Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Star Wars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-19 | 03:13 PM
  #4426  
Banned by request
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 17,800
Received 779 Likes on 583 Posts
From: Goodbye and Good Luck
Re: Star Wars

Please keep in mind they did NOT have the sound technology to have "nooooooooo" added in back in the 70's. My how technology has helped things.
Old 11-13-19 | 03:18 PM
  #4427  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,585
Received 412 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Star Wars

The problem is that the technology DOES exist now to make that scene much smoother looking (even if they want them to shoot simultaneously). But every new edit makes it look like a Jr. High fan edit.
Old 11-14-19 | 03:04 PM
  #4428  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,452
Received 1,379 Likes on 763 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: Star Wars

Apparently all digital releases (iTunes, VUDU, etc) are being changed to the Disney+ versions. Digital users are being mclunkied!
Old 11-14-19 | 10:46 PM
  #4429  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
Re: Star Wars

Yet another reminder of why it’s better to own a movie on physical media.
Old 11-15-19 | 02:00 AM
  #4430  
Former Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,045
Received 44 Likes on 30 Posts
Re: Star Wars

So I'm just wondering, is Disney still legally obligated to honor the changes Lucas made to the Original Trilogy? If not, why don't they just release the original versions?

You have casual fans that don't mind/notice the changes, and hardcore fans who loathe the changes. But the number who like the changes have to be few and far between.

I'm just wondering why they would be introducing even newer changes after Lucas is out of the picture, when it's been made clear that fans are, at best, ambivalent to them.
6.3.6
Old 11-15-19 | 07:07 AM
  #4431  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,056
Received 814 Likes on 570 Posts
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by atrium
So I'm just wondering, is Disney still legally obligated to honor the changes Lucas made to the Original Trilogy? If not, why don't they just release the original versions?
Nobody knows for sure, but I highly doubt there's any sort of legal obligation to honor Lucas's changes. it's all political/economic. Disney/Lucasfilm still want to keep George Lucas as happy as possible, since some fans still revere him. They want him to show up at Celebration each year and not be constantly griping about Disney ruining his company and his movies.

Also, while the bulk of people likely wouldn't mind reverting back to the originals, they also don't mind the changes. Another issue is that not all the changes were bad, since the bulk were fixes to slightly wonky FX. Reverting back might "age" the films a bit much for casual viewers. Some fan edits try and split the difference by keeping the improved FX but removing the more "editorial" changes, but I don't think Lucasfilm is going to make that level of creative decision on the films.

Originally Posted by atrium
I'm just wondering why they would be introducing even newer changes after Lucas is out of the picture, when it's been made clear that fans are, at best, ambivalent to them.
These changes were made before Lucas sold to Disney. They were made way back in 2012 or so, when Lucasfilm was prepping for 3D versions of all the movies, and they did new 4K scans of the originals, based off the 97SE altered negative. Disney wanted to put 4K versions up on Disney+, and this was the version they had on hand. Also, this is the first new "home release" since the 2011 Blu-ray Complete Saga set. All the subsequent Blu-ray releases have just been re-using the same disc masters.




Personally, I still hold out hope that we'll see the original unaltered versions in a newer transfer as a bonus feature on some future release, but they'll never be the "official" versions again.

At least the Maclunkey meme is producing some gems.
Old 11-15-19 | 04:58 PM
  #4432  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,942
Received 1,637 Likes on 1,190 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Re: Star Wars

Interesting about that time line of scanning. If they really did scan the original film elements, then maybe they could reassemble the original versions. I think we'll see them, and as an official release. It's too much money on the table, they can make George feel better by making a donation to some charity he likes but Disney would be foolish to leave those off the shelves.


As for the Greedo thing, I need to listen on a full speaker set up, but is it possible it's originally recorded dialog that's been left out of previous versions but is just being restored, like C-3PO's line about cutting power to the tractor beams?
Old 11-15-19 | 08:28 PM
  #4433  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,452
Received 1,379 Likes on 763 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: Star Wars

https://www.empireonline.com/movies/...ive-interview/

Interview with the Greedo actor about "Maclunkey" that is pretty funny.
Old 11-18-19 | 01:14 PM
  #4434  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,955
Received 347 Likes on 240 Posts
From: Boston
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by milo bloom
Interesting about that time line of scanning. If they really did scan the original film elements, then maybe they could reassemble the original versions. I think we'll see them, and as an official release. It's too much money on the table, they can make George feel better by making a donation to some charity he likes but Disney would be foolish to leave those off the shelves.
George Lucas had the OCNs for all three films re-conformed to the Special Edition versions in 1997. Any scan of the OCN done after that would be of the '97 SE. Later changes (such as the somewhat-improved Jabba, the blinking Ewoks, and Hayden Christensen in RotJ, etc.) were made digitally to the video masters. The film elements are locked to the '97 versions.

The original footage that Lucas spliced out was presumably saved in the Lucasfilm archive, but it would only exist as trims. Each of those fragments would have to be scanned and then edited into the digital master. Not impossible by any means, but it is more effort than the powers-that-be at Lucasfilm want to expend on these movies.
Old 11-19-19 | 09:57 AM
  #4435  
rocket1312's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,141
Likes: 0
Received 1,805 Likes on 1,229 Posts
Re: Star Wars

Lucasfilm presumably has Mike Verta's Star Wars Legacy project in hand, so at the very least they could throw that into a box set. Given what we know about that restoration, I would assume most would be happy with it even if it didn't originate from the original negatives. Hopefully Verta's radio silence since presenting it to them last year means even bigger things are afoot.
Old 11-20-19 | 05:57 AM
  #4436  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,585
Received 412 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Josh Z
The original footage that Lucas spliced out was presumably saved in the Lucasfilm archive, but it would only exist as trims. Each of those fragments would have to be scanned and then edited into the digital master. Not impossible by any means, but it is more effort than the powers-that-be at Lucasfilm want to expend on these movies.
Didn't the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts & Sciences show a 70MM print this past summer that people claimed was a 1981 pre-Special Edition version? Meaning it had "A New Hope" in the title crawl, but virtually everything else was unchanged from the 77 version? Or has that been debunked?
Old 11-20-19 | 06:59 AM
  #4437  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,056
Received 814 Likes on 570 Posts
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
Didn't the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts & Sciences show a 70MM print this past summer that people claimed was a 1981 pre-Special Edition version? Meaning it had "A New Hope" in the title crawl, but virtually everything else was unchanged from the 77 version? Or has that been debunked?
I didn't know about that. From what I can find, it was a 1981 version of the film. A tweet from an attendee says George Lucas gave "special permission" for the screening. However, I think there's a number of factors here. For one, it's a 70mm print, and I don't think Lucasfilm bothered to make 70mm prints of the SE ever. Also, the Academy apparently owns the print, so they had it on hand.
https://www.oscars.org/events/star-wars-and-rogue-one
The Academy hosted a rare and exclusive viewing of Star Wars (1977) and Rogue One (2016), featuring a 70mm Academy print of the original film. These two movies are intrinsically connected, as Rogue One tells the story of how Princess Leia received the Death Star plans that allowed the Rebel Alliance to destroy the Death Star in Star Wars.


https://www.inverse.com/article/5791...ease-unaltered
https://comicbook.com/starwars/2019/...are-lucasfilm/

However, it's known that there are prints that exist, but prints aren't the best source for a film scan. They're several generations removed from the negative, and every generation adds another level of film grain, since it's basically the film grain of the negative being copied onto an interpostive with it's own film grain, then an internegative with its own film grain, then finally a print with its own film grain.

Mike Verta, creator of the "Legacy" Star Wars restoration effort, released this video about trying to reduce/remove the additional film grain in a print:

So, whenever possible, go back to the original source. So scanning the negative trims and digitally reassembing the original unaltered version would likely be a much better result than scanning a print would ever be capable of, even a 70mm one.

Old 11-20-19 | 05:02 PM
  #4438  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,942
Received 1,637 Likes on 1,190 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Re: Star Wars

I don't know much about this Legacy project, but this isn't like an old, lost silent film discovered in an insane asylum, this is a major blockbuster piece of culture that will have multiple sources. We also know there are multiple prints in the hands of collectors that can be used for reference if needed. If Disney gave the go ahead on doing the originals, it would not be a challenge to do technically. It's just the politics holding it back, and I don't think George is holding on that hard. I get the feeling sometimes he wishes he could completely walk away.
Old 11-20-19 | 06:10 PM
  #4439  
OldBoy's Avatar
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 53,886
Received 1,678 Likes on 1,384 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by stvn1974
Apparently all digital releases (iTunes, VUDU, etc) are being changed to the Disney+ versions. Digital users are being mclunkied!
wait, what does this mean? i have the Vudu versions of all...
Old 11-20-19 | 06:23 PM
  #4440  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,452
Received 1,379 Likes on 763 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: Star Wars

Originally Posted by OldBoy
wait, what does this mean? i have the Vudu versions of all...
Check the Greedo/Han scene, the maclunky line should be added now.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.