![]() |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Mondo Kane
(Post 13735277)
I was close to posting this one, but I haven't seen Invincible Shaolin yet.
While on the martial-arts tip, the same went to Yuen Woo Ping. I've yet to see Dance/Drunken Mantis that came in between Snake in Eagle's Shadow and Drunken Master. And Dance of the Drunk Mantis is fine as well, but clearly inferior to the two with Jackie. Also, it came after SITES and Drunken Master. Not between. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 13735264)
Sorry, Sorcerer is an interesting movie, but it is no masterpiece.
Agreed. But The Wages of Fear definitely is. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 13735288)
Seriously? With your avatar?
And speaking of Roy, I prefer The Seven Ups over The FC. :shrug: I still love Gene Hackman too though... |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
I was temped to add Cameron Crowe to the list, but it depends on how one feels about Singles. I think he just misses the cut.
Say Anything (1989), Singles (1992), Jerry Maguire (1996), Almost Famous (2000). Three masterpieces and one very good rom-com mixed in. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 13735264)
Sorry, Sorcerer is an interesting movie, but it is no masterpiece.
Were those back-to-back? Well that is probably the pinnacle right there, sorry Coppola. I would also add the Three Colours Trilogy by Kieślowski https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...b742cf1457.png Unlike Blue and Red, White is no masterpiece. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Denis Viileneuve - Sicario, Arrival, Blade Runner 2049, Dune(?)
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by xraybies
(Post 13735519)
Denis Viileneuve - Sicario, Arrival, Blade Runner 2049, Dune(?)
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Has anyone mentioned Bob Fosse yet?
Cabaret (1972), Lenny (1974), All That Jazz (1979) |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Michael Bay:
Bad Boys -> The Rock -> Armageddon -> Pearl Harbor Spoiler:
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Toddarino
(Post 13735086)
John Carpenter
Halloween The Fog Escape From NY the Thing Christine I do appreciate you listing The Fog though. An absolutely wonderful, underrated Carpenter flick. My favorite second only to Halloween (hell, maybe #1 depending on my mood that day). |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
All I can say is that masterpieces gets thrown around rather haphazardly in this thread :)
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
I'm the first to mention Billy Wilder!!?? From 1950-1960 we get in order
Sunset Boulevard Ace in the Hole Stalag 17 Sabrina The Seven Year Itch The Spirit of St Louis Love in the Afternoon Witness For the Prosecution Some Like it Hot The Apartment. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
I guess what is a masterpiece?
McTiernan - Predator, Die Hard, Hunt For Red October Landis - Animal House, Blues Brothers, An American Werewolf in London, Trading Places |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Jaymole
(Post 13735738)
All I can say is that masterpieces gets thrown around rather haphazardly in this thread :)
With that said, I'll add to the list of 3 very solid films in a row: Atom Egoyan: Exotica, The Sweet Hereafter (masterpiece) and Felicia's Journey. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 13735777)
McTiernan - Predator, Die Hard, Hunt For Red October
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Jaymole
(Post 13735738)
All I can say is that masterpieces gets thrown around rather haphazardly in this thread :)
Considering the number of true masterpieces of cinema is probably a very short list, it wouldn’t make for a very fun discussion to not allow other films in. Like Coral said, the definition for this thread falls more in line with very solid films. |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
John Hughes and Mel Brooks both had streaks of great movies and if you count writing or producing, it gets more impressive
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by devilshalo
(Post 13735777)
Landis - Animal House, Blues Brothers, An American Werewolf in London, Trading Places
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by xraybies
(Post 13735519)
Denis Viileneuve - Sicario, Arrival, Blade Runner 2049, Dune(?)
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Martin McDonagh: In Bruges, Seven Psychopaths, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri
Rian Johnson: Brick, The Brothers Bloom, Looper, Star Wars: The Last Jedi (yes, i know many will scoff at that), Knives Out |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 13735885)
Never has a hot streak but cut short more definitively (or literally) than John Landis'.
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
del Toro: The Devil's Backbone, Blade II, Hellboy, Pan's Labyrinth
Peter Jackson: LotR: Fellowship of the Ring, Two Towers, Return of the King Frank Capra: Mr. Deeds Goes to Town, Lost Horizon, You Can't Take it With You, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Arsenic and Old Lace, It's A Wonderful Life |
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
^ I'm sorry, did you just call Blade II a Masterpiece? rotfl
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 13735929)
^ I'm sorry, did you just call Blade II a Masterpiece? rotfl
|
Re: Directors with three or more consecutive masterpieces
Originally Posted by GoldenJCJ
(Post 13735817)
I’ve always considered a “masterpiece” to be the single greatest work from a particular person. So by my own definition, it’s not possible for one director to have more than one masterpiece.
Considering the number of true masterpieces of cinema is probably a very short list, it wouldn’t make for a very fun discussion to not allow other films in. Like Coral said, the definition for this thread falls more in line with very solid films. And yeah, I agree that ‘masterpiece’ is being thrown around very liberally at this point, but it’s making for some good discussion at least. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.