View Poll Results: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread



0
0%



0
0%



0
0%



0
0%



0
0%
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll
Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
#127
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
Anyway, it was probably for the best that Thor used an Uzi. Little children playing with sticks have better hand-to-hand fight choreography than this movie.Also, you know it wouldn't be a SyFy Original Movie without astonishingly bad CGI. I don't quite get this. I know these movies are low budget, but even the syndicated fantasy tv shows made in the early years of CGI (like Xena and Hercules) looked way better than this.
For the actors, I think only Richard Grieco came out ok. His character looked really creepy. And unlike everyone else, who all played things dull and serious, he seemed aware that he was in a crappy movie and went over the top.
#128
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
^ Did Kevin Nash give Anthony Hopkins a run for his money? 
Since it's Mother's Day, here is a photo that most likely wants to make us guys be babies again.
Spoilerized for size.
I think they should only retain her character for the next movie if they want to introduce Enchantress of Lorelei played by Christina Hendricks. They could share a scene where they go jogging.

Since it's Mother's Day, here is a photo that most likely wants to make us guys be babies again.
Spoilerized for size.
Spoiler:
I think they should only retain her character for the next movie if they want to introduce Enchantress of Lorelei played by Christina Hendricks. They could share a scene where they go jogging.
Last edited by Dr. DVD; 05-08-11 at 12:00 PM.
#130
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
Nah, but at least he looked convincing in fight scenes. Nash's role was so small, they probably shot all his scenes in an afternoon.
Here's a great review that just got linked at imdb. The description of Cody Deal is perfect - playing Thor like a cross between Luke Skywalker and Napoleon Dynamite. Yes ... Napoleon Dynamite
Here's the whole review (spoilered for space):
Here's a great review that just got linked at imdb. The description of Cody Deal is perfect - playing Thor like a cross between Luke Skywalker and Napoleon Dynamite. Yes ... Napoleon Dynamite

Here's the whole review (spoilered for space):
Spoiler:
#131
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
^ Did Kevin Nash give Anthony Hopkins a run for his money? 
Since it's Mother's Day, here is a photo that most likely wants to make us guys be babies again.
Spoilerized for size.
I think they should only retain her character for the next movie if they want to introduce Enchantress of Lorelei played by Christina Hendricks. They could share a scene where they go jogging.

Since it's Mother's Day, here is a photo that most likely wants to make us guys be babies again.
Spoilerized for size.
Spoiler:
I think they should only retain her character for the next movie if they want to introduce Enchantress of Lorelei played by Christina Hendricks. They could share a scene where they go jogging.

#132
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
<embed src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:uma:video:nextmovie.com:649048" width="512" height="319" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashVars="configParams=vid%3D649048%26uri%3Dmgid%3Auma%3Avideo%3Anextmovie.com%3A649048" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" base="."></embed>
Greatest endorsement ever?
Greatest endorsement ever?
#133
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
Really enjoyed this, much more than Iron Man 1, 2 or The Incredible Hulk. I do think more scenes were needed between Loki and Thor when they were younger, to show the connection between them.
#134
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
In four years when it's decided Thor needs a re-boot, I'm sure that will be part of the story.
#135
Moderator
#137
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
I'd much rather watch a prequel or a Thor movie set entirely in other realms (Asgard, Jotenheim, etc.) replete with fantastical elements (frost giants, fire elementals, giant serpents, dwarves, magic...) than another pointless romp around the Earth, interacting with SHIELD, trying to order a cheeseburger, etc.
#138
Senior Member
#139
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
I'd much rather watch a prequel or a Thor movie set entirely in other realms (Asgard, Jotenheim, etc.) replete with fantastical elements (frost giants, fire elementals, giant serpents, dwarves, magic...) than another pointless romp around the Earth, interacting with SHIELD, trying to order a cheeseburger, etc.
Then, of course there's THE VIKINGS (1958), starring Kirk Douglas, Tony Curtis and Ernest Borgnine, one of the best historical epics I've ever seen.
#140
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
I loved it. Even little things like Thor twirling his hammer during the fights made me geek out. And I was never a huge fan of his in the comics, but I appreciated what they did include (Donald Blake, etc.)
And the Hawkeye cameo was great too. I thought we'd see an archer. I didn't realize it would actually be Jeremy Renner and that he'd have dialogue. Cannot wait for Captain America and then The Avengers. It's going to be epic.
#142
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,852
Received 1,683 Likes
on
1,198 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
Not sure what to think of the Hawkeye scene. Was he going to kill Thor? I thought it would have been better if he had been the one to apprehend Thor with a trick arrow once it's decided.
Is Foster (or Selvig it seems like) working with SHIELD to establish an Earthbound bridge? And why did Heimdall not inform Thor that Loki had found other means to transport in/out of Asgard?
Wasn't sure why Fury needed to show Selvig the cosmic cube. Other than Banner, I have to assume that Fury was his other contact?
Is Foster (or Selvig it seems like) working with SHIELD to establish an Earthbound bridge? And why did Heimdall not inform Thor that Loki had found other means to transport in/out of Asgard?
Wasn't sure why Fury needed to show Selvig the cosmic cube. Other than Banner, I have to assume that Fury was his other contact?
#143
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,312
Received 2,705 Likes
on
1,603 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
#145
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
They needed to do something where Hawkeye could have shown off his skill like having Thor hold up the guard's billy club but Hawkeye shoots it out of his hand. And instead of showing his face before hand, after he fired the arrow, do one of those long range zooms straight to his face and reveal who it was with a smile.
Last edited by gmanca; 05-09-11 at 03:44 PM.
#146
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
I was making a joke predicated on the fact that so many superhero movie series have been rebooted after just one or two sequels in the last decade.
#147
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Briarwood Sanatarium
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
I thought about this for 2 days and i stand bye my 3 star rating for this. It was way too cartoony/kiddie for my liking. It didnt seem "real" like Iron Man or even Incredible Hulk and it was just bland overall. I had alot more fun watching fast five than I did Thor and I was looking forward to Thor more
#148
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
Just got back from it, and loved it. I'm a huge nerd for the comics, and the movie really captured everything I love about them.
And I have to say: Hiddleston's Loki was really the standout performance for me, I'm looking forward to seeing him return in Avengers.
The pressure's on Cap now, it's got a lot to live up to. Hope it can keep up the quality of the other Avengers films.
And I have to say: Hiddleston's Loki was really the standout performance for me, I'm looking forward to seeing him return in Avengers.
The pressure's on Cap now, it's got a lot to live up to. Hope it can keep up the quality of the other Avengers films.
Last edited by ultimaton; 05-09-11 at 08:24 PM.
#149
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
Solid 3 1/2 stars. Saw it in 2D.
I loved all the action in Asgaard. The Earth scenes were passable, but entirely generic and easy to telegraph. Hemsworth was much better than I expected, but Portman was such a one-note throwaway character. Best scenes were anything involving the Rainbow Bridge, the Frost Giants battle and once he gets his power back, cheesy as it was.
I loved all the action in Asgaard. The Earth scenes were passable, but entirely generic and easy to telegraph. Hemsworth was much better than I expected, but Portman was such a one-note throwaway character. Best scenes were anything involving the Rainbow Bridge, the Frost Giants battle and once he gets his power back, cheesy as it was.
Last edited by islandclaws; 05-10-11 at 04:09 PM.
#150
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
I liked it enough 3 stars. - I do not know anything about Thor or the comics/mythology behind it so i just followed along with what was being shown to me. Loki stole the whole film - every scene of his meant something. The Asgaard scenes were great but I wished they explored it more. Thor is the god of thunder, who are the other gods? Is everyone a god but they do not get a title? or Thor special by Asgaard standards? Portman was wasted and the "love story" was just too forced.
Spoiler:





