![]() |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 10148378)
Good lord, amazing how many people around here are fascinated with the whole concept of eating shit. Is that all anyone really cares about with this movie? I've heard nothing is really shown, so I am sure you guys can find a website to better service your needs.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
(Post 10148438)
Isn't that the whole allure of the movie? Sewing people together is mildly creepy but when its ass to mouth you kinda expect some nasty shit (pun intended).
Hope the Asian guy at the front didn't eat anything too spicy. |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
It wouldn't matter, they'd just cut away to a random shot of the Dr. before anything happens anyway.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
I'm still curious as to what route they're going to take with the sequel. Especially if the plan is to get 14 people together like that.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 10148649)
I'm still curious as to what route they're going to take with the sequel. Especially if the plan is to get 14 people together like that.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
(Post 10148297)
It's a natural function of the human body
So is piss, blood, snot, puss and sweat but you don't see me eating/drinking those either. Anyways, I liked the movie. It was entertaining and fucked up and I don't think we needed to see more than we did. Also, let's be realistic; it's not a Cat III movie or a japanese movie. Tom Six probably had distribution in mind when he made it. |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
(Post 10148438)
Isn't that the whole allure of the movie? Sewing people together is mildly creepy but when its ass to mouth you kinda expect some nasty shit (pun intended).
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
All this eating-shit talk...
rotfl |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10148806)
That's what I thought. I was expecting shit eating.
Spoiler:
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
I had to order this OnDemand Sat. night. I've been hearing so much about the film that I needed to see it. My gf attempted to watch it with me, but she bailed after about 35 min. Then she kept yelling out that I was nasty for watching it. Was it gross? Of course, but not graphically so. I've seen far, far worse depravity on film than what we got here. But the concept was especially grotesque. I thought the Dr. did a damn good job. He was so incredibly creepy and misanthropic that I couldn't help but love his performance. Even the girls weren't your typical dumbass Americans. And kudos for throwing in a Japanese guy. I loved the mix of languages being used.
I don't know how they're going to do a sequel, but I'll def watch it. I thought this one was well-shot and acted. I'll pick it up on BD. |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
If anyone wants to see a better "poo-oriented"/shocking film, go see Dusan Makavejev's SWEET MOVIE.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
(Post 10148998)
Spoiler:
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 10151872)
If that's actually how it's said, then that seems like it might come across almost as comical.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by troystiffler
(Post 10148033)
Haha. Ebert's the man. He didn't have to review this, but did. He didn't give it any stars. But it was more of a "no star" rating than a "zero star" rating.
The review is at http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...IEWS/100509982 http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/...xW=415&title=1 |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
scientifically speaking....based on that graphic it's a bit more complicated right? I mean person in front poops, which goes to the 2nd and I'm assuming it has to be digested over time and again to the 3rd. Right? Is that how it happens?
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
(Post 10148653)
They're going to make a human train and call it The Steamer.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
scientifically speaking, for everyone to live the food has to nourish everyone, so therefore, the last person should be the only one pooping. The only thing that should be coming out of the first and second people's asses is chewed food (not poop).
There's definitely a new type of digestion process involved! |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 10152164)
scientifically speaking, for everyone to live the food has to nourish everyone, so therefore, the last person should be the only one pooping. The only thing that should be coming out of the first and second people's asses is chewed food (not poop).
There's definitely a new type of digestion process involved! Do they explain that? I thought this was "100% Medically Accurate." Then again, I don't think the centipede experiment is a success. |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
That is only if you take the simplistic illustration literally. He doesn't do any internal surgery, the whole procedure is superficial, so everyone still has stomachs and intestines.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 10151872)
If that's actually how it's said, then that seems like it might come across almost as comical.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by zombeaner
(Post 10152617)
It is a little bit funny. They couldn't show graphic poo eating because they are all attached, it isn't like one poops on the ground and the next one eats it.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by zombeaner
(Post 10152617)
it isn't like one poops on the ground and the next one eats it.
|
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10152144)
scientifically speaking....based on that graphic it's a bit more complicated right? I mean person in front poops, which goes to the 2nd and I'm assuming it has to be digested over time and again to the 3rd. Right? Is that how it happens?
Yeah, they are eating shit. Which isn't a huge dealbreaker actually. Flood them with antibiotics, and they will be able to grab nutrients from shit. To get enough nutrients to keep the third person alive, they would make the first guy eat 24/7. Which, this is shock horror. It isn't supposed to make sense. I was ok with that until they added the medically accurate bit. The 2nd and 3rd person would die of thirst before a week was out. Arrrggghh. The concept is terrifying. Noone wants to be "pede" #3. But claiming accuracy? Gah! |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
Originally Posted by Numanoid
(Post 10152799)
They save that stuff for Family Guy.
Or South Park. So if he attached them all that way to create a new way of existence for humans, wouldn't he know that it would kill them and his experiment ultimately prove a failure? |
Re: Human Centipede (What?)
So, taking the whole water part out of the equation, can a person actually survive by eating nothing but poop? Doesn't seem like there would be nearly enough nutrients for somebody to actually survive on that and even if there were actually enough nutrients to keep the second person alive, it seems like the nutrients would continue to decrease as it went through the centipede so the third and fourth people would have even less nutrients available.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.