![]() |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by andicus
(Post 12622964)
Yeah, I loved NCFOM and O Brother. Does that mean I won't like Llewyn Davis?
I think ILD is more closely aligned with Barton Fink - it's very different than those other two films. Yet I think Barton Fink to be a great film, but only found ILD to be "good". I also don't think I'll find ILD to have much replay value - which is why I passed on it even at $5. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Well, no harm in checking it out. I see it's listed on Netflix Canada.
Cheers! |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by andicus
(Post 12623095)
Well, no harm in checking it out. I see it's listed on Netflix Canada.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Inside Llewyn Davis was a grower. I didn't know what to make of it at first. Then I couldn't get it out of my head, and watched it again a few hours later and really loved it. It has a real soul to it. Very much unlike what the Coens have done before, yet unmistakably them.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
When I saw Inside Llewyn Davis, I was most reminded of Synecdoche, New York. Not for story or character, but for being a film that make absolutely no effort to "please" anyone or anything. Davis is its own work, and it knows what it is, and it doesn't care what you think.
Spoiler:
Depending on my mood, I could call this the best work from the Coens. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I don't think any Coen brothers release has had any real supplements of note or substance. Do we have any reason to think this one will (besides the fact that it's their first Criterion release)?
I think back to Being John Malkovich, one of my all-time favorite movies -- glad I got a Criterion Blu Ray of it, but the new extras were minimal and pretty pointless. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12623523)
I don't think any Coen brothers release has had any real supplements of note or substance. Do we have any reason to think this one will (besides the fact that it's their first Criterion release)?
I think back to Being John Malkovich, one of my all-time favorite movies -- glad I got a Criterion Blu Ray of it, but the new extras were minimal and pretty pointless. New 4K digital transfer, with 5.1 surround DTS-HD Master Audio soundtrack on the Blu-ray New audio commentary featuring writers Robert Christgau, David Hajdu, and Sean Wilentz The First Hundred Feet, the Last Hundred Feet, a new conversation between filmmaker Guillermo del Toro and directors Joel and Ethan Coen about the evolution of their approach, from Blood Simple to Inside Llewyn Davis Inside “Inside Llewyn Davis,” a forty-five-minute 2013 documentary Another Place, Another Time (2014), a 101-minute film documenting an Inside Llewyn Davis tribute concert, featuring Joan Baez, Mumford & Sons, Punch Brothers, Gillian Welch, Jack White, and others New piece on the history of “Fare Thee Well (Dink’s Song),” featuring music producer T Bone Burnett and the Coens New piece about Dave Van Ronk and the Greenwich Village folk scene of the early sixties, featuring music writer and historian Elijah Wald Sunday, a short 1961 documentary by Dan Drasin about the riots that took place in Washington Square Park after folk musicians were prevented from gathering and playing there Trailers PLUS: An essay by film critic Kent Jones |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Too bad there isn't a commentary from the Coens - they did a pretty good one for Man Who Wasn't There, so it's not like they're opposed to the idea.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
This is good conversation, but I still need to know something:
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 12621950)
I need to know something about Inside Llewyn Davis. I read part of a review when the movie first came out and it seemed to indicate something that happened, but now I'm reading more recent writings that aren't so clear.
So: Spoiler:
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Well, I watched ILD last night, and I really enjoyed it!
I don't know if I'll buy it, but I'll definitely watch it again. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dr. Mantle
(Post 12623508)
When I saw Inside Llewyn Davis, I was most reminded of Synecdoche, New York. Not for story or character, but for being a film that make absolutely no effort to "please" anyone or anything. Davis is its own work, and it knows what it is, and it doesn't care what you think.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 12623760)
This is good conversation, but I still need to know something:
Spoiler:
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by slowcloud
(Post 12627919)
No. But one thing's for sure:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Don't know why you spoilered your response, but you really should invest the time in this movie, regardless of the fate of almost entirely symbolic animal.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Good news, pervs! The Criterion Blu-ray of Mulholland Drive has removed the optical censorship over Laura Harring's privates in the sex scene. That said, the shot is so incredibly dark that it's impossible to see anything anyway. If you screencap it and boost the gamma 300%, all you'll find is a blocky mess of pixels between her legs.
But if you were so infuriated by the principle of the thing, well, I'm sure you can sleep much better now. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12628258)
all you'll find is a blocky mess of pixels between her legs.
side note: Blocky Mess of Pixels Between Her Legs would be a great name for a punk band and/or song. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12628258)
Good news, pervs! The Criterion Blu-ray of Mulholland Drive has removed the optical censorship over Laura Harring's privates in the sex scene. That said, the shot is so incredibly dark that it's impossible to see anything anyway. If you screencap it and boost the gamma 300%, all you'll find is a blocky mess of pixels between her legs.
Pass. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12628258)
Good news, pervs! The Criterion Blu-ray of Mulholland Drive has removed the optical censorship over Laura Harring's privates in the sex scene. That said, the shot is so incredibly dark that it's impossible to see anything anyway. If you screencap it and boost the gamma 300%, all you'll find is a blocky mess of pixels between her legs.
|
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 12628272)
-other-
side note: Blocky Mess of Pixels Between Her Legs would be a great name for a punk band and/or song. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Word over at the BD.com forums is that Barnes & Noble's next Criterion Sale starts on 11/10/15!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
(Post 12628456)
That's all that's ever been there. It was optically fogged, i.e., pixilated all the way back to DVD.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by asianxcore
(Post 12628866)
Word over at the BD.com forums is that Barnes & Noble's next Criterion Sale starts on 11/10/15!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12628897)
Psst : Before it was a DVD, it was a ....... movie.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12628258)
Good news, pervs! The Criterion Blu-ray of Mulholland Drive has removed the optical censorship over Laura Harring's privates in the sex scene.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 12628448)
There's macroblocking on this title?
Pass. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
(Post 12628968)
Point is, the optical fogging first came about for home video releases, and has been the same ever since the initial DVD. People are behaving like this is a recent change.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12629124)
Read what I wrote again. The optical fogging has been removed. However, the scene is so dark that it's not possible to see any nudity in the lower half of the frame.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12629124)
Read what I wrote again. The optical fogging has been removed. However, the scene is so dark that it's not possible to see any nudity in the lower half of the frame.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
(Post 12629163)
No, it hasn't. That's the way it's supposed to look on a properly calibrated monitor. In other words, the 'effect' was done so well, it's not in any way detectable by the viewer.
I am well aware that the fogging was supposed to be disguised by the darkness of the shot and shouldn't have been visible at normal playback levels. Nonetheless, it was visible if you freeze-framed and cranked up the Brightness. Doing so now, the fogging is gone, but macroblocking is exposed. You can make out more of Harring's hips and thighs, but her pubic region is just an indistinguishable mess of pixels. Anyone hoping for high-res whack-off material will come away disappointed. I can provide NSFW screencap comparisons of the Criterion disc to the UK import from a couple years ago if needed. Or you can just take my word for it that I actually know what I'm talking about. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by milo bloom
(Post 12629147)
I've never gotten around to watching this movie but I've been aware of the blurring issue since the beginning and I have to say that using low quality pixelation probably made the issue worse than if they had done a more subtle darkening in the first place.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
(Post 12629163)
No, it hasn't. That's the way it's supposed to look on a properly calibrated monitor. In other words, the 'effect' was done so well, it's not in any way detectable by the viewer.
So Josh says it's gone... I believe him. But I wonder if they just did it differently for this Blu-ray. Meaning, maybe they just dimmed the shot down a bit so, even without the effect, the detail was lost in the darkness. It would be a "classier" solution than the previous one. Or something. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 12629303)
As I remember on my DVD version, once you cranked up the the brightness, the effect was VERY obvious. That was... 13 years ago? Damn. Anyway... I never even checked my UK Blu-ray import for the same thing (since I stopped thinking it was 'censorship' about 12 years ago).
So Josh says it's gone... I believe him. But I wonder if they just did it differently for this Blu-ray. Meaning, maybe they just dimmed the shot down a bit so, even without the effect, the detail was lost in the darkness. It would be a "classier" solution than the previous one. Or something. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Josh Z
(Post 12629259)
Do you have the disc? Because I do. I am telling you that the optical fogging has been removed. The pixelation currently in the shot is not deliberate censorship. It's just compression macroblocking hidden in the below-black information in the shot.
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 12629303)
As I remember on my DVD version, once you cranked up the the brightness, the effect was VERY obvious. That was... 13 years ago? Damn. Anyway... I never even checked my UK Blu-ray import for the same thing (since I stopped thinking it was 'censorship' about 12 years ago).
So Josh says it's gone... I believe him. But I wonder if they just did it differently for this Blu-ray. Meaning, maybe they just dimmed the shot down a bit so, even without the effect, the detail was lost in the darkness. It would be a "classier" solution than the previous one. Or something.
Originally Posted by slowcloud
(Post 12629323)
Jeez, people. I saw this in the theater and never noticed any blocking. I wouldn't have noticed so much were it not for the continued pointless internet griping. Lynch will never alter this and that's it.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Crotch pixilation, NSFW:
Spoiler:
-eek- |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
(Post 12629366)
You're saying he's suddenly changed his mind in 2015 because it's on a Criterion Blu?
It really is amazing how much discussion there is over something that literally doesn't matter and has no bearing on the quality of the film. :lol: |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
(Post 12629366)
I have the StudioCanal disc, and it's exactly as you describe with your Criterion.
1) I have both the Criterion Blu-ray and the Studio Canal Blu-ray. 2) I have watched both discs. 3) I have compared this scene on both versions, both at regular playback brightness and artificially boosted brightness. 4) I have screencapped the shot on both copies and cranked the gamma to expose everything in the shadows. 5) THE TWO DISCS ARE NOT THE SAME. THEY LOOK DIFFERENT. 6) The Studio Canal disc has obvious optical censorship blurring. The Criterion disc does not. It just has random compression macroblocking, which is also visible in other parts of the frame (not just the nudity). If you still don't get it at this point, that's entirely on you. It is literally impossible (and I mean "literally" in the actual meaning of the word) for me to be less ambiguous about what I am saying. THE STUDIO CANAL BLU-RAY IS OPTICALLY BLURRED. THE CRITERION BLU-RAY IS NOT OPTICALLY BLURRED. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
So... what you're saying is...
they're the same? ;) |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
First, there's no reason to be a dick (too late for that, I s'pose).
Second, without artificially boosting monitor or projector settings, the appearance to the home viewer is exactly the same regardless of what method they used! |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 12629381)
No, not at all. I was just saying, maybe the method he chose was handled differently. Since this is a new 4K master, they would have had to manually distort the image again, no? So, I just mean... maybe instead of the method they chose last time (blurry zone), they did it more subtle; dimming the entire shot, or just that area of the shot. Josh's information seems to point to the latter, as previously I'm sure others said that there WAS more visibility in that shot on 35mm.
For obvious reasons, I haven't seen the movie on 35mm since 2001 and my memory of it is probably not reliable. As I recall, my impression of the initial DVD transfer was that the shot had been noticeably (presumably deliberately) dimmed in addition to the optical blurring. It does still seem overly dark here in comparison to other shots before and after it. In the following few shots that only show her from the torso up, Harring's breasts are well lit, but in this one she's basically a silhouette. So, yes, I do think that the dimming in that shot is a deliberate attempt to censor her pubic region, and has been since the first DVD. However, I don't think it has been made any worse in that regard. It's been oppressively dark in every video transfer for the movie. My assumption here is that, at the time of the original DVD transfer, Lynch and Harring were so concerned about this that they both dimmed and optically blurred the shot. In supervising the new Blu-ray transfer, Lynch may have realized that the dimming alone did the job well enough and the blurring wasn't actually necessary. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by BuckNaked2k
(Post 12629405)
Second, without artificially boosting monitor or projector settings, the appearance to the home viewer is exactly the same regardless of what method they used!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:02 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.