Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Star Wars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-13 | 04:36 PM
  #3151  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,380
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From: Chicagoland
re: Star Wars

Happened upon this today when looking at the actual artist's video. Had to post here at the mention of the Star War's blu ray.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJlbP...ture=endscreen
Old 02-28-13 | 09:47 PM
  #3152  
The Valeyard's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 10,800
Received 83 Likes on 50 Posts
From: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
re: Star Wars

STAR WARS BLU-RAY TRILOGIES TO BE RELEASED IN LIMITED EDITION STEELBOOK PACKAGING

Since their release in 2011, the Star Wars trilogy collections have become two of the bestselling Blu-ray Disc catalog releases of all time. Lucasfilm and Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment announced today that these beloved Star Wars sets, presenting the classic films in stunning HD, will be re-released in limited edition steelbook packaging at select retailers in the UK, Australia, Japan, and Spain. There is no US release currently planned.

Release dates for the steelbook sets will be announced shortly.




Starwars.com
Old 02-28-13 | 09:59 PM
  #3153  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
re: Star Wars

Old 02-28-13 | 10:21 PM
  #3154  
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,173
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
From: Hartford, CT
re: Star Wars

They can release it with a free gold-plated Rolls Royce, and I still won't buy it.
Old 02-28-13 | 10:38 PM
  #3155  
Quack's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,179
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Flo Rida
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
They can release it with a free gold-plated Rolls Royce, and I still won't buy it.
x2
Old 03-01-13 | 01:43 AM
  #3156  
MTRodaba2468's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Western Kentucky
re: Star Wars

As much as I love steelbooks, pass. I already have the Complete Saga set, and unless they're rereleased with something more notable than the packaging (the unaltered original trilogy, for example), I don't plan on rebuying.
Old 03-01-13 | 08:16 AM
  #3157  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by MTRodaba2468
As much as I love steelbooks, pass. I already have the Complete Saga set, and unless they're rereleased with something more notable than the packaging (the unaltered original trilogy, for example), I don't plan on rebuying.
I still dont' see why the original version can't happen. Despite Lucas' insistence that there isn't a print, we all know there is one. Now that Disney has bought Lucasfilm, we had hope again, but were told that Fox still owns the distribution rights. But as we saw with the 3D versions, since Disney owns the movie rights they can control what gets distributed and not. I am sure that if Disney wanted to release the original versions, they could easily go to Fox and say they want to release it and Fox would jump on it. It's a win-win. Fox could still distribute it, but Disney would still make the money. It's just a matter of whether or not Disney would allow for another studio to distribute it. But it would be a smart move.
Old 03-01-13 | 08:46 AM
  #3158  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,056
Received 814 Likes on 570 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by obidawsn
I still dont' see why the original version can't happen. Despite Lucas' insistence that there isn't a print, we all know there is one.
I don't think that Lucas has ever said that there isn't a print of the original versions available. He said the original negative doesn't exist (since he spliced in the SE revisions, at least the 97 ones), which is true (at least as a complete negative, the removed elements still likely exist). He also said he didn't feel like spending the money restoring what he felt were inferior versions. But he never said it was impossible.

Originally Posted by obidawsn
Now that Disney has bought Lucasfilm, we had hope again, but were told that Fox still owns the distribution rights. But as we saw with the 3D versions, since Disney owns the movie rights they can control what gets distributed and not. I am sure that if Disney wanted to release the original versions, they could easily go to Fox and say they want to release it and Fox would jump on it. It's a win-win. Fox could still distribute it, but Disney would still make the money. It's just a matter of whether or not Disney would allow for another studio to distribute it. But it would be a smart move.
It's not that Fox has distribution rights, but those distribution rights mean they get a significant chunk of the revenue earned by any such releases. Fox owns distribution rights for Star Wars in perpetuity, but only has the rights to the other films until 2020. Disney could restore and release the original versions now and let Fox take a cut of all 3 films, or they could wait until 2020 when the distribution rights to ESB and ROTJ revert back to them and they get all the revenue from those two titles. Disney may also be working behind the scenes right now to work out some deal regarding Star Wars, like they did with Paramount with The Avengers.
Old 03-01-13 | 09:02 AM
  #3159  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
re: Star Wars

Right, because in 2020 Disc and Home Media sales will be booming.
Old 03-01-13 | 09:33 AM
  #3160  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,056
Received 814 Likes on 570 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Right, because in 2020 Disc and Home Media sales will be booming.
There's still broadcast rights, along with iTunes, Amazon, even streaming like Netflix. They'll make money distributing it somehow.
Old 03-01-13 | 10:30 AM
  #3161  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,946
Received 1,637 Likes on 1,190 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
I don't think that Lucas has ever said that there isn't a print of the original versions available. He said the original negative doesn't exist (since he spliced in the SE revisions, at least the 97 ones), which is true (at least as a complete negative, the removed elements still likely exist). He also said he didn't feel like spending the money restoring what he felt were inferior versions. But he never said it was impossible.
I'd have to do some digging, but I'm fairly certain Lucas has made statements over the years that were very carefully parsed to imply that the "original negatives" were unavailable and therefore so was a new release of the originals. It was apparently worded that way, and successfully so, to convince the fans (most of whom don't really understand how film works) that this meant the originals were unavailable.

I mean, I was part of the forums at Theforce.net when those laserdisc transfer DVDs were released, and you would have thought those people were trying out for the Cirque du Soleil, the way they were twisting and contorting themselves to defend Lucas' decision, steadfast in the belief that films made prior to 1997 simply couldn't be transferred to higher definition formats.



.....

As for the re-releases, I noticed at Target yesterday that they've price-dropped the three Bluray sets a few dollars. Still way too much, the 9 disc set is still like $87.99. I found a copy used for $53 last summer and I still wish I could have found it for less.

.....


And I think GizmoDVD has a good point: if Disney wants to recoup their investment, I can see them getting a new Blu and DVD release out sooner rather than later. We can only hope they feel the cost of restoring the originals will be worth it to them. The current Blus and DVDs apparently sold well enough without them, but then again there's the "Malibu Stacy - now with hat" effect to consider.
Old 03-01-13 | 10:48 AM
  #3162  
Chrisedge's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 7,568
Received 229 Likes on 129 Posts
From: Part of the Left-Wing Conspiracy
re: Star Wars

There are plenty of us folks that refuse to buy anything else from Star Wars until they release G.O.U.T. I have Harmys versions in HD and they are more than decent enough for me, until Disney releases the original. I have NO issues buying any altered versions that include the original. In fact I would love a set that has all the different versions. Maybe a BD with one disc of the original, and then one with a SE with all the dfifferent versions available via seamless branching.
Old 03-01-13 | 10:53 AM
  #3163  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,946
Received 1,637 Likes on 1,190 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Chrisedge
There are plenty of us folks that refuse to buy anything else from Star Wars until they release G.O.U.T. I have Harmys versions in HD and they are more than decent enough for me, until Disney releases the original. I have NO issues buying any altered versions that include the original. In fact I would love a set that has all the different versions. Maybe a BD with one disc of the original, and then one with a SE with all the dfifferent versions available via seamless branching.
I'm with you. I bought the 2004 box, and the big Blu box (used, like I said), but I would gladly re-buy something for the originals.

Even back in 2006 when they announced the originals to be released, I was fully prepared to rebuy the SE versions to get them until I learned of their sub par quality.

Heck, I'd even drop a few bucks (just a few...) on a set of the 97 theatrical versions. I think they have a place in history, for better or for worse.
Old 03-01-13 | 10:59 AM
  #3164  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,056
Received 814 Likes on 570 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by milo bloom
I'd have to do some digging, but I'm fairly certain Lucas has made statements over the years that were very carefully parsed to imply that the "original negatives" were unavailable and therefore so was a new release of the originals. It was apparently worded that way, and successfully so, to convince the fans (most of whom don't really understand how film works) that this meant the originals were unavailable.
Lucas has made misleading statements, but he's never said that restoring the original versions was outright impossible, or that no prints or other elements of the original versions exist.

Originally Posted by milo bloom
And I think GizmoDVD has a good point: if Disney wants to recoup their investment, I can see them getting a new Blu and DVD release out sooner rather than later...
From the official announcements made so far by Disney, it's pretty clear that they feel that the best way to recoup their investment is in producing new films, both the new trilogy and spin-off movies. Those clamoring for the unaltered trilogy, myself included, are a small but vocal minority. Now, Disney would likely make a profit restoring and releasing the unaltered films, but it'd be a relatively small amount, maybe a few million, as opposed to the hundreds of millions the new films have the potential to make.

Something else to consider when thinking about release date for the unlatered trilogy: Disney is planning on releasing E7 in 2015, with the sequels released in 2 year intervals, so likely 2017 for E8, and 2019 for E9. So Disney could then plan and release a new "complete saga" set in 2020, when most of the films have reverted back to them.
Old 03-01-13 | 11:11 AM
  #3165  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
he's never said that restoring the original versions was outright impossible
His statements are moot because we know that it's not impossible, whatever he says.
Old 03-01-13 | 11:12 AM
  #3166  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,453
Received 1,379 Likes on 763 Posts
From: Oklahoma
re: Star Wars

I watched Star Wars (the first film, not that A New Hope shit) on VHS last night and every time there was a scene where Lucas had added some cartoon bullshit to the special edition it took me out of the scene the same way as if it was there. It would pop into my mind and ruined the experience just the same. I think I might just face that Star Wars is forever ruined for me and move on.
Old 03-01-13 | 11:24 AM
  #3167  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,946
Received 1,637 Likes on 1,190 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
Lucas has made misleading statements, but he's never said that restoring the original versions was outright impossible, or that no prints or other elements of the original versions exist.


Originally Posted by Doctorossi
His statements are moot because we know that it's not impossible, whatever he says.
My point was that those statements were *so* egregiously misleading, that he's been able to create a cultural awareness that the originals are lost, no matter how untruthy that fact may be.



Originally Posted by Jay G.

From the official announcements made so far by Disney, it's pretty clear that they feel that the best way to recoup their investment is in producing new films, both the new trilogy and spin-off movies. Those clamoring for the unaltered trilogy, myself included, are a small but vocal minority. Now, Disney would likely make a profit restoring and releasing the unaltered films, but it'd be a relatively small amount, maybe a few million, as opposed to the hundreds of millions the new films have the potential to make.

Something else to consider when thinking about release date for the unlatered trilogy: Disney is planning on releasing E7 in 2015, with the sequels released in 2 year intervals, so likely 2017 for E8, and 2019 for E9. So Disney could then plan and release a new "complete saga" set in 2020, when most of the films have reverted back to them.
Agreed, but it's just hard to think that Disney wouldn't do *something* to start the revenue stream up before the new movies.
Old 03-01-13 | 11:46 AM
  #3168  
Maxflier's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,913
Received 456 Likes on 332 Posts
From: Louisiana
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
Disney could restore and release the original versions now and let Fox take a cut of all 3 films, or they could wait until 2020 when the distribution rights to ESB and ROTJ revert back to them and they get all the revenue from those two titles.
Why not do both? If any title could get away with being double dipped, it's this one.
Old 03-01-13 | 11:53 AM
  #3169  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,197
Received 4,420 Likes on 2,913 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
Lucas has made misleading statements, but he's never said that restoring the original versions was outright impossible, or that no prints or other elements of the original versions exist.
I think he did, a long time ago. I think that the story at the time was that, since the original negatives were used to create the '97 SEs, it would be impossible to restore the original versions.

But I can't be arsed to look up an actual quote from the man himself.
Old 03-01-13 | 12:01 PM
  #3170  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,955
Received 347 Likes on 240 Posts
From: Boston
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
It's not that Fox has distribution rights, but those distribution rights mean they get a significant chunk of the revenue earned by any such releases.
I don't think it's that significant, actually. IIRC, Lucas was a hard-ass in negotiating the distribution agreements. Fox gets a much smaller percentage of the revenue from Star Wars than it does from any other typical movie the studio might distribute.

However, because it's Star Wars, that still adds up to a lot of money on all sides.
Old 03-01-13 | 12:08 PM
  #3171  
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,173
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
From: Hartford, CT
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Jay G.
Those clamoring for the unaltered trilogy, myself included, are a small but vocal minority.
Sad, but true.

Originally Posted by stvn1974
I think I might just face that Star Wars is forever ruined for me and move on.
I feel the same way. I have the bonus discs from the '06 DVDs, and I'm pretty much resigned that that's it for me.
Old 04-10-13 | 10:58 PM
  #3172  
HopToIt's Avatar
Cool New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ft. Hood, TX
re: Star Wars

Studios will disappoint. The only DVD/Blu-ray obsessions I can ever entertain into the future are new releases of Evil Dead series and Repo Man.

I understand how the high-quality unaltered trilogy would serve as a comfort to an aging 20th century generation living through increasingly alien times, but this here 21st millennium isn't kind to warm and fuzzy memories from the past.

The only place to put any faith is with the fans. Adywan revisited cuts are the way to go for now, but inevitably there will be high-quality unaltered fanedits to come.
Old 04-11-13 | 08:44 AM
  #3173  
BuckNaked2k's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,173
Received 43 Likes on 33 Posts
From: Hartford, CT
re: Star Wars

^ Check out Harmy's remastered v2.1
Old 04-11-13 | 08:56 AM
  #3174  
HopToIt's Avatar
Cool New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Ft. Hood, TX
re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
^ Check out Harmy's remastered v2.1
Who needs Hollywood? That's what I'm talking about!
Old 04-11-13 | 09:24 AM
  #3175  
EddieMoney's Avatar
RIP
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,981
Received 79 Likes on 54 Posts
From: Paradise, USA
re: Star Wars

Still hanging onto my CED videodiscs.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.