The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
#76
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
Great episode. Too bad they had to off Lizzie like that though. While she may not have fans, her character was much more interesting than Carl 
I'll take crazy Lizzie over phoney Carl any day.

I'll take crazy Lizzie over phoney Carl any day.
#77
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
On Talking Dead it said that the walkers were lured to the fire because their eyes are drawn to light and motion.
#78
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
I thought the two kids had tons of scenes this season; they even called back to some of them in this episode. They had the library, fence talks/naming, quarantine, shootings, and fleeing the prison. If crucifying a disemboweled and flayed rabbit is a "3" for you, I'd hate to see what you were like as a kid.
I dunno, I liked this episode. I liked the acting, the pace, & the writing. While it wasn't Game of Thrones good, I thought it was a solid bit of TV.
I dunno, I liked this episode. I liked the acting, the pace, & the writing. While it wasn't Game of Thrones good, I thought it was a solid bit of TV.
Funny, I was just thinking how enjoyable this episode was because of Rick and Carl's absence.
#79
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
This episode reminded me of the complaints from when they were all at Herschel's farm, how the adults would always let Carl run off unsupervised to get into trouble.
In this case, let me get this straight: You have two adults, two children and an infant. And you know that both girls have issues with being able to protect themselves --- one won't kill humans and one won't kill walkers. You've even found her playing with a walker.
But the two adults go off to look for whatever and leave the two little girls alone to watch the baby? Wouldn't it make more sense to pair one adult with one child for safety reasons, even if Lizzie wasn't disturbed?
I liked the episode --- it was the best out of this run of episodes --- but it was another case of the story advancing only because of lazy writing.
In this case, let me get this straight: You have two adults, two children and an infant. And you know that both girls have issues with being able to protect themselves --- one won't kill humans and one won't kill walkers. You've even found her playing with a walker.
But the two adults go off to look for whatever and leave the two little girls alone to watch the baby? Wouldn't it make more sense to pair one adult with one child for safety reasons, even if Lizzie wasn't disturbed?
I liked the episode --- it was the best out of this run of episodes --- but it was another case of the story advancing only because of lazy writing.
#80
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
It took Andrea's sister quite a while to turn. And there was another guy (still alive, but bit) that took forever as well. I'm waiting to see the first person that gets bit and DOESN'T turn. You'd have to figure there has to be at least a small fraction of a percentage of people who are immune.
#82
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 18,527
Received 443 Likes
on
313 Posts
From: Formerly known as Groucho AND Bandoman/Death Moans, Iowa
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
After Laurie's sister died in the first season, the change seemed to take several hours or a whole night. I guess it depends on when the attack on their camp happened.
#83
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
In this case, let me get this straight: You have two adults, two children and an infant. And you know that both girls have issues with being able to protect themselves --- one won't kill humans and one won't kill walkers. You've even found her playing with a walker.
But the two adults go off to look for whatever and leave the two little girls alone to watch the baby? Wouldn't it make more sense to pair one adult with one child for safety reasons, even if Lizzie wasn't disturbed?
But the two adults go off to look for whatever and leave the two little girls alone to watch the baby? Wouldn't it make more sense to pair one adult with one child for safety reasons, even if Lizzie wasn't disturbed?
#84
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,272
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
14 Posts
From: Seattle and sometimes hell
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
That make no sense at all. Ty wanted to get into Carol's pants. Did you see how he copped a feel when he hugged Carol. The girls had to watch the baby to give Ty a chance to make his move. He aint the governor. He isn't going get it on in front of children like some one eyed crazy man.
#85
DVD Talk Hero
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
Meh, this episode should have been better than it was.
We've seen Lizzie's character in two other episodes over the last 3 months. The character wasn't developed well enough to make what happened this episode feel organic. Her craziness went from 3 to 11. The writers didn't earn this episode, and so it came across as comical more than anything else. The whole concept could have been great, but the character was underdeveloped.
The show is really, really bad at multi-episode character arcs, one of its big problems. The current format of episodes focusing on only one or two characters makes it even more difficult. When you compare it to shows with an equal number of characters and multiple story arcs that have balanced screen time every episode, you can begin to understand the deficiencies of what they're doing on TWD.
I did like the scenes with Carol and Tyrese, especially at the end when she revealed she is the killer.
We've seen Lizzie's character in two other episodes over the last 3 months. The character wasn't developed well enough to make what happened this episode feel organic. Her craziness went from 3 to 11. The writers didn't earn this episode, and so it came across as comical more than anything else. The whole concept could have been great, but the character was underdeveloped.
The show is really, really bad at multi-episode character arcs, one of its big problems. The current format of episodes focusing on only one or two characters makes it even more difficult. When you compare it to shows with an equal number of characters and multiple story arcs that have balanced screen time every episode, you can begin to understand the deficiencies of what they're doing on TWD.
I did like the scenes with Carol and Tyrese, especially at the end when she revealed she is the killer.
The only good thing to come from this episode is that we don't have to worry about the story of crazy Lizzy anymore.
#86
Banned
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
I don't think she's damaged goods. She understands what needs to be done to survive in this new world. She still cares for her people and is capable of being the kind nurturing Carol of the past. She's just going to handle stuff that needs to be handled. She will not be paralyzed in the corner anymore or wait for someone else to do it.
It seemed to me that Carol got some of her humanity back. Although it seems to me they are going to pair up Daryl and Beth together. LIke someone else mentioned, this is not normal human society. The show likes to push enevlopes of what is acceptable in the new world.
Thanks for the perspectives that make me think I'm selling Carol a bit short (and she's always been one of my favorites). I still think Daryl might be better off with Beth...someone who's still fairly "uncorrupted" at this point.
Also agree that it seemed insane to leave the girls with the baby...especially after just fighting off a massed walker attack. As Salty pointed out above, this just seemed an excuse to give Lizzie a chance to go all Borden on little sis.
One other point: Is is "kind" to leave walkers behind who are trapped (the latest being the guy on the tracks)? Hardwick mentioned on TD that a lot of tweets mentioned Old Yeller...I commented during the show to my wife that Old Yeller would have come in handy as an illustration to Lizzie & Mika about putting down walkers...that they weren't themselves, and that they wouldn't want to exist like that if they still had human understanding. Likewise, the Of Mice & Men references to Lizzie's "mercy killing" echoed that theme...that, in a world in which one has to fight against being eaten alive and turning into a "thing", the "true death" (borrowing from TB) is something preferable when no other option is available. I always wonder when they leave walkers behind...knowing that the humans are sick of killing but also knowing that they are "putting these things out of their misery." It seems cruel to leave them to linger in that state.
I thought the actress who played Lizzie bears a striking resemblance to Elizabeth Mitchell from Lost/V/Revolution.
Last edited by creekdipper; 03-17-14 at 06:15 PM.
#87
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
When the girl was trying to shoot the deer, all I could think of was Carl bounding out of the woods and getting shot instead (again).
#88
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
All I could think of was that Carol must have been thinking, "We've been living on chestnuts for days and haven't had a decent meal for as long as I can remember. We are living on the edge of malnutrition at best, starvation at worst. Let's have the 7 year-old take the shot."
#89
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
In this case, let me get this straight: You have two adults, two children and an infant. And you know that both girls have issues with being able to protect themselves --- one won't kill humans and one won't kill walkers. You've even found her playing with a walker.
But the two adults go off to look for whatever and leave the two little girls alone to watch the baby? Wouldn't it make more sense to pair one adult with one child for safety reasons, even if Lizzie wasn't disturbed?
But the two adults go off to look for whatever and leave the two little girls alone to watch the baby? Wouldn't it make more sense to pair one adult with one child for safety reasons, even if Lizzie wasn't disturbed?
Still a decent episode mainly because it was pretty fucked up.
Has this show ever gone 3 episodes straight without an appearance from Rick?
#90
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
I was impressed that the episode did not show Lizzie killing Mika, just the after effects with Mika already dead and Lizzie with bloody hands and a knife. Actually showing the murder scene would've changed the tone considerably, made it more outright horror than pure shock.
#91
DVD Talk Limited Edition
#92
Rest In Peace
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
I don't give a crap what happened to everyone else - I'm glad the deer lived.
If fire attracts the walkers why were they walking the opposite direction from it? Is it like moths to a flame or not? Are we supposed to believe they got smart and realized fire=bad?
Agreed about the adults leaving the children alone. I think Carol thought Lizzie figured stuff out now after shooting the walkers and it was safe. I guess. Still it was stupid.
If fire attracts the walkers why were they walking the opposite direction from it? Is it like moths to a flame or not? Are we supposed to believe they got smart and realized fire=bad?
Agreed about the adults leaving the children alone. I think Carol thought Lizzie figured stuff out now after shooting the walkers and it was safe. I guess. Still it was stupid.
#93
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
I don't give a crap what happened to everyone else - I'm glad the deer lived.
If fire attracts the walkers why were they walking the opposite direction from it? Is it like moths to a flame or not? Are we supposed to believe they got smart and realized fire=bad?
Agreed about the adults leaving the children alone. I think Carol thought Lizzie figured stuff out now after shooting the walkers and it was safe. I guess. Still it was stupid.
If fire attracts the walkers why were they walking the opposite direction from it? Is it like moths to a flame or not? Are we supposed to believe they got smart and realized fire=bad?
Agreed about the adults leaving the children alone. I think Carol thought Lizzie figured stuff out now after shooting the walkers and it was safe. I guess. Still it was stupid.
#94
Rest In Peace
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
OK I'll accept that. 
Sounds like a great way to get rid of annoying walkers bothering anyone anymore. Just keep a nice fire going.

Sounds like a great way to get rid of annoying walkers bothering anyone anymore. Just keep a nice fire going.
#95
DVD Talk Legend
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
Wow. Tough watch, this episode.
It did seemed a bit telegraphed that Mika was going to die, but I hadn't imagined it going down like that. Both girls' deaths were really sad.
I thought Carol's timing with Tyreese was perfect. She seemed so heartbroken by what had happened, that she didn't care if Tyreese killed her. Then his forgiving her sort of renews her spirit.
It did seemed a bit telegraphed that Mika was going to die, but I hadn't imagined it going down like that. Both girls' deaths were really sad.
I thought Carol's timing with Tyreese was perfect. She seemed so heartbroken by what had happened, that she didn't care if Tyreese killed her. Then his forgiving her sort of renews her spirit.
#96
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
I'd just be curious how Lizzie managed to kill Mika - they seemed to assume that was a given. Crazy nuts Lizzie, can we really believe her very first instinct would've been to do it by surprise/back turned? The wound was in the front anyways, right?
Needless to say, I think it more likely Nutty McNuts would've said, "Hey, Mika, I'm gonna turn you into one of them and you'll see it all my way! C'mere, you!'
For instance, Lizzie nonchalantly tells Carol and Tyrese she planned/plans on doing Sophia next, and like she was still going to and would be allowed to do so once they saw Mika. The lunatic clearly believed in what she was doing and felt others would, too. I don't exactly buy that she just springs it on Mika without saying something - even if she did, Mika would've been likely to defend herself or run away the second she sees the knife being pulled.
Obviously it happened, so we're supposed to believe it did go down that way... I just have a hard time buying it, all things considered. Furthermore, why the hell wouldn't she have slashed Sophia's throat the second Mika hits the ground? Or hurriedly does so when Carol and Tyrese appear? (Because the 'powers that be' couldn't have that, obviously, which shows the flawed/shoddy approach to the entire thing.)
Furthermore, if she really was so delusional, believing the dead are... whatever she thinks they are, why wouldn't she just have killed herself first? She never once hinted she had any plans of offing herself, nor the adults... I dunno, the whole thing seems to have a lot of holes to me. Just as others mentioned the absurdity of leaving Sophia after discovering Lizzie playing with zombies. Seems the writers fell in love with the payoff, having Carol *have* to kill Lizzie, and rationality be damned if it got in the way.
Needless to say, I think it more likely Nutty McNuts would've said, "Hey, Mika, I'm gonna turn you into one of them and you'll see it all my way! C'mere, you!'
For instance, Lizzie nonchalantly tells Carol and Tyrese she planned/plans on doing Sophia next, and like she was still going to and would be allowed to do so once they saw Mika. The lunatic clearly believed in what she was doing and felt others would, too. I don't exactly buy that she just springs it on Mika without saying something - even if she did, Mika would've been likely to defend herself or run away the second she sees the knife being pulled.
Obviously it happened, so we're supposed to believe it did go down that way... I just have a hard time buying it, all things considered. Furthermore, why the hell wouldn't she have slashed Sophia's throat the second Mika hits the ground? Or hurriedly does so when Carol and Tyrese appear? (Because the 'powers that be' couldn't have that, obviously, which shows the flawed/shoddy approach to the entire thing.)
Furthermore, if she really was so delusional, believing the dead are... whatever she thinks they are, why wouldn't she just have killed herself first? She never once hinted she had any plans of offing herself, nor the adults... I dunno, the whole thing seems to have a lot of holes to me. Just as others mentioned the absurdity of leaving Sophia after discovering Lizzie playing with zombies. Seems the writers fell in love with the payoff, having Carol *have* to kill Lizzie, and rationality be damned if it got in the way.
Last edited by Coladar1; 03-17-14 at 10:02 PM.
#97
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
On the Talking Dead, Melissa McBride mentioned the crossword puzzle that was only partially put together on the table was revealed to the cast to be a picture of Carol's dead daughter Sophia.
#98
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
#99
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Walking Dead -- "The Grove" -- 3/16/14
That's the thing. If they wanted a boring show, the survivors would just teether armless and jawless walkers at the fence of the prison.
#100
DVD Talk Limited Edition




