![]() |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 12310781)
Magic Cook needs a better front person to help sell it, which is why I think Daymond invested in it.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Red Dog
(Post 12310878)
So in other words, it's the go-to porn POV camera? ;)
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Neil M.
(Post 12310818)
I don't see the appeal of using the Magic Cook. Once you get beyond the "it's neat" factor, you start to realize how impractical the product really is.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 12310378)
Kinda bummed the Off the Cob guy didn't get an offer. It's a really unique concept and really shone a light on the tortilla market. That was some interesting stuff.
O'Leary was a total douche to the Kitchen Safe guy. I don't see a need for it, but if there is any truth to his testimonials, then there is a real market for such a device. My question, which wasn't discussed, is what happens when the battery dies? What if the battery dies while locked? $50 for a single container though is absurd. And I agree about O'Leary being way to harsh to the safe guys. But they are dreaming if they think that product will sell gangbusters at $50 bucks a pop. 10 bucks maybe but 50? Hell, they said they would be lucky to get the manufacturing cost down to $10. Price is their death knell.
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 12310439)
I was thinking that the entire episode. For the price of investing in one business, he got massive free exposure for GoPro. I liked the song-and-dance over QVC versus HSN. If this show really wanted to pit sharks, get a HSN person to go up against Lori.
I've never minded Mr. Wonderful's blunt talk, but this season feels like he's just being mean for the sake of it. I LOVE the idea of having an HSN person square off on the show. Awesome idea. And I totally agree with you last comment. Seems if you catch O'Leary or Cuban on a bad day, they just become ranting assholes. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
I imagine they are encouraged to go on the occasional rant by Shark Tank's producers. There are entire categories of products that Cuban seems to hate with a passion.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
With the Kitchen Safe and the 'no override' statement, all I could keep picturing is a sitcom-like scene where a toddler puts his dad's wallet or phone in the safe (or maybe tickets to some pricey event) and sets it for 2 days just screwing around pressing buttons.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
rotfl at that wine valuation. And $2.99 per serving. :lol: Has to be $1/serving or less like a case of beer.
Kevin was completely right about Costco. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Kevin only does that deal if he already has a connection with Costco's buyers. He's going to make a killing if Costco carries it.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Red Dog
(Post 12325514)
rotfl at that wine valuation. And $2.99 per serving. :lol: Has to be $1/serving or less like a case of beer.
Kevin was completely right about Costco. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
I didn't think $3 was terrible either. You can get a 12 pack of soda for $3-$5 but 20oz bottles sell for $1.50-$2 just fine.
Also $3 allows you to try different wines on the cheap vs. buying a bottle and hating it. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by chowderhead
(Post 12325787)
I really don't agree. Individual energy drinks, coffee drinks, etc in a bottle all cost more than $1.50. I think $3 is about right.
You can't compare it to coffee or energy drinks. Compare it to beer. And you're buying that by the case - like beer. I guess there are some brown baggers (whinos are buying Mad Dog, like Cuban alluded to) but I don't see them buying these. It's a perfect Costco product. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 12325741)
Kevin only does that deal if he already has a connection with Costco's buyers. He's going to make a killing if Costco carries it.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Mark got a good deal with the female sports apparel. Once he gets an NBA license and can sell Mavs female oriented clothes at Mavs home games and the gift shop, he's going to make a killing on them. And that's in addition to the college licensed clothes and more schools that could be added. His Mavs gift shop can also sell Texas oriented schools as well like Baylor, UT-Austin etc.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 12326178)
Mark got a good deal with the female sports apparel. Once he gets an NBA license and can sell Mavs female oriented clothes at Mavs home games and the gift shop, he's going to make a killing on them. And that's in addition to the college licensed clothes and more schools that could be added. His Mavs gift shop can also sell Texas oriented schools as well like Baylor, UT-Austin etc.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Cuban was definitely the right partner for the athletic wear, although the wise-ass in me really wishes that when they heard his contingency, one of them had the presence of mind to say something like "Mark, I can't make you Mavs clothes if we don't have the license. Do you have any contacts in that organization?"
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 12310378)
O'Leary was a total douche to the Kitchen Safe guy. I don't see a need for it, but if there is any truth to his testimonials, then there is a real market for such a device. My question, which wasn't discussed, is what happens when the battery dies? What if the battery dies while locked? $50 for a single container though is absurd.
Originally Posted by Spiderbite
(Post 12311648)
And I agree about O'Leary being way to harsh to the safe guys. But they are dreaming if they think that product will sell gangbusters at $50 bucks a pop. 10 bucks maybe but 50? Hell, they said they would be lucky to get the manufacturing cost down to $10. Price is their death knell.
They need to big time marketing shift though that shows off how multi purpose the thing can be. They also need to get that price down about 50%, something I'm sure the Sharks will be able to help with. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Red Dog
(Post 12325892)
I think it's stupid. Why buy that at a 7-11 when you can buy a bottle at 9.99.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Exactly.
What I can't get over ... is how appealing a disposable wine cup will be to the consumer. Maybe I'm too up my own ass about how wine should be enjoyed. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
(Post 12310378)
O'Leary was a total douche to the Kitchen Safe guy. I don't see a need for it, but if there is any truth to his testimonials, then there is a real market for such a device. My question, which wasn't discussed, is what happens when the battery dies? What if the battery dies while locked? $50 for a single container though is absurd.
Last year, I went on a business trip to Mexico. There was a safe in the closet, and the front had a key pad. The thing was powered by 4 AA batteries. I had to use it to lock up some personal items (tablet, passport, etc.). Well, after a single day, the battery in the safe died. In this particular case, the lock dis-engaged before the battery was fully drained, and instead of allowing any key presses on the pad, it just displayed "BATTLOW." Point is... I'm sure the Kitchen Safe works exactly the same way. Also $3 allows you to try different wines on the cheap vs. buying a bottle and hating it. |
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Just started watching this season buy the sharks alluded to a different guy selling single serve wine before. The new guy had a proprietary lid that made it unique as well as a fancy label and super durable plastic.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Ah okay. Sounds like the new guy managed to work around the other guy's patent (from what I recall, it seemed like the original guy was the only one who could do it at the time), so of course the sharks would jump on a competing product. :) They REALLY hated the original guy. He came back a second time, pretty much just to gloat.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
He didn't work around it. He went to the actual patent holder, someone in France, and basically learned the original guy was just licensing it from him.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
:lol: That's even better! He daggered that shit!
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 12327852)
For the same reason I put $1.25 in a vending machine to get a soda, when I can get a 2-liter bottle for $2.
|
Re: Shark Tank (ABC) -- Series Thread Part II
The single-serve wine offerings are for public events and business occasions. It's more for the corporate buyer than individuals.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.