![]() |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Weird they split them up, but whatever.
Out of Lears library, the only ones that I was a big fan of was The Jefferson’s, 227, and Diff’rent Strokes. Diff’rent Strokes was actually on STARZ recently a few months ago. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Prime Video Canada is streaming Quiet Place II
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
When are we going to see the MGM post-1986 library come to Amazon Prime?
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 13957624)
When are we going to see the MGM post-1986 library come to Amazon Prime?
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Originally Posted by dex14
(Post 13957801)
Could be a while. That deal is far from finalized.
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Exactly.
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Welp. I've finally had it happen - a movie got removed from my library.
Amazon sent me an email, notifying me that The Horn Blows at Midnight was no longer available: "This content is no longer available to customers through Prime Video". They put the cost of the video on my to my account balance. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Originally Posted by Defiant
(Post 13966780)
Welp. I've finally had it happen - a movie got removed from my library.
Amazon sent me an email, notifying me that The Horn Blows at Midnight was no longer available: "This content is no longer available to customers through Prime Video". They put the cost of the video on my to my account balance. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
If it's a one-off or very rare occurrence, I'm not too bothered by it (although there are a few specific titles that I would be very annoyed if it happened to). But it does give me concerns more generally about having so much of my stuff in the cloud (from videos to music to books to games).
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Originally Posted by Defiant
(Post 13966780)
Welp. I've finally had it happen - a movie got removed from my library.
Amazon sent me an email, notifying me that The Horn Blows at Midnight was no longer available: "This content is no longer available to customers through Prime Video". They put the cost of the video on my to my account balance. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
That does suck. I'm sure we will be seeing more of that as years go by.
While I would gripe, as long as a) I'm notified and b) I get a refund or credit for the full amount, I wouldn't hold too much of a grudge. I've definitely got a ton of stuff in the cloud - between Vudu purchases, Amazon music library stuff, my preexisting music library I uploaded years back to Amazon (which at least I still have on CDR and hard drive), digital games (some of which I've already lost with no recompense - Rocket Riot, Battleborn, some Rock Band tracks). It's an interesting shift. I think it's quite likely "they" would be totally happy moving away from the whole concept of "ownership" in favor of streaming and cloud based services. My son uses Spotify for his music (rather, to listen to music, it's not his), I'm betting a large portion of <30 year olds are the same. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Same thing happened to me today, was notified that the Dublin Dr Pepper documentary was removed and credit to my account. Amazon claims they lost the license, but still selling and why would it matter. I could understand to no longer sell, but to outright remove. Not sure how that's legal.
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Is there a time Val will be available? 12am est or something. I’m off tomorrow and could take advantage and hopefully see two gems in a row, with first being The Suicide Squad.
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Originally Posted by bobwil54
(Post 13966975)
Same thing happened to me today, was notified that the Dublin Dr Pepper documentary was removed and credit to my account. Amazon claims they lost the license, but still selling and why would it matter. I could understand to no longer sell, but to outright remove. Not sure how that's legal.
It sucks for you, as someone who bought the stolen content, but Amazon puts themselves at a higher risk if they keep that content accessible to people at all, even if they paid to watch it (rental or digital purchase). It's why they also refunded you in full. It relieves them of liability for the transaction taking place. There's no way you could have known it was bootleg content, but that's not a legitimate reason for Amazon to keep it on their server, hidden or not. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
And even if it weren't bootleg, the 'fine print' for all these 'sellers' of digital content basically says "You have access to this stuff until we decide you don't." There hasn't been a solid or high-enough-profile "ownership of digital content" argument or case to really push it yet.
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
The 4th Hotel Transylvania movie is being sold to Amazon for around $100M Sony was apparently concerned that since little kids under 12 can't get vaccinated, it would be highly unlikely many parents would take their kids to see this in the theater, since this is the primary audience. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
That's probably a good call. Have any kids movies released only in theaters? I know that the Pixar stuff has all been on Disney Plus, Raya was Premier Access, Spongebob was Paramount + and Boss Baby was... Peacock, I think?
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
"Amazon Prime Video's Library Is Now Genuinely Impossible to Browse"
https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies...oiZnJEEyXU-mCk The biggest story in that article is not the headline but a passing reference the author makes to Amazon's "purge" of content: In addition to the library enduring one of the biggest apparent purges of content we’ve ever seen... Meanwhile, the content purge I mentioned at the beginning of this piece could potentially lend credence to such an idea, as it seems to imply that Amazon Prime Video is exploring whether a dramatic reduction in the number of overall available titles ultimately impacts the workings of their business. Perhaps it’s a way to downsize on server space, or eliminate junk, but the last two months have seen a reduction in movie titles across the board on Prime Video unlike anything we’ve seen before. 1) "currently unavailable to watch in your location” 2) now charging rental fees of varying degrees 3) “Watch Now Free with Ads – IMDB TV” Most of the titles I saved to my Watch List were "Free with Amazon Prime"--without ads--when I saved them. Now, only a handful of the ones I checked remain that way, including a few seasons of Pokemon and other random anime series; some Amazon Original series; and lots of black-and-white B-movies, including westerns, from the 1930s and '40s. Not quite the range of choices that drew me to the service originally. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
I really hate the IMDB-TV "free with ads" titles. I understand wanting to provide a free service for people that can't/won't pay for Prime, but if I'm paying for Prime, I feel like I should be able to watch the IMDB-TV titles ad free as well. There's not even an option to pay more to make IMDB-TV ad-free. I've been avoiding watching the new season of Leverage due to this.
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
I feel like the past year or so the amount of new content (monthly) has dropped significantly too. They used to have huge announcements of acquiring catalogs of stuff too. I guess they're banking on MGM.
I hate all "free with ads" content. Now that I have access to ad-free content it's hard for me to watch content with ads. About the only thing I watch regularly with ads is stuff on Pluto or Airy. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13973808)
I really hate the IMDB-TV "free with ads" titles. I understand wanting to provide a free service for people that can't/won't pay for Prime, but if I'm paying for Prime, I feel like I should be able to watch the IMDB-TV titles ad free as well. There's not even an option to pay more to make IMDB-TV ad-free. I've been avoiding watching the new season of Leverage due to this.
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Originally Posted by Jay G.
(Post 13973808)
I really hate the IMDB-TV "free with ads" titles. I understand wanting to provide a free service for people that can't/won't pay for Prime, but if I'm paying for Prime, I feel like I should be able to watch the IMDB-TV titles ad free as well. There's not even an option to pay more to make IMDB-TV ad-free. I've been avoiding watching the new season of Leverage due to this.
For the record, the ad breaks on Leverage are not that intrusive. The breaks only run maybe 2 minutes tops. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
I went through Amazon last night and noticed they wiped out a lot of content that I had saved in my watch list that was previously available on Prime. A lot of it was some 1980s and 1990s B action movies. I guess they did do some kind of purge recently. Or maybe no one was watching those movies because no one knew they existed on the service? :shrug: I only found them on a whim through the recommendations they gave. Some of them I just didn't have time to get to.
|
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Can anyone in the US verify that the UK series Fat Friends S4 is still available?
I can't tell if it's not available because I'm in Canada, or that the content was removed. |
Re: The Amazon Prime Streaming Thread
Originally Posted by andicus
(Post 13974273)
Can anyone in the US verify that the UK series Fat Friends S4 is still available?
I can't tell if it's not available because I'm in Canada, or that the content was removed. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.