![]() |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
No 50% after 100K likes on Criterion FB, btw, jsut a nice little thank you to us Criterion geeks.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/IiNlthlz1d8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Neeb
(Post 11330208)
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 11330251)
Sweet! That's definitely Heaven's Gate! I hope it's the director's cut!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Thanks.
I'm curious for this one only if the extras are worthwhile. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 11330251)
Sweet! That's definitely Heaven's Gate! I hope it's the director's cut!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
I had never heard of it before so I looked it up. Wikipedia says it's considered one of the worst movies ever and a complete failure in every way. Is it actually good? I'm a bit surprised Criterion is releasing it after hearing that.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
It was a pretty notorious flop when it came out, and it got a lot of really negative press. Like Ishtar, its name has become synonymous with "huge budget flops." Many saw it as an example of the danger of letting a director have free rein over his own film, and studios may or may not have used it as an excuse to become slightly more conservative in their financing decisions.
However, it did have its defenders at the time of its release, and over time its reputation has improved quite a bit. Some critics now consider it an unfairly maligned masterpiece (it ranks in the 600s on the "They Shoot Pictures, Don't They" list, which is a ranked list of the top 1000 greatest films as compiled from hundreds of critics lists from around the world.) There are also various cuts of it that apparently improve on it. I watched one version of it many years ago, and I remember feeling pretty ambivalent about it. It definitely wasn't "one of the worst movies ever" or anything - at the very least, it's very beautiful, and the production values are top notch. But the film never really seemed to come alive, which made the running time seem very long indeed. I'll probably rent the Criterion release to see if my views have changed - or to see if the director's cut improves on it - but I kind of doubt I'll end up loving it or wanting to buy it (I also have mixed feelings about Cimino's more widely loved film, so I think I may just not like his style.) It's definitely one of their riskier choices, but I can kind of understand their motivation for releasing it. At the very least, it's pretty important to Hollywood history. There was also apparently a lot of drama on the set, so they should be able to come up with some interesting extras. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
So happy if it turns out to be Heaven's Gate!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Jaymole
(Post 11330819)
So happy if it turns out to be Heaven's Gate!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by jwstl
(Post 11331066)
There's no doubt about it.
This movie, more than any ever, has created the biggest change in opinion for me over the years. When I first saw it I was underwhelmed, but over the years it has become one of my favorites. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by TheDuke
(Post 11330590)
I had never heard of it before so I looked it up. Wikipedia says it's considered one of the worst movies ever and a complete failure in every way. Is it actually good? I'm a bit surprised Criterion is releasing it after hearing that.
The directors cut plays on HD Net movies and it looks beautiful. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
here's an odd one: brie larson's top 10 criterions
sidenote: i think i'm officially in love with her |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 11330251)
Sweet! That's definitely Heaven's Gate! I hope it's the director's cut!
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by riotinmyskull
(Post 11331147)
here's an odd one: brie larson's top 10 criterions
sidenote: i think i'm officially in love with her |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
This is the one I've been waiting for for years.
I think it's safe to assume this will be the 219 min. cut(same as the MGM dvd that came out in 2000). That was the one that originally premiered in 1981, played for three days and was then pulled from theaters for a year and half while Cimino removed an hour of footage. The shortened version has never been released on video. What would really be interesting would be the five hour rough cut that Cimino showed to United Artist executives. Steven Bach mentions it in his book Final Cut. There's also a great documentary (in eight parts) about Heaven's Gate on youtube. Heaven's Gate is certainly not one of the worst films ever made. Often when a film is labeled one of the worst ever, it has nothing to do with the film's quality. It's simply because the film has a rhythm that audiences can't appreciate or understand. They say it's terrible because it doesn't fit with the tiny cinematic palette that they're used to. Look at 2001: A Space Odyssey. The film is long, slow and has huge sections where there's no dialogue at all. It's hard to explain the hypnotic feeling that makes 2001 so alluring to someone who thinks it's boring. Many critics and moviegoers had a very negative opinion of it in 1968. But 2001 stood the test of time. Why was Heaven's Gate treated so unfairly? The director's preferred version only played for THREE DAYS on ONE screen before it was yanked from distribution. So many people had the opinion that it was one one of the Worst Films Ever Made, and yet almost no one had actually seen it. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dr. Mantle
(Post 11332046)
This is the one I've been waiting for for years.
I think it's safe to assume this will be the 219 min. cut(same as the MGM dvd that came out in 2000). That was the one that originally premiered in 1981, played for three days and was then pulled from theaters for a year and half while Cimino removed an hour of footage. The shortened version has never been released on video. What would really be interesting would be the five hour rough cut that Cimino showed to United Artist executives. Steven Bach mentions it in his book Final Cut. There's also a great documentary (in eight parts) about Heaven's Gate on youtube. Heaven's Gate is certainly not one of the worst films ever made. Often when a film is labeled one of the worst ever, it has nothing to do with the film's quality. It's simply because the film has a rhythm that audiences can't appreciate or understand. They say it's terrible because it doesn't fit with the tiny cinematic palette that they're used to. Look at 2001: A Space Odyssey. The film is long, slow and has huge sections where there's no dialogue at all. It's hard to explain the hypnotic feeling that makes 2001 so alluring to someone who thinks it's boring. Many critics and moviegoers had a very negative opinion of it in 1968. But 2001 stood the test of time. Why was Heaven's Gate treated so unfairly? The director's preferred version only played for THREE DAYS on ONE screen before it was yanked from distribution. So many people had the opinion that it was one one of the Worst Films Ever Made, and yet almost no one had actually seen it. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Speaking of films with more than one versions, any chance Criterion would be interested in/could get their hands on 1984? It would be nice to have both versions of this film as well.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by LPMA
(Post 11332195)
Speaking of films with more than one versions, any chance Criterion would be interested in/could get their hands on 1984? It would be nice to have both versions of this film as well.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
1984 would be awesome and would seem to be right up CC's alley. I've been hanging on to my MGM DVD and HD recording like grim death since it went OOP.
I have to admit I didn't know anything about Heaven's gate but after reading about it I will be blind buying. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
There were news articles about the budget overruns on this movie for months before it was released. I was kind of obsessed with it at that time, and have a collection of about 20 magazine and newspaper articles about it (this was before the internets, yo). Every review I read led with the budget problems, the quality of the film itself was an afterthought. With all this, I've never actually seen the movie itself.
I read Final Cut years ago, but don't remember a lot of the business details about how it effectively bankrupted United Artists. The details about Cimino being completely oblivious to how much money was being wasted are what is memorable (and disgusting). It's one thing to spend money on a movie, it's another to squander it. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by TheDuke
(Post 11330590)
I had never heard of it before so I looked it up. Wikipedia says it's considered one of the worst movies ever and a complete failure in every way. Is it actually good? I'm a bit surprised Criterion is releasing it after hearing that.
Could this be the worst movie added to their collection since ARMAGEDDON? Does Criterion's definition of "important films" now include ones that were box-office and critical distasters? :( |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 11332951)
Could this be the worst movie added to their collection since ARMAGEDDON?
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 11332951)
I can't believe Criterion is adding Heaven's Gate to their collection...it was widely panned, and reviews of the longer version say it's just as bad. I remember Roger Ebert's review on this movie where he said something like "this is the worst Western I've ever seen...and I've seen PAINT YOUR WAGON." :)
Could this be the worst movie added to their collection since ARMAGEDDON? Does Criterion's definition of "important films" now include ones that were box-office and critical distasters? :( The value in this release will be determined by the value of bonus features. I won't buy it for the movie alone but if the extras are extraordinary then I may consider it during the next B&N sale. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by NoirFan
(Post 11332962)
I haven't seen it (yet) myself, but there's no possible way it could be worse than Chasing Amy, Benjamin Button, Easy Rider or the American Godzilla.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 11332983)
I don't see how Heaven's Gate fits into any of those niches. Is there really a following out there for this film (other than those who just love it because it's so awful?). I mean, there might be some people who wind up watching it with such LOW expectations that they'll come away saying "well, it wasn't THAT bad"...but Heaven's Gate is in no way, shape, or form, a "good" movie, let alone a "great" one.
It even has a 6.5 on the IMDb, ranking it far above most legitimate contenders for "worst movies ever made." A rating which also suggests that much of the "one of the worst movies ever made" talk was based more on the negative publicity surrounding the film rather than the actual quality of the film itself. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by NoirFan
(Post 11332962)
I haven't watched it (yet) myself, but there's no possible way it could be worse than Chasing Amy, Benjamin Button, Easy Rider or the American Godzilla. I haven't seen Jubilee, Hopscotch, Tiny Furniture, Border Radio or Ride with the Devil, the other titles which seem to have garnered the most criticism.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 11332983)
Heaven's Gate is in no way, shape, or form, a "good" movie, let alone a "great" one.
it was widely panned, and reviews of the longer version say it's just as bad. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by NoirFan
(Post 11332962)
I haven't watched it (yet) myself, but there's no possible way it could be worse than Chasing Amy, Benjamin Button, Easy Rider or the American Godzilla. I haven't seen Jubilee, Hopscotch, Tiny Furniture, Border Radio or Ride with the Devil, the other titles which seem to have garnered the most criticism.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Dr. Mantle
(Post 11333153)
Have you actually seen it?
Your earlier post seems to indicate that you haven't. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 11333976)
I've seen the non-extended version...sort of...I got through about half of it. I find it hard to believe the longer version is a better version - I don't think this is another ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
The AV club did a nice article on why 12 Angry Men got it wrong. Pretty good read.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by dino88
(Post 11234919)
Has anyone heard anything about a Moonrise Kingdom release yet?
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by musick
(Post 11339836)
Universal release 10/2... looks like you will be waiting a while
Speaking of Wes Anderson, The Royal Tenenbaums will be $19.99 at Best Buy next week, which will also lead to it being the same price on Amazon. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
yep, was just going to post the price for TRT
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by dino88
(Post 11339858)
I was only joking. Check out the post I was responding to.
Speaking of Wes Anderson, The Royal Tenenbaums will be $19.99 at Best Buy next week, which will also lead to it being the same price on Amazon. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by jwstl
(Post 11332968)
Here's the Ebert review to which you refer.
The value in this release will be determined by the value of bonus features. I won't buy it for the movie alone but if the extras are extraordinary then I may consider it during the next B&N sale. |
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Originally Posted by dino88
(Post 11339858)
Speaking of Wes Anderson, The Royal Tenenbaums will be $19.99 at Best Buy next week, which will also lead to it being the same price on Amazon.
|
re: The Criterion Collection 4K/Blu-ray Discussion and Release Thread
Someone in Blu-ray.com forum just confirmed that Criterion will be releasing Spike Lee's "The 25th Hour".
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:08 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.