Lost -- "Exposé" -- 03.28.2007
#201
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Berkeley, CA
I think some people are looking for the wrong monster sound. it makes both a clicking/tapping sound as it approaches, and a loud wooshing sound when it attacks. Only the former was in that scene. It was definately there.
#202
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Expose looked more interesting than this ep. Not a thing about Locke & his dad, just two characters I care not a wit about. Two dreadful people buried alive? Yawn...
#203
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by uteotw
Expose looked more interesting than this ep. Not a thing about Locke & his dad, just two characters I care not a wit about. Two dreadful people buried alive? Yawn...
#204
DVD Talk Legend
The sound is there starting exactly at 39:39 on the ABC site episode. It is a very specific cadence, and that exact sound has been heard before.
Now, I'm not here to argue whether the monster did it or whatever. All I'm saying is the sound is there. Why is it there? Who knows...
Now, I'm not here to argue whether the monster did it or whatever. All I'm saying is the sound is there. Why is it there? Who knows...
#205
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Remember the debate over the first episode about whether it was the smoke monster flying around or if it was just unfinished CGI? It makes me tempted to see if last night's episode had anything like that, just to mess with our heads.
#206
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by Seantn
I thought Nikki's dialogue also hinted at some stuff for her character, possibly...
Something like "Of course I have to die, I'm just a guest star...it's what everyone is expecting..."
And the guy says "But you could come back...bullet proof vest"..
Something like "Of course I have to die, I'm just a guest star...it's what everyone is expecting..."
And the guy says "But you could come back...bullet proof vest"..
Yes, I very clearly remember that scene for some reason.
#207
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
The sound is there starting exactly at 39:39 on the ABC site episode. It is a very specific cadence, and that exact sound has been heard before.
Now, I'm not here to argue whether the monster did it or whatever. All I'm saying is the sound is there. Why is it there? Who knows...
Now, I'm not here to argue whether the monster did it or whatever. All I'm saying is the sound is there. Why is it there? Who knows...
#209
Originally Posted by Snowmaker
9 pages and no screen caps from the first 5 minutes? 

#210
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rainy ass Seattle yes the weather sucks here, so do our sports teams.
Originally Posted by Doughboy
So I guess "Pablo and Nina" had no purpose whatsoever on the show. Then again, Lost is good at that lately. Having new characters appear out of thin air just so they can milk them for a few episodes(not to mention flashbacks) and then promptly dispose of them.
Was it an entertaining episode? Yes. Did I enjoy all the cameos by the dead people? Sure. Does Nikki have a great rack? Of course. But ultimately this did nothing but remind me what a disappointment Season 3 is turning out to be.
Was it an entertaining episode? Yes. Did I enjoy all the cameos by the dead people? Sure. Does Nikki have a great rack? Of course. But ultimately this did nothing but remind me what a disappointment Season 3 is turning out to be.
#211
Guest
So, 211 posts and no one mentions the obvious....
3. “Lost” (ABC) 11.24m
down another million viewers and it barely beats a repeat of CSI:NY by 600k viewers.
More and more viewers are being 'turned off' by the lack of story progression. Last nights episode did nothing to move the story forward.
Chris
3. “Lost” (ABC) 11.24m
down another million viewers and it barely beats a repeat of CSI:NY by 600k viewers.
More and more viewers are being 'turned off' by the lack of story progression. Last nights episode did nothing to move the story forward.
Chris
#212
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Actually, I wonder what the ratings were like in past seasons as the season progressed? I know the numbers have never dropped this low, but with both Seasons 1 and 2, I stopped watching and waited for the DVD's, because when I would miss an episode or two, I wouldn't know what was going on and didn't want to be confused.
#213
Originally Posted by mrpayroll
So, 211 posts and no one mentions the obvious....
3. “Lost” (ABC) 11.24m
down another million viewers and it barely beats a repeat of CSI:NY by 600k viewers.
More and more viewers are being 'turned off' by the lack of story progression. Last nights episode did nothing to move the story forward.
Chris
3. “Lost” (ABC) 11.24m
down another million viewers and it barely beats a repeat of CSI:NY by 600k viewers.
More and more viewers are being 'turned off' by the lack of story progression. Last nights episode did nothing to move the story forward.
Chris
But the big thing is the ratings ARE continuing to go down.
Thought I saw an interview with Naveen Andrews and he thought it should air earlier. I personally watch it at this later time anyways, but I DVR it, so I don't care how early it airs. I think it would do better at 7 or 8, just because more people are awake and have their TVs on at those times.
#214
Guest
Originally Posted by Seantn
Actually, I wonder what the ratings were like in past seasons as the season progressed? I know the numbers have never dropped this low, but with both Seasons 1 and 2, I stopped watching and waited for the DVD's, because when I would miss an episode or two, I wouldn't know what was going on and didn't want to be confused.
Chris
#215
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sacramento, CA
#216
Guest
Originally Posted by aktick
Well, the story progressed quite well last week (IMO...and I think most people's), so if that was the reason for previous declines, shouldn't things have held at least steady this week? If people were upset that the story didn't progress last night, it wouldn't have shown in last night's numbers.
But the big thing is the ratings ARE continuing to go down.
Thought I saw an interview with Naveen Andrews and he thought it should air earlier. I personally watch it at this later time anyways, but I DVR it, so I don't care how early it airs. I think it would do better at 7 or 8, just because more people are awake and have their TVs on at those times.
But the big thing is the ratings ARE continuing to go down.
Thought I saw an interview with Naveen Andrews and he thought it should air earlier. I personally watch it at this later time anyways, but I DVR it, so I don't care how early it airs. I think it would do better at 7 or 8, just because more people are awake and have their TVs on at those times.
Moving it to 8 pm would definitely cause the ratings to go up. Or maybe not. It might not even beat Bones which has fewer viewers at 8 pm than Lost does at 10 pm. Who knows?
We'll see if ABC panics and moves it to 8 pm. Or maybe they will move it to Tuesday night, where there is not much to watch (for me) except The Unit.
Chris
#217
DVD Talk Limited Edition
A really great episode. The only thing I didn't like about it was Boone's wig.
I do hear a monster like sound there, but I'm not sold that it paralyzed Nikki. Now that I think about it, why would Smokey paralyze her, and not just kill her?
One thing about the Pearl when Ben and Juliet left, did it look like they were headed down a hallway that was never there before? It always seemed to me, that the Pearl's ladder came right into the room and that was it, except for the can.
Also, for all of the flashbacks on the island, they added Ethan to a lot of shots too.
I like Artz, glad to see a little more of him. Some of the earlier posts reminded me of this exchange from last year:
HURLEY: Let me ask you something, Arnzt --
LESLIE ARZT: Arzt.
HURLEY: Arnzt.
LESLIE ARZT: No, not Arnzt. Arzt. A-R-Z-T. Arzt.
HURLEY: Sorry, man. Your name's hard to pronounce.
LESLIE ARZT: Oh, yeah? Well, I know a bunch of ninth graders who pronounce it just fine.
HURLEY: How about I just call you by your first name?
LESLIE ARZT: How about you don't?
HURLEY: Why not? I remember it from the plane's manifest. I think Leslie's a bitchin' name.
LESLIE ARZT: Arnzt is fine.
I do hear a monster like sound there, but I'm not sold that it paralyzed Nikki. Now that I think about it, why would Smokey paralyze her, and not just kill her?
One thing about the Pearl when Ben and Juliet left, did it look like they were headed down a hallway that was never there before? It always seemed to me, that the Pearl's ladder came right into the room and that was it, except for the can.
Also, for all of the flashbacks on the island, they added Ethan to a lot of shots too.
I like Artz, glad to see a little more of him. Some of the earlier posts reminded me of this exchange from last year:
HURLEY: Let me ask you something, Arnzt --
LESLIE ARZT: Arzt.
HURLEY: Arnzt.
LESLIE ARZT: No, not Arnzt. Arzt. A-R-Z-T. Arzt.
HURLEY: Sorry, man. Your name's hard to pronounce.
LESLIE ARZT: Oh, yeah? Well, I know a bunch of ninth graders who pronounce it just fine.
HURLEY: How about I just call you by your first name?
LESLIE ARZT: How about you don't?
HURLEY: Why not? I remember it from the plane's manifest. I think Leslie's a bitchin' name.
LESLIE ARZT: Arnzt is fine.
#218
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 10,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Capitol of the Empire! Center of all Commerce and Culture! Crossroads of Civilization! NEW ROME!!!...aka New York City
So let me get this straight...Lost introduced these two characters weeks ago just so they could write an episode of ALFRED HITCHCOCK PRESENTS?
BTW...the smoke monster sound was there, but it didnt kill her...the pheremones from the spider that Paolo squashed attracted other spiders.
BTW...the smoke monster sound was there, but it didnt kill her...the pheremones from the spider that Paolo squashed attracted other spiders.
#219
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
They should move Lost to a different day altogether.
I thought it was a pretty good episode again last night, through the story didn't progress that much it did more then past episodes other than last weeks which i thought progressed real good in the storylines.
Now that there is going to be a fourth season of the show, ABC better reschedule lost to a different time & date altogether, i think through this might sound like a bad idea. they should move the show to fridays at the same timeslot and it would go against CBS's numb3rs & the TBA law & Order.
I thought it was a pretty good episode again last night, through the story didn't progress that much it did more then past episodes other than last weeks which i thought progressed real good in the storylines.
Now that there is going to be a fourth season of the show, ABC better reschedule lost to a different time & date altogether, i think through this might sound like a bad idea. they should move the show to fridays at the same timeslot and it would go against CBS's numb3rs & the TBA law & Order.
#220
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by nateman241
They should move Lost to a different day altogether.
I thought it was a pretty good episode again last night, through the story didn't progress that much it did more then past episodes other than last weeks which i thought progressed real good in the storylines.
Now that there is going to be a fourth season of the show, ABC better reschedule lost to a different time & date altogether, i think through this might sound like a bad idea. they should move the show to fridays at the same timeslot and it would go against CBS's numb3rs & the TBA law & Order.
I thought it was a pretty good episode again last night, through the story didn't progress that much it did more then past episodes other than last weeks which i thought progressed real good in the storylines.
Now that there is going to be a fourth season of the show, ABC better reschedule lost to a different time & date altogether, i think through this might sound like a bad idea. they should move the show to fridays at the same timeslot and it would go against CBS's numb3rs & the TBA law & Order.
#221
Banned
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sand Point
Originally Posted by aktick
So they air things at the same local time in PST as EST? What time do east and west coasts have to be to work (generally)? Here in the midwest (Wisconsin), it comes on at 9...we generally have to be to work at 8am, some at 9am. It's not bad - watch Lost, catch the news, be in bed by 10:30 to wake up by 6:30ish.
#222
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by dsa_shea
A move to Friday would almost ensure that season 4 would be the last.
Originally Posted by aktick
Well, the story progressed quite well last week (IMO...and I think most people's),
Not really. What progressed? We had two characters that were set to escape/leave the island and Locke blew up their transportation. So we are back to square one. Sure we learned why Locke was in a wheelchair, but in the scope of things at this point, who cares? It doesn't advance anything at all, just like Jack's tattoo. They waited way too long to reveal some of this little stuff, because now the island plots are more important than the character building moments like these would have been after season 1.
Originally Posted by Seantn
Actually, I wonder what the ratings were like in past seasons as the season progressed? I know the numbers have never dropped this low, but with both Seasons 1 and 2, I stopped watching and waited for the DVD's, because when I would miss an episode or two, I wouldn't know what was going on and didn't want to be confused.
Lost is truly a soap opera for guys. You could miss 5-6 episodes and not be "lost" at all with how slow they are advancing things.I also found it funny that a "filler" episode has earned 6 FULL pages from this thread. They must be doing something right.
#223
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,272
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes
on
14 Posts
From: Seattle and sometimes hell
Originally Posted by d2cheer
I must have missed why Jack, Kate and Sawyer were taken, why again??
Kate was taken because Jack cares about her
Sawyer was taken because he cares about Kate
Ben was using Kate to force Jack to do the operation. He then manipulated the situation to drive Kate and Sawyer together and making sure Jack knew about it. This would give Jack a reason not to want to return to the camp and might make he join the others.
#224
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Berkeley, CA
Yeah, Ben did say that what he did was take what people were "emotionally invested in" and exploit it. Kate's investment in Sawyer ensured that when his life was threatened, she would make Jack do the surgery, which was Ben's main goal.
#225
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
I also found it funny that a "filler" episode has earned 6 FULL pages from this thread. They must be doing something right.








