![]() |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 11279144)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by kgrogers1979
(Post 11279079)
The third movie could be the Clone Saga with Emma Stone playing both MJ and Gwen!!
Actually though, if they do kill off Gwen in the second movie, the third movie as the Clone Saga might not be a bad way to end the trilogy. (the original 1970s Clone Saga, not the horrid 1990s Clone Saga.) |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by dvdjunkie32
(Post 11279070)
I already hated the idea of a reboot. Raimi's Spiderman was just fine, the cast worked well, and those films were teasing the lizard already. So many great Spidey stories yet we have to endure another origin story.
I'd also categorize Raimi's films as "fine", but I'd rather have good or great ones. |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Considering they already did a Goblin throwing Peter's girlfriend off a bridge scene. I wonder if they will change it in a future movie. You know there will be audience members pissed that the new movie just 'ripped off' a scene from the old movie.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 11279591)
I think the Internet would melt down if the movies ever tried introducing Ben Reilly into the story. They could save the franchise by revealing Andrew Garfield to be the clone, unveiling Tobey Maguire as the real Spider-Man all along.:lol:
Originally Posted by resinrats
(Post 11279633)
Considering they already did a Goblin throwing Peter's girlfriend off a bridge scene. I wonder if they will change it in a future movie. You know there will be audience members pissed that the new movie just 'ripped off' a scene from the old movie.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 11279577)
Well that's not tear-inducing at all.
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
:shrug: |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 11279858)
Spoiler:
:shrug: Spoiler:
In Spider-Man's case, it's silly for him to assume that Spoiler:
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 11279883)
In Spider-Man's case, it's silly for him to assume that
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 11279894)
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Another site claims that this movie is tracking for about 125 million for 3-8th July. I would be stunned if it actually makes that much even though it is spread over 6 days...
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 11279883)
Spoiler:
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by kgrogers1979
(Post 11279939)
:banned:
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 11279960)
What didn't you like about it? It was a very solid murder mystery.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
So nobody really has any interest in this, do they? :lol:
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/242...track-for-125m Though it's arguably the least anticipated of the three big superhero films of this Summer, that doesn't mean "The Amazing Spider-Man" won't make a small fortune in its own right. The Hollywood Reporter says that early tracking figures indicate the superhero reboot is tracking to earn $125 million in its first six days from Tuesday July 3rd through to Sunday July 8th. The figures would make it easily the best performing film of the Summer outside of "The Avengers", and are on par with that of the first "Iron Man" film. Comparatively in their first six days of release the first "Spider-Man" earned $144M, "Spider-Man 2" took $180M, "Spider-Man 3" scored $176M. In comparison with other superhero movies, "X-Men First Class" scored $70M, "Batman Begins" took $80M, "Thor" took $81M, "Iron Man" scored $121M, "Iron Man 2" got $153M, "The Dark Knight" raked in $222M, and "The Avengers" scored $258M. The film is tracking strongly with males of all ages, but is also performing well with young females due to its young stars Andrew Garfield and Emma Stone. The figures come following a half-dozen early print reviews from the UK (now up on Rotten Tomatoes) which paint a generally positive reaction. Time Out claims "We're never far from romance or laughs, and at times 'The Amazing Spider-Man' feels like a romcom upgraded to include 3D and industrial cobwebs", while The Guardian says "Webb successfully treads a fine line between keeping the hardcore superhero-movie fans happy and injecting a dose of meaningful affect." |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Deftones
(Post 11279970)
So nobody really has any interest in this, do they? :lol:
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/242...track-for-125m |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
and at times 'The Amazing Spider-Man' feels like a romcom upgraded to include 3D and industrial cobwebs |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
I think too many people dislike a spidey reboot in general so they've some stake in this. While I don't really agree w/ a reboot, I'll go w/ it and hope it's good.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by kgrogers1979
(Post 11279965)
Deathstroke beating the whole Justice League was just ridiculous and the rape was unnecessary.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Spidey is a license to print money at the box office, which is why Marvel is never ever getting him back for their movie universe. It's not like Raimi's movies were masterpieces and those blew through all expectations, including the putrid third one. I could see this movie doing great business, though not on the level of Avengers or Dark Knight.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Yeah I don't think the movie doing well financially was ever really in question. I think more people were concerned over how the quality of the film itself and why Sony felt the need for a reboot, but Spider-Man is a pretty popular character so no doubt the movie will make money.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Mike86
(Post 11280301)
Yeah I don't think the movie doing well financially was ever really in question. I think more people were concerned over how the quality of the film itself and why Sony felt the need for a reboot, but Spider-Man is a pretty popular character so no doubt the movie will make money.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Positive review, courtesy The Hollywood Reporter:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/rev...-review-340662 |
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
seems like the 3D was pointless. Wonder what others thought as well.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 11280503)
seems like the 3D was pointless. Wonder what others thought as well.
|
Re: Spider-Man (2012, Marc Webb)
Originally Posted by Deftones
(Post 11280424)
go back and re-read this thread. many people claimed the movie would be a box office flop.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:32 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.