View Poll Results: Inception Review Poll
Voters: 260. You may not vote on this poll
Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#376
DVD Talk Hero
#377
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
#378
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
The real world is boring as fuck. I'm still confused as to how a society like that exists w/ those kind of advancements in technology. The ships and getting into The Matrix..fine, I'm convinced but..how the fuck does Zion have all this "X" but none of this "X"?
#379
Moderator
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
in regards to Inception and my general opinion of the film, I liked the premise and FX, but the characters were all a bit bland and one dimensional - I really didn't care for them, this was one of the rare DiCaprio characters that I thought he did a less than stellar acting job.
#380
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Yeah, Nolan was a little too caught up in executing the idea that he forgot a few other aspects of movie making (dialog and acting took a back seat, though the performances were generally decent). It didn't bother me as much as it bothered some others.
#381
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Smallville
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#382
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: United States
#385
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZrYPJ4Yc31g&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZrYPJ4Yc31g&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
#386
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZrYPJ4Yc31g&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZrYPJ4Yc31g&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
#387
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
It's an opinion. I've simply never been Nolan fan, and no matter how much I wanted to like Inception based on the trailers, I just couldn't get past the fact that while he has some cool shots and sets, the story is just dreadfully told.
I liked Memento, not so much the Batman movies.. Heath Ledger made the Dark Knight watchable with his awesome performance, but the script was, like this one, philoso-psycho-babble Wachowski-lite drivel.
Haven't seen Insomnia or The Prestige, but I will someday.
As far as his directing, I think I shouldn't be bored throughout much of the movie, especially the action scenes.
. The editing and the action just got so monotonous. He has a cool visual style, but like Fincher (who has an even better style), you just don't give a flying fuck about the characters or what happens to them. You're just looking at the visuals. And frankly the cityscapes in this movie, like Dark Knight, are totally drab and just feel Matrix generic.
I will give Nolan and company (and the studio) credit for putting out a mature movie that isn't one of the endless 3D children's cartoons that are filling the theatres these days. These kinds of artistic risks SHOULD be taken and I totally applaud it. I just think Nolan's a crappy writer and so-so director. I'd be interested in seeing him direct something by another writer.
I particularly like this selection from A.O. Scott's review of "Inception" from the New York Times-
I liked Memento, not so much the Batman movies.. Heath Ledger made the Dark Knight watchable with his awesome performance, but the script was, like this one, philoso-psycho-babble Wachowski-lite drivel.
Haven't seen Insomnia or The Prestige, but I will someday.
As far as his directing, I think I shouldn't be bored throughout much of the movie, especially the action scenes.
Spoiler:
I will give Nolan and company (and the studio) credit for putting out a mature movie that isn't one of the endless 3D children's cartoons that are filling the theatres these days. These kinds of artistic risks SHOULD be taken and I totally applaud it. I just think Nolan's a crappy writer and so-so director. I'd be interested in seeing him direct something by another writer.
I particularly like this selection from A.O. Scott's review of "Inception" from the New York Times-
The accomplishments of “Inception” are mainly technical, which is faint praise only if you insist on expecting something more from commercial entertainment. That audiences do — and should — expect more is partly, I suspect, what has inspired some of the feverish early notices hailing “Inception” as a masterpiece, just as the desire for a certifiably great superhero movie led to the wild overrating of “The Dark Knight.” In both cases Mr. Nolan’s virtuosity as a conjurer of brilliant scenes and stunning set pieces, along with his ability to invest grandeur and novelty into conventional themes, have fostered the illusion that he is some kind of visionary.
Last edited by lamphorn; 07-20-10 at 01:18 PM.
#388
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
A.O. Scott's whining is beyond grating, it's fucking laughable.
TRANSLATION: "Everyone likes Nolan's movies because they WANT to like them, not because they're any good."
DEEPER TRANSLATION: "I'm so insecure in my own fucking opinion that I've convinced myself everyone else is delusional."
TRANSLATION: "Everyone likes Nolan's movies because they WANT to like them, not because they're any good."
DEEPER TRANSLATION: "I'm so insecure in my own fucking opinion that I've convinced myself everyone else is delusional."
#389
DVD Talk Limited Edition
#390
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: United States
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
It's an opinion. I've simply never been Nolan fan, and no matter how much I wanted to like Inception based on the trailers, I just couldn't get past the fact that while he has some cool shots and sets, the story is just dreadfully told.
I liked Memento, not so much the Batman movies.. Heath Ledger made the Dark Knight watchable with his awesome performance, but the script was, like this one, philoso-psycho-babble Wachowski-lite drivel.
Haven't seen Insomnia or The Prestige, but I will someday.
As far as his directing, I think I shouldn't be bored throughout much of the movie, especially the action scenes.
. The editing and the action just got so monotonous. He has a cool visual style, but like Fincher (who has an even better style), you just don't give a flying fuck about the characters or what happens to them. You're just looking at the visuals. And frankly the cityscapes in this movie, like Dark Knight, are totally drab and just feel Matrix generic.
I will give Nolan and company (and the studio) credit for putting out a mature movie that isn't one of the endless 3D children's cartoons that are filling the theatres these days. These kinds of artistic risks SHOULD be taken and I totally applaud it. I just think Nolan's a crappy writer and so-so director. I'd be interested in seeing him direct something by another writer.
I particularly like this selection from A.O. Scott's review of "Inception" from the New York Times-
I liked Memento, not so much the Batman movies.. Heath Ledger made the Dark Knight watchable with his awesome performance, but the script was, like this one, philoso-psycho-babble Wachowski-lite drivel.
Haven't seen Insomnia or The Prestige, but I will someday.
As far as his directing, I think I shouldn't be bored throughout much of the movie, especially the action scenes.
Spoiler:
I will give Nolan and company (and the studio) credit for putting out a mature movie that isn't one of the endless 3D children's cartoons that are filling the theatres these days. These kinds of artistic risks SHOULD be taken and I totally applaud it. I just think Nolan's a crappy writer and so-so director. I'd be interested in seeing him direct something by another writer.
I particularly like this selection from A.O. Scott's review of "Inception" from the New York Times-
#391
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
#392
DVD Talk Special Edition
#393
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: 21.3114° N, 157.7964° W
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Spoiler:
#394
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: United States
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
I dunno, are you?
You say that you don't care about the characters in Nolan's films, so you find the action boring because you don't care what happens to them. You brought up Michael Bay, do you care about the characters in his films? They are as single dimensional as possible and to top it off nearly all of his films have little to no story.
Nolan's and Fincher's films however are driven by story and supplemented with visual effects. Not to seem rude, but are you 12? Your opinions echo exactly what my nephew believes. We, the audience, are force fed high paced garbage, like Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen so often that apparently the average joe seems to think that when action scenes don't switch angles every 3 seconds that it is "boring".
You posting your negative thoughts on the film are fine, but you know very well that comparing Nolan, which many people believe is one of the best filmmakers in Hollywood today, to Michael Bay who is essentially the anti-christ of blockbuster cinema, will piss people off. That comment was simply to get attention and be a contrarian, like Armond White. Your sir, are acting like a troll.
You say that you don't care about the characters in Nolan's films, so you find the action boring because you don't care what happens to them. You brought up Michael Bay, do you care about the characters in his films? They are as single dimensional as possible and to top it off nearly all of his films have little to no story.
Nolan's and Fincher's films however are driven by story and supplemented with visual effects. Not to seem rude, but are you 12? Your opinions echo exactly what my nephew believes. We, the audience, are force fed high paced garbage, like Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen so often that apparently the average joe seems to think that when action scenes don't switch angles every 3 seconds that it is "boring".
You posting your negative thoughts on the film are fine, but you know very well that comparing Nolan, which many people believe is one of the best filmmakers in Hollywood today, to Michael Bay who is essentially the anti-christ of blockbuster cinema, will piss people off. That comment was simply to get attention and be a contrarian, like Armond White. Your sir, are acting like a troll.
#395
DVD Talk Hero
#396
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
I dunno, are you?
You say that you don't care about the characters in Nolan's films, so you find the action boring because you don't care what happens to them. You brought up Michael Bay, do you care about the characters in his films? They are as single dimensional as possible and to top it off nearly all of his films have little to no story.
Nolan's and Fincher's films however are driven by story and supplemented with visual effects. Not to seem rude, but are you 12? Your opinions echo exactly what my nephew believes. We, the audience, are force fed high paced garbage, like Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen so often that apparently the average joe seems to think that when action scenes don't switch angles every 3 seconds that it is "boring".
You posting your negative thoughts on the film are fine, but you know very well that comparing Nolan, which many people believe is one of the best filmmakers in Hollywood today, to Michael Bay who is essentially the anti-christ of blockbuster cinema, will piss people off. That comment was simply to get attention and be a contrarian, like Armond White. Your sir, are acting like a troll.
You say that you don't care about the characters in Nolan's films, so you find the action boring because you don't care what happens to them. You brought up Michael Bay, do you care about the characters in his films? They are as single dimensional as possible and to top it off nearly all of his films have little to no story.
Nolan's and Fincher's films however are driven by story and supplemented with visual effects. Not to seem rude, but are you 12? Your opinions echo exactly what my nephew believes. We, the audience, are force fed high paced garbage, like Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen so often that apparently the average joe seems to think that when action scenes don't switch angles every 3 seconds that it is "boring".
You posting your negative thoughts on the film are fine, but you know very well that comparing Nolan, which many people believe is one of the best filmmakers in Hollywood today, to Michael Bay who is essentially the anti-christ of blockbuster cinema, will piss people off. That comment was simply to get attention and be a contrarian, like Armond White. Your sir, are acting like a troll.
I will qualify this by saying I'm going on my memories of The Rock and Armageddon and haven't seen the Transformers films.. Maybe if I saw them, I'd change my opinion, but I truly can't grasp why one would consider either of those guys better than the other.
Trolls do drive-by's and threadcrap without backing up their opinions. I think I've explained mine pretty clearly. And politely, too.
Last edited by lamphorn; 07-20-10 at 05:35 PM.
#397
Banned
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
........direct dialoge scenes like a HS student? Wait...you haven't seen the latest Bay films..oh man. Watch them and then come back.
#398
Banned by request
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
I think we should note that while lamphorn's opinion is not popular, he has been nice enough to stick around and explain what he means, hasn't been rude, and hasn't made any comments about other posters. Let's make sure we extend the same courtesy to him.
#399
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: United States
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
Yeah, if you haven't seen Bay's films in the last few years, stop the comparison. The difference between the two is that Nolan's films are story first, visuals second. Bay is the exact opposite. I will conclude with saying that your opinions astound me, but they are your opinions. Just be fully aware that you are in the vast minority.
#400
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread
I've simply never been Nolan fan, and no matter how much I wanted to like Inception based on the trailers, I just couldn't get past the fact that while he has some cool shots and sets, the story is just dreadfully told.
I liked Memento, not so much the Batman movies.. Heath Ledger made the Dark Knight watchable with his awesome performance, but the script was, like this one, philoso-psycho-babble Wachowski-lite drivel.
Haven't seen Insomnia or The Prestige, but I will someday.
I liked Memento, not so much the Batman movies.. Heath Ledger made the Dark Knight watchable with his awesome performance, but the script was, like this one, philoso-psycho-babble Wachowski-lite drivel.
Haven't seen Insomnia or The Prestige, but I will someday.
Insomnia, didn't care for it a bit and the 2 Batman flicks, nothing more than well executed superhero movies which I guess is good since it isn't all that common outside of a few franchises (X-Men, Iron Man) of many
never saw Following
Last edited by musick; 07-20-10 at 06:37 PM.





















