Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-10 | 11:39 AM
  #426  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Let me see if I understand this correctly: The MIB can't kill candidates and candidates can't kill themselves, but non-candidates can kill candidates and candidates can kill each other. Is that right?

Why was Michael unable to kill himself? Was he a candidate at the time but we just didn't know it?
Old 05-22-10 | 11:46 AM
  #427  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Do I have this right?

Hurley used the numbers to win the lottery. He got the numbers from a guy in the looney bin, and the guy's wife said the numbers were cursed.

The Dharma people put the numbers on the hatch door, and they typed them into the computer every 108 minutes.

Jacob assigned those numbers to some of his candidates.

Is the repeated use of these numbers just mere coincidence? Has it already been explained (and maybe I just don't remember) or are we still hoping for an explanation in the finale?

Last edited by Joe Schmoe; 05-22-10 at 11:56 AM.
Old 05-22-10 | 11:47 AM
  #428  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,233
Received 1,469 Likes on 1,144 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by whotony
It wasn't greatly or barely implied to me.
and unless it was mentioned on other boards I never would have thought it.
I think he was joking. I hope he was joking.
Old 05-22-10 | 12:08 PM
  #429  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 14,449
Likes: 0
Received 294 Likes on 223 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by Joe Schmoe
Let me see if I understand this correctly: The MIB can't kill candidates and candidates can't kill themselves, but non-candidates can kill candidates and candidates can kill each other. Is that right?

Why was Michael unable to kill himself? Was he a candidate at the time but we just didn't know it?
I don't know. I don't think Michael not being able to kill himself had anything to do with being a candidate. I think it had to do with the will of the island not allowing him to kill himself. Maybe the island's will and Jacob's will are one and the same and I'm totally lost but who knows.
Old 05-22-10 | 01:56 PM
  #430  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Once again, I think most of the frustration that people are feeling with this show comes from their desire to fit everything that's happened on the series as a whole into logical flowcharts and provable scientific equations that make perfect sense.

"THIS happened in season 1, and THIS happened in season 2, therefore it doesn't make sense that THIS was the result in season 6! *stomp*"

This show just doesn't work that way. It has greatly evolved over the years, and each season seems to work best within its own particular rules and logic. I'm not saying that I'm anywhere near fully satisfied with the conclusions that are coming up, or even the direction that some characters have moved in (or non-direction, hi Kate!), but I prefer to enjoy what's happening on the show now rather than make sure page 79, line 4 of my clue notebook can be reconciled with page 3, line 8.
Old 05-22-10 | 03:09 PM
  #431  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So Cal
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/di3w1yV4Ehg&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/di3w1yV4Ehg&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
Old 05-22-10 | 03:32 PM
  #432  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 12,298
Received 81 Likes on 70 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

::
Old 05-22-10 | 05:07 PM
  #433  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by MoviePage
Once again, I think most of the frustration that people are feeling with this show comes from their desire to fit everything that's happened on the series as a whole into logical flowcharts and provable scientific equations that make perfect sense.

"THIS happened in season 1, and THIS happened in season 2, therefore it doesn't make sense that THIS was the result in season 6! *stomp*"

This show just doesn't work that way. It has greatly evolved over the years, and each season seems to work best within its own particular rules and logic. I'm not saying that I'm anywhere near fully satisfied with the conclusions that are coming up, or even the direction that some characters have moved in (or non-direction, hi Kate!), but I prefer to enjoy what's happening on the show now rather than make sure page 79, line 4 of my clue notebook can be reconciled with page 3, line 8.
I think you're conflating science and logic. I think only a fool would be looking for a plausible scientific explanation for what has gone on. I think only a fool would excuse the lack of an ending that is logically satisfying, though. This is one show. There is no excuse for there to be different "rules" for each season, particularly over the last half of the series. This is just more excuse making for hack charlatans who had every opportunity to make something much more satisfying than it would appear they did.
Old 05-22-10 | 06:01 PM
  #434  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,233
Received 1,469 Likes on 1,144 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by Aphex Twin
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/di3w1yV4Ehg&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/di3w1yV4Ehg&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
"I f**** your son's dog."
"What?
Old 05-22-10 | 06:02 PM
  #435  
DarkestPhoenix's Avatar
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by HE Pennypacker
She was not. Her purpose was likely merely giving birth to Aaron, who I'm convinced was initially meant to play a huge part while the writers were making up things as they progressed. The discussion about the psychic and his predictions may lend some support to Aaron's ultimate importance at one time for the writers.
Wrong. She was candidate 313, a tidbit I only remember due to the fact that I have an affinity for this particular number. MIB lied to her and Kate about not being candidates....dunno why. Or, maybe, he meant no longer active candidates.

http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Cand...own_candidates
Old 05-22-10 | 08:56 PM
  #436  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Anytown, U.S.A.
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by Jimmy James
I think you're conflating science and logic. I think only a fool would be looking for a plausible scientific explanation for what has gone on. I think only a fool would excuse the lack of an ending that is logically satisfying, though. This is one show. There is no excuse for there to be different "rules" for each season, particularly over the last half of the series. This is just more excuse making for hack charlatans who had every opportunity to make something much more satisfying than it would appear they did.
Agreed, fully.
Old 05-22-10 | 09:03 PM
  #437  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,925
Received 2,322 Likes on 1,444 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by DarkestPhoenix
Wrong. She was candidate 313, a tidbit I only remember due to the fact that I have an affinity for this particular number. MIB lied to her and Kate about not being candidates....dunno why. Or, maybe, he meant no longer active candidates.

http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Cand...own_candidates
Or the writers forgot. Which seems more likely.
Old 05-22-10 | 10:54 PM
  #438  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by Jimmy James
I think you're conflating science and logic. I think only a fool would be looking for a plausible scientific explanation for what has gone on. I think only a fool would excuse the lack of an ending that is logically satisfying, though. This is one show. There is no excuse for there to be different "rules" for each season, particularly over the last half of the series. This is just more excuse making for hack charlatans who had every opportunity to make something much more satisfying than it would appear they did.
That's the thing though - I am pretty much satisfied at this point. So are many others.

Also, we haven't seen an ending yet, so we don't know whether it's satisfying or if it needs any excuses. I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
Old 05-23-10 | 02:22 AM
  #439  
DarkestPhoenix's Avatar
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,246
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by moviepage
that's the thing though - i am pretty much satisfied at this point. So are many others.

Also, we haven't seen an ending yet, so we don't know whether it's satisfying or if it needs any excuses. I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
qft
Old 05-23-10 | 05:40 AM
  #440  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by MoviePage
That's the thing though - I am pretty much satisfied at this point. So are many others.

Also, we haven't seen an ending yet, so we don't know whether it's satisfying or if it needs any excuses. I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
Truth. There are people who get their rocks off being negative.
Old 05-23-10 | 06:29 AM
  #441  
ATX
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

regarding this episode

let's remember that Ben "always has a plan"

i assume Ben giving Miles a 2 way radio had some significance
Old 05-23-10 | 07:56 AM
  #442  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
Truth. There are people who get their rocks off being negative.
There are also people who intend to hold the creators to their statements circa the time when the length of the series was set and expect a conclusion that does not jerk us around Alias or X-Files style. It's not a particularly high bar. I've never demanded any of the really trivial answers like who shot at the outrigger.

I'm the sort of guy who is pissed that they gave us an episode that was even titled in a way that made it clear we should expect significant exploration of the Linus-Widmore relationship, yet we have dick there. No excuse for that. No excuse.
Old 05-23-10 | 09:39 AM
  #443  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Whatever happened to Christian's body on the island? Assuming Oceanic didn't ship an empty coffin, shouldn't his body have been found at some point?
Old 05-23-10 | 09:57 AM
  #444  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Anytown, U.S.A.
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by MoviePage
I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
And there will also be plenty of people watching tonight that will eat up anything the hacks will give them. They've already seemingly decided that the finale will be awesome, because hey, it's Lost.
Old 05-23-10 | 10:03 AM
  #445  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by Joe Schmoe
Whatever happened to Christian's body on the island? Assuming Oceanic didn't ship an empty coffin, shouldn't his body have been found at some point?
I've had a way out theory for quite some time that Jack used to be on the island as a baby (dunno if you saw when I posted it before...I think I posted it early on in this thread) and that Christian was a central figure on the island at some point in the past, at some point our Losties did not flash to in season five.

The fact that his body seemed to have disappeared in both realities when the plane went over the island whether it was under the water or not has to be leading to some big reveal in the final episode. I don't know if he was on the island in the past, but considering how the candidates were flashed off the Ajira flight it's perhaps a clue when Jack and his father's corpse were apparently flashed off of the Oceanic flight.

I can't think of any clues up until now that would suggest this theory is correct...so that's why I consider it very out there. But they really haven't fed us too many clues why Christian's body disappears in both timelines.
Old 05-23-10 | 10:16 AM
  #446  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by kstublen
I don't know if it's been mentioned before, but I have a feeling that Desmond is the one that has to go into the light at the center of the island. I don't know exactly what effect it will have on the island, the two realities, or the Man in Black, but I think its inevitable that he will be the one to go into the light. One possibil
I never considered that before, but I think you are spot on. I did consider Desmond would use the electromagnetic properties to change something in the past, whether it be stopping the bomb from going off or stopping Jacob from influencing the Losties, but I never considered he would go into the source.

I don't know if this has been mentioned or not, but TVGuide.com had ten questions they wanted answered in the series finale and at the top of the list was (of course) the sideways timeline. I loved a theory they threw out there...I think it sticks better than anything we have come up with...and that's Eloise is somehow responsible for the reset and that's why she's the only one who knows about both timelines in the reset/sideways timeline. But how would she get to the island in the finale? I think somehow she does, though.



Originally Posted by kstublen
I don't think the lighthouse was just a way for Jacob to watch people in the real world. I think it was a way to observe and interact. When he stands in front of the mirror it projects an image of him to wherever the mirror is currently set. obviously there is still some sort of magic involved here (a pure image probably couldn't give Sawyer a pencil or hand Jack a candy bar), but I think the lighthouse was more than just a tool of observation.
Interesting idea! Gee, if only they touched on this in "Across the Sea." I wonder if we will get a full answer to this in the finale.

---

Originally Posted by kstublen
I didn't read the long thread for "Across the Sea," but I think there is an obvious parallel between Jacob protecting the light and John Locke/Desmond/Dharma Initiative pressing the button. All of them are doing something because they were told to without fully understanding the reason behind it. Turns out pushing the button was important and not just some sick experiment, and I'm sure protecting the light is important too, but we don't know the real reason yet.
I think the hatch/pushing the button was actually protecting the source of the light. If Desmond didn't turn the fail safe key I think the island would have been destroyed. And I think that's what we are going to see happen in the finale...somebody (MIB, perhaps, or maybe even Eloise or Desmond or Jack...those are the only people I can see pulling it off) will find a way to get to the source of the light to use it to destroy the island. But I don't think it will destroy the light itself...my theory is that the light itself cannot be destroyed. It may just displace to a different part of the world, hidden again until the cycle starts all over again.

Originally Posted by kstublen
I think I saw someone speculate that perhaps Aaron is the Man in Black? I don't see how that is even remotely possible.
Neither do I. I've been terribly busy over the last several days (moving) so I don't know how the theory of David being MIB went over, but I do hope there is a happy ending for MIB and he does get off the island and gets to lead the life he always wanted. Thinking more about it, him becoming David is the best way for him to achieve this goal.

Originally Posted by kstublen
I don't think there is any way for them to wrap up all of the outstanding questions and mysteries in two and a half hours, but that doesn't mean it won't be a good episode and a satisfying conclusion. I don't buy for a second though that the creative minds behind Lost had all of this in mind all along.
I will always think they had the broad strokes in mind, but the details in the pudding? There's no way they had everything mapped out early on. And I think the finale will be good and satisfying. I think it will piss people off, but that's inevitable with something with this much hype behind it. All along, I've been on board for the ride and the ride only. I know in the past year I've gotten more deep into the theories of what's going to happen, but even if they go in a completely different direction than I expected I trust it will be a thrilling direction.
Old 05-23-10 | 10:23 AM
  #447  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,488
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by calhoun07
I've had a way out theory for quite some time that Jack used to be on the island as a baby (dunno if you saw when I posted it before...I think I posted it early on in this thread) and that Christian was a central figure on the island at some point in the past, at some point our Losties did not flash to in season five.

The fact that his body seemed to have disappeared in both realities when the plane went over the island whether it was under the water or not has to be leading to some big reveal in the final episode. I don't know if he was on the island in the past, but considering how the candidates were flashed off the Ajira flight it's perhaps a clue when Jack and his father's corpse were apparently flashed off of the Oceanic flight.

I can't think of any clues up until now that would suggest this theory is correct...so that's why I consider it very out there. But they really haven't fed us too many clues why Christian's body disappears in both timelines.
Hmm. But what about Sun? She didn't flash off flight 316 and she was a candidate. Neither did Frank, and last night's enhanced repeat of the pilot episode said he was a candidate at some point, which is why he was drawn to the island twice--first as Widmore's chopper pilot and then as the captain of fllight 316.

Plus, this season the MIB told Jack he was impersonating Christian when Jack chased him through the jungle in Season 1. I thought the MIB was able to do this only because he found Christian's unburied body. I thought this step was necessary for the MIB to appear as others (he found Yemi's unburied body and appeared as Yemi to Eko; he found Locke's unburied body and now appears as Locke; etc.). If this is how it works, then that means the MIB found Christian's body. The question remains: what did he do with it?
Old 05-23-10 | 10:33 AM
  #448  
ATX
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by Joe Schmoe
Whatever happened to Christian's body on the island? Assuming Oceanic didn't ship an empty coffin, shouldn't his body have been found at some point?
MIB stole Christian and Yemi's body... he must have hid em somewhere because once he start looking like em, they were nowhere to be found

Lockes body was retrieved and buried by ilana and them, meanwhile MIB is stuck as Locke

is there a correlation between MIB being stuck as Locke in human form and the fact that we know where his body is? hmm
Old 05-23-10 | 10:54 AM
  #449  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,200
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

The Man in Black can look like anyone who you remember from your past. Richard's wife's body was not on the island, neither were the people that Eco saw on the island that he killed in Africa. I assume that he can look like anyone that you have "stored in your head" after the MIB reads you.
Old 05-23-10 | 10:59 AM
  #450  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10

Originally Posted by Joe Schmoe
Hmm. But what about Sun? She didn't flash off flight 316 and she was a candidate. Neither did Frank, and last night's enhanced repeat of the pilot episode said he was a candidate at some point, which is why he was drawn to the island twice--first as Widmore's chopper pilot and then as the captain of fllight 316.

Plus, this season the MIB told Jack he was impersonating Christian when Jack chased him through the jungle in Season 1. I thought the MIB was able to do this only because he found Christian's unburied body. I thought this step was necessary for the MIB to appear as others (he found Yemi's unburied body and appeared as Yemi to Eko; he found Locke's unburied body and now appears as Locke; etc.). If this is how it works, then that means the MIB found Christian's body. The question remains: what did he do with it?
True...that's why I said it was "out there" because I was thinking of the holes in the theory as well. It's probably the most off the wall theory I've come up with, but at the very least I need an explanation by the time this wraps up on why Jack was apparently flashed off the plane in season one. He woke up in the same bamboo field in both instances of Oceanic and Ajira...there has to be a reason.

And if the island is destroyed in alt 2004 and apparently MIB is either dead or free of the island, why does Christian's body again disappear? There may be more to it than "he was on the island before" but I do think it will lead to a big reveal in tonight's episode.

As for why Sun may not have been taken off the plane...perhaps because Jin wasn't with her? Perhaps the island needed both of them together and considered both of them one candidate? Married people being viewed as one in union goes back centuries...it wouldn't be a new concept for the show.

And I must have been missing something...I totally missed Lapedius being a candidate. I'm not disagreeing with you...it's just proof there's a few details I missed out on.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.