Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: Inception Review Poll
52.31%
33.46%
8.85%
3.08%
1.15%
0.38%
No fighting robots? Screw this...
0.77%
Voters: 260. You may not vote on this poll

Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-18-10 | 02:14 AM
  #251  
Boba Fett's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,487
Received 115 Likes on 85 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Funny you mention the pain angle. It was something they referenced that seemed to be completely cast aside. Mal shoots Arthur in the opening scene, specifically mentioning it was a way to hurt him, since death just wakes you up. Later on, Dom asks Arthur how his leg is doing and also says he's sorry.

There was no other mention of serious injury having an effect on the real body again.
Old 07-18-10 | 02:15 AM
  #252  
Boba Fett's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,487
Received 115 Likes on 85 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by slop101
Or as my equation puts it:
(The Cell + Ocean's 11+a good cast) - emotional development = Inception
Fixed.
Old 07-18-10 | 05:32 AM
  #253  
Li
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Columbus, Ohio
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

I really did love how that intense music from the trailers and opening was what they heard in the dream as music was played to their sleeping bodies and how it got more intense the deeper the dreams went.

So no one else took issue with how the timelines didn't really seem to mesh, huh? How sometimes things seemed to be happening at the same time and sometimes they were slowed down dramatically? Perhaps it wasn't as off as it seemed to me and I need a second viewing with that in mind?

...5 minute car chase = an hour in the hotel... shouldn't 4 hours have passed on the mountain before Levit had moved them into the elevator? It seemed like a lot happened in the hotel while they were all in that 3rd dream... even if it were only 20 minutes, that would have been 4 hours on the mountain, and it seemed that they were there no more than an hour's worth of events.

Or maybe I've thinking far too into this. It just seems like if you're going to make up such rigid rules for your premise you should be consistent throughout.
Old 07-18-10 | 05:40 AM
  #254  
Li
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Columbus, Ohio
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Boba Fett
Funny you mention the pain angle. It was something they referenced that seemed to be completely cast aside. Mal shoots Arthur in the opening scene, specifically mentioning it was a way to hurt him, since death just wakes you up. Later on, Dom asks Arthur how his leg is doing and also says he's sorry.

There was no other mention of serious injury having an effect on the real body again.
Yeah, right after DiCaprio says that I could have sworn Levitt was limping a little, but then I wasn't sure.

Also remember after Watanabe is shot in the first dream, DiCaprio tells him the "pain" will be less severe the deeper they go.
Old 07-18-10 | 06:49 AM
  #255  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Beverly, MA
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

My thoughts:

Spoiler:
I think L-Cap was the target of inception the entire time. To me, Cain's plan all along was to plant the idea that his daughter in law's death wasn't his son's fault. He brought in Ellen Page to plant the seed. She helped him come to grips with this, and finally at the end, he was back in reality.

Who knows. I enjoy movies that make you think like this. Good job to Nolan.
Old 07-18-10 | 08:11 AM
  #256  
Sessa17's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NJ, the place where smiles go to die
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Blu Man
Disagree. If this was 2006, I would have agreed with you, but not now. Batman Begins fight scenes were pretty bad, but he definitely improved with The Dark Knight and Inception in my opinion. The shots now last longer, the shakiness is to give the viewer the feeling of what it is really like. I can say from first hand experience that hand to hand combat can be disorienting and it definitely isn't steady and smooth. It's a jarring experience and I have no doubt that gunfire is similar. Your supposed to feel jarred by the experience. Oh, and he has never zoomed. Actually it's physically impossible for Nolan to zoom with the lenses he and Wally use.
I'm so sick of the excuse of every time a director can't shoot action, someone saying it was done so the viewer "can feel jarred by the experience". The only thing jarring is that I don't know what the hell is going on. Its a movie, not a fight-simulator. I want the camera panned back so I can see the scene unfold & watch the action take place. No shit hand to hand combat is jarring, you don't to claim you have experience with a couple of karate classes to know that. This is a movie. Shaky camera, plus a thousand rounds of ammo shooting these guys & never hitting a damn thing equals crappy action scenes to me & more importantly boring.
Old 07-18-10 | 08:19 AM
  #257  
TGM's Avatar
TGM
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 17,096
Received 476 Likes on 297 Posts
From: Massachusetts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Sessa17
I'm so sick of the excuse of every time a director can't shoot action, someone saying it was done so the viewer "can feel jarred by the experience". The only thing jarring is that I don't know what the hell is going on. Its a movie, not a fight-simulator. I want the camera panned back so I can see the scene unfold & watch the action take place. No shit hand to hand combat is jarring, you don't to claim you have experience with a couple of karate classes to know that. This is a movie. Shaky camera, plus a thousand rounds of ammo shooting these guys & never hitting a damn thing equals crappy action scenes to me & more importantly boring.
amen brother!
Old 07-18-10 | 10:36 AM
  #258  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Atlanta, GA
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

I loved the movie. Saw it last night with a bunch of friends, and I loved the total Mindf%$# Nolan has made here.


I see a lot of complaints on how bullets never seem to hit anyone, but then there is a ton of theories on how its all in Dom's mind when the chemist puts him to sleep, and a bunch of other theories. It's very plausible that in Dom's own subconscious that the team couldn't be killed or shot.

However, I need a few more viewings of the film to let it all soak in.


Overall, though. One of my favorites this year. Aside, some of the best cinematography I have seen in a while.
Old 07-18-10 | 10:40 AM
  #259  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: United States
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Sessa17
I'm so sick of the excuse of every time a director can't shoot action, someone saying it was done so the viewer "can feel jarred by the experience". The only thing jarring is that I don't know what the hell is going on. Its a movie, not a fight-simulator. I want the camera panned back so I can see the scene unfold & watch the action take place. No shit hand to hand combat is jarring, you don't to claim you have experience with a couple of karate classes to know that. This is a movie. Shaky camera, plus a thousand rounds of ammo shooting these guys & never hitting a damn thing equals crappy action scenes to me & more importantly boring.
A couple of Karate classes? I'm insulted by that inaccurate and ignorant statement. Yes, bad action to you. I disagree. I'm not claiming he is the best action director in the world, he's far from it. But he has definitely improved since Batman Begins. You don't need to get so angry and personal. Just clam down.

Last edited by Blu Man; 07-18-10 at 11:15 AM.
Old 07-18-10 | 10:43 AM
  #260  
gryffinmaster's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,552
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Ancient City
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

My overall concentration on the film's conceptualization might've been clouding my judgment, but I felt that the editing around the action sequences was greatly improved over Nolan's other films. Still not in the upper tier, but getting a hell of a lot closer.
Old 07-18-10 | 10:49 AM
  #261  
Li
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Columbus, Ohio
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by StephenX

I see a lot of complaints on how bullets never seem to hit anyone, but then there is a ton of theories on how its all in Dom's mind when the chemist puts him to sleep, and a bunch of other theories. It's very plausible that in Dom's own subconscious that the team couldn't be killed or shot.

However, I need a few more viewings of the film to let it all soak in.
I can totally buy that because that's the impression that I got, however, it also felt like it took all the danger out of the situation. Bullets are flying everywhere and the only people getting hurt are the faceless drones who couldn't hit someone standing still, literally. Don't get me wrong, I loved the movie, but that one thing bugged the hell out of me. When that one guy stood on that bridge and seemed to empty several clips into the side of that SUV which was just sitting there, I laughed to myself. I don't think that was supposed to be funny.


-

Last edited by Li; 07-18-10 at 10:59 AM.
Old 07-18-10 | 11:14 AM
  #262  
Goat3001's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,116
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
From: NYC
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Here's how I'd rank Nolan's films now that I've had some time to digest Inception:

5/5

Memento
Inception
TDK

4/5

Batman Begins
The Prestige

I haven't seen Following and I'm leaving Insomnia out because I haven't seen it in awhile and I feel it's something I need to revisit before rating.

I'm putting Inception over TDK because of my own personal bias. I'm a sucker for psychological dramas and IMO, Nolan has executed both Memento and Inception perfectly.
Old 07-18-10 | 11:21 AM
  #263  
Raul3's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 10,706
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Picture a cup in the middle of the sea
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Exactly, bullets not hitting anyone, or almost anyone was hint. Not knowing a lot about the secondary characters can be explained the same way. It was a dream.

Did anyone else thought about Modern Warfare 2 in the snow scene?
Old 07-18-10 | 11:36 AM
  #264  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So Cal
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

I saw it with a pretty good audience (as in, no talking, cheering, clapping, etc during the movie, even though the theater was completely packed). However, there was a trailer for Devil before the movie, and everyone started cracking up and then booing when M. Night's name came up.
Old 07-18-10 | 11:40 AM
  #265  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: United States
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

So, two of the main characters were shot and put into limbo. Seven people went into the dream. Two were shot, two others went into limbo via an alternate route. Do people think Nolan should have "killed" off everybody? Two people being shot seems like enough...
Old 07-18-10 | 12:26 PM
  #266  
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 75
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Superboy
I saw it with a pretty good audience (as in, no talking, cheering, clapping, etc during the movie, even though the theater was completely packed). However, there was a trailer for Devil before the movie, and everyone started cracking up and then booing when M. Night's name came up.
My showing had a an opposite reaction to when M. Nights name popped up. Two teenaged girls cheered when his name popped up and then went "Woooo!" at the sound effect scare moment at the end of the trailer. It was not sarcastic cheers either. I remember thinking 'oh shit' these goofy teenagers are gonna ruin Inception for me by whooping it up over everything. Thankfully, they were quiet. Maybe the sheer heaviness of the film overwhelmed them to where they were mostly speechless.
Old 07-18-10 | 12:41 PM
  #267  
tylergfoster's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,540
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by huh?
My thoughts:

Spoiler:
I think L-Cap was the target of inception the entire time. To me, Cain's plan all along was to plant the idea that his daughter in law's death wasn't his son's fault. He brought in Ellen Page to plant the seed. She helped him come to grips with this, and finally at the end, he was back in reality.

Who knows. I enjoy movies that make you think like this. Good job to Nolan.
The only problem is that you have it backwards. Caine lives in Paris. He and his wife have custody of Mal's kids. His wife is French. Caine is Mal's father, not father-in-law.
Old 07-18-10 | 12:52 PM
  #268  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So Cal
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Second showing. The luster of the movie wore off quickly for me and I was able to really enjoy the plot and mechanics of the movie. Not every excellent movie needs great character development. It's a sci-fi movie that works really well on a lot of levels.
Old 07-18-10 | 01:44 PM
  #269  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,101
Received 119 Likes on 91 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Thinking on this movie a little more over the last day I have to say that as a movie I think I like it even less than originally, but in terms of the theories of the movies a couple things:

1. The top tipping over or not is a complete red herring. It is HIS dream so if he gets to a point where he wants to stay-with his kids in a limbo type state-then his subconcious can just tip over the top.

2. No one is mentioning the possibility that he actually murdered his wife. The hotel room was kinda trashed like there was a struggle, and I think the whole thing might be his dream to forgive himself and be reunited with his kids.
Old 07-18-10 | 02:19 PM
  #270  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,300
Received 261 Likes on 160 Posts
From: Indianapolis, IN
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by johnnysd
2. No one is mentioning the possibility that he actually murdered his wife. The hotel room was kinda trashed like there was a struggle, and I think the whole thing might be his dream to forgive himself and be reunited with his kids.
The wife did mention that she trashed the room and left behind things to implicate him in her death.
Old 07-18-10 | 02:20 PM
  #271  
Sessa17's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NJ, the place where smiles go to die
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Blu Man
A couple of Karate classes? I'm insulted by that inaccurate and ignorant statement. Yes, bad action to you. I disagree. I'm not claiming he is the best action director in the world, he's far from it. But he has definitely improved since Batman Begins. You don't need to get so angry and personal. Just clam down.
Wow, that explains why you took a few karate classes. I would to If I got as upset as you do over an anonymous message board. I wasn't getting angry, I was smiling. I was just making fun of the absurdity of comparing poorly shot action scenes to one's claim of hand to hand combat experience, its hysterical. And I don't know you dude, I can't get personal, just take a deep breath and relax.
Old 07-18-10 | 02:51 PM
  #272  
Boba Fett's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,487
Received 115 Likes on 85 Posts
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Sheesh, some people are very defensive of this movie. I commented on a friend's Facebook status that I thought it was a very good movie, but not perfect. You would have thought I'd told them God didn't exist. The general consensus was I was asleep in the movie and missed all the deep emotional character development that I claimed the movie lacked.
Old 07-18-10 | 03:04 PM
  #273  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: In the Universe.
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Sessa17
I'm so sick of the excuse of every time a director can't shoot action, someone saying it was done so the viewer "can feel jarred by the experience". The only thing jarring is that I don't know what the hell is going on. Its a movie, not a fight-simulator. I want the camera panned back so I can see the scene unfold & watch the action take place. No shit hand to hand combat is jarring, you don't to claim you have experience with a couple of karate classes to know that. This is a movie. Shaky camera, plus a thousand rounds of ammo shooting these guys & never hitting a damn thing equals crappy action scenes to me & more importantly boring.
This is the one thing that bothers me with his movies as he tends to zoom in too much in fight/action scenes.
Old 07-18-10 | 03:13 PM
  #274  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,472
Received 446 Likes on 346 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Saw it again last nigh at IMAX. It gets a lot better the second time around as you already know the terminology and what each person does. While you still had to pay attention, the movie was much more entertaining.

I really like the whole theory that
Spoiler:
Leo is the one being given Inception. I thought of it that way when they were all at the airport and you see everyone smiling at Leo, and Murphy gives him a look as if he knows something about what just happened. However, that begs the question if both he and Murphy were targets or Murphy was part of the team? It seems Murphy was definitely dealing with daddy issues for real.
Old 07-18-10 | 03:44 PM
  #275  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Leandro/San Francisco
Re: Inception (Nolan, 2010)- The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Boba Fett
Sheesh, some people are very defensive of this movie. I commented on a friend's Facebook status that I thought it was a very good movie, but not perfect. You would have thought I'd told them God didn't exist. The general consensus was I was asleep in the movie and missed all the deep emotional character development that I claimed the movie lacked.
The entire theater let out a groan when it ended and it didn't sound like a good groan. So, I don't think you were alone. I felt the same way you did.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.