![]() |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by sydonesia
(Post 11921463)
BTW, I did also like Mark pulling back the curtain a little during the lunchbox deal when Lori claimed she could get them with Disney and he chimed in with "You just got national exposure on Shark Tank. ANY of us can get you with Disney now."
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 11921285)
I wish someone coming into the tank would rip Robert a new one when he does that. I'd be telling him "Well, I'd hope you wouldn't want to work with someone who didn't explore all their options before making a decision" and if he fired back with that "well, you sometimes have to make snap judgments", I'd respond with "I don't want to risk my company with someone so impulsive."
This whole idea that taking time to think about an offer is toxic is NOT the way good business deals work, and those sharks should be ashamed of themselves for treating people like that, when it's more likely they're not really interested in the first place. It's good TV, but it's a bad education for potential up and comers out there. That said, the sock couple knew exactly who and what they wanted and got it. Good for them. Too bad the sock people didn't have Daymond on, he would have been a perfect partner for them. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by sydonesia
(Post 11921463)
I get what you're saying, but it's not really dramatic when Robert pulls that crap with ten minutes left in the show, since at that moment you know they aren't taking his deal.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
The destruction of the FoHawk women was one of the more brutal presentations I've seen on Shark Tank. They were all absolutely right, because the women just didn't have a clue how meager their business really was, but it was just done in such a tactless way. The blonde fighting back probably did her more harm than good, especially since she didn't seem interested in any criticism they had.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Yeah, I think the only reason the FoHawk women made it this far was so the Sharks could eat them alive.
Dumb Kids' Product + Yuppie Mommy Entitlement + Mr Wonderful = Entertainment Gold. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
I want to try some of those ribs. I think the play is get into the restaurants through licensing, then continue to sell the guys ribs in the store, with whatever restaurant's name on them that licenses the ribs. He'd get the name brand recognition from the restaurant to sell more in store, then the money from actual restaurant sales. Win/win
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Deftones
(Post 11937671)
I want to try some of those ribs. I think the play is get into the restaurants through licensing, then continue to sell the guys ribs in the store, with whatever restaurant's name on them that licenses the ribs. He'd get the name brand recognition from the restaurant to sell more in store, then the money from actual restaurant sales. Win/win
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Outback, Tony Roma's, any of the chain steakhouses. I think it would be a big hit.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
The ribs looked awesome. I love "easy" food products like this, but historically they have been poor quality. I like that more gourmet options are starting to become available. I would definitely check it out.
I also loved seeing the Omni VR treadmill - I had no idea they were going on Shark Tank. That is some pretty big exposure for the Rift and associated technologies. I was also impressed they didn't totally destroy that guy, but I'm glad they didn't. While the cost is still high, it was less than they thought, and I think overall the technology impressed them. Whether or not Mark's assessment of this stuff only appealing to a niche of the still relatively niche gaming market remains to be seen. The FoHawk women was awkward. Haven't seen a pitch that awkward since they made a women recount her history of substance abuse on national TV before stating none of them were interested and sending her on her way. I don't know why some people defend their products like that. They weren't even that harsh on the FoHawks, just saying they are pricey for what they are. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Nausicaa
(Post 11939038)
The ribs looked awesome. I love "easy" food products like this, but historically they have been poor quality. I like that more gourmet options are starting to become available. I would definitely check it out.
I also loved seeing the Omni VR treadmill - I had no idea they were going on Shark Tank. That is some pretty big exposure for the Rift and associated technologies. I was also impressed they didn't totally destroy that guy, but I'm glad they didn't. While the cost is still high, it was less than they thought, and I think overall the technology impressed them. Whether or not Mark's assessment of this stuff only appealing to a niche of the still relatively niche gaming market remains to be seen. The FoHawk women was awkward. Haven't seen a pitch that awkward since they made a women recount her history of substance abuse on national TV before stating none of them were interested and sending her on her way. I don't know why some people defend their products like that. They weren't even that harsh on the FoHawks, just saying they are pricey for what they are. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
I would love to have that thing for exercise purposes alone. No, I would not play on it the majority of the time. However, a quick 30-45 minute gaming session a day of sprints like that while playing COD would be amazing. However, it looked very awkward to run on. The idea is great though. I also was happy to see Mark talking up the Rift. It almost seemed like a paid plug how much he knew about it.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Mark was right about the VR treadmill. It serves a niche market within a niche market. I just can't see it selling much even if the Oculus Rift is a huge hit. It's definitely cool though. I think their best bet might be getting the thing in Dave and Buster's.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by spainlinx0
(Post 11939062)
I would love to have that thing for exercise purposes alone. No, I would not play on it the majority of the time. However, a quick 30-45 minute gaming session a day of sprints like that while playing COD would be amazing. However, it looked very awkward to run on. The idea is great though. I also was happy to see Mark talking up the Rift. It almost seemed like a paid plug how much he knew about it.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Goat3001
(Post 11939077)
Mark was right about the VR treadmill. It serves a niche market within a niche market. I just can't see it selling much even if the Oculus Rift is a huge hit. It's definitely cool though. I think their best bet might be getting the thing in Dave and Buster's.
I think the Rift will be pretty successful, but it's too early to say whether this submarket of VR products has any viability. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by spainlinx0
(Post 11939062)
I would love to have that thing for exercise purposes alone. No, I would not play on it the majority of the time. However, a quick 30-45 minute gaming session a day of sprints like that while playing COD would be amazing. However, it looked very awkward to run on. The idea is great though. I also was happy to see Mark talking up the Rift. It almost seemed like a paid plug how much he knew about it.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
The problem with the Omni is that it came off so much cooler as a complete package with the Rift and the gun. Robert was freaking out more over the Rift than anything else.
The price is probably going to be a dealbreaker for a lot of people. Especially when the "accessory" to the product ($400) costs more than the actual product ($300.) |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Noonan
(Post 11939083)
A lot of people say the same thing when they buy treadmills for their home. "I can use it every night while I watch TV!" How many of those do you think get used after the first week?
I do not see it as any more than a niche product, but it is one I would be interested in. Also, the floor space is a lot less than a treadmill. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
I think that product is about 3-6 years ahead of its time. But I think by the end of the current gaming generation, we'll be seeing Microsoft selling it the way they sold Kinnect at the end of the last generation.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by spainlinx0
(Post 11939203)
I see your point, but those treadmills still keep getting bought. The treadmill's problem is the monotony. I think if you disguise exercise, it works better. No one considers playing pickup basketball with your friends "exercise." Now play a pickup game on here.
I do not see it as any more than a niche product, but it is one I would be interested in. Also, the floor space is a lot less than a treadmill. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Deftones
(Post 11937853)
Outback, Tony Roma's, any of the chain steakhouses. I think it would be a big hit.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
well i doubt they are going to be microwaving them at a restaurant. i think that's just for the home consumer. and it did sound like the process of actually removing the ribs was part of the patented process.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Red Dog
(Post 11939701)
Yeah, but you still need the space for it.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
I liked the barbecue guy, and hope he's successful. The virtual-reality device also looked like it had potential, but it's kind of like the Segway. Either people will embrace it or it'll die a slow death.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
The thing about the VR device is it's overpriced and not really high tech in and of itself. The Oculus Rift itself is amazing, if that was what they were pitching you could guarantee they would have made their deal. As for a treadmill with no movable parts for $500 that requires a $300 accessory to really use? Yeah not so much.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
My second Mission Belt arrived in the mail yesterday. :banana:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:02 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.