Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
The following users liked this post:
B.A. (12-31-20)
#177
Banned by request
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
God no. For the life of me, I have no idea why that show was so well liked. I tried because I love Lethal Weapon, but I didn't make it beyond 3 episodes.
#178
DVD Talk Hero
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
The expiration date for another Lethal Weapon installment came and went about twenty years ago, though. (Sort of like Ghostbusters.) I don't think anyone under forty would give a shit about seeing two eldery cops trading witty quips while they shoot people.
#179
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
I think the general moviegoing public probably doesn't care about Mel Gibson's nuttiness (or Johnny Depp's, who was recently let go from the Harry Potter franchise), but there's still that recording out there of him ranting about his girlfriend getting "raped by a pack of [n-word]s" that will get trotted out again and that's the kind of optics the studios want to avoid. Gibson and Depp are so far into the A-list that their toxic personalities are more or less accepted and shrugged away.
The expiration date for another Lethal Weapon installment came and went about twenty years ago, though. (Sort of like Ghostbusters.) I don't think anyone under forty would give a shit about seeing two eldery cops trading witty quips while they shoot people.
The expiration date for another Lethal Weapon installment came and went about twenty years ago, though. (Sort of like Ghostbusters.) I don't think anyone under forty would give a shit about seeing two eldery cops trading witty quips while they shoot people.
#180
DVD Talk Legend
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
I would be far more concerned about making a $150M movie with a totally toxic lead.
It's one thing to have Gibson star in a tiny indie film which doesn't need to make much money to break even, and it's one thing for him to be behind the camera.
But you can't have him on-screen as the lead -- especially in a movie about a renegade rogue cop. Bad, bad optics
A reboot makes FAR more sense than a sequel.
It's one thing to have Gibson star in a tiny indie film which doesn't need to make much money to break even, and it's one thing for him to be behind the camera.
But you can't have him on-screen as the lead -- especially in a movie about a renegade rogue cop. Bad, bad optics
A reboot makes FAR more sense than a sequel.
#181
DVD Talk God
The following users liked this post:
candyrocket786 (12-30-20)
#182
DVD Talk Hero
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
Haha. Sure. I hope it feels like a Lethal Weapon film and not a one-off like the last Die Hard movie.
That's impressive to be 91 and still working. I assume there will be someone ghost directing too?
That's impressive to be 91 and still working. I assume there will be someone ghost directing too?
#183
DVD Talk Hero
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
^ Gibson is a pretty damn good director in his own right. I’m sure he could be there to help out.
#184
DVD Talk Hero
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
I guess he's not too old for this shit.
#185
DVD Talk Hero
#186
DVD Talk Legend
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
Well Clint Eastwood is 90 and still directing so it can be done.
#187
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
I assume there will be no Joe Pesci. I'll watch it, if it happens. I'm about 20/80 on it actually happening.
#189
DVD Talk Hero
#190
DVD Talk God
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
Glover is 74 and Gibson is 64. Whatever story they come up it would be it wouldn’t make any sense to have Riggs and Murtaugh still be cops. They would be long retired. And remember Roger was celebrating his 50th birthday in 1987 when the first movie came out. He would be in his 80s if the movies were in normal timelines.
#191
DVD Talk Gold Edition
#193
DVD Talk Gold Edition
#194
DVD Talk Hero
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
At the end of Lethal Weapon 4 EVERYONE had a baby so I’d imagine it would center around one of them. I can see Riggs and Murtaugh coming out of retirement, or going rogue, to help out one of those kids who got themselves into trouble. Those kids would be in their early 20s now.
#195
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
At the end of Lethal Weapon 4 EVERYONE had a baby so I’d imagine it would center around one of them. I can see Riggs and Murtaugh coming out of retirement, or going rogue, to help out one of those kids who got themselves into trouble. Those kids would be in their early 20s now.
#196
DVD Talk Legend
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
Also, Glover at 74 and Gibson at 65 are far from over the hill, given that we still get Harrison Ford (78), Al Pacino (80), Robert De Niro (77), and that director I hinted at above (90) in starring roles.
As for the storyline, I hear it's VERY dark by Lethal Weapon standards, but that's all that's known, other than this ISN'T a "passing the torch" movie - it's the end. It's supposed to be called "Lethal Finale"
Last edited by Shannon Nutt; 01-04-21 at 03:59 PM.
#197
DVD Talk Legend
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
the fact that Glover was "too old for this shit" back in Lethal Weapon ONE makes me LOL.
#198
DVD Talk Hero
#199
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,873
Received 1,686 Likes
on
1,200 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
I mean it becomes Die Hard at that point with the kids in jeopardy. That is one of the ways it makes sense, but maybe they vacation to South Africa get in trouble with the government due to the events of Lethal Weapon 2? Or they travel to China and the same thing, they run into trouble with the Triads because of Lethal Weapon 4.
#200
DVD Talk Hero
re: Lethal Weapon 5 (D: Mel Gibson)
Well that sounds great. Looking back at Lethal Weapon, Riggs' suicidal and nihilistic tendencies were always dark. I felt like it lightened up after the story turns towards the end of Lethal Weapon 2. After that, it felt all-around pretty friendly and goofy.



