Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-22 | 07:00 AM
  #751  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,082
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
The Lindelof announcement makes me think they'll still blindly hiring "name"/"hot"/"up-and-coming" directors first and finding something for them to do second, which seems to be one of the ongoing problems with Lucasfilm's handling of Star Wars.
What do you mean "still"? When did they ever do that? All the accounts I've read have suggested they've hired writers and directors for projects based on specific story pitches, not hiring them without a project for them to work on. Not all the projects have panned out. but that's the difference between a pitch and a delivered script.

Also, Lindelof isn't a director, but a writer.

Finally, can you name a director that doesn't fit into one of your categories of "name", "hot", or "up-and-coming"? Should they be hiring complete unknowns with no track record?
The following users liked this post:
IBJoel (03-16-22)
Old 03-16-22 | 09:42 AM
  #752  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,989
Received 1,661 Likes on 1,201 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Jay G.
What do you mean "still"? When did they ever do that? All the accounts I've read have suggested they've hired writers and directors for projects based on specific story pitches, not hiring them without a project for them to work on. Not all the projects have panned out. but that's the difference between a pitch and a delivered script.

Also, Lindelof isn't a director, but a writer.

Finally, can you name a director that doesn't fit into one of your categories of "name", "hot", or "up-and-coming"? Should they be hiring complete unknowns with no track record?
Bolded: one could make the argument that they have the ability to find up and coming talent and give them something to cut their teeth on, alongside the established talent.
I saw a comment elsewhere recently that had the idea of letting young, new directors use the pre-existing sets and such to make "fan films" of a sort, to let them get some work under their belt without a huge cash investment.
Old 03-16-22 | 09:50 AM
  #753  
Rob V's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,188
Received 520 Likes on 407 Posts
From: On the lake
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Jay G.
Finally, can you name a director that doesn't fit into one of your categories of "name", "hot", or "up-and-coming"? Should they be hiring complete unknowns with no track record?
Based on the ST, yes.
Old 03-16-22 | 10:11 AM
  #754  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,854
Received 1,041 Likes on 621 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

What's the over/under for when Zak Penn and/or Akiva Goldsman are brought in to develop projects as well? Since that's the caliber of talent they're pursuing... mediocre journeymen who will crank out product and toe the company line.

Fuck I'm in a shitty mood today.
Old 03-16-22 | 11:03 AM
  #755  
rocket1312's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,315
Likes: 0
Received 1,888 Likes on 1,280 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
What's the over/under for when Zak Penn and/or Akiva Goldsman are brought in to develop projects as well? Since that's the caliber of talent they're pursuing... mediocre journeymen who will crank out product and toe the company line.

Fuck I'm in a shitty mood today.
David S. Goyer or GTFO
Old 03-16-22 | 11:05 AM
  #756  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,082
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by milo bloom
Bolded: one could make the argument that they have the ability to find up and coming talent and give them something to cut their teeth on, alongside the established talent.
You literally used the phrase "up and coming," so you basically backed up my point.
Old 03-16-22 | 11:23 AM
  #757  
Administrator
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,751
Received 1,412 Likes on 842 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

A talented, unknown director is likely going to create a film even more divisive than The Last Jedi. Which, hey I'm all on board for. But handing even several million to a newbie could spiral quality out of control, since they wouldn't have a handle on that kind of budget.

Actually, here's my pitch: Start hiring established foreign directors. They can bring some fresh ideas and perspective, while also bolstering international appeal of the films. Especially Taiwanese/Chinese filmmakers, where Star Wars hasn't taken off so much. Plus, they're more likely to be familiar with a lot of the building blocks of the concepts in the franchise, such as Taoism (which is a minor religion, but has quite a bit of syncretism with the traditional folk practices).

Last edited by IBJoel; 03-16-22 at 11:29 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by IBJoel:
John Pannozzi (03-16-22), story (03-17-22)
Old 03-17-22 | 08:27 AM
  #758  
Rob V's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 13,188
Received 520 Likes on 407 Posts
From: On the lake
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Uwe Boll anyone?
Old 03-17-22 | 08:30 AM
  #759  
story's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,052
Received 4,136 Likes on 2,408 Posts
From: Hope.
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by milo bloom
I saw a comment elsewhere recently that had the idea of letting young, new directors use the pre-existing sets and such to make "fan films" of a sort, to let them get some work under their belt without a huge cash investment.
I like it, though we have plenty of complainers already that the Star Wars properties should be called The Tatooine Chronicles.

Speaking of which, aren't you glad Tatooine is a good name for a planet? It's fun to say, it works. Would you really want to spend 45+ years saying "Mustafar" that much?! Yeah, me neither.
Old 03-17-22 | 09:30 AM
  #760  
Cellar Door's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,346
Received 1,899 Likes on 1,174 Posts
From: Texas
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by milo bloom
I saw a comment elsewhere recently that had the idea of letting young, new directors use the pre-existing sets and such to make "fan films" of a sort,
Here are the pre-existing sets:



The following 2 users liked this post by Cellar Door:
ddrknghtrtns (03-18-22), IBJoel (03-17-22)
Old 03-17-22 | 09:47 AM
  #761  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,738
Received 1,411 Likes on 1,088 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

I haven’t watched any of the shows Lindelof has been involved in other than an episode or two of The Leftovers early on, but I bailed.

The movies he’s been involved with are a mixed bag. I liked Prometheus even though I know it’s a film people seem to either love or hate. I also kind of liked Tomorrowland.
The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (05-17-22)
Old 03-17-22 | 09:54 AM
  #762  
Administrator
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,751
Received 1,412 Likes on 842 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Cellar Door
Here are the pre-existing sets:

Originally Posted by story
I like it, though we have plenty of complainers already that the Star Wars properties should be called The Tatooine Chronicles.

Speaking of which, aren't you glad Tatooine is a good name for a planet? It's fun to say, it works. Would you really want to spend 45+ years saying "Mustafar" that much?! Yeah, me neither.

They have an outdoor practical set near the office. I've seen into it a little on my train ride. I actually think that' s why they keep using Tatooine in the new shows, because A. that real estate in El Segundo is expensive and B. they have the basic architecture there already. Still tons of blue screens around it though.
The following users liked this post:
story (03-17-22)
Old 03-18-22 | 11:59 AM
  #763  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,989
Received 1,661 Likes on 1,201 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

They're also using those giant LED panels to create backgrounds in-camera that help the lighting be more natural. I'm glad to see them learning new techniques like this to find a way to reduce costs while still creating an immersive story.
The following users liked this post:
IBJoel (03-18-22)
Old 03-18-22 | 12:16 PM
  #764  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,082
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by milo bloom
They're also using those giant LED panels to create backgrounds in-camera that help the lighting be more natural.
Well, they use "The Volume" for the shows, I don't think it's been used for any of the films yet.

They made that Star Wars: Visions show to experiment with a variety of anime styles. Maybe they could do something similar for a live action series of short.
The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (05-17-22)
Old 05-14-22 | 07:36 PM
  #765  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,602
Received 1,456 Likes on 799 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Today is George Lucas' birthday. He actually tried to have his birth certificate altered to change the date but the state wouldn't let him.
Old 05-17-22 | 10:22 AM
  #766  
dex14's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 47,065
Likes: 0
Received 5,339 Likes on 3,597 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

There was a big Vanity Fair piece about Star Wars TV, but this is the bit they talk about the films:

That leaves the question of what’s happening with the Star Wars movies.

“We have a road map,” Kennedy says, although Lucasfilm’s big-screen return is unlikely to follow the same relentless cadence as before. A movie from Jojo Rabbit’s Taika Waititi and 1917 screenwriter Krysty Wilson-Cairns will likely arrive first, with Rogue Squadron from Wonder Woman director Patty Jenkins further off. Is it true that Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige will produce a Star Wars film? “I would love to see what movie he might come up with,” Kennedy says. “But right now, no, there isn’t anything specifically.” And the trilogy from The Last Jedi’s Rian Johnson that was announced five years ago? Back-burnered. “Rian has been unbelievably busy with Knives Out and the deal that he made at Netflix for multiple movies.”

The emphasis on television is already influencing the upcoming film slate. “I hesitate to use the word trilogies anymore because Star Wars is much more about persistent storytelling,” Kennedy says. Now she just needs to recruit feature filmmakers.
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood...l-be-televised
The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (05-17-22)
Old 05-17-22 | 11:00 AM
  #767  
Mike86's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 25,738
Received 1,411 Likes on 1,088 Posts
From: South Dakota
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

At this point I would rather they just stick to mostly Disney+ shows unless there’s something really worthy of a film. Truthfully I kind of feel like Obi-Wan could have been worthy of being a film, but I’m glad we’re getting a more long form series of episodes.
The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (05-17-22)
Old 05-17-22 | 11:46 AM
  #768  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,164
Received 541 Likes on 402 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

I've always preferred a TV series over films (for all franchises, not just Star Wars).

A better story can be told in 6-12 hours, rather than 2 hours.
And you get new material every year, not every 2 to 3 years.

The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (05-17-22)
Old 05-17-22 | 12:38 PM
  #769  
stvn1974's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 9,602
Received 1,456 Likes on 799 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Rian Johnson's Netflix deal works out for everyone. He got a shitload of money and we don't have to worry about him shitting on Star Wars anymore. Win, Win.
The following users liked this post:
bchbdaddy (05-18-22)
Old 05-17-22 | 12:45 PM
  #770  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,674
Received 1,665 Likes on 1,182 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

“We have a road map,” Kennedy says, although Lucasfilm’s big-screen return is unlikely to follow the same relentless cadence as before.
Sounds too much like Rothman saying, "we have a plan" for the Sony Spider-verse.
Old 05-17-22 | 01:48 PM
  #771  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,989
Received 1,661 Likes on 1,201 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

There's apparently another part where KK blames the failure of Solo on the fact that they recast the part which is baloney as Alden was fun and charming despite being in a cobbled together story that had two different productions and was released while the community was still reeling from the shock of TLJ. If they had let Lord & Miller finish it and released it the following December, I think it would have done much better.

I don't hate the CGI Luke stuff being used in a few episodes of Mandalorian, but for full on projects like new Han Solo stories, or young Luke and Leia stories, then you have to recast.

Star Trek has three Spocks and doing pretty well with them.
The following users liked this post:
John Pannozzi (05-17-22)
Old 05-17-22 | 01:59 PM
  #772  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,795
Received 378 Likes on 285 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

I personally had no interest in the Solo film almost entirely because I didn't care for the actors.(yes that includes Glover) And after seeing the film I thought they were both terrible.

I don't anticipate Star Wars films going forward as I have no confidence in the current team at Lucasfilm.

And I'll save the TV criticism for that thread, but even that I anticipate will be run into the ground.
Old 05-17-22 | 02:54 PM
  #773  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,854
Received 1,041 Likes on 621 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

I had faith in TV shows being the real future of Star Wars... until the laughable mess of Book of Boba Fett. I can't wrap my head around how Favreau and Filoni managed to start promisingly and botch it so badly by the end.

But OK; two really good seasons of a show and one misfire. Not the end of the world, and still mostly good. Let's see how Kenobi shakes out.
Old 05-17-22 | 03:36 PM
  #774  
Administrator
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,751
Received 1,412 Likes on 842 Posts
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
I had faith in TV shows being the real future of Star Wars... until the laughable mess of Book of Boba Fett. I can't wrap my head around how Favreau and Filoni managed to start promisingly and botch it so badly by the end.

But OK; two really good seasons of a show and one misfire. Not the end of the world, and still mostly good. Let's see how Kenobi shakes out.
I think Filoni SPECIFICALLY is not the savior everyone makes him out to be. And I've felt this essentially since The Clone Wars got big.
Old 05-17-22 | 04:54 PM
  #775  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,591
Received 413 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Re: The General Star Wars Discussion Thread

The Variety piece certainly makes it sound like we're not getting a new Star Wars movie any time soon. Certainly not in 2023 and probably not in 2024, either.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.