![]() |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by chess
(Post 11797659)
I have no idea where the term comes from, didn't coin it and don't "enjoy" using it more than any other positive or negative term. Is there some other term to describe it?
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
First use of term "paywall" I could find on DVDTalk - http://forum.dvdtalk.com/9689855-post329.html
First use in the VG Section - http://forum.dvdtalk.com/11349110-post4165.html First use by a poster in the VG Section - http://forum.dvdtalk.com/11793447-post2976.html So I guess you could pick any of those... provided DVDTalk's search is good anyways... :) So you can blame any of those if you really wanted to. |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 11797673)
Probably nothing else so pithy. You could say "premium subscription requirement" instead though.
Pisser? Or Pissa, as we say around here... :lol: |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by chess
(Post 11797245)
If Valve did go exclusive for either console, which is unlikely IMO, it wouldn't be for a moneyhat but rather for some kind of exclusive publishing agreement that integrates Steam in some way. They hardly need money, and if anything, they compete more directly with Microsoft than they do with Sony.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 11797529)
Okay Dan, I'll play along : Why do you think they'd drop the price and take a loss in the tens of millions of dollars in order to keep packaging the One with the Kinect 2.0? Do you honestly think they'd absorb that kind of loss just to tell developers that every XBO owner actually has a Kinect as well (though it's probably packed away in a box in a closet somewhere)?
Don't you think it makes a little more sense to remove the Kinect from the bundle, sell the system to people for $100 less without costing MS a cent more in production cost and still making the Kinect 2.0 available for purchase for those who change their minds later? Even at the risk of letting publishers know what they already know (that most consumers aren't using the Kinect and that they don't really want it)? No... I think MS will find other ways to reduce the cost of the console by June that will not affect performance. Component prices will go down overall, which is normal for all consoles. Maybe they'll have a 120GB version. Maybe they'll drop the headset from the 4th or 5th batch of consoles. Maybe HDMI IN (and all processing/software/licensing) gets dropped in that theoretical 120GB version. I'm just saying... MS is betting on Kinect in a BIG way, and I just don't think they're going to drop it from their console just to get the price down, when there are other things that can be done to accomplish the same goal without drastically reducing their net revenue per console. I could very will be wrong, and I probably am. But that's my prediction. |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by MoviePage
(Post 11797690)
:lol: Implying that a company won't make decisions based on money because "they already have some" must be the most absurd claim so far in this thread, and that's really saying something.
Valve is a private company, and they care about money, but it's not the most important thing for them. Other way we would already have Half Life 6. :D |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by Raul3
(Post 11797709)
Valve is a private company, and they care about money, but it's not the most important thing for them. Other way we would already have Half Life 6. :D
Valve has also found other ways to maintain revenue streams through their games that don't require pushing out sequels left and right. For example, Dota 2 and Team Fortress 2 are nothing but profit since going F2P. Valve is doing the same for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive which will be announced as F2P tomorrow (for Steam at least, no idea if they'll do the same on the 360 and PS3). |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
My first recollection of seeing the term "paywall", was after the big internet bubble burst and companies started charging for some features because the internet was no longer a magic money machine.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
For what it's worth, I wasn't blaming anyone for the term paywall. I've just seen it used often now on other sites recently to describe Gold subscriptions, which I just thought was weird.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Paywall reminds me of the New York Times.
Premium services reminds me of Porn websites subs. ;) |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
:lol: Who the hell keeps changing the thread title....has to be Groucho.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by MoviePage
(Post 11797690)
:lol: Implying that a company won't make decisions based on money because "they already have some" must be the most absurd claim so far in this thread, and that's really saying something.
I certainly didn't mean that they are somehow above making or taking money, but I'll bet you knew that already. |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by fumanstan
(Post 11797752)
For what it's worth, I wasn't blaming anyone for the term paywall. I've just seen it used often now on other sites recently to describe Gold subscriptions, which I just thought was weird.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by chess
(Post 11797782)
I think I first heard the term either here or on an iOS site I lurk on. It's used in that space to describe that point in a free game where it's really hard to progress without paying.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by chess
(Post 11797780)
What I meant, and shouldn't have to explain, is that they don't need money up front. They aren't beholden to shareholders or a board and are in a position of financial strength where a hatfull of money now isn't likely to be enough to persuade them to give up alternate ongoing revenue streams.
I certainly didn't mean that they are somehow above making or taking money, but I'll bet you knew that already. |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by MoviePage
(Post 11797844)
Of course. It's just that among all the assumptions you're making that essentially boil down to "L4D3 won't be MS exclusive because of reasons in my head," that one stood out to me as the most hilarious.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by discostu1337
(Post 11797824)
I think that scenario is a good use of the term.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
You are like a Philly cheese steak without the steak and bread. ;)
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
I do resent having to pay for Live to use my Netflix. I have a current subscription, but I did let it lapse for a little while and found I couldn't use Netflix. It did piss me off considering you don't pay on PS3. It was doubly annoying because I think at that point the 360 wasn't offering 5.1 audio while the PS3 was.
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by Music
(Post 11797877)
You are like a Philly cheese steak without the steak and bread. ;)
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
:sad:
I don't care... you are Cheesy!!! |
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Cheesy Chester?
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by chess
(Post 11797864)
"Reasons in my head" is a pretty dismissive way of describing the points I actually made. The abridged history is:
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Well, NFL Sunday Ticket is now removed from the PS3. Step 2 is making it Xbox exclusive. If not, I'm going to be pissed that I can't watch it on either system :(
|
Re: Xbox One: We said WHAT at E3??
Originally Posted by bippitty
(Post 11797935)
You left out Newell's complaints about Xbox Live policies stifling updates. I think he even called it a "train wreck".
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.