Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

LOST -- "Meet Kevin Johnson" -- 03.20.2008

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

LOST -- "Meet Kevin Johnson" -- 03.20.2008

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-08 | 11:21 PM
  #301  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,842
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
From: Farmington Hills, MI
I understand that it's "natural" for Sun to visit Jin's grave. It's "natural" to do a lot of things. It's "natural" to sleep, go to the bathroom, etc., but fortunately we don't watch them do those things on the show. There's a reason why they showed us Sun and Hurley's visit to Jin's grave. There is obviously some significant story behind what Jin is up to. Until that story is revealed, I believe it's entirely possible that Jin is one of the Oceanic 6.

For example, let's say that Jin is one of the Oceanic 6. We know that Ben keeps tabs on people, and that Sayid is working for him to help/save his friends. So, it's likely that Ben is keeping tabs on the entire Oceanic 6 group. So, they fake Jin's death so that Jin can accomplish some task unwatched. Sun and Hurley visit Jin's grave in order to keep up appearances of Jin's death.
This makes absolutely no sense. They wouldn't need to fake a death when everyone already thinks they're dead from the plane crash. Ben could just send Jin off to do whatever Ben wants him to do, just like he did with Michael. Why would Ben take a chance putting Jin in the spotlight if that is his motive?

I truly believe that the only reason they showed Hurley and Sun go to Jin's grave is because he is dead and he was probably killed on the island. It was a shocking twist to that episode. If you want to read more into that, you can. But I think it's more fan-fiction than anything else.
Old 03-22-08 | 11:30 PM
  #302  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
He is not. best just to ignore it.
That's extremely rude of you. There are tons of theories about LOST so why tell people to ignore this one from me? I've actually been more right than wrong on a lot of my guesses.
Old 03-23-08 | 01:50 AM
  #303  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, Ca., USA
Originally Posted by Neil M.
This makes absolutely no sense. They wouldn't need to fake a death when everyone already thinks they're dead from the plane crash. Ben could just send Jin off to do whatever Ben wants him to do, just like he did with Michael. Why would Ben take a chance putting Jin in the spotlight if that is his motive?

I truly believe that the only reason they showed Hurley and Sun go to Jin's grave is because he is dead and he was probably killed on the island. It was a shocking twist to that episode. If you want to read more into that, you can. But I think it's more fan-fiction than anything else.
It doesn't make any sense because you didn't read what I wrote. Show me where I said that Ben was involved in "faking" Jin's death off the island so that Jin can work for Ben. If you're going to try to refute something I said, at least attempt to refute what I actually wrote.

What I said was that it's possible that members of the Oceanic 6 faked Jin's death so that Jin could go off and accomplish some task without being detected by Ben's people. In other words, Ben and his group are keeping a close eye on the Oceanic 6. Jin wants to accomplish something, but can't accomplish it with Ben constantly watching him. So, they fake Jin's death so that Ben stops keeping tabs on him. Then, Hurley and Sun visit Jin's grave in order to keep up the appearance that Jin is dead. In other words, they're not faking Jin's death for the benefit of the world; they're faking it to fool Ben.
Old 03-23-08 | 07:49 AM
  #304  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
Originally Posted by hardercore
According to the closeups of the clipping, do I recall correctly that the man's alias was Jeremy Bentham? I was just reading about a Jeremy Bentham today and parallels could definitely be drawn between what he was famous for - proponing utalitarianism - and Michael's acts on the show. If the New York setting of the suicide and being survived by a teenage son weren't enough to sway you onto the "it's Michael in the casket" bandwagon, here's another possible clue.
There's actually not that much readily apparent from the still of the clipping.



It looks more like Lantham to me and the first name is a J only (that's why people kept thinking Jacob at first)

However, like you, I've been saying it's Michael from the start, as have the majority of people. I think this episode shows that he's where the smart money is on as well (certainly explains the NY connection, having a son that wouldn't come to his funeral, etc.)
Old 03-23-08 | 07:52 AM
  #305  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,842
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
From: Farmington Hills, MI
I read what you wrote. You need to be more clear in your use of "they" if you truly didn't mean Ben. You make it sound exactly as I interpreted it.

And I still think you theory won't hold up. It's becoming more and more clear to the viewer and to the survivors that Ben is not the bad guy. Sure, he's manipulative but he has only done what is best for survival. I think Jack and the rest will ultimately see that. Why they would want to fool Ben when he's only helped them would make no sense. I agree there's more to the story. I'm just not buying that Jin's involved.
Old 03-23-08 | 09:42 AM
  #306  
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay G.
That doesn't make it obviously the freighter people. Think of how these two scenarios play out after she shouts out:

1) The people shooting were the freighter people, so they stop shooting and take her hostage.

2) The people shooting were the Others, so they stop shooting and take her to The Temple.

Either way, her getting up and shouting who she was saves her.

Personally, I'm leaning towards it being the Others, who are guarding their secret hiding place. Ben sent Alex with Danielle and Karl with her knowing that the Others would shoot Danielle and Karl, thus making Alex all his again.
And thats why i stated bens speach before they left,otherwise it could of been the others. They would be no reason for ben to say that to alex,the writers emphasized what ben said with dramatic pause,angles and clarity.
Old 03-23-08 | 11:10 AM
  #307  
calhoun07's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 14,401
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DthRdrX
I would think more people would be throwing sticks at this plotline:
Michael's story
Maybe it wasn't Tom...maybe it was Jacob/the Smoke Monster appearing as Tom to Michael!
Old 03-23-08 | 11:13 AM
  #308  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: On a little blue planet, third from the Sun.
I've just spent a few minutes catching up on this thread and I am literally shaking my head in wonder. There is almost no end to the number of large mysteries associated with Lost that you could be discussing. So on what "mystery" do you waste pages and pages of this thread discussing? On the absolutely trivial question of whether Aaron qualifies as an O6 member. Something that both the show itself and the show creators have confirmed and about which there is absolutely no shadow of doubt. Boggles the mind.
Old 03-23-08 | 11:29 AM
  #309  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Who cares who the six are at this point?

I just wanna see a War with guns blazin', people dying, blood galore and Locke kicking ass.

Last edited by Matthew Ackerly; 03-23-08 at 11:34 AM.
Old 03-23-08 | 12:11 PM
  #310  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, Ca., USA
Originally Posted by Neil M.
I read what you wrote. You need to be more clear in your use of "they" if you truly didn't mean Ben. You make it sound exactly as I interpreted it.

And I still think you theory won't hold up. It's becoming more and more clear to the viewer and to the survivors that Ben is not the bad guy. Sure, he's manipulative but he has only done what is best for survival. I think Jack and the rest will ultimately see that. Why they would want to fool Ben when he's only helped them would make no sense. I agree there's more to the story. I'm just not buying that Jin's involved.
I wrote that Ben keep tabs on people, and then stated that "they" want to accomplish something undetected. Perhaps I could have been a little clearer, but I think it is obvious that I meant that "they" wanted to be undetected by Ben. In which case, it's pretty obvious that the "they" is the Oceanic 6. Anyway, it doesn't matter. You can believe what you want to believe, and I'll believe what I want to believe and, as the show progresses, one of us will be correct. Bottom line, it makes absolutely no difference at this point, because the show can go in any direction the writers chose.

From the beginning my only point has been that there is no way to be 100% certain that Aaron is one of the Oceanic 6, and I've raised some possibilities to support that. The writers could clearly come up with other possibilities. Nothing is ever 100% certain on this show, as the rug has been pulled out from under the viewers numerous times.

Anyway, with that, I'm done disputing this point. We'll just have to watch the show in April and see what happens.
Old 03-23-08 | 01:26 PM
  #311  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by calhoun07
Maybe it wasn't Tom...maybe it was Jacob/the Smoke Monster appearing as Tom to Michael!
So, the smoke monster's gay?!
Old 03-23-08 | 02:38 PM
  #312  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,098
Received 828 Likes on 577 Posts
Originally Posted by theprophe
And thats why i stated bens speach before they left,otherwise it could of been the others. They would be no reason for ben to say that to alex,the writers emphasized what ben said with dramatic pause,angles and clarity.
So? Just because you think the writers wanted you to think that its the freighter people doesn't mean it actually is. Remember, they wanted you to think that Jin was racing to the hospital to see Sun for an entire episode as well. Just because they explicitly spell out one potential scenario doesn't mean that's the one that actually occurred. The second scenario of the shooters being Others plays out the same way and has the added appeal of faking the viewer out.
Old 03-23-08 | 02:42 PM
  #313  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bronx, NY
As far as the whole "Is Jin dead or isn't he?" debate goes I feel like if he's alive than he's working with Ben and Sayid who are targeting Widmore and his people, who may be targeting the O6 upon their return. If Jin was in fact alive and didn't return with his wife, than it was surely to protect her and their newborn son.

I'm thinking he remained on the island and left with Ben undetected.
Old 03-23-08 | 03:10 PM
  #314  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,798
Received 107 Likes on 69 Posts
From: Richmond, TX
Originally Posted by hardercore
According to the closeups of the clipping, do I recall correctly that the man's alias was Jeremy Bentham? I was just reading about a Jeremy Bentham today and parallels could definitely be drawn between what he was famous for - proponing utalitarianism - and Michael's acts on the show. If the New York setting of the suicide and being survived by a teenage son weren't enough to sway you onto the "it's Michael in the casket" bandwagon, here's another possible clue.
Also, I think Jeremy Bentham is the guy whose preserved body is on display at some college and his dead body is wheeled in when they have board meetings at the college.

Freaky.
Old 03-23-08 | 07:11 PM
  #315  
Baron Of Hell's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,272
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Seattle and sometimes hell
Originally Posted by cracksky
I still don't think it's Claire's Aaron. I think it's Kate & Sawyer's Aaron posing as Claire's Aaron to get the settlement. I think Claire & Aaron are back on the island or dead.
Well it is obviously Kate and Sawyer's kid but I don't think he is posing as Claire's Aaron. Kate would would have gotten the settlement no matter what for just being on the plane.
Old 03-23-08 | 07:23 PM
  #316  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,963
Received 31 Likes on 21 Posts
From: St. Louis
Originally Posted by Baron Of Hell
Well it is obviously Kate and Sawyer's kid
what?
Old 03-23-08 | 10:49 PM
  #317  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: OKC, OK
Originally Posted by Baron Of Hell
Well it is obviously Kate and Sawyer's kid but I don't think he is posing as Claire's Aaron. Kate would would have gotten the settlement no matter what for just being on the plane.

double what??

after they get off the island, kate is raising CLAIRE's child Aaron.....
Old 03-24-08 | 01:16 AM
  #318  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
There's actually not that much readily apparent from the still of the clipping.



It looks more like Lantham to me and the first name is a J only (that's why people kept thinking Jacob at first)

However, like you, I've been saying it's Michael from the start, as have the majority of people. I think this episode shows that he's where the smart money is on as well (certainly explains the NY connection, having a son that wouldn't come to his funeral, etc.)
You know what would be funny. If it turns out they got lazy and just cut the clipping out of the newspaper that day.

If Michael is in LA instead of NY I'd assume he is still working for Ben. We do know now why Walt may not want to show up at the wake. I think the only thing working against Michael being the man in the casket is that it would be a shitty thing for the writers to do to Walt, who is almost close to being alone at this point.
Old 03-24-08 | 04:32 AM
  #319  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Baron Of Hell
Well it is obviously Kate and Sawyer's kid but I don't think he is posing as Claire's Aaron. Kate would would have gotten the settlement no matter what for just being on the plane.
Yes, Kate would get the settlement (for herself) but if he [Aaron] was simply their child then no second settlement. These are two exceptional con artists that I wouldn't put it past to name their kid Aaron for a big check from Oceanic.

Although, the money probably goes into a trust fund until the child is eighteen.
Old 03-24-08 | 05:13 AM
  #320  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Southside Virginia
If Aaron is a member of the O6 and if Sun really did have her first child off island, it pretty much has to be the Aaron born on the island.
Old 03-24-08 | 06:35 AM
  #321  
Suspended
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Florida
Christ.

The kid with Kate is Claire's kid, Aaron.

Aaron is one of the Oceanic 6.

Can we please stop "debating" this?
Old 03-24-08 | 06:47 AM
  #322  
chrisih8u's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 18,335
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: A few miles north of the Cape
It can't be Kate and Sawyer's kid. If she got pregnant on the island, Kate would die. Unless....OMG! Sawyer had a baby!
Old 03-24-08 | 06:52 AM
  #323  
whotony's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 24,506
Received 949 Likes on 666 Posts
Originally Posted by lotsofdvds
Christ.

The kid with Kate is Claire's kid, Aaron.

Aaron is one of the Oceanic 6.

Can we please stop "debating" this?
yea really.

it's just becoming an old joke now with all this.
Old 03-24-08 | 07:46 AM
  #324  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,098
Received 828 Likes on 577 Posts
Originally Posted by cracksky
Yes, Kate would get the settlement (for herself) but if he [Aaron] was simply their child then no second settlement. These are two exceptional con artists that I wouldn't put it past to name their kid Aaron for a big check from Oceanic.
Question: If the kid with Kate isn't Claire's child, why the hell is it named Aaron? Nobody off-island knew what Claire named her kid, and it's not like the O6 isn't lying about a whole lot of other things already. If Kate wanted to pass of her kid as Claire's, she could name the baby anything she wants and all she'd have to say is something along the lines of, "this is Jeff, Claire's baby," once off the island.

Also, logistically it doesn't make sense. Claire was nearly full term, while Kate at this point would be at most a few weeks pregnant. Even if they were to stay long enough on the island for the baby to come to term (which would kill Kate first), the baby would be too young to pass as Claire's. Also, we know that they get off the island before Sun gives birth, so Kate would've had to have gotten pregnant before Sun, which isn't likely.

As far as Jin goes, the grave marker lists his date of death as that of the date of the crash, so he's not, and never was, a member of the O6.
http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Ji_Yeo...s_Flashforward

It remains to be seen if he's truly dead or not though.
Old 03-24-08 | 08:45 AM
  #325  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,464
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Originally Posted by lotsofdvds
Christ.

The kid with Kate is Claire's kid, Aaron.

Aaron is one of the Oceanic 6.

Can we please stop "debating" this?
Hey, we have a month until the next episode. We have to bitch back and forth about something.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.