![]() |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 9978846)
Why? It's not like Letterman moved at all during this, so you could've been watching him the whole time.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 9978846)
Why? It's not like Letterman moved at all during this, so you could've been watching him the whole time.
Like I've said before, I don't really watch late night, but when I do I watch Leno. And given the history of the tonight show, I don't want someone like Conan on there ;)
Originally Posted by dx23
(Post 9979039)
I'm pretty sure Luds is just another persona for wm lopez.;)
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
"someone like Conan"? A smart, funny, intelligent, guy who does a show that isn't just an excuse for people to come on and shill their awful movies every night while doing lowest common denominator hacky, boring material that hasn't been funny in years, if ever?
You're totally right. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
I think Jay and his people wanted Kimmel to do the 10 @ 10 and have it be banal to give the appearance that Jay & Jimmy are somehow friends or something. Then people would just dismiss Jimmy's ripping on Jay as him poking fun at a friend.
Instead, Kimmel showed cojones and the gamble on Jay's part blew up in his face. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Luds
(Post 9979157)
I don't really like Letterman anyways ;)
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 9979440)
So why'd you mention him as someone you'd watch?
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Luds
(Post 9980214)
Well I watched him a few times since Conan's his competition and Leno wasn't...
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Conan O'Brien has had 'conversations' with Fox, but network not sure they can make a profit on him
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...an_make_a.html |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Had O'Brien not taken NBC's deal, where would he probably have ended up? ABC and FOX was trying to snag him right? Did Kimmel have his show already, and if so why did ABC want Conan to go with them?
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by brayzie
(Post 9980479)
Had O'Brien not taken NBC's deal, where would he probably have ended up? ABC and FOX was trying to snag him right? Did Kimmel have his show already, and if so why did ABC want Conan to go with them?
Depending on the market, Kimmel was getting beaten by Leno and Conan, Conan head to head, or just the second half of Conan. ABC, if it snagged Conan, would have pushed its affiliates to drop their syndicated reruns, to provide Conan with the 12am slot --and there probably would have been contractual guarantees about what kind of national clearance Conan would get at 12/11c. And if Conan could prove to be a ratings winner, ABC would have dumped Nightline (as they had previously promised to do fro Letterman). ABC could have just dropped Kimmel in favor of Conan. But since Kimmel was already being pushed back in most markets, giving him the post-Conan slot (officially) would probably have been the play. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Match
(Post 9980444)
Conan O'Brien has had 'conversations' with Fox, but network not sure they can make a profit on him
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertain...an_make_a.html |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 9980367)
So you'd rather watch Letterman at 11:30 than Leno at 10:00.
Leno & Letterman at the same time I'll take Leno, but Letterman & Conan, I'll take Letterman. And if both Leno and Letterman were out, I'd just turn the TV off rather than watch Conan. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by wm lopez
(Post 9980658)
FOX needs to look at DVDTALK posts so they can see that Conan will beat Leno head to head.:sarcasm:
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
http://images.dawgsports.com/images/...by_closeup.jpg
"If you ain't first, you're last." Also, Spoiler:
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
According to TV Guide, FOX is considering airing a Conan late night show on its cable channel FX, during the week, and then on FOX broadcast channels on the weekend.
http://www.tvtattle.com/images/conanfxtvguide.jpg |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
That doesn't sound like it'll pay much, but he'll certainly have the free rein to do whatever the fuck he wants.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
I have a sneaking suspicion that Lopez and Luds work for Leno.
I'm sure either or both of them will attack my thought but something is not right here. Either that or they are 70 years old. Yes I said it. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 9983411)
According to TV Guide, FOX is considering airing a Conan late night show on its cable channel FX, during the week, and then on FOX broadcast channels on the weekend.
http://www.tvtattle.com/images/conanfxtvguide.jpg |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
I think a move to cable would be good for Conan, but that's still pretty fucked up.. I wonder what his ratings would be like.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Could be a temp move until Letterman retires and then we can get our Conan-Jay cage match in 2012.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by Darknite39
(Post 9983816)
Could be a temp move until Letterman retires and then we can get our Conan-Jay cage match in 2012.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Stewart's said that the only reason they do interviews with "stars" on the Daily Show for filler. I don't think he cares about that sort of thing at all, but I could be wrong.
|
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
As if I didn't pollute this thread enough, I feel the need to say that I was the adamant (only) supporter of Joel McHale getting the NBC Late Show.
Jimmy has no business being on Late Night. |
Re: NBC: let's see how low we can go (Conan thread, part 2)
Originally Posted by mcfly
(Post 9983810)
I think a move to cable would be good for Conan, but that's still pretty fucked up.. I wonder what his ratings would be like.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.