#151
God I would love for this movie to set records for an opening weekend. If you're not in line to see this movie the second it opens, I really pity you and your life.
#152
wendersfan , 03-24-06 04:41 PM
Moderator
wendersfan
Moderator
close
- Join DateJun 2002
- LocationAmerica!
- Posts:33,921
Received 168 Likes
on
123 Posts
Quote:
Now do you understand?
D
Originally Posted by Derrich
Are you serious? Try this. Go sit in your car and imagine that when you looked in the back seat, you saw a sh-tload of snakes. Now add Sam Jackson in the passenger seat yelling 'I want these motherf-cking snakes outta my motherf-cking car!". Are you telling me that you don't have an erection just at the thought of it? Now, imagine the same thing, but on a plane.Now do you understand?
D

That's it, precisely.
#153
riley_dude , 03-24-06 04:48 PM
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I'm not quite sure why this movie has so many people wanting to see it. I can see making fun of it but that's about it.
#154
Joe Molotov , 03-24-06 04:59 PM
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Quote:
Because for possibly the first time since The Incredibly Strange Creatures Who Stopped Living and Became Mixed-Up Zombies, the tagline for the movie also doubles as the title. It's the cinematic equivalent of seeing Haley's Comet.Originally Posted by riley_dude
I'm not quite sure why this movie has so many people wanting to see it. I can see making fun of it but that's about it.
#155
Nick Martin , 03-25-06 07:22 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
The line you have all been waiting for:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/wx69xl
Found the link on the 'Snakes On A Blog' website.
http://www.sendspace.com/file/wx69xl
Found the link on the 'Snakes On A Blog' website.
#156
That is fantastic, just fantastic. Here is more great mutha fuckin' news from snakes on a blog:
Quote:
And here’s our mini-spoiler/plot element. A New Line source told me this morning that they’ve added, for one example,
he answered.
And here’s our mini-spoiler/plot element. A New Line source told me this morning that they’ve added, for one example,
Spoiler:
#157
I'd love for the ending to have Jackson being put on trial for animal cruelty, and yelling out "YES THEY DESERVED TO DIE AND I HOPE THEY BURN IN HELL!"
They might as well just spoof every single famous Jackson quote in this movie.
They might as well just spoof every single famous Jackson quote in this movie.
#159
Quote:
Now they just need to move up the release date (as Jeffrey Wells said).Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
According to the article, the theatrical release will be the R-rated edition.
I have to see this movie. That "snakes on a blog" website has been cracking me up for a while now.
#160
Nick Martin , 03-26-06 12:54 AM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
I wonder if they will be serving Samuel Jackson Beer on that plane?
"They bit me! A Fuckin' snake bit me! Drink bitch!"
"They bit me! A Fuckin' snake bit me! Drink bitch!"
#161
Quote:
If it was PG-13, it didn't have nudity to begin with. They're not adding more, they're adding it, period!
Nudity isn't necessarily limited to R-rated movies. "Titanic," for example, was PG-13 and had plenty of nudity.Originally Posted by Seantn
I like how it is announced that they are adding more violence and MORE nudity to the R rated cut!If it was PG-13, it didn't have nudity to begin with. They're not adding more, they're adding it, period!
Quote:
You have zero sense of "fun," don't you?Originally Posted by MASAMUNE2
everybody is just trying to be "cool"
#162
This is how I talk! Haven't you seen my movies!? Juice!? The one where I say, "'I want these motherf-cking snakes off the motherf-cking plane!"




#163
Sunday Morning , 03-26-06 09:17 AM
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Another "Built-In" cult hit. Fucking studios are so adroit nowadays about how to sell a movie to an audience to make a quick buck that they are actually making it for them by pretending to give them what they really want. Not realizing that a real cult-hit is generated after growing word of mouth after a film is realeased and based on the actual value (or lack of) of the film itself. Not just a wacky premise and casting choice. Go ahead, give them their money
They need it, they paid 5 writers to come up with this crap. Movies by commitee are fun and where it's at!!!
They need it, they paid 5 writers to come up with this crap. Movies by commitee are fun and where it's at!!!
#164
Quote:
They need it, they paid 5 writers to come up with this crap. Movies by commitee are fun and where it's at!!!
I am not sure how to even respond to such a stupid, snobby post.Originally Posted by Sunday Morning
Another "Built-In" cult hit. Fucking studios are so adroit nowadays about how to sell a movie to an audience to make a quick buck that they are actually making it for them by pretending to give them what they really want. Not realizing that a real cult-hit is generated after growing word of mouth after a film is realeased and based on the actual value (or lack of) of the film itself. Not just a wacky premise and casting choice. Go ahead, give them their money
They need it, they paid 5 writers to come up with this crap. Movies by commitee are fun and where it's at!!!
#165
Sunday Morning , 03-26-06 09:53 AM
DVD Talk Gold Edition
I like debating movies, so, feel free. It doesn't come from a snobby place, really. I am a fan of films of it's ilk. I just am not a fan of the hollywoodized/bastardation versions of such. I am willing to give the film itself a chance. Just merely responding to my interpetation of the state where cinema is. And the reality of how films are being made today. I know people in the industry and honestly you'd be shocked about how many morons populate it. Though it should be obvious with the kinds of film being made...
Snakes on a plane is purely a marketing stratetgy. They are counting on us geeks to cause a fevor and make a hit for them based on words like "re-shoots" and "R-rating" that in reality should signal the movie has a lot of problems. They realize audiences are getting more saavy. And that's cool... But, i'd rather see a film that generates buzz because it's actually good or fun. And then help with generating it's word of mouth appeal. I guess that's just a preference to things being formulated for me.
Snakes on a plane is purely a marketing stratetgy. They are counting on us geeks to cause a fevor and make a hit for them based on words like "re-shoots" and "R-rating" that in reality should signal the movie has a lot of problems. They realize audiences are getting more saavy. And that's cool... But, i'd rather see a film that generates buzz because it's actually good or fun. And then help with generating it's word of mouth appeal. I guess that's just a preference to things being formulated for me.
#166
Matthew Chmiel , 03-26-06 12:10 PM
DVD Talk Legend
Quote:
Snakes on a plane is purely a marketing stratetgy. They are counting on us geeks to cause a fevor and make a hit for them based on words like "re-shoots" and "R-rating" that in reality should signal the movie has a lot of problems. They realize audiences are getting more saavy. And that's cool... But, i'd rather see a film that generates buzz because it's actually good or fun. And then help with generating it's word of mouth appeal. I guess that's just a preference to things being formulated for me.
Thumbs fucking down man. Thumbs fucking down. Originally Posted by Sunday Morning
I like debating movies, so, feel free. It doesn't come from a snobby place, really. I am a fan of films of it's ilk. I just am not a fan of the hollywoodized/bastardation versions of such. I am willing to give the film itself a chance. Just merely responding to my interpetation of the state where cinema is. And the reality of how films are being made today. I know people in the industry and honestly you'd be shocked about how many morons populate it. Though it should be obvious with the kinds of film being made...Snakes on a plane is purely a marketing stratetgy. They are counting on us geeks to cause a fevor and make a hit for them based on words like "re-shoots" and "R-rating" that in reality should signal the movie has a lot of problems. They realize audiences are getting more saavy. And that's cool... But, i'd rather see a film that generates buzz because it's actually good or fun. And then help with generating it's word of mouth appeal. I guess that's just a preference to things being formulated for me.
Over a year ago, New Line greenlighted this flick with hopes to get Wesley Snipes in the main role and from the people I know who have read the original script, it was meant to play seriously. My friends in the industry were seriously pissed off that this film was getting made as there are thousands of good scripts out there to choose from and New Line chose Snakes on a Plane instead. However, this is one of the rare times fact that a studio has realized that they have a complete piece of shit on their hands. So what are they doing to fix it? They're "polishing" it up to meet fanboy demands. It's viral marketing at it's finest and New Line is just running with it.
When I heard the premise over a year ago at dinner, I hated it. I fucking hated it. But with all the recent developments of the past few months, I'm growing more and more to actually (and honestly) looking forward to the flick when it comes out. If that's not great fucking marketing, then I don't know what is.
#167
Sunday Morning , 03-26-06 01:58 PM
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Studios always realize they have a piece of shit on their hands. It's just all about how they sell their piece of shit and the deluded line producers who do their dirty work. We are living in times where the marketing game is changing and evolving. And not for the better.
All I ask is the very least they should bring back 3-D movies. At least that gimmick is kinda fun.
All I ask is the very least they should bring back 3-D movies. At least that gimmick is kinda fun.
#168
Nick Martin , 03-26-06 04:05 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Quote:
Fixed.Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
Thumbs Muthafuckin' down man. Thumbs Muthafuckin' down. After all this is a Sam Jackson movie we're talking about here.
#169
Nick Martin , 03-26-06 04:41 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Speaking of snakes, look at this
http://imdb.com/title/tt0462200/
It's another Sam Jackson movie called "Black Snake Moan", about "a white nymphomaniac who must be "cured" of her disorder by an older black blues man"
It's from the writer/director of "Hustle & Flow".
It also stars Christina Ricci and Justin Timberlake.
I don't know what to say.
http://imdb.com/title/tt0462200/
It's another Sam Jackson movie called "Black Snake Moan", about "a white nymphomaniac who must be "cured" of her disorder by an older black blues man"
It's from the writer/director of "Hustle & Flow".
It also stars Christina Ricci and Justin Timberlake.
I don't know what to say.
#170
Joe Molotov , 03-26-06 04:49 PM
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Quote:
If that's what they're banking on, then they're not very smart. As we discovered with Serenity, internet buzz and $5 can buy you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. You could release a movie with no advertising at all, and have it accidentally make as much money as Serenity.Originally Posted by Sunday Morning
Snakes on a plane is purely a marketing stratetgy. They are counting on us geeks to cause a fevor and make a hit for them based on words like "re-shoots" and "R-rating" that in reality should signal the movie has a lot of problems.
#171
NatrlBornThrllr , 03-26-06 05:42 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Quote:
http://imdb.com/title/tt0462200/
It's another Sam Jackson movie called "Black Snake Moan", about "a white nymphomaniac who must be "cured" of her disorder by an older black blues man"
It's from the writer/director of "Hustle & Flow".
It also stars Christina Ricci and Justin Timberlake.
I don't know what to say.
Yeah, during a Q&A after a screening of Hustle & Flow, this movie was mentioned. Singleton talked about the casting, and this was before anything had been announced about the movie. The second he said that Samuel L. Jackson was going to be involved, I started to laugh.Originally Posted by Nick Martin
Speaking of snakes, look at thishttp://imdb.com/title/tt0462200/
It's another Sam Jackson movie called "Black Snake Moan", about "a white nymphomaniac who must be "cured" of her disorder by an older black blues man"
It's from the writer/director of "Hustle & Flow".
It also stars Christina Ricci and Justin Timberlake.
I don't know what to say.
-JP
#172
Nick Martin , 03-26-06 06:54 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
I guess we'll see Sam's snake after all - just in a different film, and while I could listen to him swear all day long, I don't think I ever want to hear him moan.

#173
Quote:
OMG HOW DARE YOU DISS JOSS AND SERENITY IT WAS THE BEST MOVIE EVER OMG lcOriginally Posted by Joe Molotov
If that's what they're banking on, then they're not very smart. As we discovered with Serenity, internet buzz and $5 can buy you a cup of coffee at Starbucks. You could release a movie with no advertising at all, and have it accidentally make as much money as Serenity.
#174
I don't think this compares with Serenity. Serenity had no stars in the cast, while SOAP has Samuel Jackson. Also, with Serenity, people who weren't familiar with the show had no idea what the movie was about, based on the title. SOAP, on the other hand...
#175
Nick Martin , 03-26-06 08:52 PM
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
No stars in the cast, but what a cast it had.
