General Blu-ray news and discussion PART 3
#476
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes
on
1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
When the initial number was announced I confirmed it for TALK.
#477
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
As of this very moment the first insider's info has not been retracted. And as you could see I have not kept the second "read" away from this thread. When the initial number was announced I confirmed it for TALK. And since I am not the source I have now supplied the second chart as well.
Ciao,
Pro-B
Ciao,
Pro-B
#478
DVD Talk Reviewer
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-ray.com
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
To me, "confirmation" requires first-hand knowledge of the facts, and this really doesn't sound like that's the case at all.
To Mr. Cinema: yes my posts provide you with the opportunity to have the two reads offered by the insiders. And unlike another thread on this site which announced 190 000K for Transformers yet it was never updated, even as of today, I brought you both sides of the story. So, no, I am not speculating.
Pro-B
#479
Suspended
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
As of this very moment the first insider's info has not been retracted. And as you could see I have not kept the second "read" away from this thread. When the initial number was announced I confirmed it for TALK. And since I am not the source I have now supplied the second chart as well.
Ciao,
Pro-B
Ciao,
Pro-B
#480
Suspended
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
My answer remains the same, two different insiders provided two different reads. The first one which I confirmed for the site has not yet been retracted. Now I have given you the second breakdown as well. If and when the first read is retracted I will make very clear which one contains the correct numbers. There is no intent for speculating here.
To Mr. Cinema: yes my posts provide you with the opportunity to have the two reads offered by the insiders. And unlike another thread on this site which announced 190 000K for Transformers yet it was never updated, even as of today[/i], I brought you both sides of the story. So, no, I am not speculating.
Pro-B
To Mr. Cinema: yes my posts provide you with the opportunity to have the two reads offered by the insiders. And unlike another thread on this site which announced 190 000K for Transformers yet it was never updated, even as of today[/i], I brought you both sides of the story. So, no, I am not speculating.
Pro-B
I would also like to say my contact told me Transformers sold 650k copies last week. Did I need to prove that in any sort of way or will everyone just take my word for it?
#481
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes
on
1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
My answer remains the same, two different insiders provided two different reads. The first one which I confirmed for the site has not yet been retracted.
I know it's just semantics, but the misuse of the word 'confirm' does grate a bit.
#482
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
So which one is it? I'm going to assume its the latter as Sony had not announced anything else yet and is keeping mum on this. If they had sold 225k of Spider-Man 3 (separate and trilogy) there would have been fireworks by now. FACT: Transformers sold MORE then Spider-Man 3 as a single release. Pretty damn good.
I would also like to say my contact told me Transformers sold 650k copies last week. Did I need to prove that in any sort of way or will everyone just take my word for it?
I would also like to say my contact told me Transformers sold 650k copies last week. Did I need to prove that in any sort of way or will everyone just take my word for it?
And if we take the 130,000 including both, then the 50,000+ copies of the trilogy is pretty decent numbers, until you throw in the fact that there are over 2 million Blu-ray capable players, and it doesn't seem so impressive. I think we can safely say that the Spidey trilogy appeals to almost everyone who appreciates high-definition.
#483
Suspended
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
most definitely the boxset numbers certainly were going to affect Spidey 3's numbers. I'm surprised that 70,000+ people wanted part 3 by itself. I know some are waiting for the eventual single releases of parts 1 and 2, but 70,000? That set was priced at $60 at Best Buy and Amazon, part 3 was roughly $30, so there's much more value in getting the trilogy, imo.
And if we take the 130,000 including both, then the 50,000+ copies of the trilogy is pretty decent numbers, until you throw in the fact that there are over 2 million Blu-ray capable players, and it doesn't seem so impressive. I think we can safely say that the Spidey trilogy appeals to almost everyone who appreciates high-definition.
And if we take the 130,000 including both, then the 50,000+ copies of the trilogy is pretty decent numbers, until you throw in the fact that there are over 2 million Blu-ray capable players, and it doesn't seem so impressive. I think we can safely say that the Spidey trilogy appeals to almost everyone who appreciates high-definition.
#484
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
I agree on all counts. I feel bad for the 70k that bought Spider-Man 3 by itself, what a horrible movie (besides the Sand Mans special effects). Spider-Man 1,2,3 has come and gone and its a blip on the Blu-ray sales radar. I keep hearing how great POTC3 will do though, and Simpsons, and Die Hard 

#485
Whatever the 1st week numbers, I'm pretty sure Spidey will have legs... I'd be surprised to see either SP3 or the box set drop out of the top 10 before Christmas. I'm more interesting in seeing the results for Cars & especially the Rat. Two titles that are outside the PS3's supposed demographics, yet two killer titles (IMO the new kings of HD), backed by also IMO some outstanding promo work by Disney (great commercials that were everywhere).
Last edited by Hammer99; 11-10-07 at 03:40 PM.
#486
DVD Talk Reviewer
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Blu-ray.com
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Spider-Man 1,2,3 has come and gone and its a blip on the Blu-ray sales radar.
Pro-B
#487
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes
on
1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Spider-Man 1,2,3 has come and gone and its a blip on the Blu-ray sales radar.
#488
Suspended
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
I am unsure why you believe that the film did not have an impact. If we go by the second "read" it is still quite impressive given that there was a copy of it which went out with the PS3 and it is not counted in the overall sales as well as the current Dell-Canada promo which also bundles a copy. All things considered I expect Spidey to sell very well throughout the Hollidays.
Pro-B
Pro-B
I'm sorry, but I don't think very many people who bought a 40GB PS3 would have bought a copy of Spider-Man 3. As-is, if Spider-Man 3 and the Trilogy only sold 130k combined. Now, of we take into account that only 20% of PS3 owners buy Blu-ray movies, and Sony maybe sold 20-30k 40GB PS3s in the past 2-3 days (being very generous there), they might have sold an extra 2-3k copies of Spider-Man 3, thats if all of that 20% bought the movie within the 1-3 days of the 40GBs release.
#489
Suspended
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I don't think that's a reasonable assessment at all. I'd bet both Spidey 3 and the box set will have legs, continuing to sell well through the end of the year. Even breaking the box set apart from the individual Spidey 3 release, they're still some of the best selling titles on either format. I'm not the biggest fan of the movie either, but I don't know how it can be reasonably called a "blip".
I really underestimated Ratatiououli on Blu-ray. That thing is selling like nuts! I imagine because its one of the first Pixar animated movies (along with Cars and Shorts), but damn...that thing really is selling! $10 off with purchase of the Cars or Shorts helps too. I wonder how Shrek 3 will fare next week on HD DVD?
#490
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes
on
1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
I wonder if the recent wave of really compelling video games -- something that's really just started in the past week or two -- is hurting things. There are more games I want that are coming out this month than the rest of the year combined, and maybe the limited time/budget most people have is eating into what they'd normally devote to Blu-ray discs, especially since the format is driven by a video game console.
#491
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
All I kept hearing all year long was "Spider-Man, Spider-Man, Spider-Man," and as a single SKU, it didn't sell better then Transformers.
I'm sorry, but I don't think very many people who bought a 40GB PS3 would have bought a copy of Spider-Man 3. As-is, if Spider-Man 3 and the Trilogy only sold 130k combined. Now, of we take into account that only 20% of PS3 owners buy Blu-ray movies, and Sony maybe sold 20-30k 40GB PS3s in the past 2-3 days (being very generous there), they might have sold an extra 2-3k copies of Spider-Man 3, thats if all of that 20% bought the movie within the 1-3 days of the 40GBs release.
I'm sorry, but I don't think very many people who bought a 40GB PS3 would have bought a copy of Spider-Man 3. As-is, if Spider-Man 3 and the Trilogy only sold 130k combined. Now, of we take into account that only 20% of PS3 owners buy Blu-ray movies, and Sony maybe sold 20-30k 40GB PS3s in the past 2-3 days (being very generous there), they might have sold an extra 2-3k copies of Spider-Man 3, thats if all of that 20% bought the movie within the 1-3 days of the 40GBs release.
C'mon man, making statements like Spidey was a blip on the radar in the BD thread is like me stating Transformers was a blip on the radar in the Hd-dvd forum and that is very much trolling. I thought it was understood to keep everything to a compelling discussion and leaving flamebait statements out of it.
#492
Suspended
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I wonder if the recent wave of really compelling video games -- something that's really just started in the past week or two -- is hurting things. There are more games I want that are coming out this month than the rest of the year combined, and maybe the limited time/budget most people have is eating into what they'd normally devote to Blu-ray discs, especially since the format is driven by a video game console.
#493
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I wonder if the recent wave of really compelling video games -- something that's really just started in the past week or two -- is hurting things. There are more games I want that are coming out this month than the rest of the year combined, and maybe the limited time/budget most people have is eating into what they'd normally devote to Blu-ray discs, especially since the format is driven by a video game console.
#494
Suspended
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
Sorry Gizmo, but it was good enough to give BD a commanding win at 71/29 in the Nielsons and this was with the the 3 day hd-dvd pricing onslaught included.
C'mon man, making statements like Spidey was a blip on the radar in the BD thread is like me stating Transformers was a blip on the radar in the Hd-dvd forum and that is very much trolling. I thought it was understood to keep everything to a compelling discussion and leaving flamebait statements out of it.
C'mon man, making statements like Spidey was a blip on the radar in the BD thread is like me stating Transformers was a blip on the radar in the Hd-dvd forum and that is very much trolling. I thought it was understood to keep everything to a compelling discussion and leaving flamebait statements out of it.
#495
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
As of this very moment the first insider's info has not been retracted. And as you could see I have not kept the second "read" away from this thread. When the initial number was announced I confirmed it for TALK. And since I am not the source I have now supplied the second chart as well.
Ciao,
Pro-B
Ciao,
Pro-B
Your rampant posting of "confirming" information (and I use that term loosely) from unnamed insiders off a Web site is 100% wrong and I don't know why mods allow you to post confirmations if you don't work for Sony, Nielsen or somebody else with direct knowledge.
There is a reason why most hearsay is barred from use of evidence in legal proceedings in the United States. Its because the person using hearsay to testify has no direct personal knowledge of facts. I'm not saying we should apply legal standards to forum, but if you want intelligent discussion, and not the posting of rampant incorrect information, the mods should not allow posters to use the word "confirm" for any facts outside their realm or knowledge or has facts accesible at a link
Last edited by chanster; 11-10-07 at 04:59 PM.
#496
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by chanster
Unless you work for Sony, Nielsen, your confirmation means absolute zero.
Your rampant posting of "confirming" information (and I use that term loosely) from unnamed insiders off a Web site is 100% wrong and I don't know why mods allow you to post confirmations if you don't work for Sony, Nielsen or somebody else with direct knowledge.
There is a reason why most hearsay is barred from use of evidence in legal proceedings in the United States. Its because the person using hearsay to testify has no direct personal knowledge of facts. I'm not saying we should apply legal standards to forum, but if you want intelligent discussion, and not the posting of rampant incorrect information, the mods should not allow posters to use the word "confirm" for any facts outside their realm or knowledge or has facts accesible at a link
Your rampant posting of "confirming" information (and I use that term loosely) from unnamed insiders off a Web site is 100% wrong and I don't know why mods allow you to post confirmations if you don't work for Sony, Nielsen or somebody else with direct knowledge.
There is a reason why most hearsay is barred from use of evidence in legal proceedings in the United States. Its because the person using hearsay to testify has no direct personal knowledge of facts. I'm not saying we should apply legal standards to forum, but if you want intelligent discussion, and not the posting of rampant incorrect information, the mods should not allow posters to use the word "confirm" for any facts outside their realm or knowledge or has facts accesible at a link
But I can not confirm that this belongs here....
#498
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
The only big game for PS3 has been Ratchet and Clank (and GHIII).
#499
DVD Talk Hero
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
All I kept hearing all year long was "Spider-Man, Spider-Man, Spider-Man," and as a single SKU, it didn't sell better then Transformers.
I'm sorry, but I don't think very many people who bought a 40GB PS3 would have bought a copy of Spider-Man 3. As-is, if Spider-Man 3 and the Trilogy only sold 130k combined. Now, of we take into account that only 20% of PS3 owners buy Blu-ray movies, and Sony maybe sold 20-30k 40GB PS3s in the past 2-3 days (being very generous there), they might have sold an extra 2-3k copies of Spider-Man 3, thats if all of that 20% bought the movie within the 1-3 days of the 40GBs release.
I'm sorry, but I don't think very many people who bought a 40GB PS3 would have bought a copy of Spider-Man 3. As-is, if Spider-Man 3 and the Trilogy only sold 130k combined. Now, of we take into account that only 20% of PS3 owners buy Blu-ray movies, and Sony maybe sold 20-30k 40GB PS3s in the past 2-3 days (being very generous there), they might have sold an extra 2-3k copies of Spider-Man 3, thats if all of that 20% bought the movie within the 1-3 days of the 40GBs release.
#500
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I don't think that's a reasonable assessment at all. I'd bet both Spidey 3 and the box set will have legs, continuing to sell well through the end of the year. Even breaking the box set apart from the individual Spidey 3 release, they're still some of the best selling titles on either format. I'm not the biggest fan of the movie either, but I don't know how it can be reasonably called a "blip".



