Originally Posted by Paul_SD (Post 11238027)

This was intended to be a 3D film from the start. Don't know if it was filmed in 3D, or just that the shots were composed and designed to maximize the effect post conversion, but I'm pretty sure that won't be the only shot we see going for that effect.
Frankly, that whole sequence looked pretty damn good to me. The things fall and break with believable weight weight behind them, and the character movement seems natural and has an appropriate weight to it. Not sure what it is you're seeing that bothers you.

I'm not sure if its better for CG animators to follow old school animation principles (like squash and stretch and the related drag in motion) or if incorporating those makes it look too cartoony. When you don't heed those in traditional animation, then the movements look too stiff and robotic.

Also, don't know if this being a Sony film that they would keep every single effects shot in-house, but what usually happens is that a ton of little mom & pop design studio make bids and separate shots/sequences are farmed out to many different houses- which is why some shots look much more polished than others. I guess it's the nature of the beast when you have so many complex effects per film and have a hard and fast release date. It makes sense to divvy up the work burden and not let it all fall on one groups shoulders.

Originally Posted by fumanstan (Post 11238069)

Nice :) To be fair, wasn't that always the case in the comics, cartoons, or whatever too?

Originally Posted by Big Boy Laroux (Post 11238078)

Also, what is he breaking the window with? his pinky finger?

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC (Post 11237839)

that's irrelevant. Not what I was pointing out either.

...then why does it look it's a cg guy jumping in front of a projected screen?

Originally Posted by whotony (Post 11246143)

My Target just cleared an entire isle for the Spider-man and New Batman toys.

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC (Post 11246147)

well if the movie underperforms at least they made they're money from the merchandise. lol.

No, honestly...really? Already? Damn.

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC (Post 11246127)

Originally Posted by bluetoast (Post 11246161)

He's coming for Kanye!

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC (Post 11246147)

well if the movie underperforms at least they made they're money from the merchandise. lol.

No, honestly...really? Already? Damn.

Originally Posted by Draven (Post 11250074)

A

Eh, still does nothing for me.

Originally Posted by Draven (Post 11250074)

Australian trailer with added scenes - including skateboarding!

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/cjq5-zmIpWA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Eh, still does nothing for me.

Originally Posted by Dragon Tattoo (Post 11250089)

So you keep saying.

You show an obscene amount of interest in a movie you apparently have no interest in.