![]() |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Perhaps Peter should be a cinematographer now since that's the hot ticket these days and work on film sets.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 11276144)
Over at blu-ray.com he was bitching about how Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter is only 101 minutes long. I was glad to see he still has his standards. :lol:
edit: Yep, the fuck is doing his thing there too and people don't like it there either: chris_sc77: 105 mins run time. ugh. means I will definitely not be seeing this in theaters. Maybe the $1 movie house but a big let down from the almost 3hr. run time false rumor. |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Bet the guy was all about Prometheus! ;)
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Oh, shit. Now I have to see wtf he thought of that.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 11276034)
No. But they basically turned Captain Stacey into J Jonah Jameson.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Paul_SD
(Post 11276109)
according to Devin Farci, all the references to Peter being a genetic experiment of his father have been removed from the film as per the recent NYC screening.
Also, the embargo on reviews might be lifted this week. DF says word of mouth afterward was mixed, with the biggest Spidey fan he knows telling him he thought it was a travesty. |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Devin who?
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Faraci.
misspelled in the previous post. |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by BJacks
(Post 11276119)
I recall it being around 90 minutes. It went by fairly quickly.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
This says the running time is 136 minutes.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Paul_SD
(Post 11276394)
Faraci.
misspelled in the previous post. |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Paul_SD
(Post 11276109)
according to Devin Farci, all the references to Peter being a genetic experiment of his father have been removed...
BJacks, I know the Bugle isn't featured, I was making a jest about reasons to not include Jameson in the film.
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 11276132)
News outlets would still need photos for their online articles.
I'd go with BBFC there. They even have the footage! 12250+8 (feet + frames) is indeed just over 136 minutes of film. Also, bear in mind when it says they classified the film on 1/6/12, that means June 1st (none of this weird "The US writes dates month first, not smallest time unit to biggest" nonsense). |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Nick Martin
(Post 11276434)
That doesn't help. Still don't know who that is or why it matters, but whatever.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by DonnachaOne
(Post 11276884)
Nick, why snap? Devin Faraci is a journalist who writes about film online, and has been active for many years.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Nick Martin
(Post 11276886)
Okay, but I've just learned over the years to take internet journalists' views with a grain of salt, mainly because there's such a strong bias most of the time, usually against whatever the subject is.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
I never heard if him. Maybe when someone here references someone they cOuld mention who it is and why that person was referenced. I wasn't like it was Ebert who is universally known.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
The first review calls it "Spider-Man for the Twilight generation."
So does that mean Lizard sparkles in sunlight? |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by kgrogers1979
(Post 11277405)
The first review calls it "Spider-Man for the Twilight generation."
So does that mean Lizard sparkles in sunlight? |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
...that review is kind of weak. Sounds like a good film, interesting thing he said about the film and Gwen.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 11277417)
...that review is kind of weak. Sounds like a good film, interesting thing he said about the film and Gwen.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Maybe I was off about the running time; it felt like it went by fairly quickly. Hard to remember when it started and ended.
I definitely wouldn't call this the Twilight of superhero movies. If anything it's the Garden State of superhero movies (which makes sense given Webb directed 500 Days of Summer). There are some corny bits but it feels like a movie from the comic books which is nice. I enjoyed Garfield more than Tobey, I thought he got the character traits right, like the sarcastic quips and all that. And the Lizard is quite imposing. |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
interesting.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xdxHat8dXp0?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 11278060)
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/xdxHat8dXp0?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
And the cop shoots at him from about two or three feet away and Spidey dodges with ease. Sure Spidey has dodged gunfire in the comics, but it has always been long range, not extreme close range like that. He is fast, but certainly not that fast. He isn't the Flash. |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Or is he?
Saw that scene yesterday. That part confused me. How'd he get in? But I do like the webswinging. Also about that. We do see spidey swing in the day. Remember the 1st person. View...in the day. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.