Superman Returns Sequel is a GO!
#126
Moderator
Originally Posted by Charlie Goose
Yes. When the Trio invade the small town, the young boy, who did a poor job of covering his British accent, rode away on a horse for help. Non threw the police strobe light he had and killed the boy. The death itself wasn't shown, just a puff of smoke in the distance.
#127
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by TallGuyMe
Um, the rest? is.. uh... rather boring. Decent premise, poor execution, which may or may not be Bryan Singer's fault... the problem with this, or anything else associated with Superman is the fact that there never is any real fear that Superman will die. Or lose. Or get seriously hurt. He is simply TOO powerful, always has been, right from the get-go... so until you put Superman up against a foe that shows they have the potential to KILL the man of steel (how about a cool scene where the villain manages to rip off one of Superman's fingers, to at least show that old Supes is up against a villain that could do him some physical harm?), then you will never get a truly satisfying Superman movie.
ding ding ding ding.... we have a winner.... you are absolutely right and thats the problem with this character... he is just to powerful... you expect him to stop all dangers to humans... hell... lex will never really hurt superman... Batman and other superheroes can be killed and hurt bad... but hell if you get kryptonite off of him.. he is super again...hell in the movie they stabbed him badly... but once away from kryptonite... he is alive and healed.....
#128
DVD Talk Legend
Please, no Lex creates a natural disaster and Supes has to stop it. Mr. Singer, we have seen this one time too many. Returns was a great homage to the original and you channeled Richard Donner well. Now do something original.
In all honesty, if you have the Superman Returns videogame, it has a great story set-up. It simply takes the premise that Superman has been around for a while and runs with it, giving him a rogues gallery consisting of Mongul, Metallo, and Luthor. You also get to battle a lot of creatures from Star Labs. Had they actually realized they had this power in the screenwriting, they could have done a much more action oriented movie.
In all honesty, if you have the Superman Returns videogame, it has a great story set-up. It simply takes the premise that Superman has been around for a while and runs with it, giving him a rogues gallery consisting of Mongul, Metallo, and Luthor. You also get to battle a lot of creatures from Star Labs. Had they actually realized they had this power in the screenwriting, they could have done a much more action oriented movie.
#129
DVD Talk Legend
I'm in the camp that thought Returns was pretty weak overall. I enjoyed it and it entertained me, to a point. I won't even bother going in to some of the glaring plotholes the film presented, I can only hope they learn from the mistakes and make a truly worthy sequel. I still think the best idea would be to use the Doomsday storyline. That would make one hell of a film if they did it with respect to the comic.
#130
Moderator
Originally Posted by Giles
my understanding is that the scene is only featured in the documentary - 'You Will Believe: The Cinematic Saga of Superman' on Disc 13 of the Ultimate Superman Collection
#131
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KillerCannabis
I still think the best idea would be to use the Doomsday storyline. That would make one hell of a film if they did it with respect to the comic.
I always wished they would make a trilogy of movies from the Death, Funeral, and Return of Superman storylines. Death with Superman and Doomsday killing each other. Funeral with the Eradicator Superman, Cyborg Superman, Superboy clone, and Steel. Return with the return of the real Superman. That would have made an awesome trilogy.
#134
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by TallGuyMe
the problem with this, or anything else associated with Superman is the fact that there never is any real fear that Superman will die. Or lose. Or get seriously hurt. He is simply TOO powerful, always has been, right from the get-go...
Chris Reeve Superman: Clark Kent=wimpy/Superman=macho
Brandon Routh Superman: Clark Kent=wimpy/Superman=wimpy
#135
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by raven56706
refresh my memory... how did doomsday kill superman and how did superman come back to life

Doomsday's origin was explained in a later comic which I barely remember. Something about some dude on Krypton creating the ultimate lifeform. The dude would set the specimen loose in a hostile environment where it would get killed. The dude then regenerated it. Once regenerated, the specimen retained all the knowledge and experience of its previous life and became immune to whatever previously killed it (kind of like how the Borg adapt). Slowly, the specimen became more and more powerful and lived longer each time until it eventually became the "ultimate lifeform" or something.
Superman has this Kryptonian artifact called the Eradicator in the Fortress of Solitude. Somehow after Doomsday killed Superman, the Eradicator got his body and put him in some type of regeneration thing that looked like a bacta tank from Star Wars. It somehow brought Superman back to life. I don't remember much about it either.
#137
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by raven56706
but if superman was super how the hell did doomsday kill him

Seriously though, in the comics Superman could get his ass kicked by aliens/monsters that were more powerful than him. It is a misconception that kryptonite is the only thing that harms him.
#138
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,733
Received 1,672 Likes
on
1,188 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Originally Posted by taffer
Because Doomsday was more super. 
Seriously though, in the comics Superman could get his ass kicked by aliens/monsters that were more powerful than him. It is a misconception that kryptonite is the only thing that harms him.

Seriously though, in the comics Superman could get his ass kicked by aliens/monsters that were more powerful than him. It is a misconception that kryptonite is the only thing that harms him.
#140
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,733
Received 1,672 Likes
on
1,188 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Originally Posted by taffer
Doomsday used the Avada Kedavra spell on Superman. 

#141
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,733
Received 1,672 Likes
on
1,188 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Warners should just treat this like Universal is treating the Hulk.
#142
Originally Posted by Giles
my understanding is that the scene is only featured in the documentary - 'You Will Believe: The Cinematic Saga of Superman' on Disc 13 of the Ultimate Superman Collection
#143
Originally Posted by taffer
It has been ages since I last read the comics. I mainly just remember reading Doomsday beating the living crap out of the entire JLA with one arm tied behind his back. Yes, he literally did have one arm tied behind his back for half the battle. 

#144
DVD Talk Special Edition
I've been reading SUPERMAN comics for a couple of decades now...and I gotta tell ya, most of the stories simply suck. I don't think that any of the comics (excluding issues where Superman is a guest star, like THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS) come anywhere to approaching the movies in terms of character interest and quality.
#145
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by Doughboy
I doubt that. It's gotten worse for me over time. Don't get me wrong. The movie has some great moments, but as a whole, it's a mediocre film. The passage of time won't improve bad casting decisions and dumb creative moves like recycling the first movie's plot or giving Superman a kid.
My intention isn't to defend SUPERMAN RETURNS, or convert those who dislike it. I know it has problems, and as far as superhero movies go, it's bound to disappoint those who want another SPIDER-MAN (which was far overrated, I believe).
But like THE GODFATHER III (another film which people seem to hate, but is still far better in terms of artistry and compelling drama than 90% of the Hollywood crap out there), films which fail short of their predecessor's high standards (meaning the first SUPERMAN and SUPERMAN II) are really given a lot of short-shrift, and time may tell whether the movie survives the knee-jerk negativity of the internet.
Back in the early eighties, fans complained about the long and languid Krypton scenes, the fact that Lex Luthor wasn't a mad scienties, as well as Superman actually banging Lois Lane in the sequel. Now, we think nothing of them because they fit within the version of Superman we now appreciate. It will probably be the same way with the kid: Superman has a son and that's now the hero we'll know.
Sorry for getting off-topic. Back to the main point, it will be great to see Superman flying yet again without the likes of Nic Cage, Tim Burton, McG or any other director who doesn't really know the character.
Last edited by DieselsDen; 07-12-07 at 09:33 PM.
#146
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DieselsDen
I've been reading SUPERMAN comics for a couple of decades now...and I gotta tell ya, most of the stories simply suck. I don't think that any of the comics (excluding issues where Superman is a guest star, like THE DARK KNIGHT RETURNS) come anywhere to approaching the movies in terms of character interest and quality.
#147
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
Actually, the more I watch SUPERMAN RETURNS, the more I dislike it. I've gone from thinking it was good, to thinking it's so-so, to downright not enjoying most of it. I think the first time out I was just enjoying the IMAX. 

#148
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by devilshalo
Warners should just treat this like Universal is treating the Hulk.
I know a lot more people who enjoyed Returns and that's something that can't be said about Hulk.
#149
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
As one of the few who liked Returns, I don't want a reboot.
I know a lot more people who enjoyed Returns and that's something that can't be said about Hulk.
I know a lot more people who enjoyed Returns and that's something that can't be said about Hulk.
#150
DVD Talk Hero
I enjoy Luthor being the main villain. I think the Superman movies have tried to keep the universe they've created as far from a sci-fi film as possible. There are only two planets, Earth and Krypton. All elements must spring forth from them. Bringing in other worlds, aliens, multi-dimensional beings, etc., would only weaken the Superman universe that I have come to know and love so dearly (never read any of the comics).
There are plenty of other movies that deal with that stuff already. I like that the Superman movies play on the fact that Earth is pretty much like it is in reality, except it has Superman in it. Having a universe that is filled with mighty creatures really weakens the whole messiah complex that has been created.
There are plenty of other movies that deal with that stuff already. I like that the Superman movies play on the fact that Earth is pretty much like it is in reality, except it has Superman in it. Having a universe that is filled with mighty creatures really weakens the whole messiah complex that has been created.



