![]() |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Whoo hoo, lots of Marvel goodness
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
I would assume that Spider-Man 3 will be a PS6 release then?
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by PerryD
(Post 14364801)
I would assume that Spider-Man 3 will be a PS6 release then?
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
It's a drag to see Ratchet and Clank so far out, but I'll take what I can get! Very intrigued by a full-fledged X-Men game, if it happens. When you're talking about a game seven years out, anything can happen.
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Doesn't surprise me that the Venom game in 2025 is so close to the rest. Like Miles Morales, it'll be a smaller game, probably using the same mechanics, maps, game play, etc. as Spider-Man 2.
Spider-Man (Q3 2018) : SM: Miles Morales (Q4 2020) :: Spider-Man 2 (Q4 2023) : SM: Venom (Q? 2025) Either way, if it's engaging, I'll take it. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 14364751)
Full list of Insomniac games coming over the next 8 years has leaked. New R&C is pretty far away, but there’s a whole lot of Marvel to fill that time. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by Music
(Post 14365046)
Apparently the leak is from them/Sony being hacked... :(
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Yeah, I just heard about this hack myself. Really sucks.
Unsurprisingly, IGN only focuses on the games leaked. I think equal time should have been spent on the breach of privacy of the employees. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
I like this video better, because they acknowledge from the start that this situation is more than just about leaked games info.
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Ugh, Venom was the least interesting thing about Spider-man 2. I'd rather have a SpiderGwen spinoff. I'd also rather see Ratchet sooner.
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 14365551)
Ugh, Venom was the least interesting thing about Spider-man 2. I'd rather have a SpiderGwen spinoff. I'd also rather see Ratchet sooner.
Though others are saying it sold 2.7M copies and made a profit. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14365568)
PS5 is winning the console wars by a landslide
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 14365564)
Me too, but one bit of information in the leak was that Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart was a huge disappointment financially, only sold 2.2 million copies and lost a lot of money. :sad:
https://twitter.com/GamingBoltTweet/...744187848?s=19 Though others are saying it sold 2.7M copies and made a profit. https://twitter.com/HazzadorGamin/st...341256745?s=19 |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by Music
(Post 14365636)
-ohbfrank-
Sorry. Just saw the article yesterday on several publications :shrug: I guess they made it a bigger deal than it really is. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
That's not it. The PS5 has certainly outsold the XSX, but most feel that "console wars" is a silly and outdated term. There should be room for both PS5s and XSXs in gaming.
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 14365727)
That's not it. The PS5 has certainly outsold the XSX, but most feel that "console wars" is a silly and outdated term. There should be room for both PS5s and XSXs in gaming.
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Point taken. Post deleted. :shrug: I honestly had no idea that’s a topic that no one here cares about it.
Apologies about the dumb and outdated term. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Anecdotally, I think that the information on sales and numbers of consoles are good to see as a general comparison, but to the right people they are meaningful and give direction to trends... and yeah, we are such a small insignificant slice of gamers, we'll never agree but to disagree.
If numbers really mattered, the Power-washing Game would have been replaced with a Scrub Daddy® game a long time ago. ;) |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14357796)
If you purchased any video content from Discovery through the PS store, it will be removed on December 31. Licenses expired.
https://x.com/lowrezhd/status/173099...ROaaX6I5S_8l2Q
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 14357822)
That seems ass-backwards. In the past, even when licenses expired, people who bought digital titles were at least entitled to have it, even if no new users could buy it.
The only time I recall titles being pulled from peoples digital libraries was when those titles were illegally sold by a company that never had the right to sell them in the first place, and even then, the customers got full refunds. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
:banana: Whew!! Armageddon averted. All those PS5 purchasers of Dr. Pimple Popper and My 600 Ib life can breathe a sigh of relief.
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
To be fair, the new deal is for 30 months. After that, the purchases will still be seemingly gone.
|
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 14365846)
To be fair, the new deal is for 30 months. After that, the purchases will still be seemingly gone.
;) I could care less about Discovery content on the PS ecosystem. All that shit can be watched on Max. But, it sucks for anyone who invested good money in it. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14365950)
:banana: Armageddon averted......temporarily. :sad:
;) I could care less about Discovery content on the PS ecosystem. All that shit can be watched on Max. But, it sucks for anyone who invested good money in it. I mean, ultimately, this whole thing affects a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of people. I just can't imagine there's a huge number of people who bought digital video content on the PlayStation store no less, and specifically Discovery TV content at that. That's probably why it's being delisted to begin with... nobody's buying it, and sadly, delisting stuff is not uncommon. But going so far as taking delisted shows away from people who did pay for it is what's far, far less common in these digital landscapes. Every other case I've seen regarding delisted titles, those people who did pay for it could still access it. The only exceptions are the rare cases where content was delisted due to copyright infringement on behalf of the company/person who uploaded it to the service to begin with. In those cases, people were refunded by the platform (ie: Amazon), because they didn't know they bought something that was sold illegally. Ultimately, IMHO, if Warner/Discovery doesn't want people to watch the titles they purchased on the PlayStation store, then those people should be refunded. |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
The PS5 I ordered from Amazon back in 12/2 finally shipped yesterday. Of course, despite the fact that all the other Amazon deliveries I've received from Amazon lately (including a bottle of mouthwash that arrived tonight) have been through UPS, they chose to ship the PlayStation 5 through USPS. :brickwl2:
USPS claims it'll be delivered on the 26th, but from past experience, it'll likely arrive at my local post office a few days before that and they'll just sit on it for a few days longer. :( |
Re: PlayStation 5 - 11/12/20
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 14365964)
I agree.
I mean, ultimately, this whole thing affects a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of people. I just can't imagine there's a huge number of people who bought digital video content on the PlayStation store no less, and specifically Discovery TV content at that. That's probably why it's being delisted to begin with... nobody's buying it, and sadly, delisting stuff is not uncommon. But going so far as taking delisted shows away from people who did pay for it is what's far, far less common in these digital landscapes. Every other case I've seen regarding delisted titles, those people who did pay for it could still access it. The only exceptions are the rare cases where content was delisted due to copyright infringement on behalf of the company/person who uploaded it to the service to begin with. In those cases, people were refunded by the platform (ie: Amazon), because they didn't know they bought something that was sold illegally. Ultimately, IMHO, if Warner/Discovery doesn't want people to watch the titles they purchased on the PlayStation store, then those people should be refunded. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.