Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
#801
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
While a couple of the cameos in Ghostbusters do come off a little gratuitous and in some cases, a little long (Bill Murray), it was fun to hear a fresh audience gasp, laugh and applaud when each original cast member appeared. Also, I made an argument in the reviews thread that it could be a bit of "universe-building" on the filmmakers' part, especially since Reitman and Aykroyd co-produced it.
#802
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
Another review:
http://www.theonion.com/video/onion-...tbusters-53213
http://www.theonion.com/video/onion-...tbusters-53213
#803
Banned by request
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
Thanks, I was born in 1985. Ghostbusters was probably the biggest pop culture phenomenon of my childhood. My friends and I had all of the action figures. We had the firehouse playset, the Ecto 1. We strapped the proton packs to our back and ran around looking for ghosts. We drank the Hi-C Ecto Cooler and watched The Real Ghostbusters animated series(the Boogieman episode gave me nightmares!). On road trips I had the Ghostbusters 2 soundtrack cassette on repeat in my Walkman. It was probably the first time my white bread ass was exposed to R&B and Hip Hop. To this day my friends and I watch both movies on a regular basis. Last year they released the original film for the 4k remaster. I all ready had the BD pre-ordered, but I wasn't going to pass on a chance to see it on the big screen. My friend and I took our girlfriends, to our amazement, they had never seen it!
I should have been as happy about a new Ghostbusters movie as Star Wars fans were for TFA. I read stories about the excitement viewers felt when the lights dimmed. Grown men who saw Star Wars as a kid in 1977, were now taking their children to see TFA and when the horns blared and the crawl started, they felt like a kid again. It saddens me that not only will I ever experience that feeling, but me and a legion of Ghostbusters fans have been vilified on social media thanks to a vocal minority of jerks.
On behalf of all Ghostbusters fans, I apologize for the sexist jerks, they don't represent all, or even most of us. But every fandom has a shitty subsection of creeps. That doesn't justify the level of vitriol that has been spewed right back at Ghostbusters fans in general. And to those who like to denigrate the original films to make a point, to those who keep coming in here to say "All this fuss over Ghostbusters? I like it, but it's not (insert renowned film from a completely unrelated genre and era)..' I hope this never happens to you. I hope your favorite film series isn't rebooted, with its original timeline erased, and that you don't have to suffer countless blogs calling fans of the original 'cave-dwelling knuckle-draggers' and 'mouth-breathing neckbeards.' You don't have to like Ghostbusters 2, but I'm damn sure not going to apologize for loving it, and being disappointed in the direction of this new movie.
It frustrates me that on this forum comic fans can rant and rave about Snyder and Trank freely and all is well, but Ghostbusters fans are treated like pieces of shit. I guess my franchise just isn't considered important enough like Star Wars or Fantastic Four so that fans should be treated with respect. In fact there's been an alarming amount of leniency towards those who are using snark and an insulting tone to minimize the opinions who are critical of this film. I'd like to express myself in a mature conversation, but I'm afraid my opinion will be dismissed and I'll be labeled a misogynist. Sadly, I don't feel like this thread is a safe or friendly environment for people like myself, and it goes way beyond a couple of sexist people nobody takes seriously.
I should have been as happy about a new Ghostbusters movie as Star Wars fans were for TFA. I read stories about the excitement viewers felt when the lights dimmed. Grown men who saw Star Wars as a kid in 1977, were now taking their children to see TFA and when the horns blared and the crawl started, they felt like a kid again. It saddens me that not only will I ever experience that feeling, but me and a legion of Ghostbusters fans have been vilified on social media thanks to a vocal minority of jerks.
On behalf of all Ghostbusters fans, I apologize for the sexist jerks, they don't represent all, or even most of us. But every fandom has a shitty subsection of creeps. That doesn't justify the level of vitriol that has been spewed right back at Ghostbusters fans in general. And to those who like to denigrate the original films to make a point, to those who keep coming in here to say "All this fuss over Ghostbusters? I like it, but it's not (insert renowned film from a completely unrelated genre and era)..' I hope this never happens to you. I hope your favorite film series isn't rebooted, with its original timeline erased, and that you don't have to suffer countless blogs calling fans of the original 'cave-dwelling knuckle-draggers' and 'mouth-breathing neckbeards.' You don't have to like Ghostbusters 2, but I'm damn sure not going to apologize for loving it, and being disappointed in the direction of this new movie.
It frustrates me that on this forum comic fans can rant and rave about Snyder and Trank freely and all is well, but Ghostbusters fans are treated like pieces of shit. I guess my franchise just isn't considered important enough like Star Wars or Fantastic Four so that fans should be treated with respect. In fact there's been an alarming amount of leniency towards those who are using snark and an insulting tone to minimize the opinions who are critical of this film. I'd like to express myself in a mature conversation, but I'm afraid my opinion will be dismissed and I'll be labeled a misogynist. Sadly, I don't feel like this thread is a safe or friendly environment for people like myself, and it goes way beyond a couple of sexist people nobody takes seriously.
I understand that you feel differently. Clearly I had a similar reaction to Prometheus so lord knows I understand.
#804
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
I have an undying (almost unhealthy) love for Die Hard. I sat through A Good Day to Die Hard! I feel as if I can now withstand any torture you throw my way. In fact, I'd probably laugh while you were doing it!
#805
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
So is Ghostbusters good or not?
#806
DVD Talk Legend
#808
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
You should go back a page or two and read that post. It's a big comparison of the mainstream and fandom reactions to this and controversial comic book movies. This has really helped me understand where comic fans are coming from with their expectations and skepticism to adaptations. While this movie is mostly divisive, it's helped me be more empathetic to a subset of fandom I didn't relate to or really understand previously.
#810
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
You should go back a page or two and read that post. It's a big comparison of the mainstream and fandom reactions to this and controversial comic book movies. This has really helped me understand where comic fans are coming from with their expectations and skepticism to adaptations. While this movie is mostly divisive, it's helped me be more empathetic to a subset of fandom I didn't relate to or really understand previously. 

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/12848669-post748.html
Nicely worded and put together, and I agree with your summation about this particular movie and both "sides" of the coin, especially as someone that also thought voicing legitimate complaints regarding this movie were constantly flipped back to the sexism angle. Even now it's kind of funny to me the lengths people are going to justify the positive and negative critic reviews to support their arguments.
#811
Banned
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes
on
127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
Why does it limit mature conversation (that actually made me laugh when i read it.....mature conversation about Ghostbusters movies.....lol)? And why is it provocative? I can understand a person being a fan of a movie, but i find it unrealistic when that person sees the movie as something other than what it actually is. The original Ghostbusters was a well made family fun comedy that did exactly what it set out to do. It is not however anything that could be analyzed for years due to its indepth storyline, world class acting or sublime postmodern characterization. I think you are completely missing the point with this discussion. I am not saying that you shouldn't treasure it, and you certainly have a personal love for it....which is great.....but don't try putting it on a pedestal next to truly great movies that are considered much more important and think it gives them a run for their money. That was the point i was making. I grew up as a Star Wars fan and was a kid at the time. To me they were my favorite movies, but as i grew up i could see them for what they are. Great movies that entertain, but they are not high art. Just because you love something does not mean any criticism thrown its way is unwarranted. Thats blindly loving something and pretty small minded if you ask me. I love discussing my favorite movies with people and hearing their opinions, and the conversations with ones who are most diametrically opposed to mine tend to the be the most fulfilling as it gives me a different perspective.
Getting back to Ghostbusters and its sequel let me give you an example. I am probably the worlds biggest Blade Runner fan. I have been watching it since it originally came out, have seen it at the cinema on numerous occasions and have watched it thousands of times. Not to mention reading many books on it, watching documentaries on it and even collecting a lot of things from it. Next year we are finally getting a sequel. How do i feel about that? Well it seems to have a lot of great people involved in it and i have high hopes. But heres the thing.........even if it sucks and is a horrible mess, i will still always have the original movie to go back to and enjoy.
Getting back to Ghostbusters and its sequel let me give you an example. I am probably the worlds biggest Blade Runner fan. I have been watching it since it originally came out, have seen it at the cinema on numerous occasions and have watched it thousands of times. Not to mention reading many books on it, watching documentaries on it and even collecting a lot of things from it. Next year we are finally getting a sequel. How do i feel about that? Well it seems to have a lot of great people involved in it and i have high hopes. But heres the thing.........even if it sucks and is a horrible mess, i will still always have the original movie to go back to and enjoy.
Last edited by Mabuse; 07-14-16 at 08:19 PM.
#812
DVD Talk Legend
#813
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
You're not the only one who thought it was awful. A lot of critics that I respect have given it VERY bad reviews.
And here's a great video that really states what I've been saying for months, only maybe presented better...
I wish I had seen that months ago...
(But the points remain valid, maybe even moreso now that the movie is out and many of the assumptions made based on the trailer have apparently turned out to be correct.)
And here's a great video that really states what I've been saying for months, only maybe presented better...
I wish I had seen that months ago...
(But the points remain valid, maybe even moreso now that the movie is out and many of the assumptions made based on the trailer have apparently turned out to be correct.)
Last edited by B5Erik; 07-15-16 at 08:09 AM.
#816
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
I assume it's this post. I appreciate the read!
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/12848669-post748.html
Nicely worded and put together, and I agree with your summation about this particular movie and both "sides" of the coin, especially as someone that also thought voicing legitimate complaints regarding this movie were constantly flipped back to the sexism angle. Even now it's kind of funny to me the lengths people are going to justify the positive and negative critic reviews to support their arguments.
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/12848669-post748.html
Nicely worded and put together, and I agree with your summation about this particular movie and both "sides" of the coin, especially as someone that also thought voicing legitimate complaints regarding this movie were constantly flipped back to the sexism angle. Even now it's kind of funny to me the lengths people are going to justify the positive and negative critic reviews to support their arguments.
#817
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
Can't believe people here are still trying to convince others that it's a bad movie. 
Most critics gave it a thumbs up. Take a deep breath, step away from the keyboard and move on with your life.

Most critics gave it a thumbs up. Take a deep breath, step away from the keyboard and move on with your life.
#818
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
Have you SEEN it? I thought it was bad. I wouldn't fight with someone who said it was "just okay" or "average", but I question anyone who thinks this movie is really good. And you should turn in your "critic" card if you think it's "great." If this film was the FIRST Ghostbusters movie, with no memory about what came before or connection to a prior film(s) it would be gone and forgotten after this weekend...it's coasting on memories of a better movie. It's like an bad cover version of a great tune.
#820
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
With how the pre-release buzz went, the audience rating can fuck off. No way I would ever trust that thing on this movie.
#821
DVD Talk Hero
#822
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
So far, most people think it's fine to pretty good.
#823
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
Personally, the fact this movie is more or less a remake of the original (and much-loved) movie from 1984 and the Director Paul Feig's dismissive attitude of the potential viewing audience are not helping things among moviegoers.
Now, if this movie had been based on the female descendants of the original cast, that would have been a different thing altogether--and would have been a much more interesting movie, too.
Now, if this movie had been based on the female descendants of the original cast, that would have been a different thing altogether--and would have been a much more interesting movie, too.
#824
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
I guarantee, about 90% (or more) of those 1-star or 0/10 reviews on RT and IMDB are coming from those exact same people and types of people; both on Reddit and 4chan. They think "If I just give a bad review, then the whole world will see how bad this movie I haven't seen is!!!"
So yes, the 'user score' on those sites can fuck off.
#825
Member
Re: Ghostbusters (2016, D: Feig)
This is why I avoid those sites. I find most folks on here to be fairly well-adjusted, despite the numerous thread closings (which wasn't warranted, some warnings early on would have nipped it in the bud).




