The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
#826
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
all over Star Wars. It was all over after that. Yeah Rise wasn't great but I think it was just about the best that they could do with the mess they had after TLJ.My hot take is Disney unfairly gets a lot of the blame. I think it is their fault for reducing it to 2 years in between movies vs 3 but Lucasfilm was largely still intact from when George Lucas was in charge. They kept KK in charge like Lucas wanted. Besides the accelerated timeline I think they had little to do with what the final product ended up being. I think Disney under Bob Iger was pretty smart with their acquisitions and let Pixar/Marvel/Lucasfilm all run pretty much under the same creative leadership without some big corporate shake up or installing their own people to be the heads of those studios.
#827
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
My hot take is Disney unfairly gets a lot of the blame. I think it is their fault for reducing it to 2 years in between movies vs 3 but Lucasfilm was largely still intact from when George Lucas was in charge. They kept KK in charge like Lucas wanted. Besides the accelerated timeline I think they had little to do with what the final product ended up being. I think Disney under Bob Iger was pretty smart with their acquisitions and let Pixar/Marvel/Lucasfilm all run pretty much under the same creative leadership without some big corporate shake up or installing their own people to be the heads of those studios.
They immediately wanted product/content, period. When TLJ disappointed (in relation to TFA), when Solo tanked, and when TRoS failed to engage critics and sputtered to a close with audiences (comparatively), they were lucky enough to have The Mandolorian ready to roll on the backburner.
The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (06-08-22)
#828
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
And I thought that Force Awakens, The Last Jedi and Rise of Skywalker were so far above the prequels in quality they might as well have be from a different movie universe.
That's why I'm liking Obi-Wan so much - they actually did something good with the character after he was truly terrible in the prequels.
That's why I'm liking Obi-Wan so much - they actually did something good with the character after he was truly terrible in the prequels.
#829
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
^^ I don't know if they're putting a ton of thought into it as much as they're paralyzed by fear of making another shit trilogy. That said, after watching the Book of Boba Fett and now Obi Wan, I am dumbfounded that nobody watches these back and says "this isn't good enough". So maybe Disney really does think it's putting out high quality stuff. Subscriptions would tell them that their business model works - hell, I've had D+ since day 1 and only watch the SW shows and a few MCU shows.
#830
Moderator
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
I like Star Wars.
The following 2 users liked this post by story:
Boondock Saint (06-08-22),
IBJoel (06-08-22)
#832
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
I though Ewan's Obi-Wan was easily the best part of the prequels as he (Ewan) seemed to be the only one (well along with Ian) having any kind of fun with their roles and actually putting for effort. I was at Star Wars Celebration a couple of weeks ago and with no big movie announcements, maybe that means they are putting some actual thought into their future theatrical releases. I would have been happy with more "stories" as I loved Rogue One and thought Solo was way better than it had a right to be (and left me wanting to see more of his adventures leading into ANH).
The Obi-Wan series posits "what if Ewan McGregor was Obi-Wan Kenobi but everything around him was better?"
#833
Senior Member
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
I'd argue that the worst thing about The Last Jedi isn't Luke dying but rather that they wasted Laura Dern by saddling her character with a needlessly complicated triple-agent subplot. And I'm someone who actually enjoyed TLJ.
Still haven't seen Rise of Skywalker. Someday, God give me strength. FTR, I haven't seen Attack of the Clones in its entirety either.
Still haven't seen Rise of Skywalker. Someday, God give me strength. FTR, I haven't seen Attack of the Clones in its entirety either.
#834
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Disney literally disregarded Lucas's plans for a sequel trilogy and came up with one all their own after the purchase. Is KK a problem, yeah, but while she was Lucas's heir apparent in the end she was appointed by Iger. Disney/Lucasfilm came up with the 2 year cycle, the one-off movies, basically cranking out product every year. The entire time, without a fleshed out storyline or overall plan or direction for the property.
They immediately wanted product/content, period. When TLJ disappointed (in relation to TFA), when Solo tanked, and when TRoS failed to engage critics and sputtered to a close with audiences (comparatively), they were lucky enough to have The Mandolorian ready to roll on the backburner.
They immediately wanted product/content, period. When TLJ disappointed (in relation to TFA), when Solo tanked, and when TRoS failed to engage critics and sputtered to a close with audiences (comparatively), they were lucky enough to have The Mandolorian ready to roll on the backburner.
So again other then setting an unreasonably aggressive timeline I don't think Disney had much to do with their output creatively. For better or for worse it seems like it was all Lucasfilm.
And of course they wanted content. Why else would they have bought Star Wars? The fans want content. Everyone wants content. Nothing wrong with that.
#835
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (06-09-22)
#836
DVD Talk Legend
The following 4 users liked this post by Cellar Door:
#837
Administrator
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
For reference, these were Lucas' initial plans. Make of them what you w(h)ill.
Spoiler:
The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (06-13-22)
#838
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
ETA: Yeah, it's what Joel posted a few minutes before my post.

The following users liked this post:
IBJoel (06-09-22)
#839
Administrator
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
I think only the Leia stuff really shines, but that would have likely caused the same reaction in many of the people who hate Rey/Rose/Holdo.
The Luke stuff is pretty par for the course and like the third iteration of rebuilding the Jedi.
The Maul stuff is... Yikes. Star Wars, for the love of God, please stop bringing characters back from the dead. EU, Sequels, TV shows, I'm talking to all of you.
#840
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
#841
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
See I'm the opposite. I think there is a good movie buried in Phantom. The Jar Jar/Naboo stuff is pretty much trash same with the Pod racing, but there is some good stuff in there. Clones I have a difficult time finding anything good.
#842
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Isn’t Attack of the Clones the one with the extended sequence of R2 and 3PO doing slapstick in a droid factory with C-3PO making wisecracks? Yeah, no, it’s trash through and through.
#843
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
And that scene was added in after the film was shot because Lucas felt it needed more action.
#844
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
If the prequels had been made in the same style/quality of the OT, they'd be infinitely better. Still overly long and clunky, but more than adequate imo. It's all in the execution.
#845
Administrator
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
- The Republic needing to implement a draft to fight against a clone army is a better way to connect with the audience, as well as draw upon Lucas' memories of Vietnam (I know he didn't serve, but that was have been the major conflict during his coming of age).
- Starting with Anakin at age 19 where he's super into podracing. Scrap the slave stuff and just make him a character from American Graffiti. Small town with big dreams.
- Making Anakin as a more concrete mirror of Luke: When Obi-Wan mentions him as "a good friend", I always had in my mind that Anakin was the Classical Hero to Luke's Child Hero. Competent, barrel-chested, in control. I kind of always had in my head that his pursuit of the Dark Side was driven more by trying to do the right thing for everyone than for just his wife. That's all headcanon, I know, but I feel it would have been thematically more inline with what we see in the OT.
- Don't make the Jedi so strict, aloof, and powerless.
#846
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Everyone was cast 10yrs too young - yes, we can have our trio in their 30's and 40's. (I've always been a Branagh as Obi Wan fan)
Drop the prophecy and Jedi attachments nonsense, it can be frowned upon, but not disallowed.
Just from a filmmaking standpoint, you work yourself into a corner with your main heroes living as monks.
The following users liked this post:
IBJoel (06-12-22)
#847
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Phantom Menace has "Duel of the Fates" and Darth Maul. That's about it. The podrace is pretty decent but it's just a fancy CG version of the speeder bikes on Endor's moon.
I'm watching Clone Wars for the first time right now. Season one was rough, but halfway through season 2 and it's getting pretty good. So timeline-wise, I might hold off on rewatching Sith until I'm done with the series.
#848
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
I like the pod race and Obi-wan/Qui-Gon/Darth Maul duel in TPM. I like the Yoda stuff in AotC. I can't find a single redeemable thing in RotS, however.
#849
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
The ST is entirely indefensible, as a whole and each movie. TFA was a scam. TLJ was a joke. TROS was an abomination.
D+ SW content has been mostly crap. Even TM is hit and miss, and that's the best of the live action to date. Rogue One was very good.
I see more and more how SW is a joke of a franchise to follow religiously, or to be glued to each new show/animation. It's gone beyond farcical in Disneys ownership. Its laughable really the content. The years go by now where my own fandom gets less and less.
Maybe if there was something truly great again I'd get back on board. Something new and different, a distant era pre or post-Saga. But it's not just that desire/need for a new era, the actual content itself is so poorly written, unengaging, relying on references, easter eggs and brand awareness, the nostalgia angle, to mask actual poor story-telling. It's bereft of heart and soul, just a Coca-Cola ad now.
TM season 1 was largely a bore of mission for the day crap, a few funny/cool moments here and there, season 2 packed more punch but it was still pretty low standards compared to far better TV shows that exist, that rivet you, fascinating stories and characters. Boba Fett and Obi-Wan series had some funny/cool moments but was largely shit. That's the in-your-bones truth that you ALL know too to be true. It's just we try to enjoy it "hey its SW content at least" we say to appease ourselves.I'm still waiting for something to merit getting excited for, that merits rewatching, that merits loving.
The Lucas Era SW had pride in craftsmanship and a dignity to its own mythology/lore. Lucas made errors, especially in the PT that cheapened the product. But Disney and the new LFL are going the extra miles and digging in deep to make it worse and indigestible.
D+ SW content has been mostly crap. Even TM is hit and miss, and that's the best of the live action to date. Rogue One was very good.
I see more and more how SW is a joke of a franchise to follow religiously, or to be glued to each new show/animation. It's gone beyond farcical in Disneys ownership. Its laughable really the content. The years go by now where my own fandom gets less and less.
Maybe if there was something truly great again I'd get back on board. Something new and different, a distant era pre or post-Saga. But it's not just that desire/need for a new era, the actual content itself is so poorly written, unengaging, relying on references, easter eggs and brand awareness, the nostalgia angle, to mask actual poor story-telling. It's bereft of heart and soul, just a Coca-Cola ad now.
TM season 1 was largely a bore of mission for the day crap, a few funny/cool moments here and there, season 2 packed more punch but it was still pretty low standards compared to far better TV shows that exist, that rivet you, fascinating stories and characters. Boba Fett and Obi-Wan series had some funny/cool moments but was largely shit. That's the in-your-bones truth that you ALL know too to be true. It's just we try to enjoy it "hey its SW content at least" we say to appease ourselves.I'm still waiting for something to merit getting excited for, that merits rewatching, that merits loving.
The Lucas Era SW had pride in craftsmanship and a dignity to its own mythology/lore. Lucas made errors, especially in the PT that cheapened the product. But Disney and the new LFL are going the extra miles and digging in deep to make it worse and indigestible.
Last edited by xe.kilroy; 06-26-22 at 10:33 PM.
The following users liked this post:
bchbdaddy (06-27-22)
#850
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
The OT (even Ewok nonsense) was still great stuff. Pacing, writing, story-telling. And didn't break and mock its own lore inside the trilogy. The ST certainly did that inside itself to itself and to the OT and PT to boot. Even the PT kept in step with itself in terms of telling a coherent story, building characters backstories. It had bad problems as Red Letter Media has delved into, but it's still a consistent trilogy and to the OT.
Disney content has lowered our standards, so low now we just try to enjoy it somehow, trained to brush away major flaws, tho we know it's crap and getting crapper.
Disney content has lowered our standards, so low now we just try to enjoy it somehow, trained to brush away major flaws, tho we know it's crap and getting crapper.




