![]() |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Timber
(Post 14509675)
That's the problem with the whole "toxic fandom" argument. Put out good stuff and we'll eat it up. How toxic where we with Mando? They're too busy courting every other audience then what made this a franchise and don't seem to understand why fans are angry.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Noonan
(Post 14509683)
You can both court other audiences and put out good stuff. The two are not mutually exclusive.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Timber
(Post 14509688)
And yet they're forgetting the mutual part.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14509375)
I dare say that Star Wars is likely unsalvageable. Disney will only churn out
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by MisterMike
(Post 14510104)
It might be unsalvageable. The sequels weren’t all bad but there wasn’t enough good in there to keep that flame lit as they say. I’m sort of burned out myself on Star Wars. I love the franchise as a whole but it feels like enough is enough. I prefer they just do quality shows here and there that look to fill some gaps or whatever. Outside of that, movies that take place post sequels or feature Rey? Nah, I’m out. I dont even know how executed I’d be about more origin stories from the early years. Why do I care? I have the decent prequels, the amazing originals and rogue one to scratch the movie itch. Plus a few good shows.
If we want to explore the Force more, better flesh out the real-world concepts taken from Taoism and Buddhism. Add in Indigenous beliefs or even Bahai'i. Pull characters from relatable backgrounds that we have now, like courier/delivery driver, office worker, LGBTQ, POC, freelancer, migrant worker, garbage disposal, and so on. Focus on a simple good versus evil story without "plot twists". I've said it before, but I think Star Wars has essentially "folded in on itself" and new Star Wars stories no longer draw from real world sources for inspiration, they draw from other Star Wars, to the franchise's detriment. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14510224)
In my ideal Star Wars universe, we stop worrying about "lore" and explaining things and go back to embracing some mystery. We pull from classic films and history again. Update the "Wars" part to reflect the Cold War or GWOT. Take from 80s films (like Hong Kong action or even slashers), Bollywood, Soviet cinema, James Bond, whatever.
If we want to explore the Force more, better flesh out the real-world concepts taken from Taoism and Buddhism. Add in Indigenous beliefs or even Bahai'i. Pull characters from relatable backgrounds that we have now, like courier/delivery driver, office worker, LGBTQ, POC, freelancer, migrant worker, garbage disposal, and so on. Focus on a simple good versus evil story without "plot twists". I've said it before, but I think Star Wars has essentially "folded in on itself" and new Star Wars stories no longer draw from real world sources for inspiration, they draw from other Star Wars, to the franchise's detriment. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
The quality doesn't come from what the story is about, it comes from how well that story is told.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Maybe I have a different definition of "lore" but I would say their avoidance of getting into the lore of the world in lieu of shoving SKYWALKER SKYWALKER SKYWALKER down our throats IS the problem. They are forsaking the lore and mystery of the world for 'member berries.
Rogue One, Andor, the first seasons of The Mandalorian . . . all NOT "the family" story lines. All focused on the WORLD of Star Wars. Hell, I will even toss Rebels in there, up to a point. I remember taking serious umbrage with a podcast that I usually like because one of the hosts believed Rogue One was bad because it made the world smaller by going back and focusing on "that point in time." I strenuously object . . . it is actually quite the opposite. Rogue One opened up the world by showing us there is a galactic war going on, not a 23-And-Me kit gone bad. More Skywalker is a bore, not lore. Exploring the world is lore building. I have no qualm saying I found the premise to The Acolyte to be phenomenal and promising . . . I was hoping for something that would turn the galaxy on its head. It had the potential, it had the bones of the story . . . then it was bungled beyond belief. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Was this the Daisy Ridley movie? Looks like it's dead with the focus on the new Kinberg movies in development.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14510874)
Was this the Daisy Ridley movie? Looks like it's dead with the focus on the new Kinberg movies in development.
https://variety.com/2024/film/news/s...-6-1236211852/ Disney has removed an untitled “Star Wars” film previously scheduled for Dec. 18, 2026 from its release calendar. “Ice Age 6” will move into its spot. While it was never confirmed exactly what this project would be, Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy was previously announced as the director of an upcoming “Star Wars” film following Daisy Ridley’s Rey after the events of 2019’s “Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker.” The film lost screenwriter Steven Knight earlier this year (after Damon Lindelof and Justin Britt-Gibson previously departed the project). ...Another untitled “Star Wars” film remains on the slate for Dec. 17, 2027. Elsewhere in a galaxy far, far away, Lucasfilm revealed last week that “X-Men” alum Simon Kinberg would write and produce a new trilogy with Kennedy. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
It sounds like they can't even get scripts written and approved, so it shouldn't be surprising that they're being yanked from the schedule.
Probably not a good idea to schedule a new Star Wars movie for two years from now when they can't even figure out what it's going to be about. I'm guessing that the Mandalorian one is still a go since they already have an established director, writer, cast and some sense of what it will be. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 14510926)
I'm guessing that the Mandalorian one is still a go since they already have an established director, writer, cast and some sense of what it will be.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Cellar Door
(Post 14509636)
Call me crazy, but I think if they actually made a new Star Wars project with a good script, there would be less criticism. Imagine that! A good script would respect the existing lore, and expand upon it. Let me know when Star Wars makes something that's actually good and the fans hate it and tear it apart. I haven't seen that happen yet.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
The main thing I’ve hated with the Disney Star Wars properties is bringing back deceased characters (and I don’t mean a force ghost appearance).
I think it cheapens the character’s death in the previous movie scene. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Let the franchise rest. Release the Mandalorian film and wait a decade. Let the foul stench of Disney/Kennedy Star Wars waft away. Take some time to build characters and storylines, expand the universe, plot it out, have a real plan and take the time to develop it. Drop tantalizing hints here and there about what's coming, but don't look back. Don't bring back Rey. Don't bring back ANYONE. Make it all new. Set it 2000 years AFTER The Battle of Yavin. And Baba Booey to you all.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Rey will be back. Bet on it.
The Rey re-enactors that they have walking around the Disney parks are apparently some of the most popular, especially with the younger set. She has more appeal than folks think |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 14511283)
Let the franchise rest. Release the Mandalorian film and wait a decade.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 14511536)
Rey will be back. Bet on it.
The Rey re-enactors that they have walking around the Disney parks are apparently some of the most popular, especially with the younger set. She has more appeal than folks think I don’t doubt her popularity though because she’s part of the newest films and a lot of the Disney park crowd is younger kids and families. I was just at Galaxy’s Edge earlier in the year with my wife and still had fun but did wish there was more of a balance between the eras of Star Wars. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Rey is far from Star Wars' biggest problem these days.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 14511683)
I mean considering the fact that the parks exclusively focus on the sequels I don’t think that’s the most fair way to gauge it.
I don’t doubt her popularity though because she’s part of the newest films and a lot of the Disney park crowd is younger kids and families. I was just at Galaxy’s Edge earlier in the year with my wife and still had fun but did wish there was more of a balance between the eras of Star Wars. Remix, reuse, and repurpose a bunch of stuff from the OT, put a bland Disney princess in the lead, drop some of the older characters into the mix to satisfy the older fans, then unceremoniously kill off the old characters to get them out of the way. Hire J.J. Abrams fresh of Star Trek to do to Star Wars what he did to that franchise. You can even see Disney doing this with the post-Phase III MCU, introducing in all of these Mark 2.0 versions of the original characters as a sort of soft reboot. |
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by MLBFan24
(Post 14511110)
The main thing I’ve hated with the Disney Star Wars properties is bringing back deceased characters (and I don’t mean a force ghost appearance).
I think it cheapens the character’s death in the previous movie scene.
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 14511536)
Rey will be back. Bet on it.
The Rey re-enactors that they have walking around the Disney parks are apparently some of the most popular, especially with the younger set. She has more appeal than folks think
Originally Posted by TGM
(Post 14511719)
Rey is far from Star Wars' biggest problem these days.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by MisterMike
(Post 14511811)
Amen to this. Palpatines bull shit "somehow he returned" is what buried the sequels for me and they were hanging on by a thread as it was when I got to rise of Skywalker. Just terrible. He was dead. Lucas knew it, the fan base knew it and so did even most non fans. But, due to bad writing, no plan and a desperate move he magically came back. Even worse is the hilarious attempts at explanations from the sequel apologists. See, his spirit transferred to a waiting decrepit old body of his as he was blown up and fell 50 miles down a shaft…. Blah blah yada yada. Sure, Jan.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Meathead
(Post 14511813)
While I agree bringing Palpatine back for Rise of Skywalker was a dumb move, the idea was from 30 years prior. The Dark Horse comic book series Dark Empire was where the clone idea came from. Actually Lucasfilm ended up raiding that series for Boba Fett's return and it was the first appearance of Anakin Solo. It was a great comic book series.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Aside from the Dark Empire comics (which Lucas apparently liked) already touching on the idea of him returning, there are also certain recent events in real life that have made me appreciate the "somehow Palpatine has returned" line a bit more, to be perfectly honest.
|
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 14511865)
It was still somewhat lazy in the Dark Empire series, but at least that was a non-canon comic, and it set Palpatine's return very shortly after ROTJ, and gave him a new, younger body, from what I recall. The idea that Palpatine stayed hidden for 30 years while siting on an armada of Star Destroyers with Death Star lasers just stretched credibility to the breaking point.
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 14511878)
Aside from the Dark Empire comics (which Lucas apparently liked) already touching on the idea of him returning, there are also certain recent events in real life that have made me appreciate the "somehow Palpatine has returned" line a bit more, to be perfectly honest.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.