Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Lost -- "Do No Harm" -- 04.06.2005

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Lost -- "Do No Harm" -- 04.06.2005

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-08-05 | 02:09 AM
  #176  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: San Jose, California
Originally Posted by Ted The Bug
I'm really surprised there was is so much confusion in this thread about the number of survivors. The whole reason we know there was 48 was through dialogue in the first episode.... when Jack&Kate&Charlie find the cockpit, the pilot asks Jack how many survivors and Jack tells the pilot there was 48 survivors.

Then the marshall died leaving 47
Then the lady died swimming leaving 46
Then Ethan killed Scott or Steve leaving 45
Then Boone dying left 44

Claire's baby being born doesn't count as a "survivor", there are still 44 original "survivors".

Dudes! Sara's shirt had 44 on the back of it in that scene with Jack at the piano.
Old 04-08-05 | 03:43 AM
  #177  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by Ted The Bug
I'm really surprised there was is so much confusion in this thread about the number of survivors. The whole reason we know there was 48 was through dialogue in the first episode.... when Jack&Kate&Charlie find the cockpit, the pilot asks Jack how many survivors and Jack tells the pilot there was 48 survivors.

Then the marshall died leaving 47
Then the lady died swimming leaving 46
Then Ethan killed Scott or Steve leaving 45
Then Boone dying left 44

Claire's baby being born doesn't count as a "survivor", there are still 44 original "survivors".
But my question is, was Ethan around for that first head count? Or did he slip in later?
Old 04-08-05 | 05:03 AM
  #178  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by BadlyDrawnBoy
I thought this episode was terrible, horribly slow paced, no back story of note, and nothing happened.

We knew claire would have the baby.

Someone was going to die, would it be boone or not?

I think we need to get back to the secondary characters again, and away from Jack, this is the Jack show with occasional other characters, and he's my least favourite.
I don't know if I'd say terrible, but I did think it was the worst episode of the season. I don't think Claire going through labor and Boone dying of his injuries needed to take up an entire episode. The backstory was pretty lame too, except for Julie Bowen. You don't get cold feet marrying Julie Bowen, Jackass!

I'm annoyed at the writer saying publicly that they were going to kill off a main character, and then actually doing it. We were far enough along I was hoping it was a red herring. It made it worse in a way that it was Boone, since they made him out to be creepy and unlikable recently. I remember reading a quote that they wouldn't dare kill off the Hobbit because he's so popular. Wussies!
Old 04-08-05 | 06:31 AM
  #179  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Just north of Atlanta
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
But my question is, was Ethan around for that first head count? Or did he slip in later?
And did Jack include the pilot in his head count? Why wouldn't he?

Edit: To answer my own question (somewhat)- from the Episode Guide on the ABC website:

Jack, Kate and Charlie find the wreckage in the jungle. They see no signs of survivors as they climb up into the fuselage towards the cockpit. After breaking their way in, they find the Pilot still strapped to his seat. As Kate and Jack search for the fuselage, the seemingly-dead Pilot wakes up. After they give him some water, they tell the pilot "at least 48" of the passengers have survived, and it's been sixteen hours since the crash. The Pilot then tells them they lost their radio six hours into the flight, and couldn't be seen by anyone. They turned around to head to Fiji, and by the time they hit turbulence and crashed, they were a thousand miles off-course. The rescuers are looking in the wrong place.
So it looks like Jack referred to the survivors as 48 "passengers", which I assume wouldn't include the pilot.

Edit 2: To further prove the point, this is from the episode 5 guide, shortly after the lady dies swimming:

Hurley and Charlie tell Jack that they are dangerously low on water. It hasn't rained in a few days and there are 47 people to take care of. Jack has to point out the mathematical error. Better make that 46. They want Jack to decide what should be done, but he wants no part of it.
So it looks like 48 is correct (not counting the pilot). But I assume that count did include Ethan.

Last edited by johnglass; 04-08-05 at 06:43 AM.
Old 04-08-05 | 09:17 AM
  #180  
SmithsGuy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Chain reaction anyone?

Originally Posted by Mike1055
If I remember right she said she hit an SUV head on. So unless Locke trades in his VW Beetle for an SUV this doesn't seem to fit.
Yeah, but Locke could have subsequently hit the SUV in some sort of chain-reaction collision with a numerically appropriate (44 or the like) number of vehicles...

Ciao,
Smithsguy
Old 04-08-05 | 09:24 AM
  #181  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NY
Originally Posted by Ted The Bug
Claire's baby being born doesn't count as a "survivor", there are still 44 original "survivors".
Now you're getting into a whole different debate. The question becomes whether an unborn child is "alive" or not and therefore can be said to be a "passenger" or "survivor." My answer is that the child counts.

I believe Ethan doesn't count as a "survivor" thus still leaving the number at 44.
Old 04-08-05 | 10:52 AM
  #182  
Geofferson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 39,973
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts
From: The Village Green
Not specific to this particular episode, but the coming issue of Entertainment Weekly has the men of "Lost" on the cover...and it is issue #815 (the same number as the Oceanic Flight that crashed in the show).
Old 04-08-05 | 11:11 AM
  #183  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NY
Originally Posted by Geofferson
Not specific to this particular episode, but the coming issue of Entertainment Weekly has the men of "Lost" on the cover...and it is issue #815 (the same number as the Oceanic Flight that crashed in the show).
As posted by
Originally Posted by Timmio
Anyone see the new cover to next week's Entertainment Weekly? It's all about Lost and guess what...it's issue #815! Wasn't that the flight number? I know it's part of the numbers...
Old 04-08-05 | 11:12 AM
  #184  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by Geofferson
Not specific to this particular episode, but the coming issue of Entertainment Weekly has the men of "Lost" on the cover...and it is issue #815 (the same number as the Oceanic Flight that crashed in the show).
Big shocker! Every other week is a Lost cover. I think they are milking it more than ABC.
Old 04-08-05 | 11:13 AM
  #185  
Goldberg74's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 21,947
Received 1,875 Likes on 1,285 Posts
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by hahn
Yeah, but we don't know when Jack got married to Sarah. In the flashbacks, it appeared that his relationship with his father hadn't soured yet, so it very well could have been 5-6 years ago. Ooo Ooo....another theory:
Spoiler:
Maybe Jack's father had an affair with Sarah, leading to the breakup of the marriage and Jack hating his father. His father took to drinking over guilt over what happened...the rest you know.
Maybe?
Seems like a realistic theory to me.

By the way, I'm Vulcan, my blood is green and we have no "blood type".
Old 04-08-05 | 11:14 AM
  #186  
Geofferson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 39,973
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts
From: The Village Green
Originally Posted by runner001
As posted by
Oops. Oh well...
Old 04-08-05 | 12:15 PM
  #187  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Seattle
So I guess the threads have gone from the T-Rex and the wish granting island to studying numerology. I wouldn't be surprised if they were yanking our chains on most of it. "Let's put 44 on her shirt, that'll drive 'em all nuts!"
Old 04-08-05 | 12:23 PM
  #188  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,779
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by runner001
Now you're getting into a whole different debate. The question becomes whether an unborn child is "alive" or not and therefore can be said to be a "passenger" or "survivor." My answer is that the child counts.

I believe Ethan doesn't count as a "survivor" thus still leaving the number at 44.
It isn't a debate at all. It's just about the head count that Jack made when he told the Pilot how many survivors there were. Whether or not the baby was counted by Jack could be a debate but not anything to do with an unborn child counting as alive or not.
Old 04-08-05 | 12:25 PM
  #189  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,779
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Houston, TX
My question is whether Ethan was counted by Jack? Was Ethan reallly around in the beginning? I can't remember him being there or doing anything until the census. Does anybody recall when he showed up?
Old 04-08-05 | 01:06 PM
  #190  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm positive that we never saw Ethan until an episode or two before we found out that he was bad, and not part of the crash group. I've re-watched the series (up to current episode) a couple of times, and remember looking for this.
Old 04-08-05 | 01:49 PM
  #191  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sand Point
Originally Posted by Alyoshka
My question is whether Ethan was counted by Jack? Was Ethan reallly around in the beginning? I can't remember him being there or doing anything until the census. Does anybody recall when he showed up?
Ethan first appeared in the Sayid/French woman episode. He was Locke's hunting partner. In his second episode, he was revealed not to be one of them.
Old 04-08-05 | 02:34 PM
  #192  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Just north of Atlanta
Why was Jack pissed at Locke, saying he murdered Boone? From what I saw, Boone went into the plane of his own free will. Granted, Locke had a big influence over him, but if someone else on the island found that plane I'm sure they would have wanted to poke around inside.
Old 04-08-05 | 02:53 PM
  #193  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: 2nd City
Originally Posted by johnglass
Why was Jack pissed at Locke, saying he murdered Boone? From what I saw, Boone went into the plane of his own free will. Granted, Locke had a big influence over him, but if someone else on the island found that plane I'm sure they would have wanted to poke around inside.
He was pissed because Locke lied to him about how Boone's injuries occurred -- Locke told Jack that Boone fell off a cliff, which was sort of true, but not entirely. I'm not sure how the "lie" Locke told to Jack affected Boone's condition; he still had a mangled leg and internal bleeding, I mean, how would Jack have changed Boone's treatment if he knew that he was inside a plane that fell from a tree (cliff?)? (It looked like a tree to me... tree on a cliff?)

Like Lost.... answer one question, raise ten....
Old 04-08-05 | 02:54 PM
  #194  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Jack didn't know that. He just knows that Locke said he fell off a cliff (i.e. that he lied to him) and they dissappeared.

Jack said something along the lines of "he didn't fall, his leg was crushed." So he knew Locke had lied, and assumes it was his fault since he ran away after dropping him off.

Saying it was murder was just him being pissed. I think he just feels it was Lockes fault since he lied and ran off, rather than thinking Locke tried to kill him intentionally.
Old 04-08-05 | 02:57 PM
  #195  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: 2nd City
Originally Posted by bralph
You have a Tivo and haven't been using it???
I have a Series 2 Tivo in use and a non-subscribed Series 1 in storage, but I think I'll probably just split the cable that night and watch one while I Tivo the other -- American Idol finale is an hour and 45 minutes of crap and 15 minutes of results anyway....
Old 04-08-05 | 03:01 PM
  #196  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: 2nd City
Originally Posted by Josh Hinkle
Jack didn't know that. He just knows that Locke said he fell off a cliff (i.e. that he lied to him) and they dissappeared.

Jack said something along the lines of "he didn't fall, his leg was crushed." So he knew Locke had lied, and assumes it was his fault since he ran away after dropping him off.

Saying it was murder was just him being pissed. I think he just feels it was Lockes fault since he lied and ran off, rather than thinking Locke tried to kill him intentionally.
Oh, OK, I can see that. I was taking it as "you lied to me about how this happened and I treated him differently than if I had known, so you murdered him." But you're right, Jack didn't learn much from Locke before Locke left. I kept the episode because I wasn't tracking it completely Wed. night, so I should probably watch it again.
Old 04-08-05 | 03:24 PM
  #197  
ruk
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: The Island of Staten
i loved that they keep you guessing what will happen next.
Old 04-08-05 | 04:32 PM
  #198  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NY
Originally Posted by Alyoshka
It isn't a debate at all. It's just about the head count that Jack made when he told the Pilot how many survivors there were. Whether or not the baby was counted by Jack could be a debate but not anything to do with an unborn child counting as alive or not.
I guess there's no way to know whether or not Jack counted the baby as an additional survivor. IMO, Jack, as a doctor, would have counted Claire + baby.

As for whether or not Ethan was counted, his name was not on the flight manifest. When the census was taken, that's what they used. I'm going to go with that Ethan was not there in the beginning and snuck in a few eps later and therefore was not counted.

I'm not sure how we can prove one way or the other (baby and Ethan) unless they give us a headcount in an official recap.
Old 04-08-05 | 06:14 PM
  #199  
New Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anyone know the name of the piece of music played at the end of the episode? The piano notes repeated in the main portion was F D F D F D F A F.
Old 04-08-05 | 08:29 PM
  #200  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,445
Received 4,484 Likes on 2,950 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
Boone also told Jack about the plane, so Jack knew that Locke was withholding information.

It's kind of a stretch for Jack to blame Locke for his death, but it seems to be enough for Jack not to trust him. (Of course, Locke would also have a good alibi for keeping the information about the plane secret because of the heroin. Wouldn't want Charlie -- or anyone else who might be tempted -- to know about the giant stash on the island.)


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.