Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-19 | 04:45 PM
  #601  
story's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,035
Received 4,132 Likes on 2,405 Posts
From: Hope.
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.

Did, like, no parent or anybody talk to you about that? I'm just so surprised you didn't at least hear about them all those years. We talked about that all the time when I was a little kid.
Old 11-23-19 | 06:57 PM
  #602  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,798
Received 45 Likes on 37 Posts
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Jay G.
I think all y'all are just unobservant.
THAT is... entirely possible.

I may just have to blame my parents' crappy TV when I was a kid. The picture was always way too dark. So it's possible Crispy Owen and Burnt Beru just blended into their surroundings.
Old 11-23-19 | 07:04 PM
  #603  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,447
Received 4,486 Likes on 2,952 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Jay G.
I mean, yes, there's smoke, and maybe you could've missed them in the wide pan shot, but this shot....



Is pretty explicit. What did you think Luke was averting his eyes from?
I was probably five years old at the time.

Seeing Star Wars in the theater was an overwhelming experience, and the bodies sort of blend in with the rest of the debris.

I wouldn't have wondered why Luke looked away from the smoldering remains of his home. I just accepted that Luke knew his Aunt and Uncle were killed.

Old 11-23-19 | 07:53 PM
  #604  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,737
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,087 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.

I don’t think I grasped exactly what had happened when I was younger either. Picked up on it upon later viewings.

All the Star Wars movies have some darkish things in them, but really nothing beyond burnt to a crisp Anakin in Revenge of the Sith is too gruesome. Yeah there’s a lot of limbs lost, a guy gets cut in half, a couple decapitations, and a couple characters get impaled. None of those are terribly gruesome though. The acts are violent but we don’t see much of anything.
Old 11-23-19 | 09:53 PM
  #605  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.

Just a thought, but they could have also been edited out of TV broadcasts.

Count me as another that doesn't recall the skeletons being that 'in your face.' Like Josh said, they just kinda blended in with the other debris.
Old 11-24-19 | 04:01 PM
  #606  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,447
Received 4,486 Likes on 2,952 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Just a thought, but they could have also been edited out of TV broadcasts.

Count me as another that doesn't recall the skeletons being that 'in your face.' Like Josh said, they just kinda blended in with the other debris.
I might have noticed them in the CBS broadcast in 1983, which probably would have been my second viewing.

This was back in the times before home video (the dark times), so there wasn't any option to pause or rewind, and movies weren't available to view like they are now.

I don't know when my third viewing of Star Wars was (maybe cable, or another tv broadcast?) but I did get the widescreen VHS boxed set in 1995, and I was able to pause and rewind as much as I wanted to, though the image was fuzzy and rather small with those black bars.
Old 11-24-19 | 07:31 PM
  #607  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,737
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,087 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.

I actually have the trilogy that my mom taped off of USA for me back in the day (never actually owned the official releases on VHS). Could check and see how it aired on that.
Old 11-24-19 | 07:41 PM
  #608  
TGM's Avatar
TGM
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,095
Received 475 Likes on 296 Posts
From: Massachusetts
Re: Future Star Wars projects discussion thread - news, rumors, etc.

pretty sure for a lot of us it was likely multi-factorial... cropping, resolution, bewilderment, and just down right naivety.
Old 12-16-19 | 09:41 PM
  #609  
story's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,035
Received 4,132 Likes on 2,405 Posts
From: Hope.
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

I saw this for the first time today and thought it was pretty awesome. I'd like to think this progression based on Yoda's dialogue was intentional, because it does work. Anyone seen this?


Old 12-16-19 | 10:11 PM
  #610  
The Cow's Avatar
Premium Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 25,147
Received 1,214 Likes on 783 Posts
From: Grazing in a field somewhere...
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

I saw it come up a few times on FB. I don’t really associate Fear with young Anakin though. He was hesitant to leave mom, but he was more cocky than a fearful kid.
Old 01-16-20 | 06:27 PM
  #611  
Josh-da-man's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 49,447
Received 4,486 Likes on 2,952 Posts
From: The Bible Belt
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by The Cow
I saw it come up a few times on FB. I don’t really associate Fear with young Anakin though. He was hesitant to leave mom, but he was more cocky than a fearful kid.
Yeah, but Yoda must have picked up something because he gave that "fear" speech to young Anakin.
The following users liked this post:
story (01-17-20)
Old 01-16-20 | 06:43 PM
  #612  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Good news to hear about Waititi.

Regarding that image above, I don’t like to think of Darth Vader as suffering. He’s an evil bad guy who likes to destroy things and hurt people. To feel too deeply about the suffering he must feel because of a bad childhood is to give him too much humanity. Like trying to ask me to understand how much the Oklahoma City bomber must have been suffering.
Old 01-17-20 | 12:25 PM
  #613  
Administrator
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,749
Received 1,409 Likes on 839 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Mabuse
Good news to hear about Waititi.

Regarding that image above, I don’t like to think of Darth Vader as suffering. He’s an evil bad guy who likes to destroy things and hurt people. To feel too deeply about the suffering he must feel because of a bad childhood is to give him too much humanity. Like trying to ask me to understand how much the Oklahoma City bomber must have been suffering.
Your mileage may definitely vary on this. Personally, I think that every person must be humanized, no matter what wrong they do.

Within simply the spirituality of Star Wars, Vader suffers because he is incapable of overcoming his negative traits or reflecting on himself or his actions. It's like a cautionary Buddhist story to illustrate the Four Noble Truths (which seem to be a major influence on Lucas' development of Jedi philosophy).
Old 01-17-20 | 12:34 PM
  #614  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,082
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by IBJoel
Your mileage may definitely vary on this. Personally, I think that every person must be humanized, no matter what wrong they do.

Within simply the spirituality of Star Wars, Vader suffers because he is incapable of overcoming his negative traits or reflecting on himself or his actions. It's like a cautionary Buddhist story to illustrate the Four Noble Truths (which seem to be a major influence on Lucas' development of Jedi philosophy).
Cool. Now humanize Palpatine.
Old 01-17-20 | 01:16 PM
  #615  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,737
Received 1,410 Likes on 1,087 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by IBJoel
Your mileage may definitely vary on this. Personally, I think that every person must be humanized, no matter what wrong they do.

Within simply the spirituality of Star Wars, Vader suffers because he is incapable of overcoming his negative traits or reflecting on himself or his actions. It's like a cautionary Buddhist story to illustrate the Four Noble Truths (which seem to be a major influence on Lucas' development of Jedi philosophy).
Not even just all that, but Vader is physically suffering after being defeated on Mustafar and being put into the suit. Of course we aren’t supposed to think about that and he’s just supposed to be a badass in black, but there’s some interesting lore about the suit itself.
The following users liked this post:
IBJoel (01-17-20)
Old 01-17-20 | 02:20 PM
  #616  
Administrator
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,749
Received 1,409 Likes on 839 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Jay G.
Cool. Now humanize Palpatine.
Palpatine in essence is not a character, but a plot device. We are given no background on him or look into his private life or motives, and his function is simply to move the story along. He is defined solely in relation to the other characters, as either an external representation of internal conflict or problem. He's the personification of the opposing ideology. That said, he does have an appreciation for the arts (the opera scene, his chancellor's office) and displays fear and pain in both ROTJ and TROS.
The following 2 users liked this post by IBJoel:
Jay G. (01-17-20), milo bloom (01-17-20)
Old 01-17-20 | 02:23 PM
  #617  
Administrator
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,749
Received 1,409 Likes on 839 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Mike86
Not even just all that, but Vader is physically suffering after being defeated on Mustafar and being put into the suit. Of course we aren’t supposed to think about that and he’s just supposed to be a badass in black, but there’s some interesting lore about the suit itself.
Yeah, doesn't it cause him physical pain to "harness the Dark Side"? I think that's a point where there was unnecessary literal-ization. It's enough for me that his body is messed up and he lost his loved one as a direct result of his own actions.
Old 01-17-20 | 02:45 PM
  #618  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,586
Received 1,451 Likes on 795 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

As a kid before the Prequels I always thought the Darkside had a possession like hold on Vader and the Emperor controlled him through that. Once the Emperor was about to kill Luke he broke from it.
The following users liked this post:
IBJoel (01-17-20)
Old 01-17-20 | 03:01 PM
  #619  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,650
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by stvn1974
As a kid before the Prequels I always thought the Darkside had a possession like hold on Vader and the Emperor controlled him through that. Once the Emperor was about to kill Luke he broke from it.
"You don't know the power of the Darkside, I MUST obey my master!!" -Darth Vader in Return of the Jedi, 1983

That was a very powerful statement by Vader, as it jives with the exact thing you are saying. Once Anakin turned to the darkside in Revenge of the Sith because he was fooled by Palpatine (along with the whole scene being utterly ridiculous), the whole power of the darkside lost alot of weight to me.
The following users liked this post:
IBJoel (01-17-20)
Old 01-17-20 | 08:40 PM
  #620  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,675
Received 155 Likes on 125 Posts
From: MA
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

The one thing I love about the OT is that every time I watch I find something new that just bothers me. I was just watching ESB and the scene when Vader is talking to the bounty hunters, how the hell would they have gotten there? The fleet was in middle of nowhere in an asteroid field.
Old 01-17-20 | 09:14 PM
  #621  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,987
Received 1,661 Likes on 1,201 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Deadman31
The one thing I love about the OT is that every time I watch I find something new that just bothers me. I was just watching ESB and the scene when Vader is talking to the bounty hunters, how the hell would they have gotten there? The fleet was in middle of nowhere in an asteroid field.
They were inbetween the Hoth and Bespin systems, not a major lane, but not exactly in the boonies either. Vader just posted a help wanted listing on space-craigslist and gave them the fleet's transponder codes to find them.
Old 01-17-20 | 10:39 PM
  #622  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 6,880
Received 327 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

So Vader had to wait until they all showed to brief them? Were there any bounty hunters that showed up after that? That would be embarassing.

Did they really have to meet on the bridge of the Star Destroyer? That seems like a security risk. You'd think a ship that big would have some empty meeting rooms or something.
Old 01-18-20 | 12:17 PM
  #623  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,987
Received 1,661 Likes on 1,201 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Vader probably did it on the bridge to embarrass the officers who were having trouble catching one little freighter.
Old 01-18-20 | 06:58 PM
  #624  
story's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,035
Received 4,132 Likes on 2,405 Posts
From: Hope.
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by windom
So Vader had to wait until they all showed to brief them? Were there any bounty hunters that showed up after that? That would be embarassing.

Did they really have to meet on the bridge of the Star Destroyer? That seems like a security risk. You'd think a ship that big would have some empty meeting rooms or something.
Welcome to the forum, Seth Green, and I love Robot Chicken!
The following users liked this post:
Trevor (01-18-20)
Old 01-18-20 | 09:32 PM
  #625  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,675
Received 155 Likes on 125 Posts
From: MA
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by milo bloom
Vader probably did it on the bridge to embarrass the officers who were having trouble catching one little freighter.
Exactly, that’s 90 % of empire was Vader and his human resource department problems. He did it out in the open to try and light a fire under the asses of his incompetent crew. It worked for a little bit all the way through the Cloud City incidents but again due to gross incompetence, the Falcon gets away. Vader quietly storms off and I’m sure he probably resigned from Human Resources position shortly after.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.