![]() |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Raul3
(Post 12864915)
So the show is good, and anyone, any age, can like it.
Can someone that didn't live, remembers, the 80's love the show? I mean they won't get all the references, they won't the nostalgia, etc. She grew up in China and was born in 1983. Most of the references I know she didn't get, but she probably enjoyed watching on her own without me trying to pause and explain things and show off my vast trivial pop culture knowledge that she doesn't give a shit about anyway! :lol: |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by SterlingBen
(Post 12864928)
Yep, the show is good, and anyone, any age, can like it.
It's a bit like asking if people from now can like a period piece, or a film/show actually made in a different era. People still like the movies that inspired this show, like E.T., Close Encounters of the Third Kind, The Thing, Evil Dead, The Goonies, Nightmare on Elm Street, etc. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
I finished the show up tonight and really enjoyed it. I tend to generally not like child actors, but this group wasn't all that cloying or hammy. They seemed liked real kids, so good job there. The finale had a nice use of a Moby song I hadn't heard in ages.
Part of me wishes the second season would follow a different group of characters a la True Detective and just let this first season be its own thing. But I'm down for wherever they go next.
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 12863851)
And that's the only example of a song that plays "in universe" that's anachronistic.
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 12863899)
Sometimes this stuff will jump out at you if you're into the bands, or cars, or whatever.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by The Infidel
(Post 12863758)
Yes, I understand it's not a "historical reenactment". But you can't keep a certain time period in mind while watching a movie or show if something shows or plays that doesn't fit with the time period.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Raul3
(Post 12864915)
So the show is good, and anyone, any age, can like it.
Can someone that didn't live, remembers, the 80's love the show? I mean they won't get all the references, they won't the nostalgia, etc. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
This is second only to Fargo as the best TV show Ive seen in the past year. It was fantastic. The only negative for me was Wynonna Rider's "performance".
I took the scene at the end with the sheriff as him giving Eleven something to eat. As now she lives in the upside down. Maybe by choice as she realized she would never find peace in the normal world. Or maybe shes making sure that no more monsters can pass through to the normal world. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 12863911)
It's a bit like being in a certain field like medicine, law, or tech when a film/show utilizes them; the more familiar and knowledgeable about a given field, the more likely you are to notice the inaccuracies.
Sometimes it's honest mistakes, but sometimes its poetic license. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
You know as well as I do that is a newer falcon. Nerd up.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Abob Teff
(Post 12867695)
Damn, I'm a nerd. I can't swear to it, but I thought the Millenium Falcon was a newer (than 1983) version. I'm probably wrong. I hope I'm wrong. :)
Original toy version: http://farm1.staticflickr.com/44/182...b90eea63_z.jpg |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 12867905)
Yep...it wasn't the one released back in the late 70s/early 80s. I have one...it's got red stickers in the back (not blue ones)
Original toy version: http://farm1.staticflickr.com/44/182...b90eea63_z.jpg |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Netflix's newest hit show was rejected at least 15 times by other networks — here's why that's important
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/netfli...135743882.html |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Geddlo
(Post 12867918)
Decals, man. Decals.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by hdtv00
(Post 12867955)
Netflix's newest hit show was rejected at least 15 times by other networks — here's why that's important
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/netfli...135743882.html |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by Eddie W
(Post 12868163)
That's interesting but glad it ended up on Netflix. NF seems to be one of the few outlets for new shows that give complete creative control to the ones who should have it. And don't let the suits decide what they think people will 'get'.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
This was pretty good. Nowhere near Fargo for me, but still up there for Netflix.
Interesting fact - M. Night Shyamalan hired/mentored them on Wayward Pines. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by richc2
(Post 12868428)
i occasionally wish netflix would set some stricter guidelines (ie - sitcom runtimes) but otherwise yeah, they give almost completely creative control to the team producing it.
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
I really hope this comes back...
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by hdtv00
(Post 12867955)
Netflix's newest hit show was rejected at least 15 times by other networks — here's why that's important
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/netfli...135743882.html |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Binged it on a flight to France and finished up the last episode at night in my hotel. Enjoyed it immensely, and like others said it was great having kids that weren't annoying and the weak link as far as acting goes. All the kids in this were great.
Spoiler:
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Dustin (food loving kid) was my favorite, he was hilarious and talked some sense to Lucas/Mike when they needed it. Glad this wrap up nicely with a few open things for next season. It is funny that Nancy turned into
Spoiler:
|
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by The Questyen
(Post 12868523)
no.
But to each their own. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 12869558)
Arrested S4 and Schmidt S2 would have been stronger with slightly shorter episodes. Some constraints can be good.
Also, I always loved the deleted scenes from S1-3 on the DVD, and remember feeling that some would've made the episodes better. So strict constraints can also be a bad thing. To me, the time limit on TV episodes on Network TV have far more to do with fitting in commercials and conforming to strict 30 or 60 minute time slots than anything to do with creativity. That certain shows are able to do so well within those constraints is remarkable, but it feels like it's more likely in spite of those constraints rather than because of. If certain Netflix show episodes seem bloated, it's because they're not properly edited, not because they don't fit an arbitrary time limit. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Eh, I don't fully agree or disagree, my issue with AD wasn't the fragmented approach so much as the episodes just dragged on, whereas the original 3 season were rapid fire -- the rhythm seemed altered.
But that said, I'm glad that Netflix basically lets the creative teams do as they please. |
Re: Stranger Things (Netflix) -- Season 1 Thread -- S: Winona Ryder
Originally Posted by RichC2
(Post 12869958)
Eh, I don't fully agree or disagree, my issue with AD wasn't the fragmented approach so much as the episodes just dragged on, whereas the original 3 season were rapid fire -- the rhythm seemed altered.
And even if the editing on individual episodes was too loose, that's not to say that 22 minutes is the ideal length of an AD episode. It could be that the earlier FOX seasons had episodes that were hampered by being so short, and it's a bit presumptuous to think that the ideal length for every episode of every sitcom is an arbitrary length networks came up with to fill time slots and load in commercials. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.