![]() |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Not you too, David. Goddamnit.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Dvdbeaver's review of Scanners is up. They are praising the new color scheme and to them it's more "film like".
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-r...rs_blu-ray.htm |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 12151273)
We're going to have to start distinguishing between "director's intent" and actual "theatrical version." I don't know how everyone feels, but when I buy an older movie being updated for Blu-ray, I want to see the movie as close as possible to how it appeared in theaters, NOT how the director INTENDED it to appear (which is usually just an excuse for him to tweak with his movie).
Do you have the same tastes, value the same things, preoccupied by the same thoughts? Neither are these directors. People think because they inhabit the same aging physical shell, that these are the same people that created the material all those years ago. They aren't. For as different as they are now, they may as well be entirely different people unassociated with the film entirely. I need to start a petition to the studios to not allow directors to revise their films after a short grace period (say 2-5 years). If they want to do it at home and show it to a few friends, fine. But any public exhibition of any kind needs to locked down early on. As a supplement people can choose to ignore, fine. But there really needs to be some permanence returned to this art form. If it can be altered at any time by the indulgences of the studio and the current caprices of the artist, the work isn't finished to begin with and shouldn't have been declared as such. And screw Star Wars. I'm still vexed I can't watch the original Warriors without the cheesy on-the-nose comic book transitions in HD. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 12151273)
We're going to have to start distinguishing between "director's intent" and actual "theatrical version." I don't know how everyone feels, but when I buy an older movie being updated for Blu-ray, I want to see the movie as close as possible to how it appeared in theaters, NOT how the director INTENDED it to appear (which is usually just an excuse for him to tweak with his movie). This is really not too much different than someone like Lucas updating special effects - it's changing the original version (and often for no good reason).
Director intent doesn't really matter to me. It's no different than what Lucas has done or studios that press the DNR button to scrub away film grain. If it's not how it was shot and not how it was presented in theaters, its very difficult to look past that (at least to me). Is Cronenberg going to get a pass for this just because he's Cronenberg? |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
The problem that people like Lucas, Mann, Cameron, and etc is that it's ok to have a different intent now but to change some films like that is to change film history. That bothers me.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Cronenberg is starting to rape my middle age
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Easiest solution is to buy the German Subkultur release for viewing and the Criterion if you want the extras.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I wish I knew who said it (I'm pretty sure it was a director - but it may have been an actor...but it was someone of note in the Hollywood community), but recently someone was quoted as saying that (and I'm paraphrasing, as I don't remember the exact language) every movie is a reflection of the time it was released and should be preserved - warts and all - as closely to its original version as possible.
Movies are a window to our past, and every bit of tinkering that is done to them - however small, takes away some of that past when they're tampered with. Now it's one thing to clean up a film to make it look as close as possible to the theatrical release, it's quite another thing to change it because "that's how I always intended it to appear." We're seeing more and more of the latter these days, and it's really sad to see - particularly from people who claim to love film. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
The problem is, it's the studios that are facilitating it. It takes studio money/go ahead to go back in and revise it and consecrate the changes with a new master to then dispense on all the platforms.
You have to head this stuff off at the studio level. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 12152248)
I wish I knew who said it (I'm pretty sure it was a director - but it may have been an actor...but it was someone of note in the Hollywood community), but recently someone was quoted as saying that (and I'm paraphrasing, as I don't remember the exact language) every movie is a reflection of the time it was released and should be preserved - warts and all - as closely to its original version as possible.
Movies are a window to our past, and every bit of tinkering that is done to them - however small, takes away some of that past when they're tampered with. Now it's one thing to clean up a film to make it look as close as possible to the theatrical release, it's quite another thing to change it because "that's how I always intended it to appear." We're seeing more and more of the latter these days, and it's really sad to see - particularly from people who claim to love film. Also, I think you might be referring to a Spielberg interview from a few years ago. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49921 Oh, I know. I totally understand that. (In the future) there’s going to be no more digital enhancements or digital additions to anything based on any film I direct. I’m not going to do any corrections digitally to even wires that show. If 1941 comes on Blu-Ray I’m not going to go back and take the wires out because the Blu-Ray will bring the wires out, that are guiding the airplanes down Hollywood Blvd. At this point right now I think letting movies exist in the era, with all the flaws and with all of the flourishes, is a wonderful way to mark time and mark history. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
In other news...
Criterion's latest newsletter hints at It Happened One Night in the works. Great news to me as it's still one of my favorite classics. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Awesome. I'm hoping they have the rights for other Capra films.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Ringmaster
(Post 12152158)
Dvdbeaver's review of Scanners is up. They are praising the new color scheme and to them it's more "film like".
http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film3/blu-r...rs_blu-ray.htm |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Random question- how many releases were in the dual format? (spine # to spine # if possible) thanks
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Just to make sure... everybody here knows about this....
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/blu-ray-bar...july-28-a.html ... right? |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by slowcloud
(Post 12156541)
Just to make sure... everybody here knows about this....
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/blu-ray-bar...july-28-a.html ... right? |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Shit. I bought Thief cuz of the sale. I knew wtf was done to it. Technically speaking, this is a gorgeous image.
Can't grasp why Mann believes EVEN when using the negative as a color reference... That changing color is beneficial to the film. Fucking great film though. Jesus. It's so goddamn good. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Was thinking I was done until the Demy set hits in a couple weeks, but I've recently become very curious to see Shape Of Things To Come and some of the Cassevettes films- two Criterion packages that I've had zero interest in during past sales, despite the glowing reviews of each.
Looks like I'll be getting some use out of the next round of coupons after all. |
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
(Post 12162487)
Shit. I bought Thief cuz of the sale. I knew wtf was done to it. Technically speaking, this is a gorgeous image. Can't grasp why Mann believes EVEN when using the negative as a color reference... That changing color is beneficial to the film. Fucking great film though. Jesus. It's so goddamn good.
|
Originally Posted by georgec
(Post 12152260)
Fully agree! Also, I think you might be referring to a Spielberg interview from a few years ago. http://www.aintitcool.com/node/49921
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Kedrix
(Post 12163202)
The ending completely made me shake my head, especially when it had been pretty good until that point.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Ringmaster
(Post 12163273)
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I did buy the blu from the BN Criterion sale. I felt the same way about Collateral though. It was one of the best movies I've seen and the ending completely pissed me off. I hope it's not the same way with THIEF.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Ringmaster
(Post 12163273)
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I did buy the blu from the BN Criterion sale. I felt the same way about Collateral though. It was one of the best movies I've seen and the ending completely pissed me off. I hope it's not the same way with THIEF.
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 12163288)
Obviously a different director, but that's how I feel about another film that Criterion released: The Game. I have no desire to see it again because of the ending.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Kedrix
(Post 12163385)
*sigh*, my copy of Game is still sealed from the last B&N sale. Maybe I should go ahead and watch it.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I look forward to Eraserhead being green and purple.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 12163911)
I look forward to Eraserhead being green and purple.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 12163911)
I look forward to Eraserhead being green and purple.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
^wow. It's like it was filmed yesterday!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Let's put it this way: Suppose a studio releases a Blu-ray of Chaplin's The Gold Rush, fully colorized with a plethora different colors and shades in every shot. The studio claims that this is exactly what the movie was supposed to look like when it was released to theaters in 1925.
Fans complain: "There was no color film stock in 1925! All movies were black & white! The most a filmmaker could have done was apply broad, crude tints to some scenes, and there's no evidence that this movie ever had tinting like that." The studio replies: "How do you know? How do you know? Stupid internet whiners. We're telling you this is what it's supposed to look like, so STFU." Should we just take the studio at its word that this movie from 1925 was always in color, despite the fact that such a thing is totally impossible? |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12164340)
Let's put it this way: Suppose a studio releases a Blu-ray of Chaplin's The Gold Rush, fully colorized with a plethora different colors and shades in every shot. The studio claims that this is exactly what the movie was supposed to look like when it was released to theaters in 1925.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12164340)
Let's put it this way: Suppose a studio releases a Blu-ray of Chaplin's The Gold Rush, fully colorized with a plethora different colors and shades in every shot. The studio claims that this is exactly what the movie was supposed to look like when it was released to theaters in 1925.
Fans complain: "There was no color film stock in 1925! All movies were black & white! The most a filmmaker could have done was apply broad, crude tints to some scenes, and there's no evidence that this movie ever had tinting like that." The studio replies: "How do you know? How do you know? Stupid internet whiners. We're telling you this is what it's supposed to look like, so STFU." Should we just take the studio at its word that this movie from 1925 was always in color, despite the fact that such a thing is totally impossible? |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by inri222
(Post 12164357)
Chaplin's dead and so is Roland Totheroh (cinematographer) so we'll never know.
If Charlie Chaplin were to communicate to us from the afterlife and claim that The Gold Rush was always in color, we have evidence that he's wrong and (at best) misremembering. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by hdnmickey
(Post 12164362)
That's got to be one of the ridiculous things I've ever read. Now let's see if you now just starting moving goal posts again instead of just admititng how off you were when called on it.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12164382)
Do you even know what the phrase "moving the goalposts" means? You are not using it correctly.
If you knew anything about filmmaking, you'd be able to recognize that. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Modern color, take 2: now with T&O, black crush, and a hint of Abrams!
http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/image...05007563_1.jpg |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
:lol: @ Eraserhead 2014
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12164424)
I have not moved any goalposts. I have made an analogy to help you comprehend the issue. Obviously, it hasn't gotten through to you.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by hdnmickey
(Post 12164502)
An anology that says because something clearly factual (and impossible) makes your out of your ass opinion also factual. Nice try. -screwy-
I have laid out a detailed and thoroughly-reasoned case for my side of the debate. The best counter argument you can come up with is: "Nyah nyah, u so stoopid. :p :rolleyes: -screwy- " I should know better than to interact with children on the internet. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12164648)
I'm the expert. How dare you call me out on my BS.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
So is everyone here passing on the release of Scanners next week?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.