![]() |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
So, I just found out elsewhere that the animated movie Flow will be coming to Criterion later this year and I am absolutely down for that.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I know it's mostly some here being snarky (and maybe a little jealous ;)) But, I think it's amusing that some guys always give these entertainers shit for getting the free Criterions. :lol:
If Criterion wants to give them the free movies to help promote the line and product, then who really cares? I'm sure it's just an advertising write off for them. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14598729)
I know it's mostly some here being snarky (and maybe a little jealous ;)) But, I think it's amusing that some guys always give these entertainers shit for getting the free Criterions. :lol:
If Criterion wants to give them the free movies to help promote the line and product, then who really cares? I'm sure it's just an advertising write off for them. I remember one actress say that when she was a struggling actor she couldn't afford nice clothes and shoes, and once she landed her breakout project, everyone started giving her those things free. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14597952)
Aimee Lou Wood in the Criterion Closet. If you have no idea who she is, she was on the latest season of White Lotus. I loved this one. Very charming and has some good knowledge.
https://youtu.be/LDGACubU99g?si=ZYgXiN0FwZlroZtz |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Spiderbite
(Post 14597356)
Do Criterions still carry the spine numbers? If so, think about the poor completists out there buying this shit that they have zero interest in. :lol:
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
LOL, that Martha Graham DVD is one I found at Goodwill a while back for $2. Haven't watched it but it's a good example of buying something because it's cheap and comes from a boutique label.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14598729)
I know it's mostly some here being snarky (and maybe a little jealous ;)) But, I think it's amusing that some guys always give these entertainers shit for getting the free Criterions. :lol:
If Criterion wants to give them the free movies to help promote the line and product, then who really cares? I'm sure it's just an advertising write off for them. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 14599014)
It's really no different than sending screener copies out to critics for review, which every home video label does.
But even if I decided to keep a bunch of those, I could hardly call them swag since they were so compromised as to be worthless other than for writing a review (or for, say, a video store owner to decide how many copies to order). I’ve seen at various disc review sites and blogs (the ones that admit to it, anyway) that physical screeners can sometimes be finished products, extras and all, and I suppose when you’re a boutique label catering to a niche market like collector’s of Blu-rays, you want critics to review the entire package, so I can see where higher-profile sites might get an unspoiled freebie with no expectations of it being returned. I’d also imagine the boutiques are sending out far fewer screeners than their studio counterparts did in the home video heyday, so it’s surely a minor cost of doing business these days. I’ve heard that screeners now sometimes (often?) consist of giving reviewers an access code to a temporary stream of some kind, with the video likewise watermarked in some way or otherwise encoded to discourage piracy. Even TIFF and other film fests did this during COVID. Overall, though, I suspect the celebrity swag comes with much less technological baggage alongside the huge promotional benefit for both sides of the transaction. :) |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 14598791)
I remember one actress say that when she was a struggling actor she couldn't afford nice clothes and shoes, and once she landed her breakout project, everyone started giving her those things free.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Brian T
(Post 14599043)
Back when I got those in the caveman days of VHS, I had to return them. Some home video companies probably didn’t really care, but many were adamant about it, per agreements. On top of that, they were ‘spoilered’ with a ‘property of Paramount’ (or whatever) that scrolled across the bottom of the screen every minute or so. And the packaging was always temporary and similarly marked as promotional in various ways. I received a few early DVD screeners like this as well when that format first came out, and similarly had to return them. I got out of reviewing around that time anyway, so I never saw how that evolved.
But even if I decided to keep a bunch of those, I could hardly call them swag since they were so compromised as to be worthless other than for writing a review (or for, say, a video store owner to decide how many copies to order). I’ve seen at various disc review sites and blogs (the ones that admit to it, anyway) that physical screeners can sometimes be finished products, extras and all, and I suppose when you’re a boutique label catering to a niche market like collector’s of Blu-rays, you want critics to review the entire package, so I can see where higher-profile sites might get an unspoiled freebie with no expectations of it being returned. I’d also imagine the boutiques are sending out far fewer screeners than their studio counterparts did in the home video heyday, so it’s surely a minor cost of doing business these days. I don't think this is any sort of deep trade secret, or even anything to be ashamed to admit. If the studio expects a critic to review their product, they should send the full product, as it will be sold to consumers. And yes, providing that copy for free as a "keeper" is a standard industry courtesy. In the physical media heyday, discs were cheap to produce and were written off as a minor promotional expense. More expensive products, such as electronics, speakers, or other home theater gear, were a different matter. Those were expected to be returned as soon as the review period ended - though often times the critics were offered the opportunity to purchase the item at a discount if they wished. I’ve heard that screeners now sometimes (often?) consist of giving reviewers an access code to a temporary stream of some kind, with the video likewise watermarked in some way or otherwise encoded to discourage piracy. Even TIFF and other film fests did this during COVID. I'm not sure how much that's affected physical media reviews, though. With physical media, what the remaining (if dwindling) audience cares about most is the quality of the product they are expected to buy. You can't properly review that if sent a link to a watermarked streaming copy. It's not the same thing at all. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Yeah. I did get check discs on occasion in my nearly quarter-century of reviewing -- mostly in the DVD-era; I think Arrow was the only one who routinely sent check discs on Blu-ray, and they'd always follow with a retail edition a little later -- but it was nearly always final retail packaging with a punched bar code or "for promotional use only" sticker. I was never asked to send anything back. I do remember getting a couple of stray titles with what looked like final retail discs but no packaging.
I think Sonic the Hedgehog is the only thing I was asked to review with a streaming link (and it was watermarked with my name or something similar), but I didn't present it as a DVD/Blu-ray review. Mildly annoyed that I wasn't sent a physical edition afterwards. My father wrote for an industry publication for a bit in the VHS era, and we definitely had our share of watermarked videos. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 14599390)
By the DVD era (aside perhaps from the earliest days), most review screeners sent out by studios to critics were simply copies of the full retail product. I started at DVDFile in 2000. In my many years at that site, DVDTalk, High-Def Digest, and Home Theater magazine, very few (as in, almost none) of the discs I received for review were compromised in any way or even distinguishable from retail copies. They came in full packaging with all the content and no watermarks. I was also never asked to return them. A not-insignificant portion of my movie collection is comprised of discs received as screeners.
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 14599390)
I'm not sure how much that's affected physical media reviews, though. With physical media, what the remaining (if dwindling) audience cares about most is the quality of the product they are expected to buy. You can't properly review that if sent a link to a watermarked streaming copy. It's not the same thing at all.
There are a ton of movies from these labels – including many that were popular on the festival circuit, as my box of TIFF ticket mementos often reminds me – that are roundly ignored by virtually all the physical media review sites in favour, largely, of the more packed releases from our favourite boutiques who can easily afford to provide them. Admittedly, a lot of these indie label DVDs might include a trailer, maybe one of those superficial silly three-minute ‘making of’ things, and a couple of previews. But often they have nothing but a play button. I can’t imagine they’d be sending out too many screener discs since the presentations are basically locked-in, the films being recent enough that there isn’t any restoration work going on. I’ve been out of the game too long, so I wouldn’t even begin to know how smaller outfits like these promote their releases, but since there isn’t much ‘content’ on the DVDs – thus making them far less of a collector thing – I wouldn’t be surprised if reviewers calling them for screeners are simply given a code for a stream. In other words, when you get outside the ‘cult boutiques’ niche, there’s a whole bunch of other stuff that very likely is the same thing whether you watch a disc (especially a DVD) or a stream. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Brian T
(Post 14599524)
There are a ton of movies from these labels – including many that were popular on the festival circuit, as my box of TIFF ticket mementos often reminds me – that are roundly ignored by virtually all the physical media review sites in favour, largely, of the more packed releases from our favourite boutiques who can easily afford to provide them. Admittedly, a lot of these indie label DVDs might include a trailer, maybe one of those superficial silly three-minute ‘making of’ things, and a couple of previews. But often they have nothing but a play button. I can’t imagine they’d be sending out too many screener discs since the presentations are basically locked-in, the films being recent enough that there isn’t any restoration work going on.
I’ve been out of the game too long, so I wouldn’t even begin to know how smaller outfits like these promote their releases, but since there isn’t much ‘content’ on the DVDs – thus making them far less of a collector thing – I wouldn’t be surprised if reviewers calling them for screeners are simply given a code for a stream. In other words, when you get outside the ‘cult boutiques’ niche, there’s a whole bunch of other stuff that very likely is the same thing whether you watch a disc (especially a DVD) or a stream. If the outlets I worked for didn't receive a screener, the title was very unlikely to get reviewed. I might occasionally buy something at retail for review if it was a high-interest title or something I personally cared about enough to do so, but for the most part, the volume of content released every week was tremendous, and it was difficult enough just to get through the backlog of screeners. If I received a disc for free, I felt a personal responsibility to make time to review it. On the rare occasions I just couldn't find time for one, I always felt bad about it and would typically set it aside in a special stack of "I'll get to it someday" discs. And indeed, some of those discs I did eventually cover after-the-fact when I was doing a daily blog at High-Def Digest. But yes, I fully understand what you're saying about those annoying social media influencers who collect free swag only for the sake of showing it off and bragging about it, but never actually watch or "review" anything they get. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
"Reviews" nowadays are short YouTube clips by social media channels.:sad:
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 14600443)
"Reviews" nowadays are short YouTube clips by social media channels.:sad:
"ChatGPT, write a review about this zombie movie and why I didn't like it" or better yet, "ChatGPT, make a video about this zombie movie and tell the audience it sucks and why." AI layoffs start hitting a wide swath of Corporate America |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 14600443)
"Reviews" nowadays are short YouTube clips by social media channels.:sad:
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14597952)
Aimee Lou Wood in the Criterion Closet. If you have no idea who she is, she was on the latest season of White Lotus. I loved this one. Very charming and has some good knowledge.
https://youtu.be/LDGACubU99g?si=ZYgXiN0FwZlroZtz |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Spiderbite
(Post 14601046)
Don't worry. Soon even those guys will be out of a job.
"ChatGPT, write a review about this zombie movie and why I didn't like it" or better yet, "ChatGPT, make a video about this zombie movie and tell the audience it sucks and why." |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
https://s3.amazonaws.com/criterion-p...U_original.jpg
The Wes Anderson Archive: Ten Films, Twenty-Five Years | The Criterion Collection Purchase OptionsComing soon, available Sep 30, 20254K+Blu-ray20 Discs$399.96SRP: $499.95 DIRECTOR-APPROVED TWENTY-DISC 4K UHD + BLU-RAY SPECIAL EDITION COLLECTOR’S SET FEATURES
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I am ALL OVER that in October! Or whenever Criterions next 50% off flash sale is.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Man, particularly for a Wes Anderson fan, that set looks absolutely exquisite.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I didn’t realize The French Dispatch of the Liberty, Kansas Evening Sun was the film’s actual title.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
There's also going to be solo 4k/blu releases of Isle of Dogs and The French Dispatch.
I really hope they break out the others at some point as well. Although, Royal Tenenbaums is probably the only one I NEED. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Honestly a little surprised they didn’t delay it a few months, include both Asteroid City and The Phoenician Scheme, and call it a 30 year set. It’s not like his latest hasn’t been in the works for a while. Would have made the set another +$100 MSRP, though…
Still… I’m probably going to buy this during the next B&N 50% off sale. I’ve held off on even buying the blu-ray versions of some of his films, anticipating individual 4K releases. So getting them all at once is a bigger hit to the wallet, but well worth it. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by GoldenJCJ
(Post 14601293)
I didn’t realize The French Dispatch of the Liberty, Kansas Evening Sun was the film’s actual title.
Criterion also insists on calling Lynch's Mulholland Drive "Mulholland Dr." because the poster only showed the title as a street sign, but the official copyright in the end credits spells it out as "MULHOLLAND DRIVE." |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
A bigger name, a smaller name. I do like that Zauner (whose excellent book ‘Crying In H Mart’ had its film adaptation stalled, sadly), unlike many of the celebs who visit, actually picks some movies that she’s only heard about or that have been recommended to her but she hasn’t seen yet, and actually seems genuinely intent on and capable of watching the discs (she also grabs a decent cross-section of Asian titles :thumbsup:)
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Brian T
(Post 14606741)
A bigger name, a smaller name. I do like that Zauner (whose excellent book ‘Crying In H Mart’ had its film adaptation stalled, sadly), unlike many of the celebs who visit, actually picks some movies that she’s only heard about or that have been recommended to her but she hasn’t seen yet, and actually seems genuinely intent on and capable of watching the discs (she also grabs a decent cross-section of Asian titles :thumbsup:)
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shack
(Post 14606774)
So sorry to hear the adaptation of Crying in H Mart is stalled. Great selection of films she chose, including on of my favorite semi-obscure choices, The Spirit of the Beehive.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 14606832)
I love Spirit of the Beehive. It's definitely in the top 3 on my Criterion dvd upgrade wishlist along with The 49th Parallel and The Last Wave.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shack
(Post 14607175)
In the world of "If I ran Criterion" - I'd release Victor Erice's Close Your Eyes, and upgrade The Spirit of the Beehive. Such brilliant films, made 50 years apart.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
September 2025 titles:
https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1749835785 https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1749671835 https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1749671835 https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1749671836 https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1750082911 https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1749671835 https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1749835785 https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1749835785 https://braze-images.com/appboy/comm...jpg?1747950117 |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Isle of Dogs, Flow and a reissue of Spinal Tap!!!!!! What a freakin month!
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Spinal Tap. Finally.
My only concern is that he trailer for this summer's theatrical rerelease had some altered dialogue in the scene where Marty DiBergi is discussing some of their old reviews. Instead of "treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality" he says "tasteless sexuality". I'm really hoping that the line in question was only changed for the trailer and not a permanent change. It may not seem like a big deal to most people, but I've seen this movie a hundred times and the dialogue is seared into my brain. When even something that small is changed it sounds completely wrong and pulls me right out of the movie. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Embarrassing announcement: I have not seen This Is Spinal Tap in its entirety, just bits and pieces here and there. I will pick up the 4K UHD out of penance.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 14608887)
My honest question: I would usually wait for the Barnes & Noble 50% off sale. And, I so very appreciate the work of this little Latvian animation studio that could. If I were to contemplate paying full price, who does that benefit? Criterion? Barnes & Noble? Gints Zilbalodis and Dream Well Studios? I know it's just an extra $20-$25, but for the first time in a long time, I'm wondering this sort of question. Anybody have any insight into this? |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I hope Spinal Tap includes the in-character commentary from the later MGM release.
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 14608997)
I hope Spinal Tap includes the in-character commentary from the later MGM release.
I'm sold on that, as well as Flow and French Dispatch. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
The Anderson set is so freaking cool but it sucks that there is no cool cover art. The Isle of Dogs and French Dispatch packaging look great (even though I probably wouldn't get Dispatch cause I didn't really like that one).
|
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
That Wes Anderson boxed set that looks like a plain cardboard box is hilarious.
Wish This is Spinal Tap had different cover art; something more comic-booky or heavy metal-ish. |
Re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Wong Kar-wai’s 30-episode 2023-24 China TV series BLOSSOMS SHANGHAI is debuting on the channel. This one’s more for subscribers but since the the thread in that forum is pretty dormant I’m putting it here. :)
I’ve seen some folks online hoping for a physical release, but I really hope Criterion doesn’t go down that path for TV shows just because they’re made by auteurs that everyone knows because their film work is already in the collection. That’s not an automatic signifier that one TV series is better than countless others nowadays. By many accounts, this one’s pretty good, and there’s some conjecture that a ‘western’ presentation might be different from the China version with its inherent restrictions (at the very least, it’s being regraded), but who knows. It’s about characters in the post-1994 economic boom when Shanghai’s stock market first went ‘live’ and made swaths of people rich and influential in very short order (the original book follows characters from the Cultural Revolution to the 1990’s, but it sounds like that aspect was turfed, naturally). Reviews seem somewhat mixed though generally ok, and the series was hugely popular domestically (keeping in mind that many TV series are in China). Some reviews and essays I’ve found make stark comparisons between the ‘to get rich is glorious’ 90’s era in the country (both in reality and in the series) and the crushing economic woes and international pushback that have only increased since then, thus the frequent nods to wistful nostalgia for ‘better times’ that the show has evoked for domestic audiences. Could be interesting in that context, although additional reading would be necessary, and there’s some decent stuff out there. Other takes: Wong Kar-wai's first TV series revisits Shanghai's economic boom - 'Blossoms Shanghai,' by the acclaimed Hong Kong director, has been enthusiastically received, particularly by a city nostalgic for the 1990s and its era of opportunity. (No paywall: https://archive.is/PnGqW) Wong Kar Wai's Blossoms Shanghai stirs up nostalgia for Shanghai of the 1990s Director Wong Kar Wai’s first TV series stokes nostalgia for 1990s Shanghai Nostalgia for China’s boom years drives a TV hit - A drama series presents 1990s capitalists as heroes, not villains (No paywall: https://archive.is/ArMqw) Or, in a nutshell, it’s gorgeous propaganda. ;) (from the last article above): China Central Television, the flagship network of the country’s propaganda machine, has a new hit on its hands. “Blossoms Shanghai”, a big-budget melodrama in 30 parts, has enjoyed huge audiences since its first episode aired on December 27th. The show’s success—boosted by approving coverage in official and commercial media outlets—is at once unexpected and revealing. It is a surprise because its heroes are swashbuckling capitalists in the Shanghai of the early 1990s. A hard-living bunch, they cut deals, swap stock tips and scheme against rivals over an endless succession of boozy late-night banquets, filmed in demonic shades of black, gold and red. It is all a far cry from the prim, flag-waving dramas that have become the norm on state tv during Xi Jinping’s rule. Typically, such series depict crime-fighting police officers, Communist Party officials toiling to serve the masses, brave Chinese soldiers or other model citizens. Enthusiasm for the drama, the first tv series to be directed by Wong Kar-wai, a pillar of Hong Kong’s film industry, sheds light on the Chinese public’s mood. Much praise for the show has a distinctly backward-looking feel to it. Online, fans share their memories of boom years when ordinary Chinese could transform their fates with a lot of luck, good connections and hard work. At the same time, the show’s endorsement by government media is revealing about the hopes and fears of the country’s rulers. This official embrace is rather tactical and forward-looking. Boosterish coverage of the drama is in line with a broader campaign by party leaders to cheer up Chinese consumers, whose post-pandemic caution is one reason why the economy is in a funk. Party newspapers credit the drama with sparking a measurable surge in Shanghai hotel and restaurant bookings. Arguably, a show whose stars are heroic entrepreneurs also aligns with current official efforts to reassure China’s private sector. Business types have been battered by heavy-handed regulation in recent years and left feeling generally unloved. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.