Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

General Blu-ray news and discussion PART 3

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

General Blu-ray news and discussion PART 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-07 | 06:44 AM
  #126  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by QuePaso
pro-b wants to post pro-blu-ray posts in the BLU RAY thread, and is getting attacked for it. I dont see anyone attacking GizmoDVD, Chanster and the rest of the crew in the HD DVD thread. Why is it ALWAYS the Blu-Ray supporters being attacked non-stop at DVDTalk?
Then quite frankly, you're seeing only what you want to see. This same bullshit happens in that thread and all over the forum. It is of no surprise to anyone that you will come rushing to the side of anyone that likes BD. You would support a serial killer if they had a passing fancy for BD. MOD EDIT: enough already. -namja

I would like to see this thread, and the other thread be transformed into informational vehicles, with a hard hammer coming down on the rhetoric.

Last edited by namja; 10-25-07 at 03:43 AM.
Qui Gon Jim is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 06:50 AM
  #127  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am also quite fucking sick of hearing about DVDTalk's HD DVD bias. If anything, this is a place where dual support is the norm. The only people I see bitching about this percieved bias are the Harry Limes, TonyMontanas, and QuePasos of the forum. Most people want balanced discussion of topics, but these characters drag everything off topic with their BD rhetoric, especially when it is any news item that does not sound great for BD.

Also, I don't recall anyone ever complaining about the non-English post. Maybe I missed the comment or maybe the Mods deleted it before I read it. I certainly don't think it was made into a big deal.
Qui Gon Jim is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 06:51 AM
  #128  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
pro-b wants to post pro-blu-ray posts in the BLU RAY thread, and is getting attacked for it. I dont see anyone attacking GizmoDVD, Chanster and the rest of the crew in the HD DVD thread. Why is it ALWAYS the Blu-Ray supporters being attacked non-stop at DVDTalk?
Good job on the Blu-Ray Discussion! Keep it going, its real informative and focused on Blu Ray.

I am not going to respond to the personal attack of me in this thread. I simply ask:

When did the Blu Ray thread become only a positive spin zone for Blu Ray - this is Blu Ray discussion, discussion implies both good and bad discussion, not just Blu Ray is the best.

Last edited by chanster; 10-24-07 at 06:55 AM.
chanster is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 07:09 AM
  #129  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: gloucester, uk
i for one would be interested to see you attempt to engage in a useful discussion of this topic. do you think that's likely to happen?

there are about 3 or 4 problem posters in this thread, some of whom have been suspended before for their antagonistic activity. perhaps it is time for them to be removed again. comments about supporting serial killers, while amusing in their insane level of format zealotry, are probably not conducive to a civilized discussion. it is an embarressment to this forum that pro-b has been singled out for such sustained attack by these hd dvd zealots, without sufficient steps being taken to rectify the situation.
Burnt Thru is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 07:12 AM
  #130  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: gloucester, uk
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
despite his earlier retraction it does seem that he would prefer his movies to appear on blu-ray. he hasn't made any similar comments about bd exclusives has he? if not he would appear to be the first major hollywood director to declare his preference (allbeit obtusely) for one of the formats.
Burnt Thru is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 07:16 AM
  #131  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone else see the "Best of Blu-Ray" box sets that BJ's is carrying? These seemed like a pretty good deal for the money.
Qui Gon Jim is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 07:49 AM
  #132  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
Anyone else see the "Best of Blu-Ray" box sets that BJ's is carrying? These seemed like a pretty good deal for the money.
How good is their BD selection? I recently moved and received a coupon for a free 60-day membership.
Mr. Cinema is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 09:40 AM
  #133  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They had a pretty good selection of titles. All BD. Their prices weren't terrible either, IIRC.

Media price is an area where BD is looking better and better to me. It seems like they are always on sale somewhere.
Qui Gon Jim is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 09:43 AM
  #134  
tonymontana313's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
I am also quite fucking sick of hearing about DVDTalk's HD DVD bias. If anything, this is a place where dual support is the norm. The only people I see bitching about this percieved bias are the Harry Limes, TonyMontanas, and QuePasos of the forum. Most people want balanced discussion of topics, but these characters drag everything off topic with their BD rhetoric, especially when it is any news item that does not sound great for BD.

Also, I don't recall anyone ever complaining about the non-English post. Maybe I missed the comment or maybe the Mods deleted it before I read it. I certainly don't think it was made into a big deal.
It's funny that you would call other people out when if you take a look at the history of your posts, you are one of the ones that bash all of the BR articles posted. Another question, why are you in a Blu-ray thread when you don't even own a blu-ray player?
tonymontana313 is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:05 AM
  #135  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
I have decided to take this opportunity and kindly state my opinion on a number of issues that have been brought up lately. Hopefully this is the last time I do so publicly:


1. Reviewer’s bias- It has been repeatedly stated on this sub-forum that my bias has eroded TALK’s reputation. As I have not written a single HD review I must conclude that you are not only unfamiliar with my writings but the denotation of the term bias as well.


2. Anonymity- I find it very strange that you chose to address my “writings” as biased yet you are apparently unaware of my identity. Furthermore, to imply that there is a secret conspiracy where DVDTALK reviewers post their reviews veiled in secrecy is an absurd argument to say the least. Especially when the site’s Hi-Def Editor is posting in this very forum, in this very thread. I would assume that contacting him or taking a quick look at the review panel would have addressed plenty of your concerns.


3. Posting/reading non-English articles- This truly is the most absurd of issues that I have seen thrown my way. It is not only sad that we are debating it, it is wrong. Allow me to remind you and anyone else for that matter that one of the reasons why TALK has grown into such a powerful community is because the site has always been inclusive of members with different cultural and social backgrounds, not an exclusive entity where only English-speakers are allowed to participate and exchange opinions. I feel very sorry for anyone who is openly willing to act from a position of superiority and dismiss anything that may be written or spoken in a language other than English.

4. SONY affiliation – In normal circumstances I would not even bother addressing this one but given the constant insinuations that have been directed at me I am going to officially state that I am in no way affiliated with the company nor have I ever worked for them. More than ten years ago I was associated with a European distributor whose partial responsibility was to promote SONY products but I have never been officially employed by the distrib. I hope this clears all second thoughts a particular user on this forum has.

5. Sharing insider information- Every single bit of info I have posted on TALK which has been provided by an insider has been accordingly credited as such. Yet, since you are having second thoughts on the issue I left an open invitation asking for your cooperation in addressing your uncertainty. As such has been denied citing unwillingness to go back and dive through threads I must dismiss your criticism at once.

I hope this addresses once and for all any current or future issues you or others might have with my posting habits on this site.

Sincerely Yours,
Pro-B
This response was even more smarmy and deflective as I imagined it would be. It's good to see you are completely incapable of having a courteous exchange with a fellow member without resorting to the same posting style as you do with your BD news and HD-DVD responses.

I think your response gives all of your detractors confirmation of long-suspected tactics and motivations to your postings here. And really, that's a shame, because I for one was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Last edited by DVD Josh; 10-24-07 at 10:10 AM.
DVD Josh is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:06 AM
  #136  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 8,849
Received 607 Likes on 419 Posts
From: St Louis, MO
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
It's funny that you would call other people out when if you take a look at the history of your posts, you are one of the ones that bash all of the BR articles posted. Another question, why are you in a Blu-ray thread when you don't even own a blu-ray player?
i haven't looked back through qui gon jim's posts, but i would just point out that there is a big difference between attacking people who post things and discussing the content of posts. the former should never happen, but if we can't do the latter, then this thread should be renamed.
kefrank is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:10 AM
  #137  
Hammer99's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
This response was even more smarmy and deflective as I imagined it would be. It's good to see you are completely incapable of having a courteous exchange with a fellow member without resorting to the same posting style as you do with your BD news and HD-DVD responses.

I think your response gives all of your detractors confirmation of long-suspected tactics and motivations to your postings here. And really, that's a shame, because I for one was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.
Hammer99 is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:16 AM
  #138  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 8,849
Received 607 Likes on 419 Posts
From: St Louis, MO
this thread would get a lot better if those who find pro-bassoonist so obnoxious would just use the Ignore feature, rather than repeatedly attacking his character.
kefrank is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:20 AM
  #139  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
They had a pretty good selection of titles. All BD. Their prices weren't terrible either, IIRC.

Media price is an area where BD is looking better and better to me. It seems like they are always on sale somewhere.
You're talking about the WB sets right?

Definitely a good deal for those who won't have them yet.

I think there's one coming next month with Troy: DC, Alexander FC, Wyatt Earp and one other I can't think of at the moment. Definitely a good deal @ ~$60.
bunkaroo is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:20 AM
  #140  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Malvern, PA
I appreciate your info, pro-b.

Don't let the naysayers get you down.
Goldblum is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:22 AM
  #141  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
This response was even more smarmy and deflective as I imagined it would be. It's good to see you are completely incapable of having a courteous exchange with a fellow member without resorting to the same posting style as you do with your BD news and HD-DVD responses.

I think your response gives all of your detractors confirmation of long-suspected tactics and motivations to your postings here. And really, that's a shame, because I for one was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt.
I didn't read it that way at all. Seemed more like a frustrated, detailed reply from someone tired of dealing with the subject. Just my 2 cents.
bunkaroo is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:23 AM
  #142  
tonymontana313's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by kefrank
this thread would get a lot better if those who find pro-bassoonist so obnoxious would just use the Ignore feature, rather than repeatedly attacking his character.
Shhh...they would rather do things the hard way rather than the easy way. My problem is with people that don't own BR and come in to this thread to bash. There is nothing wrong with a healthy discussion but this thread within the last couple of months has gone to hell with certain people just waiting for the next article or poster to bash.
tonymontana313 is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:24 AM
  #143  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
Another question, why are you in a Blu-ray thread when you don't even own a blu-ray player?
Oh thats a qualification for posting in this thread?? Thats funny I don't see that anywhere. You can't be interested in the format if you don't own a player?
chanster is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:24 AM
  #144  
Hammer99's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kefrank
this thread would get a lot better if those who find pro-bassoonist so obnoxious would just use the Ignore feature, rather than repeatedly attacking his character.
Amen... or go to AVS with the other HD DVD fanboys.

Originally Posted by Goldblum
I appreciate your info, pro-b.

Don't let the naysayers get you down.
+1
Hammer99 is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:25 AM
  #145  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,455
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Where's the Blu-ray news?
Michael Corvin is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:25 AM
  #146  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by QuePaso
pro-b wants to post pro-blu-ray posts in the BLU RAY thread, and is getting attacked for it. I dont see anyone attacking GizmoDVD, Chanster and the rest of the crew in the HD DVD thread. Why is it ALWAYS the Blu-Ray supporters being attacked non-stop at DVDTalk?
You don't wander into the HD DVD thread, do you? Nothing can be posted without a snide comment buy someone who is Pro-Blu which derails the entire discussion, much like here.
Gizmo is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:26 AM
  #147  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by chanster
Oh thats a qualification for posting in this thread?? Thats funny I don't see that anywhere. You can't be interested in the format if you don't own a player?
I don't think he said it was a qualification. He was just asking a legitimate question seeking a legitimate answer.
Goldblum is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:29 AM
  #148  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
I don't think he said it was a qualification. He was just asking a legitimate question seeking a legitimate answer.
Really? I don't read it that way. Legitimate question? The question implies that Blu-Ray ownership is a predicate for posting in the thread.

If you don't own a player, according to Tony, you can't post in the thread or you will be questioned as to your reason for posting in the thread.
chanster is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:31 AM
  #149  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
Shhh...they would rather do things the hard way rather than the easy way. My problem is with people that don't own BR and come in to this thread to bash. There is nothing wrong with a healthy discussion but this thread within the last couple of months has gone to hell with certain people just waiting for the next article or poster to bash.
I think you are mistaken on that. It seems most of the people that support HD DVD also own a Blu-ray player, hence why you will see us in this thread. However, on the flip side, those who own a Blu-ray player don't seem to own an HD DVD player. That is why you will see more discussion in this thread vs. the HD DVD one.

As others have stated, its not reall the articles we are bashing, its the way they are being posted. Was it really needed to post this:

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showpost.ph...4&postcount=85
" NOTE: The Blu-ray is on only one disc where the HD is spread over 2 - this is a huge separation point - drawing some concrete lines in the format war. "
Those type of comments from a reviewer who is obviously biased (Making the mention that The Shining HD DVD has 2 discs 4 times in the article) was unneeded. Its just begging to get attacked.
Gizmo is offline  
Old 10-24-07 | 10:33 AM
  #150  
Hammer99's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
I think you are mistaken on that. It seems most of the people that support HD DVD also own a Blu-ray player, hence why you will see us in this thread. However, on the flip side, those who own a Blu-ray player don't seem to own an HD DVD player. That is why you will see more discussion in this thread vs. the HD DVD one.
Hammer99 is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.