![]() |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shagrath
(Post 12171691)
But then you look at stuff like Zatoichi that went from a 9 blu-ray set to a 27 disc dual format behemoth.
I don't mind a dual-format if they just throw an extra DVD in there for a single film, but that's friggin' ridiculous. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 12171242)
Anyone still clinging to DVD deserves to get left in the dust. It's 20-fucking-14. Blu-ray had been in the market for eight years, and players have dropped to 10% of the original cost. What more do these luddites need? Fuck 'em.
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
(Post 12171437)
Fuck those people.
"DVD users should be sent to the ovens and purged to make way for the master format." Yeah, great incentive. :gah: |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Yeah, I might hold off on Zatoichi boxset in the hopes that they release a much smaller, BluRay-only version in the future.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Living Deadpan
(Post 12171815)
When most upgrader arguments seem to be "You're an untermensch if you don't upgrade," no wonder people are content to remain so-called Luddites.
"DVD users should be sent to the ovens and purged to make way for the master format." Yeah, great incentive. :gah: My point is simply that we're nearly a decade into Blu-ray. Prices are rock-bottom cheap. I just saw a player for $50, so that's actually 5% of the cost of the first players that came out in 2006. There's no reason not to buy a player (especially if you're the type of person buying movies on discs), since they're all backwards compatible anyway. Disc prices are pretty damn close, and I've even seen a few DVDs that cost more than their BD equivalent. The only excuse is pure stubbornness, which I guess is how it is. People are free to do what they want. I figured Criterion would be the type of studio to make some bold moves in this market, but they're still a little too old-school. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 12171862)
The only excuse is pure stubbornness, which I guess is how it is. People are free to do what they want.
Plus there are people who want to play the movie in a few different places other than their HD-enabled living room (ie. kids rooms, mini-van entertainment system, cottage, etc.). Not everyone can afford to be HD-enabled at all the places they watch their movies. So stubbornness isn't the only reason. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
The Zatoichi set is the only set I complain about being dual format. However, I don't see that even if it were just the nine discs in the set that it would fit on a regular shelf just because of the odd design of the box. Yes, the dvd makes the set thicker but the set itself is longer and oddly shaped in the first place. It is the only Criterion blu ray set that I have that doesn't reside on the shelf with other 150 Criterions bds that I own. All of the rest of the dual format releases sit just fine with me. I wish I had a dvd copy of El Norte without having to go buy another copy.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by 3-2-1 Contact
(Post 12170983)
Finally, a Tati box set! If you haven't given his films a shot yet, do yourselves a favor when this comes out. Timeless work!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
(Post 12172266)
The Zatoichi set is the only set I complain about being dual format. However, I don't see that even if it were just the nine discs in the set that it would fit on a regular shelf just because of the odd design of the box. Yes, the dvd makes the set thicker but the set itself is longer and oddly shaped in the first place. It is the only Criterion blu ray set that I have that doesn't reside on the shelf with other 150 Criterions bds that I own. All of the rest of the dual format releases sit just fine with me. I wish I had a dvd copy of El Norte without having to go buy another copy.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shagrath
(Post 12172489)
But if it wasn't 27 discs, the box probably wouldn't have been designed as such. Luckily, I've got plenty of shelf space as well, so the dual-format stuff hasn't bothered me too much (other than being useless). I did have to move all of the stuff I haven't upgraded to blu yet to another area to avoid doing a complete reorganizing though. As of now, the Criterions take up almost 3 shelves that span the entire wall.
How do you guys organize your Criterions? Do you do it numerically by mixing and matching the clams with the digis? Or do you do them numerically by clams and then follow it up with the digis? I use the latter organizational method. Here is mine and it is spoiled for size. Spoiler:
My Zatoichi set is stored elsewhere due to the previously mentioned size. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I just mix them in with my other blurays and organize them all alphabetically.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
(Post 12172650)
How do you guys organize your Criterions? Do you do it numerically by mixing and matching the clams with the digis? Or do you do them numerically by clams and then follow it up with the digis? I use the latter organizational method.
I have mine sorted strictly by spine number, with dvds in one section, and blu-rays in another. As mentioned, I had to clear up some space (in order to avoid a complete re-org of my entire library), so I moved all the stuff I've yet to upgrade (a lot) to another section of the room. I'm at 540 titles right now between dvd and blu-ray. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
My dvds are not even on this shelf and I actually do not have all of my Criterion dvds together in one place. I still look at Armageddon and The Rock and scratch my head as to why they were even released by Criterion.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
(Post 12172669)
I just mix them in with my other blurays and organize them all alphabetically.
http://cps-static.rovicorp.com/3/JPG...er=allrovi.com |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
All my Criterions are together and shelved numerically. DVDs and BDs are mixed together. If I upgrade a DVD, I just pull it out and slide the BD in its place.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I was just browsing some of my titles on Amazon and I came across this 2004 Criterion gift set.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51WVAP3K55L.jpg I wonder what that cost back in the day? |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Many of my DVDs are organized by director, so I would never keep all my Criterions together.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by BSTNFAN
(Post 12172718)
All my Criterions are together and shelved numerically. DVDs and BDs are mixed together. If I upgrade a DVD, I just pull it out and slide the BD in its place.
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
(Post 12172744)
I was just browsing some of my titles on Amazon and I came across this 2004 Criterion gift set.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51WVAP3K55L.jpg I wonder what that cost back in the day? |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Ok, OCD'ers, enough with your uber sexy ways of organization. I'm sure it drives the females crazy. Let's move on to something else.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 12172755)
I'm sure it drives the females crazy.
So, yes. Yes it does. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Kenny Powers alphabetizes his Criterions.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Guru Askew
(Post 12172769)
Kenny Powers alphabetizes his Criterions.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 12172767)
Well, I mean, my wife did once get really frustrated, saying, "Dammit, Dan. Just tell me where the fuck I can find Dazed & Confused! It's not under the D's, so where the hell is it?!"
So, yes. Yes it does. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Figured I'd throw my pictures up as well. I'll hide 'em in a spoiler, so as not to offend anyone.
Spoiler:
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shagrath
(Post 12172949)
Figured I'd throw my pictures up as well. I'll hide 'em in a spoiler, so as not to offend anyone.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I've only got eight Criterions. I put them together, alphabetically:
Spoiler:
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Jory
(Post 12172958)
I've only got eight Criterions. I put them together, alphabetically:
Spoiler:
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 12172978)
I know it's not supposed to be funny - but compared to Shagrath's collection - I couldn't help but chuckle - you've got a lot of catching up to do ... ;)
My first Criterion dvd was Robocop. I think my first laser-disc was probably Hardboiled or The Killer. So you can tell I've been around for quite some time. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 12172978)
I know it's not supposed to be funny - but compared to Shagrath's collection - I couldn't help but chuckle - you've got a lot of catching up to do ... ;)
My Blu-ray collection is an eclectic mixture of high-brow classics and low-brow crap: Citizen Kane and House of the Dead, Apocalypse Now and The Scorpion King 3, The French Connection and Van Helsing. Just like my bookshelf, where I've got Shakespeare and Hemingway sitting next to movie novelizations and Star Trek tie-ins.
Originally Posted by Shagrath
(Post 12173001)
We all have to start somewhere. :)
My first Criterion dvd was Robocop. I think my first laser-disc was probably Hardboiled or The Killer. So you can tell I've been around for quite some time. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shagrath
(Post 12173001)
We all have to start somewhere. :)
My first Criterion dvd was Robocop. I think my first laser-disc was probably Hardboiled or The Killer. So you can tell I've been around for quite some time. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Jory
(Post 12173006)
I can't be wasting too much time and money on Criterions. There are lots of other classic films that I need to buy, like... Grudge Match and Hollow Man 2. :lol:
My Blu-ray collection is an eclectic mixture of high-brow classics and low-brow crap: Citizen Kane and House of the Dead, Apocalypse Now and The Scorpion King 3, The French Connection and Van Helsing. Just like my bookshelf, where I've got Shakespeare and Hemingway sitting next to movie novelizations and Star Trek tie-ins. I've got all three of those, but sadly not on Criterion. |
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 12173015)
what? no 'White Chicks' ? okay - I admit it, I own that on DVD.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by hanshotfirst1138
(Post 12173024)
I wouldn't share that with too many people ;).
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Ha, I'm about to dump all of my CC laserdisc titles at Amoeba sometime soon.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I keep my CC BDs by the spine number. They're just too classy to sit with my regular BDs.
Regular BDs are by alphabet except by those of a favorite director. They've a seperate section. CC makes that hard for me at times. But I won't mix a favorite director film by CC with the regular BD director section. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I'm looking at a list of every title that's ever been released on Criterion, and I'm amazed at how many I own in other editions:
The Lady Vanishes The Killer Hard Boiled RoboCop Flesh for Frankenstein Blood for Dracula The 39 Steps Monty Python's Life of Brian Carnival of Souls There are too many to list that I've seen but never owned. (Thank you AMC, TCM, and IFC.) So many I'd love to own, and yet I'm too busy buying stuff like Black Dynamite and Destroy All Monsters. Can't deprive myself of my schlock. ;) I considered organizing some of my films by director, but something always fucks that up. I could put Halloween, Escape from New York, The Thing, and In the Mouth of Madness together, but what of Halloween II? Trying to organize Ridley Scott would be impossible: where do you put Prometheus in relation to Alien? I've got the Alien Anthology followed by the three Predator films, then the AVP 2-pack, then Prometheus. Seems as good a placement as any. And I can't very well put my Gladiator Steelbook in with my standard cases for Blade Runner and Robin Hood. And how can I put my Paul W. S. Anderson movies together? The Resident Evil movies need to go together, even the ones he didn't direct, and the Death Race stuff needs to go together, and AVP obviously needs to go with the Alien stuff, and Event Horizon has to sit there by itself because there's no other way, and oh my god I think my head just disappeared up my own ass. -eek- |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Jory
(Post 12173190)
I considered organizing some of my films by director, but something always fucks that up. I could put Halloween, Escape from New York, The Thing, and In the Mouth of Madness together, but what of Halloween II? Trying to organize Ridley Scott would be impossible: where do you put Prometheus in relation to Alien? I've got the Alien Anthology followed by the three Predator films, then the AVP 2-pack, then Prometheus. Seems as good a placement as any. And I can't very well put my Gladiator Steelbook in with my standard cases for Blade Runner and Robin Hood. And how can I put my Paul W. S. Anderson movies together? The Resident Evil movies need to go together, even the ones he didn't direct, and the Death Race stuff needs to go together, and AVP obviously needs to go with the Alien stuff, and Event Horizon has to sit there by itself because there's no other way, and oh my god I think my head just disappeared up my own ass. -eek-
Some directors I keep together, partially. John Carpenter, for instance, I don't always have all his films together but I keep the "Apocalypse Trilogy" in the same area (The Thing, PoD, ITMOM). I keep They Live, The Fog and Halloween in this area too. The "dark films". Since my director subsections are chronological, sometimes I want to keep it "Dark Carpenter" and go from The Fog to The Thing without jutting Escape From New York in between. I keep flip-flopping on my Cronenberg Criterions, though. Sometimes I put them on my Cronenberg shelf, sometimes I put them on my Criterion shelf.
Originally Posted by Jory
(Post 12173190)
Carnival of Souls[/i]
Aside from CARNIVAL & perhaps the 2 Hitchcock films, I think most of the other films in your list have better transfers in their non-Criterion releases (certainly the more recent editions of Life of Brian & Robocop). |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Here's the entire Criterion collection (sans laser discs), in one spot:
https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hpho...38872485_n.jpg |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Living Deadpan
(Post 12173239)
I keep flip-flopping on my Cronenberg Criterions, though. Sometimes I put them on my Cronenberg shelf, sometimes I put them on my Criterion shelf.
Which version do you own? Last I checked aside from Criterion they're all cheapo public domain copies, and the colorized DVDs by Legend Films & Rifftrax. I've been told that the colorized Legend Films discs are actually quite good, since they restore the black and white prints before colorizing them and include both the black and white and color versions. I may upgrade in the future (to another DVD or a Blu-ray... I haven't even bothered looking into the film's Blu-ray availability), but I'm frankly not a big enough fan of Carnival of Souls for it to be high on my priory list. Aside from CARNIVAL & perhaps the 2 Hitchcock films, I think most of the other films in your list have better transfers in their non-Criterion releases (certainly the more recent editions of Life of Brian & Robocop). |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
How I wish Carnival Of Souls would get a Bd upgrade from Criterion...but being a pd title, doesn't seem too likely.
Anyone have any opinions on Pierre Etaix? |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Paul_SD
(Post 12173342)
How I wish Carnival Of Souls would get a Bd upgrade from Criterion...but being a pd title, doesn't seem too likely.
Anyone have any opinions on Pierre Etaix? |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.