Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-16 | 10:04 AM
  #376  
A-aron's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,719
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Formerly known as achau9598 - Baltimore, MD
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Guru Askew
This trailer is a substantial improvement over the earlier one. You can definitely tell who was just waiting to bash it regardless though. It pretty much cements the fact that the Internet hive mind's opinion was cemented long before a single second of footage was released.
Really? How do you figure?

Its just not funny. And for a film that is claiming to not be tied to the original - why keep using things from it (the Ray Parker Jr. song, the "mass hysteria" comment).

We see Hemsworth taken over by the ghost, and what power do we see it give him - the ability to pop a wheelie. Amazing. Not driving up the wall or flying, but stunt riding.

It seems like these trailers are being cut with no real idea about the identity of the film - if it is a comedy, they really aren't putting selling it as such (the jokes aren't funny, at least IMO). If it is a dramatic film, it isn't doing thay, either.

If someone edited this trailer - but used the original cast instead of this one, the reaction would be the same. Just not funny.
A-aron is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:09 AM
  #377  
HN
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,515
Received 94 Likes on 60 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by stingermck
Chris Hemsworth! Cap had nothing to do with this!
Originally Posted by B5Erik
(big black woman falls flat on her back because the crowd won't crowd surf her, Chris Evans looking less than masculine in his reversed role)
did i miss a Capt. America reference?
HN is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:10 AM
  #378  
Jaymole's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,095
Received 617 Likes on 357 Posts
From: N.Y, N.Y
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

If their intent was to make me laugh, the trailer failed miserably.
Jaymole is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:11 AM
  #379  
jjcool's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,957
Received 190 Likes on 150 Posts
From: CT
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by bluetoast
Yeah, it's not looking good at all. Here:

Certainly no tired and predictable jokes there.
On a side note, why are so many of the SJW trolls so concerned about what people think of this movie? It's pretty sad that they have no lives and nothing better to do than worry about what other pople think.
jjcool is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:13 AM
  #380  
jjcool's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,957
Received 190 Likes on 150 Posts
From: CT
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Quack
I can't even seem to put in words why this has zero interest for me....maybe it's Melissa M., whom I'm sick of.

I don't even care that it's women, Wiig is also annoying to me.
Yeah. What these idiots dont understand is that it's not that it's women in these parts. It's that 3 of the four women that they cast in a COMEDY are not funny.
jjcool is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:14 AM
  #381  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,057
Received 575 Likes on 407 Posts
From: Southern California
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by stingermck
Chris Hemsworth! Cap had nothing to do with this!
Nor would he.

But, MAN, is Odin going to be PISSED!!!!


Originally Posted by HN
did i miss a Capt. America reference?
Nope, just a slip - wrong Chris from Marvel.
B5Erik is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:15 AM
  #382  
Hailey G's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 13,024
Received 1,050 Likes on 489 Posts
From: Detroit, formerly known as Obi-Wanma
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

There's too many Chrises in the MCU, B5Erik is confused.
Hailey G is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:16 AM
  #383  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,057
Received 575 Likes on 407 Posts
From: Southern California
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Obi-Wan Jabroni
There's too many Chrises in the MCU, B5Erik is confused.
Yeah, it's early, I'm tired, not feeling well, going senile...


(And after watching that trailer I think I lost about 45 points off my IQ...)
B5Erik is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:17 AM
  #384  
wishbone's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,512
Likes: 0
Received 225 Likes on 158 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Obi-Wan Jabroni
There's too many Chrises in the MCU, B5Erik is confused.
Oh fer Chrisakes...

wishbone is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:19 AM
  #385  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

If I had some kind of agenda I woulda been sucking the dick of the first trailer. Good luck finding a post where I defend it.

The first trailer was not only inept regardless of the content, the content itself was substandard. The fact that Sony rushed a revised trailer out that excised the disastrous Exorcist footage really says it all. It was even more troubling when the concert footage that replaced it was only slightly better.

That concert footage holdover is really the only part of this new trailer that misses the mark. This one actually has effective comedy moments in it. Wiig holding onto the table warning people to leave NYC. The Michael McDonald joke. McCarthy saying its beautiful as Wiig gets drenched in slime. It's like a night-and-day difference. Of course, writing "even worse!" is a lot easier and far less controversial.
Guru Askew is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:20 AM
  #386  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,057
Received 575 Likes on 407 Posts
From: Southern California
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by wishbone
Oh fer Chrisakes...

Well done!

And funnier & more clever than anything in that trailer!

B5Erik is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 10:23 AM
  #387  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,057
Received 575 Likes on 407 Posts
From: Southern California
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Guru Askew
If I had some kind of agenda I woulda been sucking the dick of the first trailer. Good luck finding a post where I defend it.

The first trailer was not only inept regardless of the content, the content itself was substandard. The fact that Sony rushed a revised trailer out that excised the disastrous Exorcist footage really says it all. It was even more troubling when the concert footage that replaced it was only slightly better.

That concert footage holdover is really the only part of this new trailer that misses the mark. This one actually has effective comedy moments in it. Wiig holding onto the table warning people to leave NYC. The Michael McDonald joke. McCarthy saying its beautiful as Wiig gets drenched in slime. It's like a night-and-day difference. Of course, writing "even worse!" is a lot easier and far less controversial.
I'm sorry, but none of that stuff was even remotely funny. It was painfully inept and amateurish in terms of writing, and the, "Acting," was worthy of a bad TV sitcom.

If you really believe that this is a halfway decent trailer then we'll just agree to disagree. I honestly think it's garbage. UNfunny, not the least bit clever, and poorly edited (not to mention the, "Jokes," been poorly written and delivered).

And that would be my take on it even if there were no previous Ghostbusters movies.
B5Erik is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:01 AM
  #388  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,262
Received 1,555 Likes on 1,110 Posts
From: The place beyond the pines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

MovieBob has some stuff to say about the "Angry Video Game Nerd" video I posted earlier.
http://moviebob.blogspot.fi/2016/05/...-internet.html
There's a LOT, but this is the gist.

I have ZERO reason to believe he has some kind of issue with women and the fact that he doesn’t bring it up at all bares that out: I take him at what looks to be his word that this is about remaking classics and not about gender politics or whatever.

I HATE the fact that we can’t have an honest back and forth about this or any other movie without having to think about whether or not what we say is going to get repurposed a weapon in a bullshit “culture war,” but I know who’s to blame for it – and it aint’ the so-called “SJWs.”: It’s the regressives and the trolls and fedora squad and the MRA/”meninist” right-wing internet collective that’s been banging on about this shit ever since they realized that the inexorable tide of cultural evolution is poised and ready to sweep them and their bullshit played-out reactionary worldview into the dumpster of societal-obsolesence.

Because guess what: The remakes of ROBOCOP and TOTAL RECALL *both* looked just as bad as the new GHOSTBUSTERS looks (and spoiler: they WERE exactly as awful as they looked) – but I don’t remember a year-long preemptive, pre-TRAILER hate campaign against those movies; so logically there’s obviously something else at play here – and while it’s true that Chris Hemsworth being in a movie where he’s NOT playing Thor is usually a bad sign… I kinda don’t think it’s that.

You think the remake of GHOSTBUSTERS looks terrible? I agree – it looks terrible. I just hope it doesn’t stop people from putting Leslie Jones Kate McKinnon in good movies because those are two funny fuckin’ people. You think it looks super-disrespectful to the legacy of one of the most important genre-comedies ever made? Yeah, I think that looks to the most-likely case. Don’t wanna watch it because of that? Fine – totally valid, you do you. But please, don’t you DARE insult either of our intelligences by trying to tell me that *most* of the super over-the-top mega-hatred that’s being trained on this project and RUINING any chance to have an honest discourse isn’t mainly coming from paranoid sexist assholes who think something is being “stolen” from them.
To be clear: I don't think all the people here are paranoid sexist assholes who think something is being stolen from them, although a tiny handful have very specifically said things that mirror that.

It's when the focus goes from "this looks bad" to "women, especially scientists, can't carry backpacks" that it's more difficult to separate the legitimate complaints (of which there are many) from the sexist bullshit.
Dan is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:04 AM
  #389  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Even on the cesspool that is the Ghostbusters Reddit the consensus seems to be that this is a much stronger trailer.
Guru Askew is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:12 AM
  #390  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

I don't see it. It looks awful.

I'll be honest, where this whole project went off the rails for me was Melissa McCarthy. I was out the moment her name was mentioned. I just really loath her. If it had been Aykroyd, Murray, Hudson all returning and McCarthy was cast in the Jenine role I would have still been out. Seeing her thrust her crotch after shooting at a ghost is just pathetic. It's cringe worthy in that way where I actually feel embarrassed for her when I look at it.

McCarthy is just recycling the kind of middle class, blue collar comedy that folks like Rosanne Barr and Brett Butler capitalized on in the '90s. I don't like blue collar comedy and I don't like her schtick.

I'm not sexist, I'm just extremely prejudiced against this one person. I can't stand her or anything she's made. I did like Inside Out however. Exception to the rule I guess.
Mabuse is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:22 AM
  #391  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,262
Received 1,555 Likes on 1,110 Posts
From: The place beyond the pines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Mabuse
I did like Inside Out however. Exception to the rule I guess.
If you're talking about Sadness, that was actually Phyllis Smith from The Office.
Dan is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:25 AM
  #392  
raven56706's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,766
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Back in the Good Ole USA
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

looks bad.... and i dont know what it is.


i feel like its just the same thing or a parody of the other one.
raven56706 is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:26 AM
  #393  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Dan
If you're talking about Sadness, that was actually Phyllis Smith from The Office.
Oh really?! Well there you go.
Mabuse is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:36 AM
  #394  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,057
Received 575 Likes on 407 Posts
From: Southern California
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Dan
It's when the focus goes from "this looks bad" to "women, especially scientists, can't carry backpacks" that it's more difficult to separate the legitimate complaints (of which there are many) from the sexist bullshit.
See, no one said they can't. It's just harder for someone at 5'3", 120 pounds to lug around heavy equipment than someone at 5'10" 190 pounds to do the same thing.

Someone bigger and stronger than me (5'7", 190) is going to be able to do it better and easier than me, be it a man or a woman. That's just a fact, and I'm not the least bit insulted by that. I know that when I have had packs on my back that weighed 30 or more pounds I got winded and sore after 5 or 6 minutes. Would that happen to a person who is 5'11", 200? Not nearly as much. And, again, I would not be the least bit insulted if someone suggested to me that a bigger, stronger person do the heavy lifting instead of me.

The bottom line to most people's irritiation with this movie is simply this - whole gender switch was a gimmick and an excuse to get a movie made that SHOULD have been made with the original cast years earlier. The studio dragged it's feet on a sequel with the original cast, but then they instantly greenlit a gender-bending sequel,l even without a passable script.

That's largely what got people pissed about the gimmicky gender swap. Reitman and Akroyd worked for over a decade to get a sequel made, only to have the studio drag it's feet because they said they didn't like the scripts, and then as soon as someone says, "Why not a remake with women Ghostbusters instead of men," the project gets greenlit - without a good script!

And as we've seen from the trailers, the script is loaded with cliches and incredibly stupid stuff, so it can't be any better than (and probably not nearly as good as) the scripts that Akroyd and Reitman were working on.

There is nothing in either trailer that makes this movie look funny or clever. I have zero doubt that this is going to be a shit movie that only got made because someone thought that the gimmick was more important than a good script.
B5Erik is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:37 AM
  #395  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,737
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,087 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

It looks fucking horrible. People are delusional if they believe this is better. It's nothing to do with the women either. If the same type of jokes were being done with men it would be equally awful. This looks to be appealing to the lowest of low brow humor and I don't see any redeeming qualities. McCarthy and Jones in particular solidly the fact that I'll never watch this.
Mike86 is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:39 AM
  #396  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,262
Received 1,555 Likes on 1,110 Posts
From: The place beyond the pines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by B5Erik
See, no one said they can't. It's just harder for someone at 5'3", 120 pounds to lug around heavy equipment than someone at 5'10" 190 pounds to do the same thing.

Someone bigger and stronger than me (5'7", 190) is going to be able to do it better and easier than me, be it a man or a woman. That's just a fact, and I'm not the least bit insulted by that. I know that when I have had packs on my back that weighed 30 or more pounds I got winded and sore after 5 or 6 minutes. Would that happen to a person who is 5'11", 200? Not nearly as much. And, again, I would not be the least bit insulted if someone suggested to me that a bigger, stronger person do the heavy lifting instead of me.
You just can't give up on this one can you?

The bottom line to most people's irritiation with this movie is simply this - whole gender switch was a gimmick and an excuse to get a movie made that SHOULD have been made with the original cast years earlier. The studio dragged it's feet on a sequel with the original cast, but then they instantly greenlit a gender-bending sequel,l even without a passable script.

That's largely what got people pissed about the gimmicky gender swap. Reitman and Akroyd worked for over a decade to get a sequel made, only to have the studio drag it's feet because they said they didn't like the scripts, and then as soon as someone says, "Why not a remake with women Ghostbusters instead of men," the project gets greenlit - without a good script!

And as we've seen from the trailers, the script is loaded with cliches and incredibly stupid stuff, so it can't be any better than (and probably not nearly as good as) the scripts that Akroyd and Reitman were working on.

There is nothing in either trailer that makes this movie look funny or clever. I have zero doubt that this is going to be a shit movie that only got made because someone thought that the gimmick was more important than a good script.
I can't see it being worse of a film than Ghostbusters 2 at this point, so does any of that stuff even matter?
Dan is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:41 AM
  #397  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by B5Erik

The bottom line to most people's irritiation with this movie is simply this - whole gender switch was a gimmick and an excuse to get a movie made that SHOULD have been made with the original cast years earlier. The studio dragged it's feet on a sequel with the original cast, but then they instantly greenlit a gender-bending sequel,l even without a passable script.

That's largely what got people pissed about the gimmicky gender swap. Reitman and Akroyd worked for over a decade to get a sequel made, only to have the studio drag it's feet because they said they didn't like the scripts, and then as soon as someone says, "Why not a remake with women Ghostbusters instead of men," the project gets greenlit - without a good script!
It's a little more complicated than just the studio dragging their feet.

And stop with the back pack shit already.
Mabuse is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:42 AM
  #398  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 29,262
Received 1,555 Likes on 1,110 Posts
From: The place beyond the pines
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Mabuse
And stop with the back pack shit already.
It's my fault. I brought it up. Didn't think anyone would still try to argue it, though.
Dan is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 11:46 AM
  #399  
B5Erik's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,057
Received 575 Likes on 407 Posts
From: Southern California
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Originally Posted by Dan
You just can't give up on this one can you?
No, I just want to make my point clear when someone else misrepresents it to mean something that I didn't imply.

Bigger, stronger people can carry heavy stuff more easily than smaller, weaker people. Why do some people have a problem with that? It's a fact. Get over it and let it go.

I can't see it being worse of a film than Ghostbusters 2 at this point, so does any of that stuff even matter?
I disagree. While Ghostbusters 2 wasn't nearly as laugh out loud funny as the original it was still fun. I enjoy G2 and seeing those characters in a new situation. I love those characters. The characters we're seeing in this one are abrasive and unfunny. They're unlikeable.

I would have much rather seen a G3 than this garbage, even if G3 were no better than G2. At least we'd have good characters that make you feel good while watching them. And maybe, just maybe, Akroyd and Reitman could have come up with a better script this time out. Now we'll never know since the studio refused to make G3. The fact that they instantaneously greenlit this movie based solely on the concept of a gender swap just adds insult to injury.
B5Erik is offline  
Old 05-18-16 | 12:00 PM
  #400  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer

Much better trailer but the only place to go after the last trailer, was up.

The selfie stick thing was pretty funny.
Michael Corvin is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.