Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-16 | 09:12 AM
  #801  
Orbi-Wan Techno's Avatar
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,220
Received 77 Likes on 52 Posts
From: Virginia Beach
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Guru Askew
I've never once argued with someone over whether a cameo appearance is an insult before. It's a brand-new argument. Certified Fresh.
While a couple of the cameos in Ghostbusters do come off a little gratuitous and in some cases, a little long (Bill Murray), it was fun to hear a fresh audience gasp, laugh and applaud when each original cast member appeared. Also, I made an argument in the reviews thread that it could be a bit of "universe-building" on the filmmakers' part, especially since Reitman and Aykroyd co-produced it.
Orbi-Wan Techno is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 11:54 AM
  #802  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,266
Received 1,555 Likes on 1,110 Posts
From: The place beyond the pines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Another review:
http://www.theonion.com/video/onion-...tbusters-53213
Dan is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 12:43 PM
  #803  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
Thanks, I was born in 1985. Ghostbusters was probably the biggest pop culture phenomenon of my childhood. My friends and I had all of the action figures. We had the firehouse playset, the Ecto 1. We strapped the proton packs to our back and ran around looking for ghosts. We drank the Hi-C Ecto Cooler and watched The Real Ghostbusters animated series(the Boogieman episode gave me nightmares!). On road trips I had the Ghostbusters 2 soundtrack cassette on repeat in my Walkman. It was probably the first time my white bread ass was exposed to R&B and Hip Hop. To this day my friends and I watch both movies on a regular basis. Last year they released the original film for the 4k remaster. I all ready had the BD pre-ordered, but I wasn't going to pass on a chance to see it on the big screen. My friend and I took our girlfriends, to our amazement, they had never seen it!

I should have been as happy about a new Ghostbusters movie as Star Wars fans were for TFA. I read stories about the excitement viewers felt when the lights dimmed. Grown men who saw Star Wars as a kid in 1977, were now taking their children to see TFA and when the horns blared and the crawl started, they felt like a kid again. It saddens me that not only will I ever experience that feeling, but me and a legion of Ghostbusters fans have been vilified on social media thanks to a vocal minority of jerks.

On behalf of all Ghostbusters fans, I apologize for the sexist jerks, they don't represent all, or even most of us. But every fandom has a shitty subsection of creeps. That doesn't justify the level of vitriol that has been spewed right back at Ghostbusters fans in general. And to those who like to denigrate the original films to make a point, to those who keep coming in here to say "All this fuss over Ghostbusters? I like it, but it's not (insert renowned film from a completely unrelated genre and era)..' I hope this never happens to you. I hope your favorite film series isn't rebooted, with its original timeline erased, and that you don't have to suffer countless blogs calling fans of the original 'cave-dwelling knuckle-draggers' and 'mouth-breathing neckbeards.' You don't have to like Ghostbusters 2, but I'm damn sure not going to apologize for loving it, and being disappointed in the direction of this new movie.

It frustrates me that on this forum comic fans can rant and rave about Snyder and Trank freely and all is well, but Ghostbusters fans are treated like pieces of shit. I guess my franchise just isn't considered important enough like Star Wars or Fantastic Four so that fans should be treated with respect. In fact there's been an alarming amount of leniency towards those who are using snark and an insulting tone to minimize the opinions who are critical of this film. I'd like to express myself in a mature conversation, but I'm afraid my opinion will be dismissed and I'll be labeled a misogynist. Sadly, I don't feel like this thread is a safe or friendly environment for people like myself, and it goes way beyond a couple of sexist people nobody takes seriously.
I was born in '84, watched both Ghostbusters movies religiously, watched the cartoon, had all the toys (except the ones I didn't and I'd complain incessantly to my parents to get them too). I don't think I had a copy of the soundtracks but that aside, I was a huge Ghostbusters fan as well. But for whatever reason, other properties eventually took priority (Star Wars, TMNT, eventually Star Trek and much later Doctor Who, etc.). I now have no problem divorcing my childhood enthusiasm from the actual content of the property. I still think the original film is a stone cold classic. The sequel, not so much. And while I have opinions about what would have made a great Ghostbusters sequel or remake or reboot, I think this film looks decent, I like Paul Feig, I like most of the cast, I have little to really complain about.

I understand that you feel differently. Clearly I had a similar reaction to Prometheus so lord knows I understand.
Supermallet is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 01:31 PM
  #804  
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 32,743
Received 4,835 Likes on 3,026 Posts
From: Colorado
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Supermallet
I understand that you feel differently. Clearly I had a similar reaction to Prometheus so lord knows I understand.
I have an undying (almost unhealthy) love for Die Hard. I sat through A Good Day to Die Hard! I feel as if I can now withstand any torture you throw my way. In fact, I'd probably laugh while you were doing it!
GoldenJCJ is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 05:02 PM
  #805  
whotony's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 24,478
Received 943 Likes on 660 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

So is Ghostbusters good or not?
whotony is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 05:08 PM
  #806  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,591
Received 413 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by whotony
So is Ghostbusters good or not?
I'll let you know in about 3 hours.
Shannon Nutt is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 05:22 PM
  #807  
The Cow's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,150
Received 1,214 Likes on 783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by whotony
So is Ghostbusters good or not?
Go to the movie review thread, this one is just the usual circle snarky banter similar to the political forum.
The Cow is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 05:43 PM
  #808  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by fumanstan
I didn't catch that. Thanks
You should go back a page or two and read that post. It's a big comparison of the mainstream and fandom reactions to this and controversial comic book movies. This has really helped me understand where comic fans are coming from with their expectations and skepticism to adaptations. While this movie is mostly divisive, it's helped me be more empathetic to a subset of fandom I didn't relate to or really understand previously.
DaveyJoe is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 05:47 PM
  #809  
Orbi-Wan Techno's Avatar
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,220
Received 77 Likes on 52 Posts
From: Virginia Beach
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by whotony
So is Ghostbusters good or not?
I liked it a lot, but not everyone will.
Orbi-Wan Techno is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 06:33 PM
  #810  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
You should go back a page or two and read that post. It's a big comparison of the mainstream and fandom reactions to this and controversial comic book movies. This has really helped me understand where comic fans are coming from with their expectations and skepticism to adaptations. While this movie is mostly divisive, it's helped me be more empathetic to a subset of fandom I didn't relate to or really understand previously.
I assume it's this post. I appreciate the read!

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/12848669-post748.html

Nicely worded and put together, and I agree with your summation about this particular movie and both "sides" of the coin, especially as someone that also thought voicing legitimate complaints regarding this movie were constantly flipped back to the sexism angle. Even now it's kind of funny to me the lengths people are going to justify the positive and negative critic reviews to support their arguments.
fumanstan is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 07:20 PM
  #811  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by james2025a
Why does it limit mature conversation (that actually made me laugh when i read it.....mature conversation about Ghostbusters movies.....lol)? And why is it provocative? I can understand a person being a fan of a movie, but i find it unrealistic when that person sees the movie as something other than what it actually is. The original Ghostbusters was a well made family fun comedy that did exactly what it set out to do. It is not however anything that could be analyzed for years due to its indepth storyline, world class acting or sublime postmodern characterization. I think you are completely missing the point with this discussion. I am not saying that you shouldn't treasure it, and you certainly have a personal love for it....which is great.....but don't try putting it on a pedestal next to truly great movies that are considered much more important and think it gives them a run for their money. That was the point i was making. I grew up as a Star Wars fan and was a kid at the time. To me they were my favorite movies, but as i grew up i could see them for what they are. Great movies that entertain, but they are not high art. Just because you love something does not mean any criticism thrown its way is unwarranted. Thats blindly loving something and pretty small minded if you ask me. I love discussing my favorite movies with people and hearing their opinions, and the conversations with ones who are most diametrically opposed to mine tend to the be the most fulfilling as it gives me a different perspective.


Getting back to Ghostbusters and its sequel let me give you an example. I am probably the worlds biggest Blade Runner fan. I have been watching it since it originally came out, have seen it at the cinema on numerous occasions and have watched it thousands of times. Not to mention reading many books on it, watching documentaries on it and even collecting a lot of things from it. Next year we are finally getting a sequel. How do i feel about that? Well it seems to have a lot of great people involved in it and i have high hopes. But heres the thing.........even if it sucks and is a horrible mess, i will still always have the original movie to go back to and enjoy.
Not only are the techniques used making the original Star Wars art, at this point I'd go so far as to say they are a lost art. The film is/was a complex analogue magic trick more akin to an engineering project or an animated film. And it still had heart and humor. The quality of the designs alone make it art.

Last edited by Mabuse; 07-14-16 at 08:19 PM.
Mabuse is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 09:56 PM
  #812  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,591
Received 413 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by N2DVD
I liked it a lot, but not everyone will.
I thought it was AWFUL. I'll post more in the review thread.
Shannon Nutt is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 11:05 PM
  #813  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,057
Received 575 Likes on 407 Posts
From: Southern California
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

You're not the only one who thought it was awful. A lot of critics that I respect have given it VERY bad reviews.

And here's a great video that really states what I've been saying for months, only maybe presented better...



I wish I had seen that months ago...

(But the points remain valid, maybe even moreso now that the movie is out and many of the assumptions made based on the trailer have apparently turned out to be correct.)

Last edited by B5Erik; 07-15-16 at 08:09 AM.
B5Erik is offline  
Old 07-14-16 | 11:34 PM
  #814  
The Valeyard's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 10,800
Received 84 Likes on 51 Posts
From: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

The Valeyard is offline  
Old 07-15-16 | 10:46 AM
  #815  
bluetoast's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,880
Received 324 Likes on 244 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Have people seem the Facebook ads, with the "square" aspect ratio? Chopping up your own movie like that...fucking shit man.
bluetoast is offline  
Old 07-15-16 | 06:25 PM
  #816  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by fumanstan
I assume it's this post. I appreciate the read!

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/12848669-post748.html

Nicely worded and put together, and I agree with your summation about this particular movie and both "sides" of the coin, especially as someone that also thought voicing legitimate complaints regarding this movie were constantly flipped back to the sexism angle. Even now it's kind of funny to me the lengths people are going to justify the positive and negative critic reviews to support their arguments.
The interesting thing is that this movie could have sparked an honest conversation about sexism and the lack of opportunities for women in Hollywood. Unfortunately people were too quick to shout down fans of Ghostbusters with legitimate criticisms, and they felt like they were automatically being accused of being misogynists. It dumbed down the conversation and people didn't want to participate in it anymore.
DaveyJoe is offline  
Old 07-15-16 | 07:07 PM
  #817  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,483
Received 1,526 Likes on 1,022 Posts
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Can't believe people here are still trying to convince others that it's a bad movie.

Most critics gave it a thumbs up. Take a deep breath, step away from the keyboard and move on with your life.
Coral is offline  
Old 07-15-16 | 10:17 PM
  #818  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,591
Received 413 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Coral
Can't believe people here are still trying to convince others that it's a bad movie.

Most critics gave it a thumbs up. Take a deep breath, step away from the keyboard and move on with your life.
Have you SEEN it? I thought it was bad. I wouldn't fight with someone who said it was "just okay" or "average", but I question anyone who thinks this movie is really good. And you should turn in your "critic" card if you think it's "great." If this film was the FIRST Ghostbusters movie, with no memory about what came before or connection to a prior film(s) it would be gone and forgotten after this weekend...it's coasting on memories of a better movie. It's like an bad cover version of a great tune.
Shannon Nutt is offline  
Old 07-15-16 | 10:26 PM
  #819  
VinVega's Avatar
Admin
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 36,106
Received 561 Likes on 364 Posts
From: Behind enemy lines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Uh oh, critics like it, viewers don't.

VinVega is offline  
Old 07-15-16 | 10:54 PM
  #820  
Troy Stiffler's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 27,566
Received 609 Likes on 431 Posts
From: Under an I-10 Overpass
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

With how the pre-release buzz went, the audience rating can fuck off. No way I would ever trust that thing on this movie.
Troy Stiffler is offline  
Old 07-15-16 | 11:04 PM
  #821  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 46,636
Received 1,376 Likes on 1,080 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by VinVega
Uh oh, critics like it, viewers don't.
It was 44% the millisecond voting was enabled and a 3.8 on imdb with 16,000 votes as soon as voting was enabled, impressive.
RichC2 is offline  
Old 07-15-16 | 11:31 PM
  #822  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,591
Received 1,807 Likes on 1,294 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
Have you SEEN it? I thought it was bad. I wouldn't fight with someone who said it was "just okay" or "average", but I question anyone who thinks this movie is really good. And you should turn in your "critic" card if you think it's "great."
I don't think anyone has called it great. But, looking at the scores in the reviews thread, you're the only one that has scored it low (discounting the two 0 votes).

So far, most people think it's fine to pretty good.
TomOpus is offline  
Old 07-16-16 | 05:43 AM
  #823  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,067
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Personally, the fact this movie is more or less a remake of the original (and much-loved) movie from 1984 and the Director Paul Feig's dismissive attitude of the potential viewing audience are not helping things among moviegoers.

Now, if this movie had been based on the female descendants of the original cast, that would have been a different thing altogether--and would have been a much more interesting movie, too.
RayChuang is offline  
Old 07-16-16 | 07:37 AM
  #824  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,266
Received 1,555 Likes on 1,110 Posts
From: The place beyond the pines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

Originally Posted by Troy Stiffler
With how the pre-release buzz went, the audience rating can fuck off. No way I would ever trust that thing on this movie.
A common thing on Reddit is "brigading" where a large group of people who are regulars on one subreddit head over to another subreddit and proceed to downvote either a specific user's posts and comments, or every post and comment they can see. These people are obsessed with Reddit karma (ie: Magic internet points that literally have zero value) and think it actually upsets the people they're targeting.

I guarantee, about 90% (or more) of those 1-star or 0/10 reviews on RT and IMDB are coming from those exact same people and types of people; both on Reddit and 4chan. They think "If I just give a bad review, then the whole world will see how bad this movie I haven't seen is!!!"

So yes, the 'user score' on those sites can fuck off.
Dan is offline  
Old 07-16-16 | 09:04 AM
  #825  
Brack's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,011
Received 63 Likes on 40 Posts
From: near Cincinnati
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)

This is why I avoid those sites. I find most folks on here to be fairly well-adjusted, despite the numerous thread closings (which wasn't warranted, some warnings early on would have nipped it in the bud).
Brack is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.