![]() |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
At the rate this is going, it shouldn't be too long before Neil Breen somehow makes it into this thread (...though, I guess he just did).
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Dennis Dugan with 7 (although maybe Jack and Jill is stretching it a little): The Benchwarmers, I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry, You Don't Mess with the Zohan, Grown Ups, Just Go with It, Jack and Jill, Grown Ups 2
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Maybe not masterpieces, but Brad Bird's run of The Iron Giant -> The Incredibles -> Ratatouille was pretty good.
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
I guess the term "masterpiece" just doesn't mean what it used to. Is there a DVD Talk award for thread that jumped the shark the quickest? :lol:
Very few directors have had a run of three consecutive masterpieces, in my opinion. Most of them were mentioned on the first page. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
I was trying to string together three consecutive Wong Kar-Wai films but am having difficulty.
For example, IMO: As Tears Go By (good) - Days of Being Wild (ok) - Ashes of Time (great) - Chungking Express (great) - Fallen Angels (good) - Happy Together (good) - In the Mood for Love (great) - 2046 (ok)...... Any opinions on these? |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 13736574)
I guess the term "masterpiece" just doesn't mean what it used to. Is there a DVD Talk award for thread that jumped the shark the quickest? :lol:
Very few directors have had a run of three consecutive masterpieces, in my opinion. Most of them were mentioned on the first page.
Originally Posted by cultshock
(Post 13736586)
I was trying to string together three consecutive Wong Kar-Wai films but am having difficulty.
For example, IMO: As Tears Go By (good) - Days of Being Wild (ok) - Ashes of Time (great) - Chungking Express (great) - Fallen Angels (good) - Happy Together (good) - In the Mood for Love (great) - 2046 (ok)...... Any opinions on these? |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
For what it's worth, I take back my Tarantino comment. I forgot he did Death Proof in between Kill Bill and Basterds. I think Death Proof is fun, but definitely not a masterpiece.
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
I just watched William Friedkins adaptation of "The Boys in the Band" last night for the first time, while maybe some find Sorceror is questionable, I'm completely confident in putting The Boys in the Band before French Connection and Exorcist. What an absolutely amazing film.
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 13736697)
For what it's worth, I take back my Tarantino comment. I forgot he did Death Proof in between Kill Bill and Basterds. I think Death Proof is fun, but definitely not a masterpiece.
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Tarantino has made 1, maybe 2 classics to me. Pulp Fiction is an indisputable classic. There may be another classic in there that you could make an argument for. But in Tarantino I see more of a guy with a high batting average than a guy who just pumps out classic after classic. Directors who have released multiple consecutive classics seem to do it by genre hopping (Kubrick: black comedy, space sci-fi, dystopian sci-fi, period piece) and putting their unique stamp on each one, or by incrementally mastering a genre and putting a different flavor on each version of that (Leone mastering the Western with the TMWNN trilogy, then deconstructing it with OUATITW). Even Leone realized he'd said all he could about the Western and moved on to a masterful gangster flick. Tarantino seems more content to stay in his wheelhouse of tricks. The costumes and the time period change, but the snappy dialogue, revenge plots, and extreme violence are always there. The man patented a style and no one can take that away from him, but he also seems like sort of a prisoner to it. It makes for fun and entertaining movies, but ones that I feel like I've seen before. I walk away from classics feeling like I've never seen anything like them before.
But I haven't seen Once Upon a Time in Hollywood yet so maybe that's different.
Originally Posted by Hazel Motes
(Post 13736843)
I just watched William Friedkins adaptation of "The Boys in the Band" last night for the first time, while maybe some find Sorceror is questionable, I'm completely confident in putting The Boys in the Band before French Connection and Exorcist. What an absolutely amazing film.
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Tarantino for me:
Reservoir Dogs 5/5 Pulp Fiction 5/5 Jackie Brown 5/5 Kill Bill 1&2 3.5/5 Death Proof 2/5 Inglourious Basterds 4.5/5 Django Unchained 3/5 The Hateful Eight 4.5/5 Once Upon a Time in Hollywood 5/5 |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Hazel Motes
(Post 13736964)
Tarantino for me:
Reservoir Dogs 5/5 Pulp Fiction 5/5 Jackie Brown 5/5 Kill Bill 1&2 3.5/5 Death Proof 2/5 Inglourious Basterds 4.5/5 Django Unchained 3/5 The Hateful Eight 4.5/5 Once Upon a Time in Hollywood 5/5 And yeah, I never understood the fuss about Django either. That movie started out interesting and then devolved into Tarantino's usual revenge porn nonsense. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Christopher Nolan for me.
2017 Dunkirk 2014 Interstellar 2012 The Dark Knight Rises 2010 Inception 2008 The Dark Knight 2006 The Prestige 2005 Batman Begins 2002 Insomnia 2000 Momento There are others in not mentioned with Nolan producing in between those years of movies, but these are just the ones he actually directed. Nolan can use extreme violence or none at all, which Tarantino cannot do without in his movies. Unfortunately, I think that's Tarantino's Achilles' heel in his latest movies which do nothing for me. His earlier works were masterpieces, imo, and he's spawned a lot of copycats (who fail). |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Because I've had a few drinks and I'm bored....
Tarantino, Reservoir Dogs 4/4 Pulp Fiction 4/4 Jackie Brown 3/4 Kill Bill 1&2 3/4 Death Proof 2/4 Inglourious Basterds 3.5/4 Django Unchained 2/4 The Hateful Eight 3.5/4 Nolan, Memento 3.5/4 Insomnia 3/4 Batman Begins 3/4 The Prestige 2.5/4 The Dark Knight 3.5/4 Inception 3/4 The Dark Knight Rises 2.5/4 Interstellar 3/4 Dunkirk 3.5/4 I'll watch Once Upon a Time in the next few days and update :) |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
No love for James Cameron? Aliens, The Abyss, Terminator 2.
And one of my favorite lesser known directors - Alexander Payne - Election, About Schmidt, Sideways |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by redtornado
(Post 13736129)
Kevin Smith - Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy, Dogma
Chad Stahelski - John Wick, John Wick II, John Wick III The Russo Brothers - Captain America Civil War, Avengers: Infinity War, Avengers: Endgame |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by bluetoast
(Post 13734869)
Kurosawa has at least 5 in a row. I haven’t seen some of the others in between other masterpieces, so it’s possibly an even longer chain (for me).
The Hidden Fortress The Bad Sleep Well Yojimbo Sanjuro High and Low I have not seen The Lower Depths (1957) yet. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Hayao Miyazaki: LAPUTA: CASTLE IN THE SKY (1986), MY NEIGHBOR TOTORO (1988), KIKI'S DELIVERY SERVICE (1989).
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Toddarino
(Post 13735086)
John Carpenter
Halloween The Fog Escape From NY the Thing Christine |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Coens would've had a long ass chain if not for Hudsucker: Blood Simple, Raising Arizona, Miller's Crossing, Barton Fink, Hudsucker Proxy (nope), Fargo, The Big Lebowski, Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?, The Man Who Wasn't There
Polanski: Chinatown, The Tenant, Tess (borderline) Kurosawa's best streak was Dersu Uzala, Kagemusha, Ran Peter Weir: Gallipoli, The Year of Living Dangerously, Witness Brian De Palma: Dressed to Kill, Blow Out, Scarface Truffaut: 400 Blows, Shoot the Piano Player, Jules et Jim also Day for Night, Story of Adele H, Small Change |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by atrium
(Post 13734881)
I love many of the directors mentioned so far, but would hesitant to call all of the films listed masterpieces. But hey, that's what makes discussion fun. :)
Steven Spielberg nearly rattled off 4 classics in a row but ruined it with 1941: Jaws -> Close Encounters -> 1941 -> Raiders of the Lost Ark -> E.T. Jurassic Park -> Schindler's List -> The Lost World: Jurassic Park -> Amistad -> Saving Private Ryan |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by OldBoy
(Post 13735926)
Peter Jackson: LotR: Fellowship of the Ring, Two Towers, Return of the King |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Finisher
(Post 13741538)
Coens would've had a long ass chain if not for Hudsucker: Blood Simple, Raising Arizona, Miller's Crossing, Barton Fink, Hudsucker Proxy (nope), Fargo, The Big Lebowski, Oh Brother, Where Art Thou?, The Man Who Wasn't There
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by tanman
(Post 13741628)
I definitely consider the LotR trilogy to be a masterpiece but it's really like one giant movie so not sure if it really counts?
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Joseph Zito
The Prowler Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter Missing in Action Invasion USA Red Scorpion |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.