SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE: The First 5 Years - NBC
#26
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by GuessWho
I think the first 5 years get high praise compared to now because we only see the BEST clips. We see clip shows and retrospectives and we're only seeing a fraction of the stuff. No matter how bad you think the current cast is, if you boil 5 seasons into 2 hours, you're gonna have damn good stuff.
When watching current shows, 85 minutes of suck will make you forget a genius 5 minute sketch. But years later when you ONLY show those good ones, it looks like the show batted 1.000.
When watching current shows, 85 minutes of suck will make you forget a genius 5 minute sketch. But years later when you ONLY show those good ones, it looks like the show batted 1.000.
I think you will generally find that anyone 30 and older who remembers watching the Original cast when it was live prasies the first 5 years (even some of the horrible stuff you don't see anymore, example louise lasser was stoned and stuff from that episode is very rarely seen). Vs. under 30s who have only seen best ofs and the more recent casts who don't get some of the references in the late 70s humor.
True memories tend to make things you liked sound even better with age, then you watch it later and say "Why did I like this?" like that old newspaper article you were saving becuase it interested you at the time, but when you dig it out of your attic/basement you think "Who was this Monudo fellow and why did I save this article?"
There were the classic "land shark" scetches and the first appearance of The Blues Brothers and the special "The Things We Did Last Summer", The Mr. Bill segments and then there were the things that didn't go so well like The entire Louise Lasser Episode, and some of the off the wall short fillms.
#28
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by jeffkjoe
Anyone else find the first five years highly overrated?
(Perhaps it's just dated), but I prefer the Dana Carvey/Phil Hartman years.
(Perhaps it's just dated), but I prefer the Dana Carvey/Phil Hartman years.
#29
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by riley_dude
As far as I am concerned the first 5 years were the only decent years. All the rest suffer in comparison.
#30
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
I agree. the only period that would come close would be the Carvy, Meyers, Hartman era.
As people mention, sure you remember all the classic sketches from the original cast, but there was a LOT of unfunny as well.
#31
DVD Talk Legend
Hartman and Lovitz were as big a talent as anyone from the first five years, and Carvey, Miller, and Nealon less so.
Many of the sketches from the first five years were very topical, and don't hold up as well, but in the context of the time were top notch.
Many of the sketches from the first five years were very topical, and don't hold up as well, but in the context of the time were top notch.




