's loud and obnoxious, I said it was because she exclusively plays vulgar, uneducated, blue collar type characters. She doesn't seem to have it in her to change, just like I doubt Larry the Cable Guy has it in him to be in Branagh's next Shakespeare adaptation.
You've never heard of casting against type? Granted, sometimes it doesn't work. Other times it's magic.
Supermallet is offline  
Old 07-05-16 | 07:40 PM
  #346  
whotony's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 24,473
Received 942 Likes on 660 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Just saw a new to me commercial for this.

I'll be shocked, shocked I say if this movie is good.

Preview was mostly Jones yelling and slapping McCarthy.

It also threw in who the villain is.
whotony is offline  
Old 07-06-16 | 02:03 PM
  #347  
Banned by request
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,800
Received 779 Likes on 583 Posts
From: Goodbye and Good Luck
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

FINALLY. THANK GOD.

E Unit is offline  
Old 07-06-16 | 02:05 PM
  #348  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Finally what?
fumanstan is offline  
Old 07-06-16 | 02:07 PM
  #349  
Banned by request
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,800
Received 779 Likes on 583 Posts
From: Goodbye and Good Luck
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

I replaced the picture. From an email Sony just sent. It left off the type when I coped the picture link.
E Unit is offline  
Old 07-06-16 | 02:10 PM
  #350  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,262
Received 1,555 Likes on 1,110 Posts
From: The place beyond the pines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Uh, can you NSFW that pic? Those sexy stripes caught the eye of my coworker. Not cool.
Dan is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.