DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Forum Feedback and Support (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/forum-feedback-support-4/)
-   -   The Official Forum Upgrade Bug/Issue Thread (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/forum-feedback-support/399058-official-forum-upgrade-bug-issue-thread.html)

bigsoos 12-07-04 08:28 PM

why doesn't the site remember my log in information? I tried clearing my cookies, but it still logs me out after a while.

Yakuza Bengoshi 12-07-04 09:24 PM

Issue: I use Safari to reach this site. Previously, DVDTalk remembered me. Now, however, I have to log in each time I visit the site even though I click "remember me" when I do log in. I'm not blocking cookies so what gives?

strife 12-07-04 09:25 PM

remember me log in required you to delete your cookies (only to dvdtalk) and will fix the problem.

BizRodian 12-07-04 10:32 PM

I don't like being able to choose my own title! it's too much responsibility!

Deftones 12-07-04 11:00 PM

So what's the fix w/ the constant logging in issue? I've cleared my cookies throught the site, and I still have to log in every time. It's pain in the ass.

Myster X 12-07-04 11:27 PM

Why can't I add an avatar or edit my title? :(

MJKTool 12-07-04 11:31 PM


Originally Posted by Deftones, Esq
So what's the fix w/ the constant logging in issue? I've cleared my cookies throught the site, and I still have to log in every time. It's pain in the ass.

I agree. I had to log on just to write this reply. Annoying to say the least.

GeoffK 12-08-04 12:46 AM


Originally Posted by Myster X
Why can't I add an avatar or edit my title? :(

Avatars are just being tested by Mods and Reviewers. And Editing titles isn't a feature we're going to offer just yet.

Tscott 12-08-04 09:47 AM

On the old boards, when a mod changed a thread title the old thread title still appeared within the original post in small bolded letters- thus clueing in the observant that the current thread title wasn't the original posters intent. I've noticed that this is no longer the case. (I'd link to the thread I first saw this in, but it's in the adult forum (the thongs/tongs thread).) Anyway, it could get confusing if title changes are used in the humorous way they have been in the past as there's no visual clue to indicate the thread's been tampered with.

Oh, and speaking of the adult forum, I'm assuming you're aware it's no longer showing links to adult dvd reviews at the top of the page, but the normal reviews that are everywhere else?

JANK 12-08-04 12:40 PM

I wants a snazzy title too
 

Originally Posted by gkleinman
<snip>
CLOSED ISSUES
<snip>- Member Titles Aren't Updated - FIXED
<snip>


So how DO you update one's "member title" ??? Please advise as in where you do it at. Thanks!

twikoff 12-08-04 12:53 PM


Originally Posted by JANK
So how DO you update one's "member title" ??? Please advise as in where you do it at. Thanks!

titles are based on number of posts (with the exception of some people who have received their titles by servicing the mods)

you cant set your own

FinkPish 12-08-04 02:48 PM

Correction, you can't set your own anymore.

(I know this is just asking to have mine set back to normal)

Trigger 12-08-04 03:17 PM

still not keeping me logged in - deleted all my dvdtalk cookies...

[email protected][1].txt
[email protected][2].txt
[email protected][1].txt
me@dvdtalk[1].txt
me@dvdtalk[2].txt
[email protected][1].txt
[email protected][1].txt

Am I missing any?

FinkPish 12-08-04 03:19 PM

Damn.

twikoff 12-08-04 04:42 PM


Originally Posted by FinkPish
Damn.


:lol:

well.. i did point out the other day that there was an area in the USER CP area to put in your own member title
but i couldnt test it, because my current title is above the max allowed characters.. so if I had changed it, i couldnt have changed back

FinkPish 12-08-04 04:58 PM

I like the idea of having custom user titles, either instead of the DVD Talk rating or above it as an an additional title. Maybe that will be something for the eventual pay site.

twikoff 12-08-04 05:12 PM


Originally Posted by FinkPish
Maybe that will be something for the eventual pay site.

yep
i would assume so

das Monkey 12-08-04 06:04 PM

I certainly hope we don't ever have the option to set our own titles. Titles are like nicknames. You can't give yourself one; it has to be given to you. Between username, sig, and apparently soon-to-be avatars, that's more than enough for us to express ourselves.

das

hifi 12-08-04 07:09 PM

I don't have time to read all of this thread, so sorry if this has been covered, but can we please reduce the size of everything (fonts, images, etc.) on the new forum (more to the size of the old forum). The old forum was much smaller and display friendly. This new thing eats up my whole screen, the reply button's and thread icons are huge. The amount of empty space seems like it has doubled. I can change the font size myself but I can't do anything about the image or the whitespace. Now if someone wants to send me a bigger display, now thats a different story... ;)

das Monkey 12-08-04 08:23 PM

I don't see how some people can handle it. I run at 1600x1200 with a very narrow browser header bar, and it's too big even for me. Thinking about those at 800x600 gives me a headache. With 100x100 avatars, giant fonts, and poofy buttons, a single line post (without a sig) appears to take about 300 pixels in height! -eek- I'm all for everyone expressing themselves and having fun, but I guess I just don't see the need for all that (not to mention all the wasted whitespace) other than the simple novelty of it all.

Don't get me wrong ... I love much of the new functionality, and I appreciate the changes that have been made between when the forum was reborn and today. In the end, the forum will be much better off for the change, and I'm happy for it, but I think there's still some work to be done to make this place user-friendly for everyone.

das

abintra 12-08-04 09:24 PM

I'm on 800x600 with dial-up.. best of both worlds (turned off avatars immediately).

I would love it if they altered the colors to make them easier to read. The white backgrounds with the light purple links makes for eye strain, atleast for me.

I'm not a big fan of the following forum because since they upgraded the site takes so long for it to load that I no longer visit but I like the color scheme much better.. http://www.thedigitalreview.com/forum/index.php?s= and http://www.thedigitalreview.com/foru...isplay.php?f=2

FinkPish 12-08-04 09:26 PM


Originally Posted by das Monkey
I don't see how some people can handle it. I run at 1600x1200 with a very narrow browser header bar, and it's too big even for me. Thinking about those at 800x600 gives me a headache. With 100x100 avatars, giant fonts, and poofy buttons, a single line post (without a sig) appears to take about 300 pixels in height! -eek- I'm all for everyone expressing themselves and having fun, but I guess I just don't see the need for all that (not to mention all the wasted whitespace) other than the simple novelty of it all.

Don't get me wrong ... I love much of the new functionality, and I appreciate the changes that have been made between when the forum was reborn and today. In the end, the forum will be much better off for the change, and I'm happy for it, but I think there's still some work to be done to make this place user-friendly for everyone.

das

You know what might help with size issues? Not signing every post you make. -wink-

Your name is right next to it, we already know who is writing.

das Monkey 12-08-04 09:50 PM

http://www.epsilonminus.com/livejournal/ohsnap.gif

For the record, I don't sign every post I make.

das

Wizdar 12-08-04 10:39 PM

Yeah, ya do too. Which is a good thing. Makes it easy to spot forgeries.


(Is that kid saying what I think he’s saying? :lol: )

Tafellappen 12-08-04 10:56 PM


Originally Posted by abintra
I'm on 800x600 with dial-up.. best of both worlds (turned off avatars immediately).

I would love it if they altered the colors to make them easier to read. The white backgrounds with the light purple links makes for eye strain, atleast for me.

I'm not a big fan of the following forum because since they upgraded the site takes so long for it to load that I no longer visit but I like the color scheme much better.. http://www.thedigitalreview.com/forum/index.php?s= and http://www.thedigitalreview.com/foru...isplay.php?f=2

I prefer that color scheme too

das Monkey 12-08-04 11:04 PM


Wizdar

Yeah, ya do too. Which is a good thing. Makes it easy to spot forgeries.

Nevermind. You're right. ;)

Spoiler:
I don't sign posts. I sign comments.


das

Anteater87 12-09-04 02:04 PM


Originally Posted by Anteater87
I didn't see this mentioned in the previous messages.

Can you have the 'Previous Thread | Next Thread' links at the top of the page as well (between 'Post Reply' and pages, just like at the bottom)?

Thanks.

Since it didn't get a reply (yes or no), I'll ask again. Is this something that could be done?

Rogue588 12-10-04 10:46 AM

Late last nite [or early this morning, your choice], I typed up the weekly "What DVDs Are You Getting?" poll.

Usually, I hyperlink the poll options with the DVD Talk Amazon.com referral...however, after I had everything formatted, it told me that the options had more than 100 characters and it wouldn't let me post 'em.

abintra 12-11-04 02:43 AM


Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
Thanks for the heads-up. I fixed it the morning the new software went up, but I "fixed" an old version, and the newer version that was continuing to run was still broken. It should all be running correctly now.

Unless there hasn't been an update since the 6th, it appears that it isn't running correctly yet.

68ShelbyGT500KR 12-12-04 09:39 AM

I have had countless times that FireFox 1.0 (not pr) has been crashing since the upgrade. I have NOT had any extensions installed since the upgrade to V3. Anybody else have FF 1.0 crash since the upgrade. It NEVER happened previously.

I'd hate to resort to using IE just for this site.

XP Pro SP2

Holly E. Ordway 12-12-04 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by 68ShelbyGT500KR
I have had countless times that FireFox 1.0 (not pr) has been crashing since the upgrade. I have NOT had any extensions installed since the upgrade to V3. Anybody else have FF 1.0 crash since the upgrade. It NEVER happened previously.

I'm running Firefox 1.0 and I haven't had any problems, for what it's worth.

(It's SUCH a better browser than IE!)

Numes 12-12-04 01:39 PM

Well, I thought I'd give it a week before posting again. I haven't seen either of these two issues addressed at all. I was hoping these would at least show up on the "Open Issues" on the first page of this thread. I'm sure things are still in flux, I just wanted to get the word out again.

1. The thread title display puts the original poster below the thread title. Before, there was a column for the original poster. Putting the original poster on a line below the thread title makes the whole thread listings cluttered, there is no flow at all. In addition, it adds a lot of extra lines that are unnecessary, you can't see as many thread titles in one page, and it is much more difficult to scan thread titles quickly.

2. The "subscribe to this thread" link is nowhere to be found. I believe the only way to subscribe is if you actually post a message.

seymouru 12-12-04 02:20 PM


Originally Posted by Numes
2. The "subscribe to this thread" link is nowhere to be found. I believe the only way to subscribe is if you actually post a message.

The subscribe-to-thread link is hidden in the "Thread Tools" dropdown at the top right of the thread. I sure do miss having a direct subscribe link on the page.

Numes 12-12-04 02:25 PM


Originally Posted by seymouru
The subscribe-to-thread link is hidden in the "Thread Tools" dropdown at the top right of the thread. I sure do miss having a direct subscribe link on the page.

Alright. I can't say I'm too keen on that either, but at least I can subscribe to threads now! Thanks.

Adam Tyner 12-12-04 02:58 PM


Originally Posted by abintra
Unless there hasn't been an update since the 6th, it appears that it isn't running correctly yet.

Aargh. I automated it in a different way than before and futzed it up. It should be working now. If you see a problem like this, please e-mail me since I check my e-mail more frequently than the 9th or 10th page of a thread like this.

seymouru 12-13-04 02:57 PM


Originally Posted by seymouru
I sure do miss having a direct subscribe link on the page.

It's back!

Edit: I thought it was back, but for some reason, it only shows up as a link in my old Netscape browser, not in IE. Completely different navigation scheme in Netscape.

gutwrencher 12-13-04 07:32 PM

sig troubles...
 
maybe I just missed it....but I'm wondering why I can't delete or add anything in my sig? I'm having no other problems except for that. no problems staying logged in or anything, either. btw...I save everything in the sig when updating....but it then goes back to the older sig if I jam out a new post.

Thanks!!

68ShelbyGT500KR 12-13-04 08:17 PM


Originally Posted by gutwrencher
maybe I just missed it....but I'm wondering why I can't delete or add anything in my sig? I'm having no other problems except for that. no problems staying logged in or anything, either. btw...I save everything in the sig when updating....but it then goes back to the older sig if I jam out a new post.

Thanks!!

I am trying to update my sig at it is giving me this error when trying to save:

The following errors occurred when this message was submitted:
Your signature can not be longer than 300 characters.

I removed some characters but it still won't rename the URL name. It will only let me update and save the actual URL

My total sig must be wayyyyy over 300 characters, though
Is there a way to count the characters in the sig?

twikoff 12-13-04 09:13 PM

code (for links, color, bold, etc) all count

so if you use [b]twikoff rocks[b] (with a / in the 2nd one)
that would count as 20 (not 13) characters

bigsoos 12-14-04 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by 68ShelbyGT500KR
I have had countless times that FireFox 1.0 (not pr) has been crashing since the upgrade. I have NOT had any extensions installed since the upgrade to V3. Anybody else have FF 1.0 crash since the upgrade. It NEVER happened previously.

I'd hate to resort to using IE just for this site.

XP Pro SP2

I've had DVDTalk crash my FireFox 1.0 as well too.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:38 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.