Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Thor (Branagh, 2011) ? The Reviews Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread
5.38%
19.23%
46.92%
18.46%
8.46%
0.77%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
I am now ruler of AssontheCouch.
0.77%
Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll

Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-11 | 03:21 AM
  #126  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

btw....how did Thor in "Almighty Thor" get an Uzi...i've been wondering about that since I saw it.
Old 05-08-11 | 04:24 AM
  #127  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,366
Received 332 Likes on 232 Posts
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
btw....how did Thor in "Almighty Thor" get an Uzi...i've been wondering about that since I saw it.
The Uzi was lying around one of the abandoned warehouses Thor and Jarnsaxa were hanging out in. That's typical in LA, right? Anyway, it was probably for the best that Thor used an Uzi. Little children playing with sticks have better hand-to-hand fight choreography than this movie.

Also, you know it wouldn't be a SyFy Original Movie without astonishingly bad CGI. I don't quite get this. I know these movies are low budget, but even the syndicated fantasy tv shows made in the early years of CGI (like Xena and Hercules) looked way better than this.

For the actors, I think only Richard Grieco came out ok. His character looked really creepy. And unlike everyone else, who all played things dull and serious, he seemed aware that he was in a crappy movie and went over the top.
Old 05-08-11 | 11:47 AM
  #128  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,486
Received 457 Likes on 349 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

^ Did Kevin Nash give Anthony Hopkins a run for his money?


Since it's Mother's Day, here is a photo that most likely wants to make us guys be babies again.

Spoilerized for size.
Spoiler:



I think they should only retain her character for the next movie if they want to introduce Enchantress of Lorelei played by Christina Hendricks. They could share a scene where they go jogging.

Last edited by Dr. DVD; 05-08-11 at 12:00 PM.
Old 05-08-11 | 12:17 PM
  #129  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,114
Received 78 Likes on 63 Posts
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

I just saw it. GREAT movie. 4/5 stars from me.

Spoiler:

I really liked the intro of the frost giants in Norway at the beginning. Nice touch of reminding audiences of the mythological Norse connections. The frost giants freezing and killing the humans was light weight disturbing for some reason.

Everything on Asgard was amazing. The costume design, the set design, the special effects. It all worked so well.

Loki was a very good villain. Not the typical "Bwahahaha," baddie but you could somewhat empathize with him. I like that even though he was evil, his plan wasn't actually to kill his father. I thought it was and didn't see it coming that it was all an elaborate plot to impress his father.

Hemsworth was perfect.

Heimdale was very cool. He really had that presence as an all seeing and hearing sentinel. He looked pretty bad ass too.
The comedy scenes were nice. Darcy was cute and funny ("Who's meow meow?")

ONLY THINGS I DIDN'T LIKE...
The Hawkeye cameo. What could have been a little nod was, imo, a little too much. I think that scene would have been more effective had it been just a regular sniper.

The music got just a little cheesy for a bit when Thor gets his hammer back.



Old 05-08-11 | 02:44 PM
  #130  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,366
Received 332 Likes on 232 Posts
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
^ Did Kevin Nash give Anthony Hopkins a run for his money?
Nah, but at least he looked convincing in fight scenes. Nash's role was so small, they probably shot all his scenes in an afternoon.

Here's a great review that just got linked at imdb. The description of Cody Deal is perfect - playing Thor like a cross between Luke Skywalker and Napoleon Dynamite. Yes ... Napoleon Dynamite

Here's the whole review (spoilered for space):
Spoiler:
You can always count on The Asylum for a good laugh or two. Each and every one of their shamelessly low-budget “mockbusters” seems to take great pride in delivering the cheapest and cheesiest thrills for the money, and I’ve yet to be disappointed with any of their recent efforts. Not surprisingly, director Christopher Ray’s SyFy original outing “Almighty Thor” has been scheduled for release around the same time that Kenneth Branagh’s big budget comic book adaptation “Thor” bows in theaters across North America. “Almighty Thor” is just as genuinely awful as I thought it would be, but as you well know, that’s precisely what I was hoping for. However, instead of mining the comic book for material, the filmmakers choose to plant their roots in the actual mythology surrounding the titular titan. Sneaky, sneaky.

Newcomer Cody Deal portrays the whiny, snot-nosed son of Odin (Kevin Nash), the latter of whom is currently in the midst of a very bloody war with the villainous Loki (Richard Grieco). Apparently this pasty middle-aged goth lord is highly interested in getting his sweaty little palms all over a magical hammer, which he will use to destroy the Tree of Life. However, before he can acquire said mystical weapon, Odin sends it hurtling into another dimension. Loki, understandably irritated with the whole scenario, savagely murders the old God and Thor’s bald, badass brother in a fit of rage. Upon discovering their bloodless corpses, Thor cries for a few brief moments before declaring revenge on the otherworldly demon who butchered his family. In order to prepare for the inevitable showdown, our hero teams up with a sexy warrior named Jarnsaxa (Patricia Velasquez), who desperately wishes to train the big blonde bozo for the fight of his life.

The first half of “Almighty Thor” is as follows: Thor whines about the death of his loved ones and claims profusely that he wants to kill Loki. Jarnsaxa informs him that he’s not yet ready to face his foe, and the pair run deeper into the forest. Loki, meanwhile, keeps taunting Thor, and sometimes he shows up to harass him face-to-face. A sword fight breaks out, Thor loses, Loki laughs and/or screams, and the whole processes is repeated once more. There’s also a fair amount of slow motion, a few shots that are used more than once, and a heaping helping of bargain basement CGI. It’s not until the 40-minute mark that Thor’s monotonous and occasionally-confusing adventures lead him into the land of the humans. And by the land of the humans, of course, I mean Los Angeles. And by Los Angeles, I mean a few back alleyways and a couple of warehouse parking lots.

Cody Deal channels both Luke Skywalker and Napoleon Dynamite for his portrayal of Thor, a combination that is almost lethal to the entire production. For the first half-hour, I really wanted Loki to beat the absolute crap out of the empty-headed bastard. Then a funny thing happened: Cody Deal’s annoying turn was eclipsed by the scenery-chewing powers of Richard Grieco. The “If Looks Could Kill” alumni’s pasty white mug often wears a wide variety of genuinely frightening expressions, all of which are accompanied by a limited selection of generic dialogue. The script, meanwhile, is a hodgepodge of tired action cliches, familiar sword and sorcery conventions, and mythological terminology gleaned from a quite perusal of Wikipedia. Then again, what do you expect from a concept created by someone who wrote “Snakes on a Train”. That’s right — “Snakes on a Train“.

But who am I kidding? I eat this sort of low-rent lunacy for breakfast with a big wooden spoon. “Almighty Thor” is schlock cinema at its finest, a cheap, unabashedly stupid action flick that will surely get plenty of free advertising from its association with a certain Hollywood blockbuster. Anyone expecting anything more from Christopher Ray’s impossibly campy romp is seriously barking up the wrong cinematic tree. There’s not a single drop of quality buried anywhere throughout the production; even the giant hellhounds aren’t very inspired or well-designed. But that’s precisely what I’d hoped “Almighty Thor” would deliver, and I couldn’t be happier with the end result. Hell, I wouldn’t even mind sitting down with a sequel. Assuming, of course, they can get Cody Deal and Richard Grieco to reprise their roles. I wouldn’t have the tale of Thor or Loki told any other way.
Old 05-08-11 | 03:44 PM
  #131  
dsa_shea's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 22,313
Received 360 Likes on 260 Posts
From: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
^ Did Kevin Nash give Anthony Hopkins a run for his money?


Since it's Mother's Day, here is a photo that most likely wants to make us guys be babies again.

Spoilerized for size.
Spoiler:



I think they should only retain her character for the next movie if they want to introduce Enchantress of Lorelei played by Christina Hendricks. They could share a scene where they go jogging.
Would you like to be a key ingredient in her mam sandwich?
Old 05-08-11 | 05:31 PM
  #132  
Travis McClain's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,798
Received 209 Likes on 135 Posts
From: Western Hemisphere
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

<embed src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:uma:video:nextmovie.com:649048" width="512" height="319" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashVars="configParams=vid%3D649048%26uri%3Dmgid%3Auma%3Avideo%3Anextmovie.com%3A649048" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" base="."></embed>

Greatest endorsement ever?
Old 05-09-11 | 12:38 AM
  #133  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,017
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Really enjoyed this, much more than Iron Man 1, 2 or The Incredible Hulk. I do think more scenes were needed between Loki and Thor when they were younger, to show the connection between them.
Old 05-09-11 | 08:59 AM
  #134  
Travis McClain's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,798
Received 209 Likes on 135 Posts
From: Western Hemisphere
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by gmanca
Really enjoyed this, much more than Iron Man 1, 2 or The Incredible Hulk. I do think more scenes were needed between Loki and Thor when they were younger, to show the connection between them.
In four years when it's decided Thor needs a re-boot, I'm sure that will be part of the story.
Old 05-09-11 | 09:16 AM
  #135  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by gmanca
Really enjoyed this, much more than Iron Man 1, 2 or The Incredible Hulk. I do think more scenes were needed between Loki and Thor when they were younger, to show the connection between them.
Rob Zombie's Thor?
Old 05-09-11 | 09:37 AM
  #136  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,097
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Thor: First Class
or
Thorigins
Old 05-09-11 | 09:43 AM
  #137  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,858
Received 1,042 Likes on 622 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

I'd much rather watch a prequel or a Thor movie set entirely in other realms (Asgard, Jotenheim, etc.) replete with fantastical elements (frost giants, fire elementals, giant serpents, dwarves, magic...) than another pointless romp around the Earth, interacting with SHIELD, trying to order a cheeseburger, etc.
Old 05-09-11 | 09:58 AM
  #138  
DiggityDawg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 274
Received 57 Likes on 48 Posts
From: Kansas City
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by musick
Thorigins

Old 05-09-11 | 10:03 AM
  #139  
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 13,281
Received 496 Likes on 367 Posts
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
I'd much rather watch a prequel or a Thor movie set entirely in other realms (Asgard, Jotenheim, etc.) replete with fantastical elements (frost giants, fire elementals, giant serpents, dwarves, magic...) than another pointless romp around the Earth, interacting with SHIELD, trying to order a cheeseburger, etc.
Yeah, there was an Italian fantasy film called SIGFRIDO (1957) released in English as DRAGON'S BLOOD sometime in the 1960s, based on the Siegfried legend. I saw a trailer for it at a convention, and it looked intriguing, but I know very little about it. That's probably the closest you can come (in the sound era that is; Fritz Lang made a two-parter about SIEGFRIED in the 1920s), other than Bugs Bunny's "What's Opera, Doc?"

Then, of course there's THE VIKINGS (1958), starring Kirk Douglas, Tony Curtis and Ernest Borgnine, one of the best historical epics I've ever seen.
Old 05-09-11 | 11:12 AM
  #140  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 47,910
Received 2,320 Likes on 1,442 Posts
From: Rosemount, MN
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by kd5
The actor they chose to play Thor seemed of smaller stature to me than what I remember of Thor, but I'm anxious to see how he plays out in this movie. -kd5-
I'm not sure how any human being could look more like a super hero than Chris Hemsworth. The guy is a fucking beast in the movie. And he completely owns the part.

I loved it. Even little things like Thor twirling his hammer during the fights made me geek out. And I was never a huge fan of his in the comics, but I appreciated what they did include (Donald Blake, etc.)

And the Hawkeye cameo was great too. I thought we'd see an archer. I didn't realize it would actually be Jeremy Renner and that he'd have dialogue. Cannot wait for Captain America and then The Avengers. It's going to be epic.
Old 05-09-11 | 11:18 AM
  #141  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Thor (of Marvel Comics) is 6'6". Chris Hemsworth is 6'3". Close enough.
Old 05-09-11 | 12:36 PM
  #142  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,852
Received 1,683 Likes on 1,198 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Not sure what to think of the Hawkeye scene. Was he going to kill Thor? I thought it would have been better if he had been the one to apprehend Thor with a trick arrow once it's decided.

Is Foster (or Selvig it seems like) working with SHIELD to establish an Earthbound bridge? And why did Heimdall not inform Thor that Loki had found other means to transport in/out of Asgard?

Wasn't sure why Fury needed to show Selvig the cosmic cube. Other than Banner, I have to assume that Fury was his other contact?
Old 05-09-11 | 01:45 PM
  #143  
Giantrobo's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 65,312
Received 2,705 Likes on 1,603 Posts
From: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
Thor (of Marvel Comics) is 6'6". Chris Hemsworth is 6'3". Close enough.

Agreed.

It's better than:

Wolverine...5'3"
Hugh Jackman...6'3"


Old 05-09-11 | 02:03 PM
  #144  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Giantrobo
Agreed.

It's better than:

Wolverine...5'3"
Hugh Jackman...6'3"


yeah...lol...They had to get James Marsden on boxes to be taller than Famke Jensen and Jackman. He's 5'10"
Old 05-09-11 | 03:38 PM
  #145  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,017
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by MinLShaw
In four years when it's decided Thor needs a re-boot, I'm sure that will be part of the story.
I wouldn't want a re-boot, just that it would have been a great artistic touch if during the fight or at certain vulnerable points there were quick intercuts to a shot from their childhood of one brother protecting the other, or some budding interaction.

Originally Posted by devilshalo
Not sure what to think of the Hawkeye scene. Was he going to kill Thor? I thought it would have been better if he had been the one to apprehend Thor with a trick arrow once it's decided.
They needed to do something where Hawkeye could have shown off his skill like having Thor hold up the guard's billy club but Hawkeye shoots it out of his hand. And instead of showing his face before hand, after he fired the arrow, do one of those long range zooms straight to his face and reveal who it was with a smile.

Last edited by gmanca; 05-09-11 at 03:44 PM.
Old 05-09-11 | 03:42 PM
  #146  
Travis McClain's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 7,798
Received 209 Likes on 135 Posts
From: Western Hemisphere
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by gmanca
I wouldn't want a re-boot, just that it would have been a great artistic touch if during the fight or at certain vulnerable points there were quick intercuts to a shot from their childhood of one brother protecting the other, or some budding interaction.
I was making a joke predicated on the fact that so many superhero movie series have been rebooted after just one or two sequels in the last decade.
Old 05-09-11 | 07:39 PM
  #147  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Briarwood Sanatarium
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

I thought about this for 2 days and i stand bye my 3 star rating for this. It was way too cartoony/kiddie for my liking. It didnt seem "real" like Iron Man or even Incredible Hulk and it was just bland overall. I had alot more fun watching fast five than I did Thor and I was looking forward to Thor more
Old 05-09-11 | 08:19 PM
  #148  
ultimaton's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Austin, TX
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Just got back from it, and loved it. I'm a huge nerd for the comics, and the movie really captured everything I love about them.

And I have to say: Hiddleston's Loki was really the standout performance for me, I'm looking forward to seeing him return in Avengers.

The pressure's on Cap now, it's got a lot to live up to. Hope it can keep up the quality of the other Avengers films.

Last edited by ultimaton; 05-09-11 at 08:24 PM.
Old 05-10-11 | 10:53 AM
  #149  
islandclaws's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,084
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Behind the Orange Curtain
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

Solid 3 1/2 stars. Saw it in 2D.

I loved all the action in Asgaard. The Earth scenes were passable, but entirely generic and easy to telegraph. Hemsworth was much better than I expected, but Portman was such a one-note throwaway character. Best scenes were anything involving the Rainbow Bridge, the Frost Giants battle and once he gets his power back, cheesy as it was.

Last edited by islandclaws; 05-10-11 at 04:09 PM.
Old 05-10-11 | 01:46 PM
  #150  
squidget's Avatar
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,471
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NoVA
Re: Thor (Branagh, 2011) — The Reviews Thread

I liked it enough 3 stars. - I do not know anything about Thor or the comics/mythology behind it so i just followed along with what was being shown to me. Loki stole the whole film - every scene of his meant something. The Asgaard scenes were great but I wished they explored it more. Thor is the god of thunder, who are the other gods? Is everyone a god but they do not get a title? or Thor special by Asgaard standards? Portman was wasted and the "love story" was just too forced.

Spoiler:
so what is the box at the end of the credits and how does Loki play into it? Does this mean he can control anyone at will now? or just the doctor?


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.