Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

General Blu-ray news and discussion PART 3

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

General Blu-ray news and discussion PART 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-07 | 02:28 PM
  #476  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes on 1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
When the initial number was announced I confirmed it for TALK.
To me, "confirmation" requires first-hand knowledge of the facts, and this really doesn't sound like that's the case at all.
Adam Tyner is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 02:28 PM
  #477  
Music's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,033
Received 169 Likes on 130 Posts
From: NH
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
As of this very moment the first insider's info has not been retracted. And as you could see I have not kept the second "read" away from this thread. When the initial number was announced I confirmed it for TALK. And since I am not the source I have now supplied the second chart as well.

Ciao,
Pro-B
So does your confirmation mean anything? or is it speculation?
Music is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 02:49 PM
  #478  
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Blu-ray.com
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
To me, "confirmation" requires first-hand knowledge of the facts, and this really doesn't sound like that's the case at all.
My answer remains the same, two different insiders provided two different reads. The first one which I confirmed for the site has not yet been retracted. Now I have given you the second breakdown as well. If and when the first read is retracted I will make it clear which one contains the correct numbers.

To Mr. Cinema: yes my posts provide you with the opportunity to have the two reads offered by the insiders. And unlike another thread on this site which announced 190 000K for Transformers yet it was never updated, even as of today, I brought you both sides of the story. So, no, I am not speculating.

Pro-B
pro-bassoonist is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 02:49 PM
  #479  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
As of this very moment the first insider's info has not been retracted. And as you could see I have not kept the second "read" away from this thread. When the initial number was announced I confirmed it for TALK. And since I am not the source I have now supplied the second chart as well.

Ciao,
Pro-B
You seemed to jump right in before the official numbers were posted to the public like you had contacts regarding the 130k number was for Spider-Man 3 only and not the boxset. That is what I am taking issue with now. I tend to believe the second set of numbers you posted, since I don't see how 300 on Blu-ray could jump out several thousand copies in a single week (even with the $400 PS3 being released on Friday). Too many issues with Spider-Man 3 doing 130k copies.
Gizmo is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 02:52 PM
  #480  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
My answer remains the same, two different insiders provided two different reads. The first one which I confirmed for the site has not yet been retracted. Now I have given you the second breakdown as well. If and when the first read is retracted I will make very clear which one contains the correct numbers. There is no intent for speculating here.

To Mr. Cinema: yes my posts provide you with the opportunity to have the two reads offered by the insiders. And unlike another thread on this site which announced 190 000K for Transformers yet it was never updated, even as of today[/i], I brought you both sides of the story. So, no, I am not speculating.

Pro-B
So which one is it? I'm going to assume its the latter as Sony had not announced anything else yet and is keeping mum on this. If they had sold 225k of Spider-Man 3 (separate and trilogy) there would have been fireworks by now. FACT: Transformers sold MORE then Spider-Man 3 as a single release. Pretty damn good.

I would also like to say my contact told me Transformers sold 650k copies last week. Did I need to prove that in any sort of way or will everyone just take my word for it?
Gizmo is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 02:56 PM
  #481  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes on 1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
My answer remains the same, two different insiders provided two different reads. The first one which I confirmed for the site has not yet been retracted.
What I'm saying is that you haven't confirmed anything. If you don't know anything yourself -- if you're relying 100% on what you're told by another party and lack direct access to the numbers you're touting -- then you are inherently unable to provide confirmation. An insider may have confirmed something, and it'd be perfectly reasonable to say that he confirmed it, but you yourself are not in a position to confirm anything.

I know it's just semantics, but the misuse of the word 'confirm' does grate a bit.
Adam Tyner is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 03:21 PM
  #482  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
So which one is it? I'm going to assume its the latter as Sony had not announced anything else yet and is keeping mum on this. If they had sold 225k of Spider-Man 3 (separate and trilogy) there would have been fireworks by now. FACT: Transformers sold MORE then Spider-Man 3 as a single release. Pretty damn good.

I would also like to say my contact told me Transformers sold 650k copies last week. Did I need to prove that in any sort of way or will everyone just take my word for it?
most definitely the boxset numbers certainly were going to affect Spidey 3's numbers. I'm surprised that 70,000+ people wanted part 3 by itself. I know some are waiting for the eventual single releases of parts 1 and 2, but 70,000? That set was priced at $60 at Best Buy and Amazon, part 3 was roughly $30, so there's much more value in getting the trilogy, imo.

And if we take the 130,000 including both, then the 50,000+ copies of the trilogy is pretty decent numbers, until you throw in the fact that there are over 2 million Blu-ray capable players, and it doesn't seem so impressive. I think we can safely say that the Spidey trilogy appeals to almost everyone who appreciates high-definition.
Mr. Cinema is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 03:31 PM
  #483  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
most definitely the boxset numbers certainly were going to affect Spidey 3's numbers. I'm surprised that 70,000+ people wanted part 3 by itself. I know some are waiting for the eventual single releases of parts 1 and 2, but 70,000? That set was priced at $60 at Best Buy and Amazon, part 3 was roughly $30, so there's much more value in getting the trilogy, imo.

And if we take the 130,000 including both, then the 50,000+ copies of the trilogy is pretty decent numbers, until you throw in the fact that there are over 2 million Blu-ray capable players, and it doesn't seem so impressive. I think we can safely say that the Spidey trilogy appeals to almost everyone who appreciates high-definition.
I agree on all counts. I feel bad for the 70k that bought Spider-Man 3 by itself, what a horrible movie (besides the Sand Mans special effects). Spider-Man 1,2,3 has come and gone and its a blip on the Blu-ray sales radar. I keep hearing how great POTC3 will do though, and Simpsons, and Die Hard
Gizmo is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 03:34 PM
  #484  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
I agree on all counts. I feel bad for the 70k that bought Spider-Man 3 by itself, what a horrible movie (besides the Sand Mans special effects). Spider-Man 1,2,3 has come and gone and its a blip on the Blu-ray sales radar. I keep hearing how great POTC3 will do though, and Simpsons, and Die Hard
Pirates 3 should sell better than the other 2, due only to the fact that it's day and date. But like Spidey 3, Pirates 3 sold alot less tickets than its predecessor. Simpsons should do well, but I wouldn't put my hopes on Die Hard 4 dominating anything.
Mr. Cinema is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 03:36 PM
  #485  
Hammer99's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever the 1st week numbers, I'm pretty sure Spidey will have legs... I'd be surprised to see either SP3 or the box set drop out of the top 10 before Christmas. I'm more interesting in seeing the results for Cars & especially the Rat. Two titles that are outside the PS3's supposed demographics, yet two killer titles (IMO the new kings of HD), backed by also IMO some outstanding promo work by Disney (great commercials that were everywhere).

Last edited by Hammer99; 11-10-07 at 03:40 PM.
Hammer99 is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 03:52 PM
  #486  
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Blu-ray.com
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Spider-Man 1,2,3 has come and gone and its a blip on the Blu-ray sales radar.
I am unsure why you believe that the film did not have an impact. If we go by the second "read" it is still quite impressive given that there was a copy of it which went out with the PS3 and it is not counted in the overall sales as well as the current Dell-Canada promo which also bundles a copy. All things considered I expect Spidey to sell very well throughout the Hollidays.

Pro-B
pro-bassoonist is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 03:59 PM
  #487  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes on 1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
Spider-Man 1,2,3 has come and gone and its a blip on the Blu-ray sales radar.
I don't think that's a reasonable assessment at all. I'd bet both Spidey 3 and the box set will have legs, continuing to sell well through the end of the year. Even breaking the box set apart from the individual Spidey 3 release, they're still some of the best selling titles on either format. I'm not the biggest fan of the movie either, but I don't know how it can be reasonably called a "blip".
Adam Tyner is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 04:11 PM
  #488  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
I am unsure why you believe that the film did not have an impact. If we go by the second "read" it is still quite impressive given that there was a copy of it which went out with the PS3 and it is not counted in the overall sales as well as the current Dell-Canada promo which also bundles a copy. All things considered I expect Spidey to sell very well throughout the Hollidays.

Pro-B
All I kept hearing all year long was "Spider-Man, Spider-Man, Spider-Man," and as a single SKU, it didn't sell better then Transformers.

I'm sorry, but I don't think very many people who bought a 40GB PS3 would have bought a copy of Spider-Man 3. As-is, if Spider-Man 3 and the Trilogy only sold 130k combined. Now, of we take into account that only 20% of PS3 owners buy Blu-ray movies, and Sony maybe sold 20-30k 40GB PS3s in the past 2-3 days (being very generous there), they might have sold an extra 2-3k copies of Spider-Man 3, thats if all of that 20% bought the movie within the 1-3 days of the 40GBs release.
Gizmo is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 04:16 PM
  #489  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I don't think that's a reasonable assessment at all. I'd bet both Spidey 3 and the box set will have legs, continuing to sell well through the end of the year. Even breaking the box set apart from the individual Spidey 3 release, they're still some of the best selling titles on either format. I'm not the biggest fan of the movie either, but I don't know how it can be reasonably called a "blip".
Sorry, in general its not a blip in terms of HDM sales. However, I think a lot of Pro-Blu people were expecting it to sell somewhere around 400-500k copies in the first week. When combined it only sells 130k...its pretty dissapointing. I'm sure either Spider-Man 3 or the Trilogy will remain in the top 10 throughout the Holidays, but I think a lot of people were expecting it to be topple 300 combined numbers by a landslide. It clearly did not. Selling only 130k copies to a base of 3-4 Million capable Blu-ray players is not that great. Thats 3-4% of Blu-ray owners. I imagine even a small HD DVD release would get a better % then that.

I really underestimated Ratatiououli on Blu-ray. That thing is selling like nuts! I imagine because its one of the first Pixar animated movies (along with Cars and Shorts), but damn...that thing really is selling! $10 off with purchase of the Cars or Shorts helps too. I wonder how Shrek 3 will fare next week on HD DVD?
Gizmo is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 04:16 PM
  #490  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,711
Received 2,803 Likes on 1,864 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
I wonder if the recent wave of really compelling video games -- something that's really just started in the past week or two -- is hurting things. There are more games I want that are coming out this month than the rest of the year combined, and maybe the limited time/budget most people have is eating into what they'd normally devote to Blu-ray discs, especially since the format is driven by a video game console.
Adam Tyner is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 04:19 PM
  #491  
tonymontana313's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
All I kept hearing all year long was "Spider-Man, Spider-Man, Spider-Man," and as a single SKU, it didn't sell better then Transformers.
I'm sorry, but I don't think very many people who bought a 40GB PS3 would have bought a copy of Spider-Man 3. As-is, if Spider-Man 3 and the Trilogy only sold 130k combined. Now, of we take into account that only 20% of PS3 owners buy Blu-ray movies, and Sony maybe sold 20-30k 40GB PS3s in the past 2-3 days (being very generous there), they might have sold an extra 2-3k copies of Spider-Man 3, thats if all of that 20% bought the movie within the 1-3 days of the 40GBs release.
Sorry Gizmo, but it was good enough to give BD a commanding win at 71/29 in the Nielsons and this was with the the 3 day hd-dvd pricing onslaught included.

C'mon man, making statements like Spidey was a blip on the radar in the BD thread is like me stating Transformers was a blip on the radar in the Hd-dvd forum and that is very much trolling. I thought it was understood to keep everything to a compelling discussion and leaving flamebait statements out of it.
tonymontana313 is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 04:20 PM
  #492  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I wonder if the recent wave of really compelling video games -- something that's really just started in the past week or two -- is hurting things. There are more games I want that are coming out this month than the rest of the year combined, and maybe the limited time/budget most people have is eating into what they'd normally devote to Blu-ray discs, especially since the format is driven by a video game console.
The only big game for PS3 has been Ratchet and Clank (and GHIII), and that didn't sell as well as they had hoped. With the Holidays a ton of games will be coming out, and when they do, I fully expect numbers on the Blu side to dip. I still see a big chunk of the Blu-ray buyers as being a PS3 owner who buys movies because of lack of games. Why spend $25 on a 2 hour movie when you can get a great game for $60 that has 10-40 hours of entertainment? Same thing happened to UMD when games came out for the PSP.
Gizmo is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 04:21 PM
  #493  
tonymontana313's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, Texas
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I wonder if the recent wave of really compelling video games -- something that's really just started in the past week or two -- is hurting things. There are more games I want that are coming out this month than the rest of the year combined, and maybe the limited time/budget most people have is eating into what they'd normally devote to Blu-ray discs, especially since the format is driven by a video game console.
It's about damn time! COD4 and Ratchet and Clank have been some great titles to play. Hopefully this is when the tsunami starts.
tonymontana313 is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 04:23 PM
  #494  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 31,779
Received 101 Likes on 87 Posts
From: Formerly known as "GizmoDVD"/Southern CA
Originally Posted by tonymontana313
Sorry Gizmo, but it was good enough to give BD a commanding win at 71/29 in the Nielsons and this was with the the 3 day hd-dvd pricing onslaught included.

C'mon man, making statements like Spidey was a blip on the radar in the BD thread is like me stating Transformers was a blip on the radar in the Hd-dvd forum and that is very much trolling. I thought it was understood to keep everything to a compelling discussion and leaving flamebait statements out of it.
The same Nielsons that does not count Wal-Marts HD DVD sales (thats were the pricing onslaught was, remember?) Remember, Spider-Man came out on Tuesday, the $99 A2s at Wal-Mart (and Best Buy) were not until Thursday/Friday?
Gizmo is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 04:54 PM
  #495  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by pro-bassoonist
As of this very moment the first insider's info has not been retracted. And as you could see I have not kept the second "read" away from this thread. When the initial number was announced I confirmed it for TALK. And since I am not the source I have now supplied the second chart as well.

Ciao,
Pro-B
Unless you work for Sony, Nielsen, your confirmation means absolute zero.

Your rampant posting of "confirming" information (and I use that term loosely) from unnamed insiders off a Web site is 100% wrong and I don't know why mods allow you to post confirmations if you don't work for Sony, Nielsen or somebody else with direct knowledge.

There is a reason why most hearsay is barred from use of evidence in legal proceedings in the United States. Its because the person using hearsay to testify has no direct personal knowledge of facts. I'm not saying we should apply legal standards to forum, but if you want intelligent discussion, and not the posting of rampant incorrect information, the mods should not allow posters to use the word "confirm" for any facts outside their realm or knowledge or has facts accesible at a link

Last edited by chanster; 11-10-07 at 04:59 PM.
chanster is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 05:03 PM
  #496  
Music's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,033
Received 169 Likes on 130 Posts
From: NH
Originally Posted by chanster
Unless you work for Sony, Nielsen, your confirmation means absolute zero.

Your rampant posting of "confirming" information (and I use that term loosely) from unnamed insiders off a Web site is 100% wrong and I don't know why mods allow you to post confirmations if you don't work for Sony, Nielsen or somebody else with direct knowledge.

There is a reason why most hearsay is barred from use of evidence in legal proceedings in the United States. Its because the person using hearsay to testify has no direct personal knowledge of facts. I'm not saying we should apply legal standards to forum, but if you want intelligent discussion, and not the posting of rampant incorrect information, the mods should not allow posters to use the word "confirm" for any facts outside their realm or knowledge or has facts accesible at a link
I can confirm that some of this is true....

But I can not confirm that this belongs here....
Music is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 05:26 PM
  #497  
Hammer99's Avatar
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chanster
I'm not saying we should apply legal standards to forum
Agreed.
Hammer99 is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 06:26 PM
  #498  
darkside's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 19,879
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
The only big game for PS3 has been Ratchet and Clank (and GHIII).
Ratchet has also been a sales disappointment. I think Uncharted will be the big title for the PS3 this holiday season.
darkside is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 06:27 PM
  #499  
PhantomStranger's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 29,316
Received 1,218 Likes on 1,017 Posts
From: The Phantom Zone
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
All I kept hearing all year long was "Spider-Man, Spider-Man, Spider-Man," and as a single SKU, it didn't sell better then Transformers.

I'm sorry, but I don't think very many people who bought a 40GB PS3 would have bought a copy of Spider-Man 3. As-is, if Spider-Man 3 and the Trilogy only sold 130k combined. Now, of we take into account that only 20% of PS3 owners buy Blu-ray movies, and Sony maybe sold 20-30k 40GB PS3s in the past 2-3 days (being very generous there), they might have sold an extra 2-3k copies of Spider-Man 3, thats if all of that 20% bought the movie within the 1-3 days of the 40GBs release.
You're assessment of the situation is deeply flawed. Every 40 GB PS3($399) sold so far includes a Spider-man 3 BD packed in the box. And these giveaways have been confirmed to not be included in retail sales figures. Why would someone go out and buy a second copy of Spider-man 3?
PhantomStranger is offline  
Old 11-10-07 | 06:28 PM
  #500  
darkside's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 19,879
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
I don't think that's a reasonable assessment at all. I'd bet both Spidey 3 and the box set will have legs, continuing to sell well through the end of the year. Even breaking the box set apart from the individual Spidey 3 release, they're still some of the best selling titles on either format. I'm not the biggest fan of the movie either, but I don't know how it can be reasonably called a "blip".
As people buy new hardware there are always certain catalog titles they will pick up to watch and I think the Spider Man movies definitely fall in that category. They will have legs and continue to sell just like 300 has.
darkside is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.