Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017)
10.24%
21.46%
25.37%
8.78%
15.61%
6.34%
5.85%
2.44%
2.93%
0.49%
0.49%
What are you high?
0
0%
Voters: 205. You may not vote on this poll

Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-17, 10:48 AM
  #1126  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 44,233
Received 1,944 Likes on 1,505 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Breakfast with Girls
I agree with them, too. I had a mixed reaction at the end of the film. The key point they make that I agree with is that there's not a single character or plot development to anticipate in Episode IX. All they've set up is Resistance vs. First Order and Rey vs. Kylo Ren.

I've also grown tired of how oppressive the recent Star Wars movies have been. The original trilogy had big threats, but it remained fun. The Force Awakens, Rogue One, and now The Last Jedi are just so relentlessly dark. I wouldn't have been shocked at the end of The Last Jedi if the First Order killed everyone. Like, that's it. The end. The First Order wins. It would have felt like the natural conclusion, honestly.
I don't know how you define fun, but I feel like these movies have comedic moments despite the oppressive nature of the FO, and are in a lot of ways less dark and scary than the OT, where there was similar hopelessness. I mean the end of Empire basically ends with Luke emotionally and physically crippled, and Han trapped in carbonite after they were betrayed by Lando (which was really shocking to me when I was a kid). I'm not sure how "fun" that was.
Old 12-27-17, 11:10 AM
  #1127  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,748
Received 1,156 Likes on 902 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Threadf

Yeah agreed. I don’t view either this or The Force Awakens as too dark. There are a lot of funny character moments and in jokes and while some things are cutesy and probably a bit Disney-fied (BB-8, the porgs) none of it feels too forced. The darkest of the new films is Rogue One but really it’s basically a movie that’s a suicide mission so that’s to be expected. Even there though K2SO provided some great humor and is one of the best new characters despite only being in one film.
Old 12-27-17, 02:01 PM
  #1128  
DVD Talk Legend
 
stingermck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cobra Island
Posts: 17,130
Received 427 Likes on 291 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Just saw it a 4th time. Still enjoy it.

I was surprised the theater was almost full. On a Wednesday, 11am and it's 6 degrees outside.
Old 12-27-17, 02:15 PM
  #1129  
Member
 
Brack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: near Cincinnati
Posts: 10,007
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

I’ve seen it three times now, the last ones being back-to-back showings on Xmas Eve, and I think it keeps getting better. The casino stuff is actually not even 25 minutes of the movie, maybe 20 minutes even. I’ll have try to keep count next time. That’s nothing considering the length of the movie. It’s a brisk 2 1/2 hours for me.

Phasma needs to give up on that armor. It clearly hinders her ability to move effectively in a fight. I’d rather see her kicking but, i.e. Game of Thrones style, even if it would be typecasting/performing.
Old 12-27-17, 02:17 PM
  #1130  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 19,515
Received 917 Likes on 677 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by stingermck
Just saw it a 4th time. Still enjoy it.

I was surprised the theater was almost full. On a Wednesday, 11am and it's 6 degrees outside.
My wife went to see Greatest Showman (or whatever it's called) yesterday afternoon and said they had to sit in the front row. Packed house at 1pm on a Tuesday.

I saw TLJ a 2nd time. Sadly, I still don't enjoy it. It's a good movie but a bad Star Wars story.
Old 12-27-17, 02:39 PM
  #1131  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 44,233
Received 1,944 Likes on 1,505 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Brack
Phasma needs to give up on that armor. It clearly hinders her ability to move effectively in a fight. I’d rather see her kicking but, i.e. Game of Thrones style, even if it would be typecasting/performing.
Eh, the blaster proof armor is the only reason she didn't die earlier (if she is indeed dead). It is a little surprising that for all the storm troopers they have, we haven't really gotten a ground level battle with rebel forces, the closest is on Maz's planet and the FO retreated before the good guys landed. That's the only way she could kick butt, if she beat some red shirts.
Old 12-27-17, 02:43 PM
  #1132  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,684
Received 650 Likes on 450 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by stingermck
I was surprised the theater was almost full. On a Wednesday, 11am and it's 6 degrees outside.
Originally Posted by Noonan
My wife went to see Greatest Showman (or whatever it's called) yesterday afternoon and said they had to sit in the front row. Packed house at 1pm on a Tuesday...
A lot of people are off work/school this week, so movie viewing is going to be up. This is why the doom-and-glooming of TLJ's "poor" 3 day weekend was a bit premature. TLJ actually did slightly better box office on Tue than on Mon, Christmas Day.
https://www.the-numbers.com/news/227...h-28-3-million

The box office trend looks like it's going to split the difference between TFA and Rogue One in BO gross:
https://www.the-numbers.com/movies/c...tar-Wars-Story

Last edited by Jay G.; 12-27-17 at 02:53 PM.
Old 12-27-17, 02:57 PM
  #1133  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,019
Received 100 Likes on 80 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin

The Cruiser hitting lightspeed through the Star Destroyer has to be my favorite scene. It was just epic.
I am not a card carrying member of the smear TLJ campaign or trying to convince people otherwise, but for me I have a difficult time getting past completely illogical and silly plotting. The "epic" payoffs of ludicrous plotting does not make up for the serious problems it creates.

Take this as an example. Visually and technically it was awesome. But I cant get immersed because the scene is inherently stupid and violates its own rules. I love fantasy books and the best fantasy books have outlandish elements but there is a science and consistency to them.

So it's cool but the scene is just so dumb?

1. Why couldn't they use autopilot and not have to have purple hair die
2. If that works, why isnt that their main way of fighting the New Order. It is INDEFENSIBLE
3. Why didnt someone think of this before?

So that scene was cool and all but it tears down the foundation of the entire universe in which Star Wars exists. It's cool for the sake of cool and has dramatic impact, but it is just so game changing that it just ruins the experience.

And there are dozens of things like this in the movie. The cool scenes in a movie should flow logically from the narrative, not just thrown in as a convenient plot device.

The entire premise of the movie is stupid. All of a sudden the ships seem to run on gas of some sort and they don't have enough fuel so they can only warp once more, but (plot armor) they have a Warp tracker so we have to eliminate that, but (plot armor) we are smaller so we can stay ahead of the New Orders bigger ships?

Seriously?

All of that just again tears down the universe of Star Wars. None of that make sense on any level.

It just detaches me (and many others) from the movie, and once you are detached and not involved in the story it just amplifies every little thing until it becomes just unwatchably bad.

The PT did the same thing. There was a great story in there of Palpatine democratically becoming the Emperor and at the same time turning Anakin to the "dark side" but it was done in like the dumbest way possible.

One thing I did like about TLJ is the broadening of the world, though it could have been done a zillion times better. I also liked the foreshadowing that there really isn't a "dark" side of the force, just a set of powers that come from a different place and it is how you use those that determine if it is good or evil.
Old 12-27-17, 03:23 PM
  #1134  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 43,205
Received 36 Likes on 20 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by johnnysd
So it's cool but the scene is just so dumb?

1. Why couldn't they use autopilot and not have to have purple hair die
2. If that works, why isnt that their main way of fighting the New Order. It is INDEFENSIBLE
3. Why didnt someone think of this before?
I can think of a dozen answers to each of those questions.
  • The fleet didn't have autopilot.
  • They did have autopilot, but it was damaged.
  • The autopilot works, but Captain Holdo wanted to be able to respond to changed circumstances rather than trust the autopilot.
  • The autopilot can't be programmed to do whatever it is Holdo planned to do after the escape pods got away.
  • There needed to be life signs on board the ship or the First Order would have known it was a ruse.
  • Ships are expensive and take a long time to build; you can't go ramming them into the enemy every battle or you'll quickly run out of ships.
  • Once the First Order knows about the tactic, they'll come up with workarounds.
  • People did think of it before -- it happened in the Clone Wars; we just never saw it on screen.
  • Nobody thought of it before because Holdo is a tactical genius.
  • People thought of it before but it was too horrific to contemplate the thought of a suicide mission.
That's just off the top of my head.
Old 12-27-17, 03:27 PM
  #1135  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,019
Received 100 Likes on 80 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by JasonF
I can think of a dozen answers to each of those questions.
  • The fleet didn't have autopilot.
  • They did have autopilot, but it was damaged.
  • The autopilot works, but Captain Holdo wanted to be able to respond to changed circumstances rather than trust the autopilot.
  • The autopilot can't be programmed to do whatever it is Holdo planned to do after the escape pods got away.
  • There needed to be life signs on board the ship or the First Order would have known it was a ruse.
  • Ships are expensive and take a long time to build; you can't go ramming them into the enemy every battle or you'll quickly run out of ships.
  • Once the First Order knows about the tactic, they'll come up with workarounds.
  • People did think of it before -- it happened in the Clone Wars; we just never saw it on screen.
  • Nobody thought of it before because Holdo is a tactical genius.
  • People thought of it before but it was too horrific to contemplate the thought of a suicide mission.
That's just off the top of my head.
Ok. if those rationalizations work for you that's great.
Old 12-27-17, 03:38 PM
  #1136  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,748
Received 1,156 Likes on 902 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

I think you’re overthinking it a bit and those explanations are all more than logical especially considering that this is a science fiction adventure film.
Old 12-27-17, 03:47 PM
  #1137  
DVD Talk Hero
 
slop101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: So. Cal.
Posts: 43,911
Received 445 Likes on 312 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by johnnysd
Ok. if those rationalizations work for you that's great.
You're watching a space opera about space wizards and you're sweating this shit? Give me a fucking break.
Old 12-27-17, 04:00 PM
  #1138  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 44,233
Received 1,944 Likes on 1,505 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by JasonF
I can think of a dozen answers to each of those questions.
  • The fleet didn't have autopilot.
  • They did have autopilot, but it was damaged.
  • The autopilot works, but Captain Holdo wanted to be able to respond to changed circumstances rather than trust the autopilot.
  • The autopilot can't be programmed to do whatever it is Holdo planned to do after the escape pods got away.
  • There needed to be life signs on board the ship or the First Order would have known it was a ruse.
  • Ships are expensive and take a long time to build; you can't go ramming them into the enemy every battle or you'll quickly run out of ships.
  • Once the First Order knows about the tactic, they'll come up with workarounds.
  • People did think of it before -- it happened in the Clone Wars; we just never saw it on screen.
  • Nobody thought of it before because Holdo is a tactical genius.
  • People thought of it before but it was too horrific to contemplate the thought of a suicide mission.
That's just off the top of my head.
I think it's less stupid that Holdo (or someone) needed to stay on the ship for tactical reasons than for the dummies to stay on the medical and support frigates when they knew they were going to be shot down. And I think someone mentioned this before in this thread, but kamikaze bombers have been a thing for a long time and yet it's not standard practice in wartime.

But the main thing is, that was one of the coolest parts in the movie! I mean are you going to complain that all of a sudden everything was quiet? Lasers make sounds in space, where are the explosions? How did that collision warp Phasma all the way across the fighter bay when she was standing right in front of Finn and Rose just before?

And I said it earlier, but there are a lot dumber strategic things that happen. Like those worthless b-wing lite speeders Poe and company went out in, which did absolutely nothing except give Finn and Rose a cool scene. Or the first order landing and marching slowly in a line towards the wall with the command ship ripe for targeting just hovering overhead, and no thought to surround the base or anything with their superior numbers. Or, and this is probably the one that I agree with the most because it's so central to the plot, the fact that the first order had no access to smaller, faster frigates, or ability to warp other ships in front of them to pincer them in, or heck just sacrifice some tie fighters to slow them down. Or why Holdo doesn't reveal her plan, since there was nothing to be gained by secrecy (if they thought there was a traitor, the traitor would have similarly given them up when they launched in the escape pods anyway).
Old 12-27-17, 04:06 PM
  #1139  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,684
Received 650 Likes on 450 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by fujishig
I think it's less stupid that Holdo (or someone) needed to stay on the ship for tactical reasons than for the dummies to stay on the medical and support frigates when they knew they were going to be shot down...
I thought the captain of the medical ship said that the crew had all been evacuated, presumably to the main cruiser. He was piloting the ship while everyone else escaped, pretty much like the beginning of Star Trek (2009), or like Holdo does just a bit later in the film.
Old 12-27-17, 04:11 PM
  #1140  
Banned by request
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Goodbye and Good Luck
Posts: 17,800
Received 778 Likes on 582 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

My biggest a gripe was that red background in Snokes room. That shit looked flammable as hell. Why would you use flammable background like that stuff? I’m glad he’s dead.
Old 12-27-17, 04:18 PM
  #1141  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 44,233
Received 1,944 Likes on 1,505 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Jay G.
I thought the captain of the medical ship said that the crew had all been evacuated, presumably to the main cruiser. He was piloting the ship while everyone else escaped, pretty much like the beginning of Star Trek (2009), or like Holdo does just a bit later in the film.
Right, I meant the captain himself. The ship is running out of fuel and is going to just float in space and get destroyed. Holdo at least has to maintain course and react if the FO does anything while she continues on the path so that it doesn't seem like everyone abandoned ship.
Old 12-27-17, 04:25 PM
  #1142  
Banned by request
 
Supermallet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Termite Terrace
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

The whole movie the resistance goes on about how many ships it’s losing—they clearly don’t have enough ships to do endless hyperspace suicide attacks like Holdo did. Furthermore, it didn’t actually destroy most of the big First Order ships, it just damaged them, so not only is it an extreme waste of resources, it’s also not as effective as targeted strikes would be. Holdo only did it out of sheer desperation.
Old 12-27-17, 04:37 PM
  #1143  
DVD Talk Legend
 
sracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 15,380
Received 59 Likes on 37 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Just returned from seeing it for the first time. As a die-hard fan of the original trilogy (but not of the prequel trilogy, nor the novels, or any other side-bar series, etc.)... I absolutely loved it. (with only a few cringe-worthy scenes, like Leia's "superman in space" moment)

It had an epic feeling to it... mostly due to the Original Trilogy-feel and the presence of Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill. It got me wondering if there has been a longer time span for an actor to play the same character.

I thought there were a quite a few points of commonality between TLJ and ESB. Ice Planet vs. Salt Planet, Yoda the hermit vs. Luke the Hermit, etc. It wasn't over done, and it gave me a subtle sense of deja vu that didn't seem like a rehash.

I appreciated that not every encounter was an epic battle to the death, but some were dispatched relatively quickly.

So much fun. As with TFA, I felt like 20-something again (roughly the age range I was when the OT was first released).

Last edited by sracer; 12-27-17 at 05:04 PM. Reason: fixed typos
Old 12-27-17, 04:43 PM
  #1144  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 44,233
Received 1,944 Likes on 1,505 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by sracer
It had an epic feeling to it... mostly due to the Original Trilogy-feel and the presence of Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill. It got me wondering if there has been a longer time span for an actor to play the same character.
First off, glad you had fun.

As far as reprising roles, off the top of my head, maybe Jeff Bridges in Tron? Arnold in Terminator and Ford in Indiana Jones were long but not quite as long an in between I think.
Old 12-27-17, 04:44 PM
  #1145  
Member
 
Brack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: near Cincinnati
Posts: 10,007
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by slop101
You're watching a space opera about space wizards and you're sweating this shit? Give me a fucking break.
This x1000000000000000000000

I’m getting people on other blogs mad about astral projections not being “canon” and why other Jedis never did it, when it’s almost hinted at when Kylo feels water on his hand/face after another force connection with Rey.

The reason is most likely because it’s a suicide ability. Jedis typically aren’t kamikaze pilots, but whatever, people will bitch about anything.
Old 12-27-17, 04:51 PM
  #1146  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,684
Received 650 Likes on 450 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by sracer
It got me wondering if there has been a longer time span for an actor to play the same character....
This prompted me to look into this. Unsurprisingly, the answer is that certain soap opera actors have acted for longer:

https://www.quora.com/Which-actor-ha...e-longest-time
For television, that would be William Roache. He has played Ken Barlow on the British soap opera Coronation Street for 56 years...

If you're looking for an American answer, that too would come from a soap opera. Don Hastings played Bob Hughes on the soap opera As the World Turns, from 1960 until the series ended in 2010 (just shy of 50 years).

There's also been some impressive gaps where actors reprised old roles. It was 42 years between the Twilight Zone episode "It's A Good Life" (1961) and the Twilight Zone revival episode "It's Still A Good Life" (2003), with Cloris Leachman and Bill Mumy both reprising their roles.

https://www.giantbomb.com/forums/off...-role-1771209/
Old 12-27-17, 04:52 PM
  #1147  
Member
 
Brack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: near Cincinnati
Posts: 10,007
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by fujishig
And I said it earlier, but there are a lot dumber strategic things that happen. Like those worthless b-wing lite speeders Poe and company went out in, which did absolutely nothing except give Finn and Rose a cool scene. Or the first order landing and marching slowly in a line towards the wall with the command ship ripe for targeting just hovering overhead, and no thought to surround the base or anything with their superior numbers. Or, and this is probably the one that I agree with the most because it's so central to the plot, the fact that the first order had no access to smaller, faster frigates, or ability to warp other ships in front of them to pincer them in, or heck just sacrifice some tie fighters to slow them down. Or why Holdo doesn't reveal her plan, since there was nothing to be gained by secrecy (if they thought there was a traitor, the traitor would have similarly given them up when they launched in the escape pods anyway).
At least the traitor would’ve most likely exposed, but yeah, I didn’t like that much either.

The First Order was crippled too, they just got blindedsided by a kamikaze Lightspeed attack, so maybe they were attacking on the side of caution and didn’t know what was on that planet as far as weapons.
Old 12-27-17, 04:58 PM
  #1148  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
funkyryno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,361
Received 188 Likes on 105 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Supermallet
... There is the shot in TLJ of Rey looking at Finn as he covers Rose with a blanket but it seemed to me more like a shot meant to emphasize how much their paths have diverged and less of a romantic longing on Rey’s part.
I believe it was a symbolic scene of Rey looking longingly at Force Awakens plot threads that went nowhere in the Last Jedi.
Old 12-27-17, 05:05 PM
  #1149  
Member
 
Brack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: near Cincinnati
Posts: 10,007
Received 61 Likes on 39 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by funkyryno
I believe it was a symbolic scene of Rey looking longingly at Force Awakens plot threads that went nowhere in the Last Jedi.
That was the first time she saw Finn conscious and reminded her of how she had left him and hoped her friend would recover. Think Finn had the hots for Rey rather than vice versa, but hey, this isn’t going to have a Han/Leia love story like the OT did, at least no signs of one atm.
Old 12-27-17, 05:05 PM
  #1150  
DVD Talk Legend
 
sracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
Posts: 15,380
Received 59 Likes on 37 Posts
Re: Star Wars: The Last Jedi (R. Johnson, 2017) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Jay G.
This prompted me to look into this. Unsurprisingly, the answer is that certain soap opera actors have acted for longer:

https://www.quora.com/Which-actor-ha...e-longest-time



There's also been some impressive gaps where actors reprised old roles. It was 42 years between the Twilight Zone episode "It's A Good Life" (1961) and the Twilight Zone revival episode "It's Still A Good Life" (2003), with Cloris Leachman and Bill Mumy both reprising their roles.

https://www.giantbomb.com/forums/off...-role-1771209/
Thanks! I should’ve known that as my Mom has been watching the same soaps for 50+ years. lol


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.