Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Just Saw Matrix: Revolutions (Thoughts)

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Just Saw Matrix: Revolutions (Thoughts)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-03 | 01:59 AM
  #126  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
By this point it's page five of a discussion of the movie, you might as well speak your mind. any moron who is on page five deserves it to be spoiled.
Jackskeleton is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 02:09 AM
  #127  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,013
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just got back from seeing it. I thought it was really good. Not great, but really good. The effects were mind boggling! But I must say, I was dissapointed with the fact that:

Spoiler:
Neo only won the battle, but not the war. He had to rely on help from both the machines and the oracle to beat Agent Smith. I was really expecting to him to kick both the machines and Agent Smith's ass, by turning into some kind of supreme being with some ridiculous powers we hadn't seen before. But that didn't happen. Instead, Neo got his ass handed to him by Smith and if it wasn't for the Sentinel Master and the oracle, Smith would've continued to clobber neo and rip him a new one.

Also, there simply wasn't enough hand to hand combat in this one. Having Neo in only ONE freakin fight in the whole movie was just lame. The Zion battle was kick ass though, and the flying sequence with Jada and Morpheus was great. But I dunno, just wanted a little more martial arts and hand to hand stuff. Plus, there were no new villians. Just the same ole Smith and the Merivingian. I would've liked to have been introduced to a variety of more baddies. Kinda like another duo of dreadlocked twins or whatever.

Anyway, I personally feel Reloaded was slightly better, with part 1 being the best. I also strongly feel this is NOT the last Matrix movie...I am certain the studios, as well as the fans will DEMAND another sequel. We simply don't know Neo's fate. That question must be answered.


Bring on "THE MATRIX: RESURRECTION" :P
isamu is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 02:11 AM
  #128  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 11,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Memphis, TN
My thoughts... (extremely long, quite detailed, and delving into the background quite a bit).

Spoiler:

Okay, first thing's first: This didn't answer all the questions. It brought up new ones as well.

Now, it does complete the tale of the war, which is good. And unlike many people (appearantly), I get the whole Smith thing, the war thing, thing with the kid, and the ending with the peace thing.

Answers for those who didn't get it yet:

First off, you need to understand "programs".

Programs in the Matrix world take the form of people, obviously. But they have constraints. Not the same constraints people do, but constraints imposed upon them nonethess.

Okay. These programs are essentially independant AI's working for the Matrix itself. Think of it like an army. You've got the Architect at the top doing the job of CEO and a bunch of underlings. They don't actually "control" the Matrix. It's too complex to control directly like that. Instead, they supervise and adjust when needed, by heavy change (deja-vu inducing mods) or by direct action (going in as an entity and kicking some ass).

Now, these programs have existence only as bits. It's a computer simulation, after all. But the Matrix is an independant simulation and they don't actually live inside it all the time. They leave, when needed, and go home. Programs at home base do the work of maintaining the whole system and keeping it all running. Programs with nothing to do at home get deleted. This is obviously terrifying if you happen to be an AI program. So they are constrained by the home base to continue to be useful.

These are independant entities, remember. Some of them, like the Mervogian and so forth, have gone rogue. They can exist in the Matrix itself because the Matrix is running independantly and not subject to heavy duty control. That's the only way it can exist and support so many people inside it, sort of thing. The Matrix is controlled by those inside it. These "laws of nature" exist because everyone there thinks they exist. The world is one that everyone agrees on, sort of thing. This isn't really a new philosophical concept about the world, look it up.

The train station and the trainman is a secret passage, sort of thing, between home base and the Matrix proper. He created it as a waypoint between the two areas. The two programs from home base are taking their kid to the Oracle for protection because she has no purpose. If she stayed in the home base, she'd be deleted. She appearantly gets a purpose at the end of the movie by making the sun rise though.

Anyway, Smith was set "free" by Neo destroying him in the first movie. He says as much in the second movie. By "set free", he means that he's gone rogue. Since he was destroyed in the Matrix, he should have returned to home base for deletion. He didn't. He rebelled and gained some power from the merging of him and Neo. He learned how to infect others, for one thing. Neo did just that to him in the first movie, remember?

So he goes around infecting everybody. He infects the Oracle and gets her Oracular powers, in fact. Remember that the Mervogian wanted her eyes? That's a symbol, sort of thing. The Oracle was designed to be an intuitive AI program (Architect lets that slip during the second movie) and her eyes are the symbols of that.

Okay, so he takes control of all this stuff. Neo finds out that Smith has so much power over the Matrix by this relentless self-duplication, that the programs in home base can no longer control him. He's gained vast control over the Matrix itself by simply becoming everyone in it. They can't tolerate him either, but they lack the power to stop him.

Neo, however, has control of the Matrix by the fact that he's "the one". He found that power in the first movie. Smith can't control the Matrix by virtue of his own mind alone, the duplication gives him that power by having many minds thinking the same thing at once. Neo has that power because his mind is free and he knows it's not real. Smith knows it's not real but being a program he is constrained by the rules of the Matrix, which he can now change to some degree. This all puts Neo and Smith on virtually equal footing. The balancing of the equation, as the Oracle put it.

In any case, Smith infects Neo. And that's his downfall, because he's still constrained by the reality of the situation, which is that a death in the real world is a death in the Matrix, and vice versa. So when Neo gets infected and Smith takes over his body, the Architect (via the machine world) kills Neo. Since Smith is inhabiting him, this kills Smith as well and Smith gets deleted from the Matrix, according to the rules of the Matrix. It had to be Neo and not one of the other people Smith has infected because Neo is the only one with natural control over the Matrix itself, and therefore his control forces that death to occur in the Matrix as well. They could have explained this better, but the clues are there anyway.

The deal brokered (off screen) was that Neo would do this in order to buy a peace between free humans and machines. The Architect agreed to free humans who wanted to be freed from the Matrix as well in order to take care of the Smith problem. Neo was really only willing to take this course of action because Trinity died, sort of thing. That's why she had to die plot-wise, so that Neo wouldn't have any ties to prevent him from doing it. He gave beating the hell out of Smith a shot, but when he couldn't win without sacrificing himself, he gave in and did it. Note that he chose the other way in the second movie because of Trinity. So she had to go to finish the story.

Now, like I said, this movie didn't answer some things:
a) Why can Neo control or destroy the machines in the real world?
b) Why can he see this fire type deal when he's blinded?
c) How the hell did he get his conciousness knocked into the Train Station in the beginning without any connection to the Matrix or the machines at all?

If you consider the spiritual side of the movie, then you can come up with answers, but frankly I find that really unsatisfying. They should have either made these answers plain or figured out a better plot without these holes in it.

Other things I didn't like:
-Trinity took way too long to die. Not as long as some people complained about it being, but still, it was a bit annoying.
-The whole flying fight scene with Smith looked like it was straight out of DragonBall Z. It was cheesy as hell, in other words. The rain spheres were pretty freakin' cool, but other than that I was getting annoyed with it. It was too over the top.
-The battle with the machines set up a few characters to focus on during the battle itself. It seemed too obvious, really, and then those characters didn't ultimately matter in the outcome all that much. Okay, Link's girl helped fire off a few missles, big deal. The kid at least opened the door. The battle sequence was just overall too long, really. Some parts of that could have been cut with no loss to the flick.

The real problem was that the thought everybody has going into this flick is "finally, answers!" and instead they get a mostly action flick with too much fighting and not enough plot. And extra questions. Annoying, that is.


Overall, I liked it. It wasn't too annoying in it's faults, and it did have enough to ponder as I walked out of the theater. The general disappointment was immediately after it ended, and it took the rest of the day to work it out in my head to where I can say that it was a good movie overall.

But I liked the second movie far better.

Last edited by Otto; 11-06-03 at 02:14 AM.
Otto is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 02:23 AM
  #129  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 46,636
Received 1,376 Likes on 1,080 Posts
Is it really that hard to write and act in a scifi movie?

No no, I mean really. Is it?

*cringes again*

Enjoyable, but boy is it cheesy.

In a sense - it's like AOTC, only not nearly as boring.
RichC2 is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 02:57 AM
  #130  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Friggin Fiji
wow .. i need to take some time for Otto's take ...

but Isamu gave me an idea ... titles for the next sequel ???? Best Guess:

Matrix Repeated
Matrix Repulsive
Matrix Rerun
Matrix IV: The search for Neo

and one more

MatrixXx: Faster, Furiouser

keep em coming ... someone will be right
caipirina is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 02:59 AM
  #131  
Suspended
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Now, like I said, this movie didn't answer some things:
Spoiler:

a) Why can Neo control or destroy the machines in the real world?

Because the "real world" is just another computer simulation - like the kid freed himself of his own accord in the Animatrix Neo was so attuned to using his mind to hack computer systems that he was able to intuitively hack the "real world" as well.

b) Why can he see this fire type deal when he's blinded?

He's seeing something that's beyond even the code - he's looking into the very nature, the energy of the patterns inherent in the "earth" simulation.

c) How the hell did he get his conciousness knocked into the Train Station in the beginning without any connection to the Matrix or the machines at all?

Because he's a programme - the connection, being jacked in, etc., is another simulation, another system of control.

So his programme was running in both the matrix world and the desktop, the "real world."
jough is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 04:59 AM
  #132  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Originally posted by Rypro 525
My thoughts on Matrix 3.

The machines are God and his angels. God is the forces of nature and pure mathematics.

Neo is Jesus, created by God to ensure people survive Satan and exist to worship and serve, or in this case, feed, God.

Smith is Satan. Neo (Jesus) was out on earth by God to counterbalance Satan and ensure people survive to worship - feed - God.

I am not an actively religious person so maybe my thoughts are over the top.
That might be cutting it a bit to simplistic if you ask me.


Put it simply. Smith is not satan. You might recall some basic myth names thrown into the mix. Persephone is the wife of hades, lord of the underworld, satan. well you do know who is married to Persephone in the film... Merovingian. It's pretty clear that he is the master of hell. He has the exiled programs out and makes deals with them much like making a deal with the devil. What better way to create the devil then by making him french? Well simply put, he is the lord of the underworld so that would be your devil/satan character.


If anything Smith is just neo's nemesis and it wasn't like Satan was after jesus. He just wanted to tempt him so Merovingian falls into that place in a sense. To be in control.

Neo is indeed the Ying to Smith's Yang. without one or the other they would not be. How did this come about? Well not entirely sure but the merge in the first film could have something to do with this of course.

As for GOD being the machines. Well in the matrix the machines are indeed gods and the Programs would be considered the angels because they are floating around making sure that everything is in it's right place. It's those rouge programs that fall from grace and become helpers of the devil that work for the Merovingian. So that adds to the whole Merovingian being the devil role. So we have the angels and fallen angels in the matrix. God is there and Neo is the sort of Jesus figure.

The architect isn't GOD. it is just another program to make sure everything is in it's right place. to make sure everything is balanced out. This is why he wants neo to go back so that the cycle can continue. this one time it was thrown off because of choice. Not a pre-deteremined choice because not everything came true the way the arch said it would. Neo did not go back to zion and save the 23 folks and so on. there was a choice. the choice was to try to make peace and hope that a total reformt was not going to take place on the matrix and a total wipe out take place in zion.

Neo is around to be a sort of marker that shows that a reformat is about to happen. No real reason other then to clean the system out. in the past cycles the other "one's" went back and continued the cycle. Why? well who knows if you need reserves if all humanity was wiped out or so forth so having a group able to get harvested again for power is always useful. Besides, the system is in a constant upgrade so they need those folks around to exile those rejects not accepting the matrix so they kind find the flaws of the new matrix and trouble shoot it. all part of a big system debugging.

Of course the other characters come into play for names. Morpheus is the god of dreams. His belief in the one and the salvation is a sort of piece of that. A dream.

But for the most part, Smith is no satan. that role is for Merovingian.


Also for those who put in the Eva link. well Shinji had the choice on how he wanted the world to be like afterwards. His choice lead to the salvation or destruction of man. it strikes a close comperisson.

I'm awaiting the many DBZ references which being a not so big fan of DBZ, I kinda shyed away from that connection.
Jackskeleton is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 06:29 AM
  #133  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 23,466
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
From: Arizona, USA
I saw it tonight... I liked it. I thought part 2 wasn't very good, but 3 made up for it. I didn't think any of it was unclear. I also read through the thread just now and I think some of you have it wrong.

I also think reviewers are idiots.
Trigger is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 07:04 AM
  #134  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Little Rock, AR
Thought the movie was OK ... nothing great. I'll admit that I groaned at the whole
Spoiler:
blind prophet and Trinity's 15 minute death speech
.
silentbob007 is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 07:54 AM
  #135  
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jough

a) Why can Neo control or destroy...
Spoiler:
the machines in the real world?


Because the "real world" is just another computer simulation - like the kid freed himself of his own accord in the Animatrix Neo was so attuned to using his mind to hack computer systems that he was able to intuitively hack the "real world" as well.

Spoiler:


Well even in the movie the oracle said that his abilities passed from one world to another.. thats why he could do it.

dryars is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 07:54 AM
  #136  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,412
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts
From: Columbus, OH
First I would say this movie is in no way the horrible Phantom Menace-like embarrassment the majority of critics made it out to be, and I'm glad I saw it. However, that doesn't let the movie off the hook.

The first Matrix was groundbreaking with a clever science fiction concept. The third one is a paint-by-numbers generic sci-fi story running on autopilot to complete a trilogy.

There was so much exposition in the second film, which led me to believe there would be a huge payoff in the third - and that never happened. Consequently, the second one now suffers as a result. "Matrix Reloaded" now seems like an overblown director's cut that desperately needs trimmed.

The resolution for getting Neo out of his coma wasn't very interesting, and certainly wasn't worth waiting six months to see how it was going to be resolved. His final battle with Smith should have been the most mind-blowing battle to ever end a trilogy. Instead, it just made me more fond of their battle from the first Matrix. A mild disappointment there.

I realized Gloria Foster who originally played the Oracle died, but the way they explained this new actress playing the part made no sense. So the Merovingian has that kind of power? I thought the Oracle was the all-powerful mother of the Matrix! If he can do that to her, what the heck does he need her eyes for? And you're telling me the directors could get an actor for the role of Bane to play a dead-on impersonation of Agent Smith, and THIS was the best they could do with the Oracle's replacement? She wasn't even close to being as good as the original - which now makes Gloria Foster look like best supporting actress material. So all of that unfortunately took me out of the movie. My suggestion, for what it's worth, would have been to leave the Oracle scenes out and expand Seraph's part to fill any continuity gaps.

And what great characters the Merovingian and Persephone were in the previous film. Now their parts are totally wasted with no resolution to the rivalry between Merv and Neo/Trinity/Morpheus. Not sure which is worse - the way that was handled, or Boba Fett screaming like a high school girl as he falls into the Sarlacc pit.

Still, the movie has its good points. Things happen to characters which I wasn't expecting. It doesn't end with a cliche "happy feel-good" ending. However, although the Wachowskis avoided this one cliche, they instead used another: The long death scene where the dying person gets to tell their significant other how much they loved them [I'm sure that cleared up a lot of confusion between them!] complete with a final kiss. Very syrupy IMHO.

I say go see it if you're a fan of the series. (Others will most likely be disappointed.)
rennervision is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 08:49 AM
  #137  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 37,797
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Duluth, GA, USA
I see the 3 Matrix films as layers of a bigger story, not a linear form of storytelling.

The 1st one deals with the microscopic details of man and machine and how the Matrix is basically the conduit for each given the circumstances that have evolved (and filled in with the Animatrix shorts). Sure, it's well done and lays out a pretty neat premise to the bigger story to come. It's got plenty of "cool" to spare, and viewers respond to it.

The 2nd one deals with the middle-scopic details of man trying to find a way to avoid the cyclical nature of man's eventual disillusionment with their current relationship with the machines.

The 3rd one deals with the macroscopic details that build from how the emergence of Neo has enabled man to overcome their subordinate status to the machines, and entered into a new phase of their symbiotic relationship where neither overlords the other anymore (for now).

That "Revolutions" doesn't spit out pat answers to the questions raised with the little battles and skirmishes that are put up as obstacles to Neo and the resistance fighters isn't really all that relevant in the bigger picture: the survival of Zion and what it means to the relationship between man and machine in the new world order.

I don't really care that critics of "Revolutions" get caught up in the lack of payoff between scenes that happened in "Reloaded" because they aren't really all that relevant to the bigger picture, which is what "Revolutions" is all about. Critics give way too much power to the likes of the Merovingian and Persephone in the middle-story, and when their presence (in "Revolutions") is preceived to be given the short-shrift, all of their pent-up thoughts and predictions from "Reloaded" sort of show through their criticism of "Revolutions". There was so much in terms of rampant speculation of how the Merovingian and Persephone would impact "Revolutions" and when those expectations were not met, the criticism get amped up. I see those characters simply as fairly interesting obstacles put in place in order for Neo and the rest to get to their objectives at the time. Sure, they provide some clues to past incarnations of the Matrix reboots, but overall, they aren't what drives the story forward.

Why is Bane dangerous in "Revolutions"? For the simple reason that he/Smith now has the ability to affect things in the real world should suffice, but for some, this doesn't even register. A viewer sitting next to me never put it together that Bane was the physical manifestation of Smith in the real world and was confused as to why Bane would start talking like Smith. Well, Duh! Bane presented a clear and present danger to Neo, and if Neo didn't get past Bane, the revolution never gets going. Neo does get past Bane, but at the cost of his human sight.

I did find it ironic that Neo lost his sight, but his other "sight" was unleashed to its full potential. The cost was that Neo never got to see the sun in its full glory like Trinitiy did for that one amazing moment. The scene plays out metaphorically for me in that her love brings her to truly see the light and without the love for Neo, she never would have been there to experience it.

As alluded to before, the love, the connection to another person whose welfare you would put before you own at all costs is something very special and should be cultivated because it is the impetus to do truly heroic things in spite of the cost of your own life. It takes you from at a selfish state of existence to a self-less state. This point is proven time and time again in the battle for Zion as the focus goes from all the players introduced in the previous 2 films. They all play a self-less part in getting the job done in this drama.

This is the crux of "Revolutions". That love can motivate you when nothing else will is the force that can change a world. Sappy, you bet, but in a nutshell, it's always been about love and peace, because the alternative isn't worth living for.
Patman is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 09:06 AM
  #138  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,412
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts
From: Columbus, OH
On a side note, I would also like to know what the heck the MPAA uses as its criteria to rate films these days? This one was the tamest "R" of the three. According to ratings information, it was rated R for "sci-fi violence and brief sexual content." Well, I saw nothing worse than any "sci-fi violence" from PG-13 movies (or does "sci-fi violence" now automatically guarantee an R rating these days?) And the "brief sexual content" must have been very brief indeed, because I don't even remember it!
rennervision is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 09:19 AM
  #139  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,669
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: detroit, MI, USA
I think I agree with your assessment the most rennervison. I'm too thinking that now Reloaded seems almost unnecessary and Revolutions suffers from what Reloaded set up. Granted, I feel that both Reloaded and Revolutions are very good movies, I pretty much would give them about the same grade (B- and B+). But, for me I think Revolutions would have been all the better had I not been waiting for more resolution to questions/situations set up in Reloaded. Reloaded almost seems like filler now.

And personally, I missed the battles in the Matrix. With this being the final installment they could have been so sleek, stylish, but with the intensity of the battles/fight scenes in the first. Instead I got mostly "real world" Mech-battles with squiddies.

Don't get me wrong I enjoyed it, but it just seems like something is missing.
iggystar is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 09:22 AM
  #140  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,669
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: detroit, MI, USA
Originally posted by rennervision
On a side note, I would also like to know what the heck the MPAA uses as its criteria to rate films these days? This one was the tamest "R" of the three. According to ratings information, it was rated R for "sci-fi violence and brief sexual content." Well, I saw nothing worse than any "sci-fi violence" from PG-13 movies (or does "sci-fi violence" now automatically guarantee an R rating these days?) And the "brief sexual content" must have been very brief indeed, because I don't even remember it!
I'm thinking the S&M club scene may have pushed it over. Didn't you see the woman at the club getting her booby twisted? It was brief, but that's what they may have been talking about. Anyone else agree? Not to mention that an S&M club alone would have done it.
iggystar is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 09:25 AM
  #141  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,412
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts
From: Columbus, OH
Originally posted by iggystar
[B]I pretty much would give them about the same grade (B- and B+).
Yeah. B- is exactly what I was thinking. If, instead of making a trilogy out of this, the Wachowskis decided to reedit Reloaded and Revolutions into one film without all the padding, I think it could've been a mind-blowing sequel worthy of an A or A+.
rennervision is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 09:39 AM
  #142  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Indy
Originally posted by iggystar
And personally, I missed the battles in the Matrix. With this being the final installment they could have been so sleek, stylish, but with the intensity of the battles/fight scenes in the first. Instead I got mostly "real world" Mech-battles with squiddies.

Don't get me wrong I enjoyed it, but it just seems like something is missing.
That's pretty much how I felt. Less Zion, more Matrix please. You'd think the people in Zion could have rigged up some EMP's to set off. Just keep them out of range and bring them in one at a time as squiddy's approach.

I actually enjoyed Reloaded more than I did Revolutions. I guess I'm in the minority.
Astro is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 09:44 AM
  #143  
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Australia
I'm surprised after 6 pages no-ones mentioned the ghost twins from Reloaded yet. We all pretty expected them to make an appearance in this film. And then what was the deal with Persephone's kiss sampling in the last movie. I heard it was meant to come into play in Revolutions but now it just seems pointless.
Skank is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 10:00 AM
  #144  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,412
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts
From: Columbus, OH
The ghost twins' return would have been good, but I really thought they were killed in part 2. (But then again, Smith was killed in part 1, so never mind!)
rennervision is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 10:07 AM
  #145  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: USA
I thought it was good movie up untill the end, which I need explaining

Spoiler:
As I saw it in the orginal, people were getting plugged into the Matrix to look for the one. Now wasn't the one supposed to stop the machines from growing humans and using them to how they need. It ends where there is peace but how can this be when the machines are still growing humans? Surely there had to be a winner either the humans or the machines. And what about Agent Smith? It made it feel like the whole trilogy was about destroying Agent Smith because thats all they gained in the end. It was a stupid ending because now they are right back at the beginning just without Agent Smith
jhansla is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 10:18 AM
  #146  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Papillion, NE!
I was too disappointed w/Reloaded, but after seeing Revolutions, I like reloaded better. Reloaded was the cause (of choice) and Revolutions was the effect (of choice). I believe when people saw the tagline "Everything that has a beginning has an End" thought in the blackest and whitest of terms that there was going to be a Cinderella-like ending. A lot of people (critics included) have trouble thinking in the gray. Sure out of six pages of generally negative comments, people might feel upset with the trilogy, but come ten years or later, let's see what people say then.
People complain nowdays that most movies are all FX and no story; behold the Matrix, a series (if you include Animatrix/Enter the Matrix) that combines dazzling FX with a STORY and people still complain that there's little story!! WOW! what is your interpetation of a movie that has a story? Not everything has to have a 2001 level of story. But the Matrix's story is a unique one-one where people of different facets of society (religion, ethnic background) can decipher the story into a multitude of various levels, based on their interpetation.
The ending was fitting. I was thourghly pleased on how this series concluded. No Matrix 4-impossible (well, maybe in other meduims like comics or anime, but not in film).
It's a shame Reloaded is looked down upon, because, technically, reloaded and revolutions are the same movie, cut for the purpose of time.

Someone, Skank, mentioned the twins. My friend thought after Morphius blew up their Escalade, they were unable to dematerialize and therefore died in Reloaded. Anyone have thoughts on this; I thought they escaped.

Matrix: A
M: Reloaded/Revolutions: B

As a trilogy: B+
Zodiac_Speaking is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 10:26 AM
  #147  
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I caught a 10:30pm show last night, and it appears that my fellow moviegoers were as bored as I was. The guy next to me was snoring quietly for the 2nd half of the film. What I found interesting was that a sizable portion of the crowd applauded and cheered -- yes, cheered -- at the end of the long death scene mentioned earlier.


My opinion? REVOLUTIONS sucked. But I'll have to buy the DVD anyway, just to freeze-frame on the aforementioned "twins".
MisterPib is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 10:43 AM
  #148  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Originally posted by rennervision
On a side note, I would also like to know what the heck the MPAA uses as its criteria to rate films these days? This one was the tamest "R" of the three. According to ratings information, it was rated R for "sci-fi violence and brief sexual content." Well, I saw nothing worse than any "sci-fi violence" from PG-13 movies (or does "sci-fi violence" now automatically guarantee an R rating these days?) And the "brief sexual content" must have been very brief indeed, because I don't even remember it!
i personally thought this was the most violent one. i mean there's actually some blood and guts in this movie. there's none in number 2 and some briefly in no 1.
Rypro 525 is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 10:43 AM
  #149  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Papillion, NE!
I was talking about the Twins from Reloaded, the ghost-like karate experts-they were not see or mentioned in Revolutions.



What does one make of Seti, the arab girl? If the Architect is the father and the Oracle is the mother, then, speaking in Christian terms, Seti is the holy spirit?
Zodiac_Speaking is offline  
Old 11-06-03 | 10:50 AM
  #150  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,412
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts
From: Columbus, OH
Originally posted by Rypro 525
i personally thought this was the most violent one. i mean there's actually some blood and guts in this movie. there's none in number 2 and some briefly in no 1.
I suppose it's all subjective. To me, gunshot wounds to the head (in parts 1 and 2) are worse than close-ups of wounded people near death where the preceding violence was not gratuitously shown. Still, I find the Matrix films less "offensive" than, say, the PG-13 rated Austin Powers penis-joke films.
rennervision is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.