Lost 10/13/04
#51
Guest
"There is nothing on the show that isn't scientifically possible"
HAHAHAHA!
I was going to post in one of the other threads when somebody (can't remember who) got pissed because people were still speculating about "supernatural" explanations. Look, for one thing, I think it is silly to belive ad hoc what the creators say about the show. Two, and more pertinent is that what is 'scientifically possible' encompasses a lot of stuff that most of us would consider supernatural. A case can still be made that time travel is "scientifically possible". The advancement of modern science, while incrediblly great is still in its infancy if you look at what we know vs. what we don't know. Many probable and accepted theories allow or predict some pretty wild stuff. Case in point tonights episode. Locke's cure may in fact have a "scientifically plausible" explanation, but as far as I can conjure, there isn't anything that would explain this in a manner I would normally consider (with regards to what we currently know about human physiology) that I would call scientifically possible.
That said, am I the only one, despite the evil music, that is routing for Locke? His story is so incredibly sad! I hope he turns out to get his shit together and becomes and good, honorable character. Also, I am surprised at the complexity and originality of his character considering the show is filled with several other 'cookie cutter' dramatic staples.
HAHAHAHA!
I was going to post in one of the other threads when somebody (can't remember who) got pissed because people were still speculating about "supernatural" explanations. Look, for one thing, I think it is silly to belive ad hoc what the creators say about the show. Two, and more pertinent is that what is 'scientifically possible' encompasses a lot of stuff that most of us would consider supernatural. A case can still be made that time travel is "scientifically possible". The advancement of modern science, while incrediblly great is still in its infancy if you look at what we know vs. what we don't know. Many probable and accepted theories allow or predict some pretty wild stuff. Case in point tonights episode. Locke's cure may in fact have a "scientifically plausible" explanation, but as far as I can conjure, there isn't anything that would explain this in a manner I would normally consider (with regards to what we currently know about human physiology) that I would call scientifically possible.
That said, am I the only one, despite the evil music, that is routing for Locke? His story is so incredibly sad! I hope he turns out to get his shit together and becomes and good, honorable character. Also, I am surprised at the complexity and originality of his character considering the show is filled with several other 'cookie cutter' dramatic staples.
#52
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally posted by Charlie Goose
Why did they have to burn the fuselage too? It could've been used for shelter after the bodies were removed.
Why did they have to burn the fuselage too? It could've been used for shelter after the bodies were removed.
don't like issue of the bodies in there, move down the shore a few miles.. Not like a rescue party would show up, glance at the plane, then not look around.. heck scratch into the fuselage "We went ---------> that way."
oh well just a tv show, they get to do dumb stuff
over all, great ep this time.. Really happy to see that others like the slower build up that "Lost" is doing.. Wonder what some of the twists for the other people on the island will be? Locke's was pretty good.. being they did not save his for later, have to think some of the other people have some really big twists on the way..
Originally posted by Verbal Gorilla
"as far as I can conjure, there isn't anything that would explain this in a manner
"as far as I can conjure, there isn't anything that would explain this in a manner
Last edited by DeadLamb; 10-13-04 at 11:23 PM.
#53
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by Patman
I think JJ Abrams was going for a Shyamalan reveal at the end with Locke's miraculous recovery from being wheelchair bound. You'd think 4 years would have some atrophy set in which would make it tough to walk even if the condition was relieved by the fall from the sky and numerous jolts from the landing.
I think JJ Abrams was going for a Shyamalan reveal at the end with Locke's miraculous recovery from being wheelchair bound. You'd think 4 years would have some atrophy set in which would make it tough to walk even if the condition was relieved by the fall from the sky and numerous jolts from the landing.
#54
DVD Talk Hero
Anybody know what kind of pills the hobbitt is taking?
#56
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: The War Room
If we get into wish granting territory, anyone want to venture that Locke's fantasy-become-reality will be his punk ass boss, trussed up with nylon and prostrate on the deck?
#57
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Well, my Tivo recorded Entertainment Tonight instead of Lost (which came afterwards). Hopefully I'll be able to pick the ep up somewhere else. Did this happen to anyone else on the west coast?
#60
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by Charlie Goose
What? No posts yet b.s.-ing that they figured out Locke's secret in the first episode?
What? No posts yet b.s.-ing that they figured out Locke's secret in the first episode?
I hate those bragging posts tooMy first thought when he was sitting in the break room with the toy soldiers was "We've been snookered!" Nobody can claim they saw that one coming. I got the TPS reports connection, but I couldn't remember if it was an exact quote

They better keep revealing more next week because they keep piling on the secrets. Now he's seen the thing and he won't tell anyone what it was? That made as much sense to me as Jack saying he didn't want to know what Kate did

I think the woman might end up being right about her husband being alive. She'll probably at least find out for sure. They spent enough time on that scene that the tail of the plane is going to turn up at some point. As for the ending, so much for believing anything from the creators in interviews. No sci-fi my ass. I can't wait to hear the explaination for that one.
#62
I thought the guy in the suit standing in the woods was an incredibly creepy image.
#63
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Missouri
Originally posted by Roto
As for the ending, so much for believing anything from the creators in interviews. No sci-fi my ass. I can't wait to hear the explaination for that one.
As for the ending, so much for believing anything from the creators in interviews. No sci-fi my ass. I can't wait to hear the explaination for that one.
I think the BIG Twist will be Jack's Reasons for being there...
Bruce
#65
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally posted by DeadLamb
pinched nerve due to scar tissue.... crash "jarred" it loose.. Bs? Yeah but it could have happend.. or it could have just been a psychological issue..
pinched nerve due to scar tissue.... crash "jarred" it loose.. Bs? Yeah but it could have happend.. or it could have just been a psychological issue..
It was also nice to find out that it is Walt's dad, but he hasn't been a father to him until two weeks before the crash.
#67
DVD Talk Special Edition
The most interesting character by far and not one of the Calvin Klein/Lancome models that happened to find their way onto the flight.
Certain things bother me like Jack staring at a strange person for several seconds then turning away only to have him disappear. Couldn't he have yelled out HEY! or something? Doesn't he know you never look away when you spot something strange because it always disappears?
I also wonder about the sinister music they played while showing Locke in that previous episode. I don't understand why they did that other to suggest a red-herring.
If this 'creature' is so huge then it must be invisible for no one to have seen it yet. Maybe we'll learn why Locke didn't mention what it looked like as soon as he came back since he came face to face with it judging from the camera movement and his expression.
I'm enjoying the show but at times it seems the creators are ignoring logical reactions and questions in favor of stringing the viewer along.
Certain things bother me like Jack staring at a strange person for several seconds then turning away only to have him disappear. Couldn't he have yelled out HEY! or something? Doesn't he know you never look away when you spot something strange because it always disappears?
I also wonder about the sinister music they played while showing Locke in that previous episode. I don't understand why they did that other to suggest a red-herring.
If this 'creature' is so huge then it must be invisible for no one to have seen it yet. Maybe we'll learn why Locke didn't mention what it looked like as soon as he came back since he came face to face with it judging from the camera movement and his expression.
I'm enjoying the show but at times it seems the creators are ignoring logical reactions and questions in favor of stringing the viewer along.
#68
Originally posted by Charlie Goose
Why did they have to burn the fuselage too? It could've been used for shelter after the bodies were removed.
Despite the lack of food, no one even broached the subject of dining on the dearly departed.
Why did they have to burn the fuselage too? It could've been used for shelter after the bodies were removed.
Despite the lack of food, no one even broached the subject of dining on the dearly departed.
#69
DVD Talk Reviewer
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,835
Received 52 Likes
on
44 Posts
From: Formerly known as "12thmonkey"/Frankfort, IL
The whole Locke storyline was doled out wonderfully. I still see Terry O'Quinn as his shady Peter character from Millennium or evil Gen. Santiago from Harsh Realm, so it's hard for me to not be slightly distrustful of the guy.
But after last night I see him in a whole new light. At least so far.
good stuff!
But after last night I see him in a whole new light. At least so far.
good stuff!
Last edited by Pointyskull; 10-14-04 at 08:02 AM.
#70
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Rochester, NY
does anyone think
I really hope not, since I think this show is more intelligent than to do something that's been done many times before, but it's an option...
Spoiler:
I really hope not, since I think this show is more intelligent than to do something that's been done many times before, but it's an option...
#71
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: the Great Lakes state
John Locke -- badass Enlightenment philosopher, now a badass boar hunter. Are the creators hinting that Locke will be more of a thinker in future eps?
I assumed the guy Jack saw was either a) his father or b) a dead former patient (or both). Jack has trouble dealing with death, didn't want to talk much about why he got into medicine, etc.
I still think the biggest mystery of all isn't what's on the island, but how these folks 'survived' falling from 35,000 feet. Speaking of what's scientifically possible...
I assumed the guy Jack saw was either a) his father or b) a dead former patient (or both). Jack has trouble dealing with death, didn't want to talk much about why he got into medicine, etc.
I still think the biggest mystery of all isn't what's on the island, but how these folks 'survived' falling from 35,000 feet. Speaking of what's scientifically possible...
#72
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 20,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
From: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Originally posted by OldDude
Dead people bleed from the wounds that kill them, bloat up in 4 days of tropical heat, smell really foul, and ooze decomposing flesh all over everything. I believe this answers both questions.
Dead people bleed from the wounds that kill them, bloat up in 4 days of tropical heat, smell really foul, and ooze decomposing flesh all over everything. I believe this answers both questions.
Originally posted by Patman
You'd think 4 years would have some atrophy set in which would make it tough to walk even if the condition was relieved by the fall from the sky and numerous jolts from the landing.
You'd think 4 years would have some atrophy set in which would make it tough to walk even if the condition was relieved by the fall from the sky and numerous jolts from the landing.



