Rogue One: A Star Wars Story (Edwards, 2016) The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread
Subscribe
#1
OldBoy , 12-11-16 04:26 PM
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
OldBoy
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
close
- Join DateDec 2003
- Location"Are any of us really anywhere?"
- Posts:53,886
Received 1,678 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
**SPOILERS WITHIN**
Please continue pre-release discussion here.
Movie:
" Rogue One: A Star Wars Story " (Starring: Felicity Jones, Diego Luna, Donnie Yen, Alan Tudyk, Ben Mendelsohn, Wen Jiang, Forest Whitaker, Mads Mikkelsen)
Release Date:
12/16/16
Rating:
PG-13 (for extended sequences of sci-fi violence and action throughout.)
Running Time:
133m. (2h. 13m.)
Budget:
$200 million (estimated)
IMDb Synopsis:
IMDb Info and Rating:
7.9 (3,871 votes as of 12/14/16)
Rotten Tomatoes:
Fresh:137 Rotten:27 (84% as of 12/14/16)
Metacritic:
65 metascore ('Generally favorable reviews' as of 12/14/16)
Trailer:
Poster Art:

Please continue pre-release discussion here.
Movie:
" Rogue One: A Star Wars Story " (Starring: Felicity Jones, Diego Luna, Donnie Yen, Alan Tudyk, Ben Mendelsohn, Wen Jiang, Forest Whitaker, Mads Mikkelsen)
Release Date:
12/16/16
Rating:
PG-13 (for extended sequences of sci-fi violence and action throughout.)
Running Time:
133m. (2h. 13m.)
Budget:
$200 million (estimated)
IMDb Synopsis:
Spoiler:
IMDb Info and Rating:
7.9 (3,871 votes as of 12/14/16)
Rotten Tomatoes:
Fresh:137 Rotten:27 (84% as of 12/14/16)
Metacritic:
65 metascore ('Generally favorable reviews' as of 12/14/16)
Trailer:
Poster Art:

#2
Abob Teff , 12-11-16 06:08 PM
DVD Talk Hero
Abob Teff
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateAug 1999
- LocationNot necessarily Formerly known as Solid Snake
- Posts:34,164
Received 2,037 Likes
on
1,385 Posts
Jyn Erso is Snoke?! Holy shit! 
I am eagerly awaiting the post-release conversation on this -- thank you for setting it up Oldboy!
The pre-release discussion is interesting due to the number of people saying "temper your expectations, this won't be great without Luke, Han, and Leia". Notice nobody mentions Chewie in that breath ... no medal again.
Anyway, it will be interesting!

I am eagerly awaiting the post-release conversation on this -- thank you for setting it up Oldboy!
The pre-release discussion is interesting due to the number of people saying "temper your expectations, this won't be great without Luke, Han, and Leia". Notice nobody mentions Chewie in that breath ... no medal again.
Anyway, it will be interesting!
#3
OldBoy , 12-11-16 06:44 PM
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
OldBoy
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
close
- Join DateDec 2003
- Location"Are any of us really anywhere?"
- Posts:53,886
Received 1,678 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
Have my reserved seats already purchased. Yee haw!
#4
Hazel Motes , 12-12-16 12:18 AM
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Hazel Motes
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
close
- Join DateAug 2009
- Posts:7,940
Received 583 Likes
on
395 Posts
Quote:

I am eagerly awaiting the post-release conversation on this -- thank you for setting it up Oldboy!
The pre-release discussion is interesting due to the number of people saying "temper your expectations, this won't be great without Luke, Han, and Leia". Notice nobody mentions Chewie in that breath ... no medal again.
Anyway, it will be interesting!
Vader > Luke, Han, LeiaOriginally Posted by Abob Teff
Jyn Erso is Snoke?! Holy shit! 
I am eagerly awaiting the post-release conversation on this -- thank you for setting it up Oldboy!
The pre-release discussion is interesting due to the number of people saying "temper your expectations, this won't be great without Luke, Han, and Leia". Notice nobody mentions Chewie in that breath ... no medal again.
Anyway, it will be interesting!
#6
For comparisons sake, what did Episode VII end up with on RT?
#7
SmackDaddy , 12-13-16 12:07 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Force Awakens: 92% Fresh (333 fresh, 28 rotten)
#8
Solid Snake , 12-13-16 12:15 PM
Banned
Quote:
Originally Posted by redcon1
Currently at 84% on RT. 41 Fresh, 8 Rotten.
Quote:
..... that was quick.Originally Posted by SmackDaddy
92% Fresh (333 fresh, 28 rotten)
#9
I'm reading it as 79% at the moment (63/17)
#10
OldBoy , 12-13-16 12:39 PM
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
OldBoy
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
close
- Join DateDec 2003
- Location"Are any of us really anywhere?"
- Posts:53,886
Received 1,678 Likes
on
1,384 Posts
#11
RichC2 , 12-13-16 01:26 PM
DVD Talk Hero
RichC2
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:46,549
Received 1,353 Likes
on
1,062 Posts
Sounds like fan critics are loving it while regular critics are struggling to find anything unique about it.
Roeper's conclusion makes sense too:
Roeper's conclusion makes sense too:
Quote:
Small stuff. Mostly and most memorably, “Rogue One” is a bright light in the “Star Wars” canon.
Originally Posted by Richard Roeper
So why three and a half stars? Why not the full four stars? There was a little too much “We’ve got to do this!” and “I’m going to explain that!” in the dialogue — and the score was a bit heavy-handed and overbearing in the transitions from “inspirational music to accompany our heroes” to “foreboding harbinger of bad things to come” when various villains enter the picture.Small stuff. Mostly and most memorably, “Rogue One” is a bright light in the “Star Wars” canon.
#12
I know I'm in the minority, but I've never cared for Giacchino's music in pretty much ever movie he's done. The heavy-handiness worked briefly for the Star Trek reboot, but even then it was, well too heavy-handed. That may be the one aspect of this movie that will dull the level of excitement for me when I see it this weekend.
#13
Mike86 , 12-13-16 03:09 PM
DVD Talk Hero
Mike86
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateApr 2009
- LocationSouth Dakota
- Posts:25,724
Received 1,409 Likes
on
1,086 Posts
Quote:
Roeper's conclusion makes sense too:
I dunno some of the fan critic reviews I've listened to aren't bashing it but seem a bit mixed. It sounds like there's a lack of good characterization save for a few characters. None of them seem to really hate it but I don't think its going to knock our socks off with how great it is.Originally Posted by RichC2
Sounds like fan critics are loving it while regular critics are struggling to find anything unique about it.Roeper's conclusion makes sense too:
#14
We have a GAME CHANGER on our hands!!!!! Some guy named Michael Doran says Rogue One "is clearly the most accomplished feat of film making of the so-far eight."
I think he is forgetting just what Star Wars did in '77. This could end up having a better story, but no way in hell will this ever be considered a more accomplished film making feat than Star Wars.
I think he is forgetting just what Star Wars did in '77. This could end up having a better story, but no way in hell will this ever be considered a more accomplished film making feat than Star Wars.
#15
Quote:
Yeah, the lack of compelling characters/characterizations seems to be a consensus of many reviews.Originally Posted by Mike86
I dunno some of the fan critic reviews I've listened to aren't bashing it but seem a bit mixed. It sounds like there's a lack of good characterization save for a few characters. None of them seem to really hate it but I don't think its going to knock our socks off with how great it is.
Stuckmann's non spoiler review
#16
Ash Ketchum , 12-14-16 07:13 AM
DVD Talk Legend
Ash Ketchum
DVD Talk Legend
close
- Join DateFeb 2009
- Posts:13,246
Received 476 Likes
on
354 Posts
A.O. Scott gives it a negative review in The New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/mo...dayspaper&_r=0
Here's a quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/mo...dayspaper&_r=0
Here's a quote:
Quote:
Millions of people will sit through this thoroughly mediocre movie (directed with basic competence by Gareth Edwards from a surprisingly hackish script by Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy) and convince themselves that its perfectly delightful. Its so much easier to obey than to resist. The spoiler warning sent by the Disney empire instructed journalists to continue to be our partners on this journey, and defiance is unthinkable, even if partner is taken as a synonym for shill.
Millions of people will sit through this thoroughly mediocre movie (directed with basic competence by Gareth Edwards from a surprisingly hackish script by Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy) and convince themselves that its perfectly delightful. Its so much easier to obey than to resist. The spoiler warning sent by the Disney empire instructed journalists to continue to be our partners on this journey, and defiance is unthinkable, even if partner is taken as a synonym for shill.
#17
Dan , 12-14-16 08:16 AM
DVD Talk Hero
Dan
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateFeb 2005
- LocationThe place beyond the pines
- Posts:29,222
Received 1,547 Likes
on
1,104 Posts
Quote:
Why does that dude always have such an obnoxious fucking look on his face in his terrible YouTube thumbnails. Makes me want to punch him.Originally Posted by Paul_SD
Stuckmann's non spoiler review
#18
EddieMoney , 12-14-16 08:18 AM
RIP
Quote:
Because he's an obnoxious fuck who deserves to be punched.Originally Posted by Dan
Why does that dude always have such an obnoxious fucking look on his face in his terrible YouTube thumbnails. Makes me want to punch him.
#19
I never pay attention to people who become famous on YouTube, I was always confused when people kept citing Stuckmann as though he was a well known reviewer.
#20
Mike86 , 12-14-16 09:03 AM
DVD Talk Hero
Mike86
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateApr 2009
- LocationSouth Dakota
- Posts:25,724
Received 1,409 Likes
on
1,086 Posts
I like a lot of YouTube reviewers personally. Stuckmann is a good reviewer but I agree about his thumbnails being goofy.
#21
GoldenJCJ , 12-14-16 09:22 AM
DVD Talk Hero
GoldenJCJ
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateOct 2000
- LocationColorado
- Posts:32,564
Received 4,778 Likes
on
2,989 Posts
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/mo...dayspaper&_r=0
Here's a quote:
Millions of people will sit through this thoroughly mediocre movie (directed with basic competence by Gareth Edwards from a surprisingly hackish script by Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy) and convince themselves that it’s perfectly delightful. It’s so much easier to obey than to resist. The spoiler warning sent by the Disney empire instructed journalists to “continue to be our partners on this journey,” and defiance is unthinkable, even if “partner” is taken as a synonym for “shill.”
That sounds a lot like The Phantom Menace. A lot of people saw it for what it was right off the bat but there was a large number of fanboys who were in denial for quite some time.Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
A.O. Scott gives it a negative review in The New York Times:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/mo...dayspaper&_r=0
Here's a quote:
Millions of people will sit through this thoroughly mediocre movie (directed with basic competence by Gareth Edwards from a surprisingly hackish script by Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy) and convince themselves that it’s perfectly delightful. It’s so much easier to obey than to resist. The spoiler warning sent by the Disney empire instructed journalists to “continue to be our partners on this journey,” and defiance is unthinkable, even if “partner” is taken as a synonym for “shill.”
#22
Quote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/mo...dayspaper&_r=0
Here's a quote:
Millions of people will sit through this thoroughly mediocre movie (directed with basic competence by Gareth Edwards from a surprisingly hackish script by Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy) and convince themselves that its perfectly delightful. Its so much easier to obey than to resist. The spoiler warning sent by the Disney empire instructed journalists to continue to be our partners on this journey, and defiance is unthinkable, even if partner is taken as a synonym for shill.
Sounds like A.O. Scott is a real Rebel, fighting against the evil Empire of Disney. Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
A.O. Scott gives it a negative review in The New York Times:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/13/mo...dayspaper&_r=0
Here's a quote:
Millions of people will sit through this thoroughly mediocre movie (directed with basic competence by Gareth Edwards from a surprisingly hackish script by Chris Weitz and Tony Gilroy) and convince themselves that its perfectly delightful. Its so much easier to obey than to resist. The spoiler warning sent by the Disney empire instructed journalists to continue to be our partners on this journey, and defiance is unthinkable, even if partner is taken as a synonym for shill.

Honestly, I don't imagine Disney is worried enough about how "Rogue One" will perform at the BO to do a bunch of hand-wringing with movie reviewers. They will most likely make crazy money from all of the SW films they produce.
#23
RichC2 , 12-14-16 10:01 AM
DVD Talk Hero
RichC2
DVD Talk Hero
close
- Join DateMay 2001
- Posts:46,549
Received 1,353 Likes
on
1,062 Posts
Quote:
If you're going to go with PT comparisons, his review reads more like Attack of the Clones than TPM or RotS, since it has a good bit of politics and apparently is too self-involved with its own obligations as being a Star Wars movie to just be a regular good movie that happens to be Star Wars.Originally Posted by GoldenJCJ
That sounds a lot like The Phantom Menace. A lot of people saw it for what it was right off the bat but there was a large number of fanboys who were in denial for quite some time.
His little rant on Disney not wanting him to spoil a couple details seems unusual though, that's standard issue.
#24
Solid Snake , 12-14-16 11:02 AM
Banned
A lot of "Donnie Yen stealing the show" moments in these reviews. Finally people are noticing him on a larger scale that won't be forgettable.
#25
Stuckman's review isn't exactly glowing. He gives it a B... but he doesn't sound convinced of it. His review felt like a C but he upgraded because it is SW.