The Hobbit
#2151
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
Wanting to see some reviews about the movie itself, not how great it looked.
#2152
DVD Talk Legend
#2153
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
When does the embargo lift?
#2155
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,024
Received 1,051 Likes
on
489 Posts
From: Detroit, formerly known as Obi-Wanma
Re: The Hobbit
The Sterling Heights MJR is, but the last time I checked the list of available theaters, it wasn't on there, and even though the AMC Livonia isn't anywhere near me (and Livionia is a city, not in or really near Detroit proper, so it's funny that that one is listed as Detroit), the last time I checked AMC's list, they didn't have anything in Michgan. Thanks, and where is the list that you pulled this from?
#2156
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Hobbit
48fpsmovies.com
#2157
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
#2159
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The Hobbit
Correlating 48 fps to interpolated 120hz refresh seems misguided. Two completely different things, one truly contains double the amount of information, the other is electronic trickery. I'll reserve judgment until I see it.
#2160
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Hobbit
Is there any reason that 24 fps is better other than that's what was always used? Was it chosen because film looked the best for the human eye at that particular rate? If not, then I don't get why people think 24 is the magic number.
#2161
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
People mainly like 24fps because they're used to it; films have been that speed for nearly a century. Also, when TV was introduced, it ran at 50/60hz, or around 25/30fps. The faster framerate of video gave it smoother motion, but it initially had lots of other drawbacks. Unfotunately, people are now so used to faster framerates being associated with "cheap" video that the new higher framerates for cinema are being associated with cheap video as well.
Last edited by Jay G.; 11-29-12 at 05:11 PM.
#2163
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Hobbit
I'm almost finished re-reading the book and am so amped to see the film in theaters. I can't wait. I'm sort of surprised that the buzz is only finally starting to build up a couple of weeks before release considering the first trilogy were a big deal when they were first released. Granted, the last film was released almost 10 years ago and most of the new breed of filmgoers were young and didn't care, but for us older folks, they were the shit. I guess it's been a very congested year of films.
In reading the book - Gandalf and Thorin Oakenshield are going to kick so much ass - it will be ridiculous.
In reading the book - Gandalf and Thorin Oakenshield are going to kick so much ass - it will be ridiculous.
#2164
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Hobbit
On a side note: I know Thorin Oakenshield is being played by Richard Armitage from "Strike Back," but I swear he sounds just like Matthew Macfadyen from "Ripper Street" and "Three Musketeers." I wonder if Macfayden is doing Thorin's voiceover? I initially thought Macfayden was playing Thorin because of the voice.
#2165
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Hobbit
24fps was chosen as a standard around the time that sound was introduced (before that, silent films were shot and projected at a variety of speeds). The speed was chosen as the slowest possible while still maintaining the illusion of motion. This was to save money on film.
People mainly like 24fps because they're used to it; films have been that speed for nearly a century. Also, when TV was introduced, it ran at 50/60hz, or around 25/30fps. The faster framerate of video gave it smoother motion, but it initially had lots of other drawbacks. Unfortunately, people are now so used to faster framerates being associated with "cheap" video that the new higher framerates for cinema are being associated with cheap video as well.
People mainly like 24fps because they're used to it; films have been that speed for nearly a century. Also, when TV was introduced, it ran at 50/60hz, or around 25/30fps. The faster framerate of video gave it smoother motion, but it initially had lots of other drawbacks. Unfortunately, people are now so used to faster framerates being associated with "cheap" video that the new higher framerates for cinema are being associated with cheap video as well.
( Wikipedia entry on this )
#2166
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
Not only that, but projecting film actually at just 24fps (24Hz) on large screens produces a noticeable flicker effect. However, a workaround to this problem is to project each frame twice in row (or 48Hz, and some even show each frame 3x for a 72Hz rate), which is how movies have been projected ever since to solve the flicker problem. Without this simple workaround for the flicker problem, movies would've had to go to a higher frame rate almost a century ago.
( Wikipedia entry on this )
( Wikipedia entry on this )
#2167
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
Embargo gets lifted tonight at 9pm PST.
This guy apparently is with the Writers Guild, so I guess he isn't on a embargo. Full review:
http://whichwayisawesome.blogspot.co...it-review.html
10/10
This guy apparently is with the Writers Guild, so I guess he isn't on a embargo. Full review:
http://whichwayisawesome.blogspot.co...it-review.html
10/10
But what has finally emerged is a towering epic on par with the first three films in the series; a masterclass in fantasy filmmaking with some of the best, most authentic genre setpieces filmed this year. Say what you will about Jackson as a director, but no one can deny that his style and sensibility is perfectly suited to this kind of movie. He allows us to believe, for a fleeting moment, in a world populated by giant eagles and tree people that coexist with wizards, demons and elves. The movie is imbued with the same spirit of fellowship and brotherhood, as well as the humor and gravitas, that marked both the Tolkien works and the first series of films. I'm so glad to have these movies back, and I'm even happier to report that this first one makes me feel like we never left.
#2168
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
9PM PST??? Why so late? That will be midnight in my neck of the woods.
#2169
DVD Talk Legend
#2170
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
I just hope it's not because they are negative and they want to sit on them as long as possible, but then again, if such were the case, they wouldn't want them out close to two weeks ahead of time.
#2171
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
Yeah if the reviews were negative, you would think they wouldn't release them till next week. Lots of reviews by guild writers watching the film and tweeting about it. I'm sure there will be negative reviews, but I have a feeling this is going to be a slam dunk.
#2172
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54,126
Received 1,722 Likes
on
1,412 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Re: The Hobbit
i guess i'll get that reviews thread ready...
#2174
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Hobbit
http://greggtonyandjim.blogspot.com/...-dec-2012.html
Podcast review. Extremely positive.
One of the great comments "3D was so immserive, I thought a guy was actually standing up in the theater"
"Felt that you were a part of the movie"
**Language**
Podcast review. Extremely positive.
One of the great comments "3D was so immserive, I thought a guy was actually standing up in the theater"
"Felt that you were a part of the movie"
**Language**
Last edited by superdeluxe; 12-03-12 at 03:40 PM.
#2175
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Hobbit
Do the reviews even matter for a movie like this? I mean for anybody that saw Lord of the Rings and liked the movies, would it really matter if the reviews weren't great? To all of you that are planning on seeing the movie, which I have to believe is a large percentage of this forum, would you actually NOT go see it if the reviews weren't very good?



