![]() |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Word.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Even though I wasn't born in the year this takes place, I'd like to express appreciation for getting the clothing and fashions looking appropriate. A lot of times with 80s period stuff, you have an exaggerated neon overload or extreme hair on everyone (but to be fair, that's mainly in a comedy setting/flashback). But this show, with Barb looking like a 50 year old librarian, that fits right in. Plus, since it's a small town, not everyone is up on the "latest" shit.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Just started this... Chapter 3 was amazing.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 12869558)
Arrested S4 would have been stronger...
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Troy Stiffler
(Post 12874130)
Arrested Development S4 is a masterpiece. Watch it again and again until you can take it all in.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
One of the few things that they screwed up in terms of the time period was Nancy talking about picking out a "top". In 1983 she would have said "blouse".
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
would one be considered a wuss if they may have shed a tear in the last episode?
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Nope. I just started a rewatch (episodes 1-3 tonight) and when they pull "Will's body" from the quarry and Mike goes home and his mother hugs him while he cries...
well, my vision got a little blurry at that point. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Wife and I watched the entire series over the weekend and loved it. Boy they really nailed it. I was in their age bracket at the time the movie was set so I can relate to all of it. The day long adventures of just hopping on your bike and doing whatever, and it was all ok as long as you made it back in time for dinner! Really took me back.
I'm not sure how I feel about a second season though. I like the threads left at the end, but not sure how well that would translate without feeling like a rehash of season 1 (where you would assume more upside down world, searching for Elle, govt/ bad guys). Maybe they can go the Fargo route with different stories, but then tie it all back to the event that caused the rift to the upside down. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
I just watched this. It was a bit more horror/suspense than I was anticipating. The 80s movie / book references are constant but the story and acting are both solid enough to make it more than just a nostalgia piece. I particularly liked the reference to "Tourist Trap", one of my favorite cheap-but-nasty late 70s horror flicks. My 15 year old daughter really liked the despite all of the references going over her head.
One minor note, I really like the graphics of the title sequence. Nicely gritty synth track, beautiful red outline logo and "zoom through the episode title to the opening shot". Clean and atmospheric. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
I was 12 in 1983, middle-school aged like the kids, and the entire setting rang completely true to me. They absolutely nailed it. The tone was perfect.
Preppy-hot girls were a huge thing back then. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
They should have used an X-Wing instead of the Millennium Falcon.:)
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 12874142)
One of the few things that they screwed up in terms of the time period was Nancy talking about picking out a "top". In 1983 she would have said "blouse".
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
not sure if this was posted, interview with the creators:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/14/ar...view.html?_r=0 On paper, the plot of the series “Stranger Things,” a runaway summer hit from Netflix, reads like a Dungeons & Dragons campaign. And an early scene takes place in a suburban Indiana basement in 1983, with four adolescent boys debating the best way to defeat a mythical Demogorgon. When a version of that creature enters their world, the show unfolds into an interdimensional tribute to classic ’80s fantasy, sci-fi and horror, with nods to “Alien”; “E.T.: The Extraterrestrial”; “A Nightmare on Elm Street”; and Stephen King’s 1986 novel, “It.” Since its release in July, the series has attracted a wave of internet attention, with detailed examinations of its cinematic and cultural references — including a deep dive into the characters’ corduroy wardrobes. [Did you watch “Stranger Things”? Let’s talk about it.] The show’s creators, Matt and Ross Duffer, are twins who grew up in the suburbs of Durham, N.C. Their 2015 film debut, “Hidden,” was a thriller starring Alexander Skarsgard with a twist similar to those of one of their heroes, M. Night Shyamalan. The script attracted Mr. Shyamalan’s attention, and the brothers were hired to consult and write for the first season of the Fox series “Wayward Pines,” for which Mr. Shyamalan was an executive producer. In a recent phone interview, the Duffers, 32, explained the genesis and influences of “Stranger Things.” These are edited excerpts from the conversation. What was your pitch for this show? MATT There were a lot of things going against it. We just weren’t established. And we were very intent on showrunning it and directing. And we were told you cannot put kids in the lead roles of a show that’s not intended for a kid audience. Photo Ross Duffer, left, and his twin brother, Matt, the creators of “Stranger Things.” Credit James Minchin/Netflix We wrote one script for it, the pilot, which is very close to the first episode as it exists now. And then we made a 20-page pitch book, where we took an old Stephen King book cover, and we had a lot of imagery from a lot of the movies that we’re referencing. The first week, I think, we had 15 pitches, and it was all passes. There was a moment where we’re like, “Oh, I think people aren’t getting it.” And then the next week, offers started to come in, and luckily Netflix understood it right away. ROSS There was a lot of that question of, “Why can’t it just be this sheriff going around investigating paranormal activities in a ‘Twin Peaks’ town?” We just weren’t interested in that. What we didn’t realize is that Netflix — they never said this, but just looking at it — they’re sort of moving into Phase 2, in which Phase 1 is, they’ve got the David Finchers and the Jenji Kohans, very successful people with proven track records. And they had so much success with that, with things like “House of Cards” and “Orange Is the New Black,” that they’re able to roll the dice on some younger voices. And you knew you wanted this to be a TV series — this was not a film idea? MATT I think we initially talked about it as a film, but we thought it would be better as a series. The cool thing about TV is you have a lot more time. [But] you’re not stuck now with 22 episodes. It’s almost impossible to tell a cinematic story when you have that many episodes. Sign Up for the Watching Newsletter Watching Newsletter Get recommendations on the best TV shows and films to stream and watch, delivered to your inbox. ROSS This is almost really the first time that I can think of in history that people are able to come up with a story, and they’re able to go, how long should this be? Should this be six hours? Should this be seven hours? Should this be 11 hours? And Netflix is very good at not dictating how many episodes it should be. MATT If you’re doing a movie, the minute you put a monster in it, it becomes a horror movie. And if it’s a horror movie nowadays, it’s basically a haunted house ride. You’re trying to get jump scares every six, seven minutes. You just don’t have the time to spend with characters. We love monsters, but if it was a movie, it would be all about the monster. But a place like Netflix, they actually care a lot more about the characters. So we’re able to tell these very character-driven stories and also appease our childlike sensibilities by putting a flesh-eating monster in it. If you’re given a second season, would you pick up immediately where it left off, or would you let time pass? ROSS I think we have to let time pass. Just because the kids — even by the end of the season, their voices were dropping, and we just saw them at the premiere, and they look different. We can’t pick up at Christmastime, where we left off. We’ve been talking a lot about “Harry Potter” just in terms of how they dealt with these kids growing older. Photo Tim Curry in the mini-series “It.” Credit Green/Epstein Productions and Konigsberg/Sanitsky Company How long did it take to cast the kids? MATT We looked at 1,000 kids. Most kids, you can turn off their auditions after five seconds, because there’s nothing authentic about it. The minute we saw Gaten [Matarazzo], who plays Dustin, we basically cast him off the first tape that he sent in. When you see someone like Gaten, and he pops the way he does, you’re just like, “This kid, we’re putting him in the show, 100 percent.” At their ages, they might not know the reference points for the nostalgia in the show — did you give them homework assignments? ROSS We had them all watch “Stand by Me,” and we told them what movies to watch. Finn [Wolfhard], who plays Mike, he’s a movie buff, so he’s seen everything multiple times. But these are kids who are just authentic to begin with. You’re working on a TV schedule — it’s not like we can do 10 takes and try to beat a performance out of them. They just did it, take after take after take, for six months. The ’80s pop culture references in the show have themes in which the idyllic American small town life is destroyed. And there’s the underlying Communist threat in the show, which was an element in certain movies of that time — what is it about this particular era? Photo Robert Englund as Freddy Krueger in “A Nightmare on Elm Street.” Credit New Line Cinema MATT It felt back that then that there was this facade of “Oh, everything is perfect, everything is wonderful.” And a lot of these stories that we love, they’re sort of ripping at that facade. Even Stephen King’s stories, they always talk about that. There’s always the supernatural evil, but the real evil in his stories is always human in nature. ROSS There’s this idea of this Cold War, this looming threat, and everyone’s going about their business with their families and living their lives. When we were kids, the reason we responded to this stuff so much is because we could relate to these characters, these families, the kids. How is it working together? Do you finish each other’s sentences? MATT You have to go through a big process with the Directors Guild in order to get co-direction credit. They sit you in front of this microphone in front of like 40 legendary directors, and they start grilling you. We were very nervous, but we just kept talking and finishing each other’s sentences, and one of the directors said, “I don’t understand how you guys are going to be able do this, because I can’t even understand what you’re saying.” But we started making movies together way back in the third grade with our other friend, who lived next to us in Durham. We’re pretty much dysfunctional apart. Continue reading the main story RELATED COVERAGE ‘Stranger Things’ Is the Show of the Summer. Let’s Talk About It. JULY 29, 2016 Review: With ‘Stranger Things,’ Netflix Delivers an Eerie Nostalgia Fix JULY 14, 2016 FROM OUR ADVERTISERS Were the films you were making in third grade about similar topics? MATT Our first movie was a feature adaptation of [the trading card game] Magic: The Gathering. We were making comedies for a while. As we got more into high school, we started to get into genre, and then we started to make darker, horror stuff. Photo Matt Duffer, left, and his twin brother, Ross, creators of “Stranger Things,” with Winona Ryder on the set. Credit Netflix ROSS It was seventh grade or something like that when we started falling in love with stuff like Sam Raimi and Wes Craven and John Carpenter. Also, our filmmaking skills were getting a little more polished, so we thought we could actually make something that was not funny. That’s when we started making these little short films about people getting possessed by demons. When you were kids, what scared you? MATT We have a particular problem with clowns. I’m still not quite over it. We saw the “It” mini-series, which is — I don’t want to knock it — it’s not very good. I had read the book, I think we were in fourth grade or third grade, so, too young. ROSS We’re 10 or something, and we’re watching “Evil Dead,” which you don’t really see the humor in when you’re 10 years old. It was just terrifying. And same with “A Nightmare on Elm Street,” which is such a brilliant movie and such a brilliant concept. MATT Freddy Krueger scared us. “Hellraiser” really messed us up. ROSS But what we were trying to do with “Stranger Things” is, it’s again, very ordinary, like “Nightmare on Elm Street” is very ordinary: teens, people that you understand and can relate to, and then this evil that you can’t even fully explain. And that’s what’s great about Freddy Krueger, and that’s also what’s great about Clive Barker’s stuff — there’s an inherent logic to that, but also it’s just weird. When you put that unexplainable evil with this very ordinary American life, to us, that was the scariest, because suddenly I’m going to bed, and I’m thinking, “Is Freddy going to push through the ceiling and grab me?” MATT Now that I’m thinking about it, both “It” and “Hellraiser” are also about interdimensional beings. Maybe we’re just terrified of interdimensional beings, particularly if they can turn themselves into clowns. What scares you now? MATT Big parties and interviews like this are scarier to me now than clowns. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 12874628)
I was 12 in 1983, middle-school aged like the kids, and the entire setting rang completely true to me. They absolutely nailed it.
Everything inside middle class houses was awful back then: nasty dark wood laminate "paneling", loudly patterned fuzzy/scratchy upholstery, shitty wall-to-wall carpeting, cheap/brittle plastic plumbing fittings and wall switches etc. They really nailed the suburban 80s, every detail is correct. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Just finished this a few minutes ago -- probably one of the best seasons of TV I've seen in a long, long while. My wife was on the edge of her seat and literally cheered a few times in the final 3 episodes. Pretty fantastic all around. :thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
As someone without Netflix, it's getting tiring hearing everyone talking about this show. Is there gonna be a blu-ray release soon?
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by windom
(Post 12877011)
As someone without Netflix, it's getting tiring hearing everyone talking about this show. Is there gonna be a blu-ray release soon?
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by windom
(Post 12877011)
As someone without Netflix, it's getting tiring hearing everyone talking about this show. Is there gonna be a blu-ray release soon?
Also, some Netflix shows have gotten only DVD releases, although I think Stranger Things has a decent chance for a Blu-ray release. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by windom
(Post 12877011)
As someone without Netflix, it's getting tiring hearing everyone talking about this show. Is there gonna be a blu-ray release soon?
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
I agree it won't be for a while but they'd be stupid to not to release this on Blu-ray. In time for the holidays would be smart but probably won't happen.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
(Post 12877571)
I agree it won't be for a while but they'd be stupid to not to release this on Blu-ray. In time for the holidays would be smart but probably won't happen.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Deftones
(Post 12877513)
Get a free trial and blast through it. It is only 8 episodes.
Netflix has a handful of shows that makes it well worth it. If you really are on a budget, fit in Lady Dynamite. And Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. And Wet Hot American Summer. And With Bob and David. Try BoJack Horseman. And I'm sure I'm forgetting some. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
I think windom's issue from what I've seen of his postings is that he doesn't want to spend $10/month on content he won't watch right away. I recall him mentioning that he's so backed up on content DVR-wise and has tons more stored on a hard drive (hundreds of hours). I guess he wants a BD of the show to watch "some day" when he's not backed up.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Troy Stiffler
(Post 12877606)
Or just keep it. I have the subscription where 3 or 5 users can watch at a time, and it's only $12/mo.
Netflix has a handful of shows that makes it well worth it. If you really are on a budget, fit in Lady Dynamite. And Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt. And Wet Hot American Summer. And With Bob and David. Try BoJack Horseman. And I'm sure I'm forgetting some. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ted_by_Netflix I liked Sense8, and House of Cards, and Jessica Jones, and the first season of Daredevil (second season was uneven).
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 12877610)
I think windom's issue from what I've seen of his postings is that he doesn't want to spend $10/month on content he won't watch right away. I recall him mentioning that he's so backed up on content DVR-wise and has tons more stored on a hard drive (hundreds of hours). I guess he wants a BD of the show to watch "some day" when he's not backed up.
That said, if he truly doesn't want to sign up for a trial or a month of service, by the time he clears through some of his backlog, a BD release of this show may be pending. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.