Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Phantom Menace to be released in 3D Next Spring

Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Phantom Menace to be released in 3D Next Spring

Old 05-24-06, 01:47 AM
  #1  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
 
Kal-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 7,992
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Phantom Menace to be released in 3D Next Spring

I just got my Popular Science today and there was an article in it about Return of 3D to theaters. The article mentions that TPM is set to be re-released next spring in 3D and that the other 5 movies should follow.

Anyway, just thought I'd share the good(?) news?
Old 05-24-06, 02:59 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wonder if it will make the movie better?
Old 05-24-06, 08:57 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Out of the sandbox!
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought they swore off making any of these in 3D....
Old 05-24-06, 09:26 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Maxflier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 12,203
Received 50 Likes on 33 Posts
Will it's Box Office take stack with what it has already made?
Old 05-24-06, 10:00 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 24,366
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts
icky poo doo!
Old 05-24-06, 10:10 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maxflier
Will it's Box Office take stack with what it has already made?
Of course. That's what happened with the SE's.
Old 05-24-06, 10:34 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Maxflier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 12,203
Received 50 Likes on 33 Posts
So I guess Titanic will eventually be overtaken once Star Wars gets enough theatrical releases...
Old 05-24-06, 10:46 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gijon213
I thought they swore off making any of these in 3D....
I think they were referring to the OT.

The shit coming out of Lucasfilm hasn't made much sense lately.
Old 05-24-06, 12:01 PM
  #9  
DRG
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: ND
Posts: 13,421
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The prequels should adapt well to this since most of the original footage is either digital or filmed against a greenscreen (easy to separate). But to do the original trilogy would be pretty tough, and would probably require completely recreating backgrounds, sets, vehicles, props, etc. digitally.

Originally Posted by Maxflier
So I guess Titanic will eventually be overtaken once Star Wars gets enough theatrical releases...
No, because James Cameron is the main guy behind this new 3D movement, and he'll just redo Titanic in 3D himself if the record is in danger.
Old 05-24-06, 12:16 PM
  #10  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,604
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by SeekOnce

The shit coming out of Lucasfilm hasn't made much sense lately.
it's a revolving door of shit if you ask me.
Old 05-24-06, 12:24 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Giles
it's a revolving door of shit if you ask me.
I couldn't agree more!
Old 05-24-06, 12:30 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Numanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Down in 'The Park'
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I was doing my weekly search for "revolving door of shit" and this thread came up. I must say that I am greatly disappointed.
Old 05-24-06, 12:31 PM
  #13  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,604
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Numanoid
I was doing my weekly search for "revolving door of shit" and this thread came up. I must say that I am greatly disappointed.
I somehow knew I'd get shit for starting a thread about 'defecation in movies' ...
Old 05-24-06, 12:43 PM
  #14  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,604
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
you'd think LucasFilms, Fox, DLP and REAL3D would team up and do what Disney/Dolby Digital and DLP did with 'Chicken Little 3D' and make a conservetive effort to bring down the costs of the 3D system/setup so more theatres can book and feature this as such. (sorry for the run-on sentence there).
Old 05-24-06, 01:29 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Papillion, NE!
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whoooopie!!!

Mesa thinks in 3D yousa coulda punch young Annie!!!
Old 05-24-06, 03:16 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,029
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by DRG
The prequels should adapt well to this since most of the original footage is either digital or filmed against a greenscreen (easy to separate). But to do the original trilogy would be pretty tough, and would probably require completely recreating backgrounds, sets, vehicles, props, etc. digitally.
From what I've read, that shouldn't be a problem. The process allows a 3-D film to be created from an already shot 2-D film.

Lucas has already stated that all 6 ST films will get the 3-D re-release.

It will be interesting to see how well it looks. I hope it works as well as the process used for Chicken Little, which was terrific. Forgot I was wearing the glasses after a while, and it was the first time I've been able to watch a 3-D film that didn't give me a headache or eye strain.
Old 05-24-06, 04:07 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 3,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i am for any film in 3d, if you get to see any in a digital theater its fantastic, Chicken Little looked awesome in 3d
Old 05-24-06, 04:07 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Posts: 31,961
Received 292 Likes on 208 Posts
Fool me once, shame on you.. fool me twice, shame on me.. 3D isn't getting my money, Mr. Lucas.
Old 05-24-06, 05:36 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: behind the eight ball
Posts: 19,403
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 45 Posts
So, do you stil need the special glasses, or have they found a way around that? I wear real glasses, so I'm pretty much screwed if they do.
Old 05-24-06, 05:50 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Drexl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 16,075
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Jon2
From what I've read, that shouldn't be a problem. The process allows a 3-D film to be created from an already shot 2-D film.

Lucas has already stated that all 6 ST films will get the 3-D re-release.

It will be interesting to see how well it looks. I hope it works as well as the process used for Chicken Little, which was terrific. Forgot I was wearing the glasses after a while, and it was the first time I've been able to watch a 3-D film that didn't give me a headache or eye strain.
I doubt it will look that good. With digitally animated material I would assume they render it in 3D to begin with, rather than trying to create a 3D image from a 2D image like they are doing with these. I think Episodes 2 and 3 might work better than Episode 1 because they were shot on digital video, but not as good as pure CGI.
Old 05-24-06, 06:55 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
 
Kal-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 7,992
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason
So, do you stil need the special glasses, or have they found a way around that? I wear real glasses, so I'm pretty much screwed if they do.
Apparently even with the technology they're using, yes. There's 2 developing right now. Basically it involves showing 144fps and every other frame is for one eye. One of the glasses used is lcd and it basically blocks the eye which the displayed film strip isn't for. So if the current frame is for the right eye, the lcd glass turns the left eye side opaque and vice versa. They said it happens so fast that you'll hardly notice it. There's even a picture of Peter Jackson wearing them. I forgot how the other one works.

I think it's cool. I'm thinking of the first attack on the Death Star, the Speeder Bike Chase in Jedi and of course the Asteroid Chase in Empire.
Old 05-25-06, 08:45 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any process that magically transforms 2D into 3D is going to look fake--you're adding a ton of information that's just not in the original image, and it's hard to imagine how you'd do that in a way that looks natural. My guess is it will look more like a diorama than real 3D.

Of course with the prequels he can re-render all the CGI effects to get true 3D, but in the case of the original trilogy that's not an option.

This sounds like the 21st century equivalent of colorizing B&W movies to me. If Lucas wants to wow us with new technology, let him do it in with a new movie instead of constantly fiddling with his old ones.
Old 05-25-06, 02:13 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Inverse
Any process that magically transforms 2D into 3D is going to look fake--you're adding a ton of information that's just not in the original image, and it's hard to imagine how you'd do that in a way that looks natural. My guess is it will look more like a diorama than real 3D.

Of course with the prequels he can re-render all the CGI effects to get true 3D, but in the case of the original trilogy that's not an option.

This sounds like the 21st century equivalent of colorizing B&W movies to me. If Lucas wants to wow us with new technology, let him do it in with a new movie instead of constantly fiddling with his old ones.
You have no idea what you are talking about, this isn't the old 3-D with things coming at you. When George Lucas, James Cameron, and Peter Jackson are all blown away by the process even on old movies, I'm there. Sorry but despite what you may have heard from a bunch of idiots who only know how to use the internet to bitch, these 3 guys know how to make films.
Old 05-25-06, 03:21 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Thread Starter
 
Kal-El's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fortress of Solitude
Posts: 7,992
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by shaggy
You have no idea what you are talking about, this isn't the old 3-D with things coming at you. When George Lucas, James Cameron, and Peter Jackson are all blown away by the process even on old movies, I'm there. Sorry but despite what you may have heard from a bunch of idiots who only know how to use the internet to bitch, these 3 guys know how to make films.
One thing I forgot to mention is that PJ's King Kong is one of the other movies being "3D-fied" for a re-release.
Old 05-25-06, 03:27 PM
  #25  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,604
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Kal-El
One thing I forgot to mention is that PJ's King Kong is one of the other movies being "3D-fied" for a re-release.
I have noted this in the past, but I think this film is meant for IMAX, Jackson should have taken Spielberg's intention of 'Jurassic Park' and released this in 1.85 or lower so that the screen would take advantage of Kong's and the Dinosaur's heights. Out of curiosity, what is your source for this news?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.