Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
#426
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Let me see if I understand this correctly: The MIB can't kill candidates and candidates can't kill themselves, but non-candidates can kill candidates and candidates can kill each other. Is that right?
Why was Michael unable to kill himself? Was he a candidate at the time but we just didn't know it?
Why was Michael unable to kill himself? Was he a candidate at the time but we just didn't know it?
#427
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Do I have this right?
Hurley used the numbers to win the lottery. He got the numbers from a guy in the looney bin, and the guy's wife said the numbers were cursed.
The Dharma people put the numbers on the hatch door, and they typed them into the computer every 108 minutes.
Jacob assigned those numbers to some of his candidates.
Is the repeated use of these numbers just mere coincidence? Has it already been explained (and maybe I just don't remember) or are we still hoping for an explanation in the finale?
Hurley used the numbers to win the lottery. He got the numbers from a guy in the looney bin, and the guy's wife said the numbers were cursed.
The Dharma people put the numbers on the hatch door, and they typed them into the computer every 108 minutes.
Jacob assigned those numbers to some of his candidates.
Is the repeated use of these numbers just mere coincidence? Has it already been explained (and maybe I just don't remember) or are we still hoping for an explanation in the finale?
Last edited by Joe Schmoe; 05-22-10 at 11:56 AM.
#428
DVD Talk Hero
#429
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Let me see if I understand this correctly: The MIB can't kill candidates and candidates can't kill themselves, but non-candidates can kill candidates and candidates can kill each other. Is that right?
Why was Michael unable to kill himself? Was he a candidate at the time but we just didn't know it?
Why was Michael unable to kill himself? Was he a candidate at the time but we just didn't know it?
#430
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Once again, I think most of the frustration that people are feeling with this show comes from their desire to fit everything that's happened on the series as a whole into logical flowcharts and provable scientific equations that make perfect sense.
"THIS happened in season 1, and THIS happened in season 2, therefore it doesn't make sense that THIS was the result in season 6! *stomp*"
This show just doesn't work that way. It has greatly evolved over the years, and each season seems to work best within its own particular rules and logic. I'm not saying that I'm anywhere near fully satisfied with the conclusions that are coming up, or even the direction that some characters have moved in (or non-direction, hi Kate!), but I prefer to enjoy what's happening on the show now rather than make sure page 79, line 4 of my clue notebook can be reconciled with page 3, line 8.
"THIS happened in season 1, and THIS happened in season 2, therefore it doesn't make sense that THIS was the result in season 6! *stomp*"
This show just doesn't work that way. It has greatly evolved over the years, and each season seems to work best within its own particular rules and logic. I'm not saying that I'm anywhere near fully satisfied with the conclusions that are coming up, or even the direction that some characters have moved in (or non-direction, hi Kate!), but I prefer to enjoy what's happening on the show now rather than make sure page 79, line 4 of my clue notebook can be reconciled with page 3, line 8.
#431
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: So Cal
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/di3w1yV4Ehg&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/di3w1yV4Ehg&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
#433
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Once again, I think most of the frustration that people are feeling with this show comes from their desire to fit everything that's happened on the series as a whole into logical flowcharts and provable scientific equations that make perfect sense.
"THIS happened in season 1, and THIS happened in season 2, therefore it doesn't make sense that THIS was the result in season 6! *stomp*"
This show just doesn't work that way. It has greatly evolved over the years, and each season seems to work best within its own particular rules and logic. I'm not saying that I'm anywhere near fully satisfied with the conclusions that are coming up, or even the direction that some characters have moved in (or non-direction, hi Kate!), but I prefer to enjoy what's happening on the show now rather than make sure page 79, line 4 of my clue notebook can be reconciled with page 3, line 8.
"THIS happened in season 1, and THIS happened in season 2, therefore it doesn't make sense that THIS was the result in season 6! *stomp*"
This show just doesn't work that way. It has greatly evolved over the years, and each season seems to work best within its own particular rules and logic. I'm not saying that I'm anywhere near fully satisfied with the conclusions that are coming up, or even the direction that some characters have moved in (or non-direction, hi Kate!), but I prefer to enjoy what's happening on the show now rather than make sure page 79, line 4 of my clue notebook can be reconciled with page 3, line 8.
#434
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/di3w1yV4Ehg&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/di3w1yV4Ehg&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
"What?
#435
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
She was not. Her purpose was likely merely giving birth to Aaron, who I'm convinced was initially meant to play a huge part while the writers were making up things as they progressed. The discussion about the psychic and his predictions may lend some support to Aaron's ultimate importance at one time for the writers.
http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Cand...own_candidates
#436
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
I think you're conflating science and logic. I think only a fool would be looking for a plausible scientific explanation for what has gone on. I think only a fool would excuse the lack of an ending that is logically satisfying, though. This is one show. There is no excuse for there to be different "rules" for each season, particularly over the last half of the series. This is just more excuse making for hack charlatans who had every opportunity to make something much more satisfying than it would appear they did.
#437
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Wrong. She was candidate 313, a tidbit I only remember due to the fact that I have an affinity for this particular number. MIB lied to her and Kate about not being candidates....dunno why. Or, maybe, he meant no longer active candidates.
http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Cand...own_candidates
http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Cand...own_candidates
#438
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
I think you're conflating science and logic. I think only a fool would be looking for a plausible scientific explanation for what has gone on. I think only a fool would excuse the lack of an ending that is logically satisfying, though. This is one show. There is no excuse for there to be different "rules" for each season, particularly over the last half of the series. This is just more excuse making for hack charlatans who had every opportunity to make something much more satisfying than it would appear they did.
Also, we haven't seen an ending yet, so we don't know whether it's satisfying or if it needs any excuses. I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
#439
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
that's the thing though - i am pretty much satisfied at this point. So are many others.
Also, we haven't seen an ending yet, so we don't know whether it's satisfying or if it needs any excuses. I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
Also, we haven't seen an ending yet, so we don't know whether it's satisfying or if it needs any excuses. I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
#440
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
That's the thing though - I am pretty much satisfied at this point. So are many others.
Also, we haven't seen an ending yet, so we don't know whether it's satisfying or if it needs any excuses. I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
Also, we haven't seen an ending yet, so we don't know whether it's satisfying or if it needs any excuses. I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
#442
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
There are also people who intend to hold the creators to their statements circa the time when the length of the series was set and expect a conclusion that does not jerk us around Alias or X-Files style. It's not a particularly high bar. I've never demanded any of the really trivial answers like who shot at the outrigger.
I'm the sort of guy who is pissed that they gave us an episode that was even titled in a way that made it clear we should expect significant exploration of the Linus-Widmore relationship, yet we have dick there. No excuse for that. No excuse.
I'm the sort of guy who is pissed that they gave us an episode that was even titled in a way that made it clear we should expect significant exploration of the Linus-Widmore relationship, yet we have dick there. No excuse for that. No excuse.
#443
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Whatever happened to Christian's body on the island? Assuming Oceanic didn't ship an empty coffin, shouldn't his body have been found at some point?
#444
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
I can imagine, however, that there will be plenty of people watching tomorrow night with their keyboards poised in front of them, fingers ready to strike at those hack charlatans at a moment's notice. I'd rather just try to enjoy the final episode of what has been, for the most part, a brilliant, moving, and unique show, the likes of which we probably won't see again.
#445
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
The fact that his body seemed to have disappeared in both realities when the plane went over the island whether it was under the water or not has to be leading to some big reveal in the final episode. I don't know if he was on the island in the past, but considering how the candidates were flashed off the Ajira flight it's perhaps a clue when Jack and his father's corpse were apparently flashed off of the Oceanic flight.
I can't think of any clues up until now that would suggest this theory is correct...so that's why I consider it very out there. But they really haven't fed us too many clues why Christian's body disappears in both timelines.
#446
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
I don't know if it's been mentioned before, but I have a feeling that Desmond is the one that has to go into the light at the center of the island. I don't know exactly what effect it will have on the island, the two realities, or the Man in Black, but I think its inevitable that he will be the one to go into the light. One possibil
I don't know if this has been mentioned or not, but TVGuide.com had ten questions they wanted answered in the series finale and at the top of the list was (of course) the sideways timeline. I loved a theory they threw out there...I think it sticks better than anything we have come up with...and that's Eloise is somehow responsible for the reset and that's why she's the only one who knows about both timelines in the reset/sideways timeline. But how would she get to the island in the finale? I think somehow she does, though.
I don't think the lighthouse was just a way for Jacob to watch people in the real world. I think it was a way to observe and interact. When he stands in front of the mirror it projects an image of him to wherever the mirror is currently set. obviously there is still some sort of magic involved here (a pure image probably couldn't give Sawyer a pencil or hand Jack a candy bar), but I think the lighthouse was more than just a tool of observation.
---
I didn't read the long thread for "Across the Sea," but I think there is an obvious parallel between Jacob protecting the light and John Locke/Desmond/Dharma Initiative pressing the button. All of them are doing something because they were told to without fully understanding the reason behind it. Turns out pushing the button was important and not just some sick experiment, and I'm sure protecting the light is important too, but we don't know the real reason yet.
I don't think there is any way for them to wrap up all of the outstanding questions and mysteries in two and a half hours, but that doesn't mean it won't be a good episode and a satisfying conclusion. I don't buy for a second though that the creative minds behind Lost had all of this in mind all along.
#447
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
I've had a way out theory for quite some time that Jack used to be on the island as a baby (dunno if you saw when I posted it before...I think I posted it early on in this thread) and that Christian was a central figure on the island at some point in the past, at some point our Losties did not flash to in season five.
The fact that his body seemed to have disappeared in both realities when the plane went over the island whether it was under the water or not has to be leading to some big reveal in the final episode. I don't know if he was on the island in the past, but considering how the candidates were flashed off the Ajira flight it's perhaps a clue when Jack and his father's corpse were apparently flashed off of the Oceanic flight.
I can't think of any clues up until now that would suggest this theory is correct...so that's why I consider it very out there. But they really haven't fed us too many clues why Christian's body disappears in both timelines.
The fact that his body seemed to have disappeared in both realities when the plane went over the island whether it was under the water or not has to be leading to some big reveal in the final episode. I don't know if he was on the island in the past, but considering how the candidates were flashed off the Ajira flight it's perhaps a clue when Jack and his father's corpse were apparently flashed off of the Oceanic flight.
I can't think of any clues up until now that would suggest this theory is correct...so that's why I consider it very out there. But they really haven't fed us too many clues why Christian's body disappears in both timelines.
Plus, this season the MIB told Jack he was impersonating Christian when Jack chased him through the jungle in Season 1. I thought the MIB was able to do this only because he found Christian's unburied body. I thought this step was necessary for the MIB to appear as others (he found Yemi's unburied body and appeared as Yemi to Eko; he found Locke's unburied body and now appears as Locke; etc.). If this is how it works, then that means the MIB found Christian's body. The question remains: what did he do with it?
#448
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Lockes body was retrieved and buried by ilana and them, meanwhile MIB is stuck as Locke
is there a correlation between MIB being stuck as Locke in human form and the fact that we know where his body is? hmm
#449
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
The Man in Black can look like anyone who you remember from your past. Richard's wife's body was not on the island, neither were the people that Eco saw on the island that he killed in Africa. I assume that he can look like anyone that you have "stored in your head" after the MIB reads you.
#450
Re: Lost -- "What They Died For" -- 18.05.10
Hmm. But what about Sun? She didn't flash off flight 316 and she was a candidate. Neither did Frank, and last night's enhanced repeat of the pilot episode said he was a candidate at some point, which is why he was drawn to the island twice--first as Widmore's chopper pilot and then as the captain of fllight 316.
Plus, this season the MIB told Jack he was impersonating Christian when Jack chased him through the jungle in Season 1. I thought the MIB was able to do this only because he found Christian's unburied body. I thought this step was necessary for the MIB to appear as others (he found Yemi's unburied body and appeared as Yemi to Eko; he found Locke's unburied body and now appears as Locke; etc.). If this is how it works, then that means the MIB found Christian's body. The question remains: what did he do with it?
Plus, this season the MIB told Jack he was impersonating Christian when Jack chased him through the jungle in Season 1. I thought the MIB was able to do this only because he found Christian's unburied body. I thought this step was necessary for the MIB to appear as others (he found Yemi's unburied body and appeared as Yemi to Eko; he found Locke's unburied body and now appears as Locke; etc.). If this is how it works, then that means the MIB found Christian's body. The question remains: what did he do with it?
And if the island is destroyed in alt 2004 and apparently MIB is either dead or free of the island, why does Christian's body again disappear? There may be more to it than "he was on the island before" but I do think it will lead to a big reveal in tonight's episode.
As for why Sun may not have been taken off the plane...perhaps because Jin wasn't with her? Perhaps the island needed both of them together and considered both of them one candidate? Married people being viewed as one in union goes back centuries...it wouldn't be a new concept for the show.
And I must have been missing something...I totally missed Lapedius being a candidate. I'm not disagreeing with you...it's just proof there's a few details I missed out on.




: